Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Abdominal Radiology 2/2019

01-02-2019

Imaging in the pre-operative staging of ovarian cancer

Authors: Francesca Castellani, Edward C. Nganga, Lucy Dumas, Susana Banerjee, Andrea G. Rockall

Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 2/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

The main prognostic factor in ovarian cancer is the stage of disease at diagnosis. The staging system in use (FIGO classification, updated in 2014) is based on the surgical-pathological findings. Although surgical staging is the gold standard in ovarian cancer, the initial patient management depends on the imaging-based pre-surgical staging assessment, in order to identify unresectable or difficult to resect disease. Radiologists need to be aware of the strengths of the available imaging modalities, as well as the imaging pitfalls. Clear understanding of pattern of disease spread and review areas are critical for accurate staging and treatment planning. The current standard of care for pre-surgical staging is CT of the thorax, abdomen, and pelvis. This allows a rapid evaluation of disease extent and is fairly accurate in identifying bulky disease but has definite limitations in assessing the extent of small volume disease and in the confirmation of certain sites of disease beyond the abdomen. Functional MRI has been reported to be superior in detecting small peritoneal deposits. PET/CT may be used as a problem-solving tool in some patients where determination remains unclear, particularly in confirmation of advanced stage beyond the abdomen.
Literature
6.
go back to reference Menon U, Gentry-Maharaj A, Hallett R, et al. (2009) Sensitivity and specificity of multimodal and ultrasound screening for ovarian cancer, and stage distribution of detected cancers: results of the prevalence screen of the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS). Lancet Oncol 10:327–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70026-9 CrossRefPubMed Menon U, Gentry-Maharaj A, Hallett R, et al. (2009) Sensitivity and specificity of multimodal and ultrasound screening for ovarian cancer, and stage distribution of detected cancers: results of the prevalence screen of the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS). Lancet Oncol 10:327–340. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​S1470-2045(09)70026-9 CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Force USPST (2018) Screening for ovarian cancer: Us preventive services task force recommendation statement. JAMA 319:588–594CrossRef Force USPST (2018) Screening for ovarian cancer: Us preventive services task force recommendation statement. JAMA 319:588–594CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Tavassoli FA, Devilee P (2003) WHO histological classification of tumours of the ovary. In: Pathology and genetics of tumours of the breast and female genital organs. IARC Press, Lyon, pp 113–202 Tavassoli FA, Devilee P (2003) WHO histological classification of tumours of the ovary. In: Pathology and genetics of tumours of the breast and female genital organs. IARC Press, Lyon, pp 113–202
37.
go back to reference National Collaborating Centre for Cancer (UK) (2011) Ovarian cancer: the recognition and initial management of ovarian cancer. NICE Clinical Guideline National Collaborating Centre for Cancer (UK) (2011) Ovarian cancer: the recognition and initial management of ovarian cancer. NICE Clinical Guideline
Metadata
Title
Imaging in the pre-operative staging of ovarian cancer
Authors
Francesca Castellani
Edward C. Nganga
Lucy Dumas
Susana Banerjee
Andrea G. Rockall
Publication date
01-02-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Abdominal Radiology / Issue 2/2019
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Electronic ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-018-1779-6

Other articles of this Issue 2/2019

Abdominal Radiology 2/2019 Go to the issue

Classics in Abdominal Radiology

The “two-tone” testis