Published in:
01-12-2018
Small pancreatic ductal carcinomas on triple-phase contrast-enhanced computed tomography: enhanced rims and the pathologic correlation
Authors:
Ryo Takaji, Yasunari Yamada, Shunro Matsumoto, Maki Kiyonaga, Norio Hongo, Hiromu Mori, Naoki Hijiya, Masayuki Ohta, Masafumi Inomata, Hajime Takaki, Kengo Fukuzawa, Hirotoshi Yonemasu
Published in:
Abdominal Radiology
|
Issue 12/2018
Login to get access
Abstract
Purpose
To reveal the prevalence of small (≤ 20 mm) pancreatic ductal carcinomas with enhanced rims on triple-phase contrast-enhanced CT and correlate the CT images with the pathologic findings.
Materials and methods
Between April 2005 and April 2016, 45 patients underwent preoperative triple-phase contrast-enhanced CT and were pathologically diagnosed with small pancreatic ductal carcinoma. CT images were independently reviewed by two radiologists. The attenuation values of the enhanced rims, internal areas of the tumors, and surrounding pancreatic parenchyma were compared using Mann–Whitney U test. These areas were also correlated with the pathologic findings. Tumor invasiveness was compared between the tumors with and without enhanced rims using Fisher’s exact test.
Results
Enhanced rims were identified in 18 tumors (40%) by consensus between the two reviewers. The enhanced rims showed significantly higher mean attenuation values compared with the internal areas of the tumors (p < 0.001) and surrounding pancreatic parenchyma (p < 0.0086), and were most clearly visualized on equilibrium phase. The enhanced rims pathologically reflected the abundant fibrotic stroma with cancer cells in all tumors. There was no statistically significant difference in tumor invasiveness between the tumors with and without enhanced rims (anterior peripancreatic invasion, p = 0.137; posterior peripancreatic invasion, p = 0.758; portal vein invasion, p = 0.639; and lymph node metastases, p = 0.359).
Conclusions
Enhanced rims were detected at a rate of 40% in small pancreatic ductal carcinomas and could be an important finding for diagnosis on CT images, but did not suggest a less aggressive nature.