Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Abdominal Radiology 12/2018

01-12-2018

Small pancreatic ductal carcinomas on triple-phase contrast-enhanced computed tomography: enhanced rims and the pathologic correlation

Authors: Ryo Takaji, Yasunari Yamada, Shunro Matsumoto, Maki Kiyonaga, Norio Hongo, Hiromu Mori, Naoki Hijiya, Masayuki Ohta, Masafumi Inomata, Hajime Takaki, Kengo Fukuzawa, Hirotoshi Yonemasu

Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 12/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To reveal the prevalence of small (≤ 20 mm) pancreatic ductal carcinomas with enhanced rims on triple-phase contrast-enhanced CT and correlate the CT images with the pathologic findings.

Materials and methods

Between April 2005 and April 2016, 45 patients underwent preoperative triple-phase contrast-enhanced CT and were pathologically diagnosed with small pancreatic ductal carcinoma. CT images were independently reviewed by two radiologists. The attenuation values of the enhanced rims, internal areas of the tumors, and surrounding pancreatic parenchyma were compared using Mann–Whitney U test. These areas were also correlated with the pathologic findings. Tumor invasiveness was compared between the tumors with and without enhanced rims using Fisher’s exact test.

Results

Enhanced rims were identified in 18 tumors (40%) by consensus between the two reviewers. The enhanced rims showed significantly higher mean attenuation values compared with the internal areas of the tumors (p < 0.001) and surrounding pancreatic parenchyma (p < 0.0086), and were most clearly visualized on equilibrium phase. The enhanced rims pathologically reflected the abundant fibrotic stroma with cancer cells in all tumors. There was no statistically significant difference in tumor invasiveness between the tumors with and without enhanced rims (anterior peripancreatic invasion, p = 0.137; posterior peripancreatic invasion, p = 0.758; portal vein invasion, p = 0.639; and lymph node metastases, p = 0.359).

Conclusions

Enhanced rims were detected at a rate of 40% in small pancreatic ductal carcinomas and could be an important finding for diagnosis on CT images, but did not suggest a less aggressive nature.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Rao SX, Zeng MS, Cheng WZ, et al. (2011) Small solid tumors (≤ 2 cm) of the pancreas: relative accuracy and differentiation of CT and MR imaging. Hepatogastroenterology 58:996–1001PubMed Rao SX, Zeng MS, Cheng WZ, et al. (2011) Small solid tumors (≤ 2 cm) of the pancreas: relative accuracy and differentiation of CT and MR imaging. Hepatogastroenterology 58:996–1001PubMed
2.
go back to reference Choi TW, Lee JM, Kim JH, et al. (2016) Comparison of multidetector CT and gadobutrol-enhanced MR imaging for evaluation of small, solid pancreatic lesions. Korean J Radiol 17:509–521CrossRef Choi TW, Lee JM, Kim JH, et al. (2016) Comparison of multidetector CT and gadobutrol-enhanced MR imaging for evaluation of small, solid pancreatic lesions. Korean J Radiol 17:509–521CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Yoon SH, Lee JM, Cho JY, et al. (2011) Small (≤ 20 mm) pancreatic adenocarcinomas: analysis of enhancement patterns and secondary signs with multiphasic multidetector CT. Radiology 259:442–452CrossRef Yoon SH, Lee JM, Cho JY, et al. (2011) Small (≤ 20 mm) pancreatic adenocarcinomas: analysis of enhancement patterns and secondary signs with multiphasic multidetector CT. Radiology 259:442–452CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Dietrich CF, Sahai AV, D’Onofrio M, et al. (2016) Differential diagnosis of small solid pancreatic lesions. Gastrointest Endosc 84:933–940CrossRef Dietrich CF, Sahai AV, D’Onofrio M, et al. (2016) Differential diagnosis of small solid pancreatic lesions. Gastrointest Endosc 84:933–940CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Yu MH, Lee JY, Kim MA, et al. (2010) MR imaging features of small solid pseudopapillary tumors: retrospective differentiation from other small solid pancreatic tumors. AJR 195:1324–1332CrossRef Yu MH, Lee JY, Kim MA, et al. (2010) MR imaging features of small solid pseudopapillary tumors: retrospective differentiation from other small solid pancreatic tumors. AJR 195:1324–1332CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kamisawa T, Wood LD, Itoi T, Takaori K (2016) Pancreatic cancer. Lancet 388:73–85CrossRef Kamisawa T, Wood LD, Itoi T, Takaori K (2016) Pancreatic cancer. Lancet 388:73–85CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Xu Z, Pothula SP, Wilson JS, Apte MV (2014) Pancreatic cancer and its stroma: a conspiracy theory. World J Gastroenterol 20:11216–11229CrossRef Xu Z, Pothula SP, Wilson JS, Apte MV (2014) Pancreatic cancer and its stroma: a conspiracy theory. World J Gastroenterol 20:11216–11229CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Gleason MX, Mdzinarishvili T, Are C, et al. (2013) Prognostic estimator of survival for patients with localized and extended pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Inform 12:103–114CrossRef Gleason MX, Mdzinarishvili T, Are C, et al. (2013) Prognostic estimator of survival for patients with localized and extended pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Inform 12:103–114CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Prokesch RW, Chow LC, Beaulieu CF, Bammer R, Jeffrey RB Jr (2002) Isoattenuating pancreatic adenocarcinoma at multi-detector row CT: secondary signs. Radiology 224:764–768CrossRef Prokesch RW, Chow LC, Beaulieu CF, Bammer R, Jeffrey RB Jr (2002) Isoattenuating pancreatic adenocarcinoma at multi-detector row CT: secondary signs. Radiology 224:764–768CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Ishigami K, Yoshimitsu K, Irie H, et al. (2009) Diagnostic value of the delayed phase image for iso-attenuating pancreatic carcinomas in the pancreatic parenchymal phase on multidetector computed tomography. Eur J Radiol 69:139–146CrossRef Ishigami K, Yoshimitsu K, Irie H, et al. (2009) Diagnostic value of the delayed phase image for iso-attenuating pancreatic carcinomas in the pancreatic parenchymal phase on multidetector computed tomography. Eur J Radiol 69:139–146CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Yamada Y, Mori H, Matsumoto S, et al. (2010) Pancreatic adenocarcinoma versus chronic pancreatitis: differentiation with triple-phase helical CT. Abdom Imaging 35:163–171CrossRef Yamada Y, Mori H, Matsumoto S, et al. (2010) Pancreatic adenocarcinoma versus chronic pancreatitis: differentiation with triple-phase helical CT. Abdom Imaging 35:163–171CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Furuhashi N, Suzuki K, Sakurai Y, et al. (2015) Differentiation of focal-type autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreatic carcinoma: assessment by multiphase contrast-enhanced CT. Eur Radiol 25:1366–1374CrossRef Furuhashi N, Suzuki K, Sakurai Y, et al. (2015) Differentiation of focal-type autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreatic carcinoma: assessment by multiphase contrast-enhanced CT. Eur Radiol 25:1366–1374CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Tamada T, Ito K, Kanomata N, et al. (2016) Pancreatic adenocarcinomas without secondary signs on multiphasic multidetector CT: association with clinical and histopathologic features. Eur Radiol 26:646–655CrossRef Tamada T, Ito K, Kanomata N, et al. (2016) Pancreatic adenocarcinomas without secondary signs on multiphasic multidetector CT: association with clinical and histopathologic features. Eur Radiol 26:646–655CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174CrossRef Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Greenlee RT, Murray T, Bolden S, Wingo PA (2000) Cancer statistics, 2000. CA Cancer J Clin 50:7–33CrossRef Greenlee RT, Murray T, Bolden S, Wingo PA (2000) Cancer statistics, 2000. CA Cancer J Clin 50:7–33CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Lau MK, Davila JA, Shaib YH (2010) Incidence  and  survival  of  pancreatic  head  and  body  and  tail cancers: a population-based study in the United States. Pancreas 39:458–462CrossRef Lau MK, Davila JA, Shaib YH (2010) Incidence  and  survival  of  pancreatic  head  and  body  and  tail cancers: a population-based study in the United States. Pancreas 39:458–462CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Matsuno S, Egawa S, Fukuyama S, et al. (2004) Pancreatic cancer registry in Japan: 20 years of experience. Pancreas 28:219–230CrossRef Matsuno S, Egawa S, Fukuyama S, et al. (2004) Pancreatic cancer registry in Japan: 20 years of experience. Pancreas 28:219–230CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Asayama Y, Yoshimitsu K, Irie H, et al. (2006) Delayed-phase dynamic CT enhancement as a prognostic factor for mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Radiology 238:150–155CrossRef Asayama Y, Yoshimitsu K, Irie H, et al. (2006) Delayed-phase dynamic CT enhancement as a prognostic factor for mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Radiology 238:150–155CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Hwang RF, Moore T, Arumugam T, et al. (2008) Cancer-associated stromal fibroblasts promote pancreatic tumor progression. Cancer Res 68:918–926CrossRef Hwang RF, Moore T, Arumugam T, et al. (2008) Cancer-associated stromal fibroblasts promote pancreatic tumor progression. Cancer Res 68:918–926CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Kalluri R, Zeisberg M (2006) Fibroblasts in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 6:392–401CrossRef Kalluri R, Zeisberg M (2006) Fibroblasts in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 6:392–401CrossRef
21.
go back to reference von Ahrens D, Bhagat TD, Nagrath D, Maitra A, Verma A (2017) The role of stromal cancer-associated fibroblasts in pancreatic cancer. J Hematol Oncol 10:76CrossRef von Ahrens D, Bhagat TD, Nagrath D, Maitra A, Verma A (2017) The role of stromal cancer-associated fibroblasts in pancreatic cancer. J Hematol Oncol 10:76CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Chiou YY, Chiang JH, Hwang JI, et al. (2004) Acinar cell carcinoma of the pancreas: clinical and computed tomography manifestations. J Comput Assist Tomogr 28:180–186CrossRef Chiou YY, Chiang JH, Hwang JI, et al. (2004) Acinar cell carcinoma of the pancreas: clinical and computed tomography manifestations. J Comput Assist Tomogr 28:180–186CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Hsu MY, Pan KT, Chu SY, et al. (2010) CT and MRI features of acinar cell carcinoma of the pancreas with pathologic correlations. Clin Radiol 65:223–229CrossRef Hsu MY, Pan KT, Chu SY, et al. (2010) CT and MRI features of acinar cell carcinoma of the pancreas with pathologic correlations. Clin Radiol 65:223–229CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Raman SP, Hruban RH, Cameron JL, et al. (2013) Acinar cell carcinoma of the pancreas: computed tomography features–a study of 15 patients. Abdom Imaging 38:137–143CrossRef Raman SP, Hruban RH, Cameron JL, et al. (2013) Acinar cell carcinoma of the pancreas: computed tomography features–a study of 15 patients. Abdom Imaging 38:137–143CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Yin Q, Wang M, Wang C, et al. (2012) Differentiation between benign and malignant solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas by MDCT. Eur J Radiol 81:3010–3018CrossRef Yin Q, Wang M, Wang C, et al. (2012) Differentiation between benign and malignant solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas by MDCT. Eur J Radiol 81:3010–3018CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Huang YS, Chen JL, Chang CC, Liu KL (2014) Solid pseudopapillary neoplasms of the pancreas: imaging differentiation between benignity and malignancy. Hepatogastroenterology 61:809–813PubMed Huang YS, Chen JL, Chang CC, Liu KL (2014) Solid pseudopapillary neoplasms of the pancreas: imaging differentiation between benignity and malignancy. Hepatogastroenterology 61:809–813PubMed
27.
go back to reference Chung YE, Kim MJ, Choi JY, et al. (2009) Differentiation of benign and malignant solid pseudopapillary neoplasms of the pancreas. J Comput Assist Tomogr 33:689–694CrossRef Chung YE, Kim MJ, Choi JY, et al. (2009) Differentiation of benign and malignant solid pseudopapillary neoplasms of the pancreas. J Comput Assist Tomogr 33:689–694CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Small pancreatic ductal carcinomas on triple-phase contrast-enhanced computed tomography: enhanced rims and the pathologic correlation
Authors
Ryo Takaji
Yasunari Yamada
Shunro Matsumoto
Maki Kiyonaga
Norio Hongo
Hiromu Mori
Naoki Hijiya
Masayuki Ohta
Masafumi Inomata
Hajime Takaki
Kengo Fukuzawa
Hirotoshi Yonemasu
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Abdominal Radiology / Issue 12/2018
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Electronic ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-018-1645-6

Other articles of this Issue 12/2018

Abdominal Radiology 12/2018 Go to the issue