Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Abdominal Radiology 3/2018

01-03-2018

Structured reporting and quality control in CT colonography

Authors: Abraham H. Dachman, Matthew A. Barish

Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 3/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Standardized recommended techniques for performing and reporting CT colonography (CTC) examinations were developed by a consensus of experts. Published reporting guidelines, known as the CT colonography reporting and data system supplemented by recently updated comprehensive recommendations were incorporated into the American College of Radiology (ACR) practice guidelines. The application of continuous quality improvement to the practice of CT was aided by the development of an ACR national data registry (NRDR) for CTC that addressed both process and outcome quality measures. These measures can be used to benchmark an institution’s CTC practice as compared to all participants. This article will discuss the best practices for reporting CTC and describe the use of NRDR to foster quality CTC performance.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Larson DB, Towbin AJ, Pryor RM, Donnelly LF (2013) Improving consistency in radiology reporting though the use of department-wide standardized structured reporting. Radiology 267:240–250CrossRefPubMed Larson DB, Towbin AJ, Pryor RM, Donnelly LF (2013) Improving consistency in radiology reporting though the use of department-wide standardized structured reporting. Radiology 267:240–250CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference D’Orsi CJ, Getty DJ, Swets JA, et al. (1992) Reading and decision aids for improved accuracy and standardization of mammographic diagnosis. Radiology 184:619–622CrossRefPubMed D’Orsi CJ, Getty DJ, Swets JA, et al. (1992) Reading and decision aids for improved accuracy and standardization of mammographic diagnosis. Radiology 184:619–622CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Berg WA, D’Orsi CJ, Jackson VP, et al. (2002) Does training in the breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) improve biopsy recommendations or feature analysis agreement with experienced breast imagers at mammography? Radiology 224:871–880CrossRefPubMed Berg WA, D’Orsi CJ, Jackson VP, et al. (2002) Does training in the breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) improve biopsy recommendations or feature analysis agreement with experienced breast imagers at mammography? Radiology 224:871–880CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Pooler DB, Kim DH, Lam VP, Burnside ES, Pickhardt PJ (2014) CT colonography reporting and data system (C-RADS): benchmark values from a clinical screening program. Am J Roentgenol 202:1232–1237CrossRef Pooler DB, Kim DH, Lam VP, Burnside ES, Pickhardt PJ (2014) CT colonography reporting and data system (C-RADS): benchmark values from a clinical screening program. Am J Roentgenol 202:1232–1237CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Zalis ME, Barish MA, Choi JR, et al. (2005) CT colonography reporting and data system: a consensus proposal. Radiology 236:3–9CrossRefPubMed Zalis ME, Barish MA, Choi JR, et al. (2005) CT colonography reporting and data system: a consensus proposal. Radiology 236:3–9CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Pooler BD, Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ (2016) Indeterminate but Likely Unimportant Extracolonic Findings at Screening CT Colonography (C-RADS Category E3): Incidence and outcomes data from a clinical screening program. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 207:996–1001CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pooler BD, Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ (2016) Indeterminate but Likely Unimportant Extracolonic Findings at Screening CT Colonography (C-RADS Category E3): Incidence and outcomes data from a clinical screening program. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 207:996–1001CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Berland LL, Silverman SG, Gore RM (2010) Managing incidental findings on abdominal CT: White paper of the ACR Incidental Findings Committee. J Am Coll Radiol 7:754–773CrossRefPubMed Berland LL, Silverman SG, Gore RM (2010) Managing incidental findings on abdominal CT: White paper of the ACR Incidental Findings Committee. J Am Coll Radiol 7:754–773CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH (2009) Colorectal cancer screening with CT colonography: key concepts regarding polyp prevalence, size, histology, morphology, and natural history. AJR 193:40–46CrossRefPubMed Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH (2009) Colorectal cancer screening with CT colonography: key concepts regarding polyp prevalence, size, histology, morphology, and natural history. AJR 193:40–46CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al. (2008) Screening and Surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-society task force on colorectal cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Ca Cancer J Clin 58:130–160CrossRefPubMed Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al. (2008) Screening and Surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-society task force on colorectal cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Ca Cancer J Clin 58:130–160CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference McFarland EG, et al. (2009) ACR colon cancer committee white paper: status of CT colonography. J Am Coll Radiol 6(11):756–772CrossRefPubMed McFarland EG, et al. (2009) ACR colon cancer committee white paper: status of CT colonography. J Am Coll Radiol 6(11):756–772CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Ponugoti PL, Cummings OW, Rex DK (2017) Risk of cancer in small and diminutive colorectal polyps. Dig Liver Dis 49:34–37CrossRefPubMed Ponugoti PL, Cummings OW, Rex DK (2017) Risk of cancer in small and diminutive colorectal polyps. Dig Liver Dis 49:34–37CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Levin TR, Zhao W, Conell C, et al. (2006) Complications of colonoscopy in an integrated health care delivery system. Ann Intern Med 145:880–886CrossRefPubMed Levin TR, Zhao W, Conell C, et al. (2006) Complications of colonoscopy in an integrated health care delivery system. Ann Intern Med 145:880–886CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Yee J, Chang KJ, Dachman AH, et al. (2016) The added value of the CT colonography reporting and data system. Am Coll Radiol 13:931–935 Yee J, Chang KJ, Dachman AH, et al. (2016) The added value of the CT colonography reporting and data system. Am Coll Radiol 13:931–935
16.
go back to reference Brooks C, Riddle MS, Bhattacharya I, et al. (2008) CT colonography of a Medicare-Aged population: outcomes observed in an analysis of more than 1400 patients. AJR 199:27–34 Brooks C, Riddle MS, Bhattacharya I, et al. (2008) CT colonography of a Medicare-Aged population: outcomes observed in an analysis of more than 1400 patients. AJR 199:27–34
Metadata
Title
Structured reporting and quality control in CT colonography
Authors
Abraham H. Dachman
Matthew A. Barish
Publication date
01-03-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Abdominal Radiology / Issue 3/2018
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Electronic ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-018-1456-9

Other articles of this Issue 3/2018

Abdominal Radiology 3/2018 Go to the issue