Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Abdominal Radiology 1/2018

01-01-2018 | Review Paper

LI-RADS: a glimpse into the future

Authors: Claude B. Sirlin, Ania Z. Kielar, An Tang, Mustafa R Bashir

Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

This article provides a glimpse into the future of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS), discussing the immediate and long-term plans for its continuing improvement and expansion. To complement the Core and Essentials components of the latest version of LI-RADS, a comprehensive manual will be released soon, and it will include technical recommendations, management guidance, as well as reporting instructions and templates. In this article, we briefly review the process by which LI-RADS has been developed until now, a process guided by a variable combination of data, expert opinion, and desire for congruency with other diagnostic systems in North America. We then look forward, envisioning that forthcoming updates to LI-RADS will occur regularly every 3 to 5 years, driven by emerging high-quality scientific evidence. We highlight some of the key knowledge and technology gaps that will need to be addressed to enable the needed refinements. We also anticipate future expansions in scope to meet currently unaddressed clinical needs. Finally, we articulate a vision for eventual unification of imaging system for HCC screening and surveillance, diagnosis and staging, and treatment response assessment.
Literature
4.
go back to reference Darnell A, Forner A, Rimola J, et al. (2015) Liver imaging reporting and data system with MR imaging: evaluation in nodules 20 mm or smaller detected in cirrhosis at screening US. Radiology 275:698–707CrossRefPubMed Darnell A, Forner A, Rimola J, et al. (2015) Liver imaging reporting and data system with MR imaging: evaluation in nodules 20 mm or smaller detected in cirrhosis at screening US. Radiology 275:698–707CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Kim TK, Lee KH, Jang HJ, et al. (2011) Analysis of gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR findings for characterizing small (1–2-cm) hepatic nodules in patients at high risk for hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiology 259:730–738CrossRefPubMed Kim TK, Lee KH, Jang HJ, et al. (2011) Analysis of gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR findings for characterizing small (1–2-cm) hepatic nodules in patients at high risk for hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiology 259:730–738CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Han KH, Kim DY, Park JY, et al. (2013) Survival of hepatocellular carcinoma patients may be improved in surveillance interval not more than 6 months compared with more than 6 months: a 15-year prospective study. J Clin Gastroenterol 47:538–544CrossRefPubMed Han KH, Kim DY, Park JY, et al. (2013) Survival of hepatocellular carcinoma patients may be improved in surveillance interval not more than 6 months compared with more than 6 months: a 15-year prospective study. J Clin Gastroenterol 47:538–544CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Santi V, Trevisani F, Gramenzi A, et al. (2010) Semiannual surveillance is superior to annual surveillance for the detection of early hepatocellular carcinoma and patient survival. J Hepatol 53:291–297CrossRefPubMed Santi V, Trevisani F, Gramenzi A, et al. (2010) Semiannual surveillance is superior to annual surveillance for the detection of early hepatocellular carcinoma and patient survival. J Hepatol 53:291–297CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Trevisani F, De Notariis S, Rapaccini G, et al. (2002) Semiannual and annual surveillance of cirrhotic patients for hepatocellular carcinoma: effects on cancer stage and patient survival (Italian experience). Am J Gastroenterol 97:734–744CrossRefPubMed Trevisani F, De Notariis S, Rapaccini G, et al. (2002) Semiannual and annual surveillance of cirrhotic patients for hepatocellular carcinoma: effects on cancer stage and patient survival (Italian experience). Am J Gastroenterol 97:734–744CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Tanabe M, Kanki A, Wolfson T, et al. (2016) Imaging outcomes of liver imaging reporting and data system version 2014 category 2, 3, and 4 observations detected at CT and MR imaging. Radiology 281:129–139CrossRefPubMed Tanabe M, Kanki A, Wolfson T, et al. (2016) Imaging outcomes of liver imaging reporting and data system version 2014 category 2, 3, and 4 observations detected at CT and MR imaging. Radiology 281:129–139CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Cruite I, Santillan C, Mamidipalli A, et al. (2016) Liver imaging reporting and data system: review of ancillary imaging features. Semin Roentgenol 51:301–307CrossRefPubMed Cruite I, Santillan C, Mamidipalli A, et al. (2016) Liver imaging reporting and data system: review of ancillary imaging features. Semin Roentgenol 51:301–307CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
LI-RADS: a glimpse into the future
Authors
Claude B. Sirlin
Ania Z. Kielar
An Tang
Mustafa R Bashir
Publication date
01-01-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Abdominal Radiology / Issue 1/2018
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Electronic ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1448-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Abdominal Radiology 1/2018 Go to the issue