Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Abdominal Radiology 3/2018

01-03-2018 | Pictorial essay

Documentation, coding, and billing: what abdominal radiologists need to know

Authors: Andrew B. Rosenkrantz, Andrew J. Degnan, Richard Duszak Jr.

Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 3/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

This article reviews basic concepts of report documentation for abdominal imaging examinations, focusing on practical elements for ensuring appropriate physician reimbursement. Nuances of abdominal radiography, CT, MRI, and ultrasonography codes are highlighted. Special considerations for the coding of 3D-rendering and contrast administration are also described. Greater abdominal radiologist awareness of these codes and their reporting requirements can help ensure proper documentation within radiology reports, thereby optimizing legitimate reimbursement.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Wallis A, McCoubrie P (2011) The radiology report—are we getting the message across? Clin Radiol 66:1015–1022CrossRefPubMed Wallis A, McCoubrie P (2011) The radiology report—are we getting the message across? Clin Radiol 66:1015–1022CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Bosmans JM, Weyler JJ, De Schepper AM, Parizel PM (2011) The radiology report as seen by radiologists and referring clinicians: results of the COVER and ROVER surveys. Radiology 259:184–195CrossRefPubMed Bosmans JM, Weyler JJ, De Schepper AM, Parizel PM (2011) The radiology report as seen by radiologists and referring clinicians: results of the COVER and ROVER surveys. Radiology 259:184–195CrossRefPubMed
4.
5.
go back to reference Phillips CD, Hillman BJ (2001) Coding and reimbursement issues for the radiologist. Radiology 220:7–11CrossRefPubMed Phillips CD, Hillman BJ (2001) Coding and reimbursement issues for the radiologist. Radiology 220:7–11CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Levinson DR. Medicare payments for diagnostic radiology services in Emergency Departments. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General, 2011. Accessed: 17 Mar 2017. Levinson DR. Medicare payments for diagnostic radiology services in Emergency Departments. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General, 2011. Accessed: 17 Mar 2017.
7.
go back to reference Thorwarth WT Jr (2005) Get paid for what you do: dictation patterns and impact on billing accuracy. J Am Coll Radiol 2:665–669CrossRefPubMed Thorwarth WT Jr (2005) Get paid for what you do: dictation patterns and impact on billing accuracy. J Am Coll Radiol 2:665–669CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Adams DL, Norman H, Burroughs VJ (2002) Addressing medical coding and billing part II: a strategy for achieving compliance. A risk management approach for reducing coding and billing errors. J Natl Med Assoc 94:430–447PubMedPubMedCentral Adams DL, Norman H, Burroughs VJ (2002) Addressing medical coding and billing part II: a strategy for achieving compliance. A risk management approach for reducing coding and billing errors. J Natl Med Assoc 94:430–447PubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference CPT (2017) Professional edition. Chicago: American Medical Association, p 2016 CPT (2017) Professional edition. Chicago: American Medical Association, p 2016
13.
go back to reference Moorefield JM, MacEwan DW, Sunshine JH (1993) The radiology relative value scale: its development and implications. Radiology 187:317–326CrossRefPubMed Moorefield JM, MacEwan DW, Sunshine JH (1993) The radiology relative value scale: its development and implications. Radiology 187:317–326CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Lam DL, Medverd JR (2013) How radiologists get paid: resource-based relative value scale and the revenue cycle. AJR Am J Roentgenol 201:947–958CrossRefPubMed Lam DL, Medverd JR (2013) How radiologists get paid: resource-based relative value scale and the revenue cycle. AJR Am J Roentgenol 201:947–958CrossRefPubMed
15.
16.
18.
go back to reference Buck CJ (2017) 2017 HCPCS level II professional edition. St Louis: Elsevier Health Sciences Buck CJ (2017) 2017 HCPCS level II professional edition. St Louis: Elsevier Health Sciences
19.
go back to reference Stanfill MH, Williams M, Fenton SH, Jenders RA, Hersh WR (2010) A systematic literature review of automated clinical coding and classification systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc 17:646–651CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Stanfill MH, Williams M, Fenton SH, Jenders RA, Hersh WR (2010) A systematic literature review of automated clinical coding and classification systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc 17:646–651CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
23.
go back to reference Challenge Documentation (2016) Computed tomography (CT) urogram. Clin Ex Radiol 12:9–11 Challenge Documentation (2016) Computed tomography (CT) urogram. Clin Ex Radiol 12:9–11
24.
25.
go back to reference Miller J, Lineberry J (2004) Coding for effective denial management. Radiol Manag 26:18–21 Miller J, Lineberry J (2004) Coding for effective denial management. Radiol Manag 26:18–21
27.
go back to reference Duszak R Jr, Berlin JW (2012) Utilization management in radiology, part 1: rationale, history, and current status. J Am Coll Radiol 9:694–699CrossRefPubMed Duszak R Jr, Berlin JW (2012) Utilization management in radiology, part 1: rationale, history, and current status. J Am Coll Radiol 9:694–699CrossRefPubMed
29.
31.
go back to reference ICD-10-CM 2015: The Complete Official Codebook. American Medical Association, 2014. ICD-10-CM 2015: The Complete Official Codebook. American Medical Association, 2014.
34.
go back to reference ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, 2015. Accessed 17 Mar 2017 ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, 2015. Accessed 17 Mar 2017
40.
go back to reference Mulaik MW (2011) New codes, new rules: CT abdomen and pelvis. Radiol Manag 33:23–25 Mulaik MW (2011) New codes, new rules: CT abdomen and pelvis. Radiol Manag 33:23–25
48.
go back to reference 3D Interpretation and Reporting of Imaging Studies Molina Healthcare (2012). Accessed 17 Mar 2017 3D Interpretation and Reporting of Imaging Studies Molina Healthcare (2012). Accessed 17 Mar 2017
50.
go back to reference ACR–SPR–SRU Practice Parameter for Performing and Interpreting Diagnostic Ultrasound Examinations. American College of Radiology (2014). Accessed 17 Mar 2017 ACR–SPR–SRU Practice Parameter for Performing and Interpreting Diagnostic Ultrasound Examinations. American College of Radiology (2014). Accessed 17 Mar 2017
51.
go back to reference Guide Ultrasound Coding User’s (2015) Reston. VA: American College of Radiology Guide Ultrasound Coding User’s (2015) Reston. VA: American College of Radiology
52.
go back to reference Challenge Documentation (2015) Pelvic Ultrasound Complete. Clin Ex Radiol 11:10–12 Challenge Documentation (2015) Pelvic Ultrasound Complete. Clin Ex Radiol 11:10–12
53.
go back to reference Thorwarth WT Jr (2004) From concept to CPT code to compensation: how the payment system works. J Am Coll Radiol 1:48–53CrossRefPubMed Thorwarth WT Jr (2004) From concept to CPT code to compensation: how the payment system works. J Am Coll Radiol 1:48–53CrossRefPubMed
56.
go back to reference Radiology Test Case (2016) Contrast-enhanced Liver Ultrasound. Clin Ex Radiol 12(7):10–11 Radiology Test Case (2016) Contrast-enhanced Liver Ultrasound. Clin Ex Radiol 12(7):10–11
Metadata
Title
Documentation, coding, and billing: what abdominal radiologists need to know
Authors
Andrew B. Rosenkrantz
Andrew J. Degnan
Richard Duszak Jr.
Publication date
01-03-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Abdominal Radiology / Issue 3/2018
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Electronic ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1235-z

Other articles of this Issue 3/2018

Abdominal Radiology 3/2018 Go to the issue

Classics in Abdominal Imaging

The “windsock” sign