Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Abdominal Radiology 3/2017

01-03-2017

Standard vs. reduced-radiation-dose CT in the tracing of the ureter

Authors: Chang Kyu Sung, Min Hoan Moon, Hwancheol Son, Sohee Oh, Myoung Seok Lee, Hyunsik Woo

Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 3/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the effectiveness of reduced-radiation-dose computed tomography (CT) protocols in the tracing of the ureter in patients with suspected renal colic.

Methods

The study was approved by our institutional review board, and informed consent was obtained from the participants. From July 2012 to April 2014, 310 consecutive patients with suspected urolithiasis were recruited to undergo unenhanced CT at 280 (n = 62), 200 (n = 62), 140 (n = 62), 100 (n = 62), and 70 (n = 62) reference mA seconds (mAs) while keeping other imaging parameters constant. Images were independently and randomly reviewed by two radiologists blinded to the study to determine the tracing rates of the ureter and the acceptable rates of image quality according to different tube charge settings.

Results

A significant linear association was noted between tube charge settings, the rates for tracing of the ureter, and the acceptability of image quality (linear-by-linear association; p = 0.000 in all rates for both readers). The 140 reference mAs is the point at which the tracing rates deteriorate rapidly, with the tracing rate of 41.5% (95% CI 32.6%–51.0%) in reader 1 and 51.9% (95% CI 42.5%–61.2%) in reader 2, and with the acceptable rate of 82.3% (95% CI 70.8%–90.0%) in reader 1 and 96.8% (95% CI 88.3%–99.8%) in reader 2.

Conclusion

Decreasing the tube charge settings from 280 to 70 reference mAs resulted in a significant reduction in the tracing rate of the ureter, with 140 reference mAs being the breaking point.
Literature
2.
3.
go back to reference Smith RC, Coll DM (2000) Helical computed tomography in the diagnosis of ureteric colic. BJU Int 86(Suppl 1):33–41PubMed Smith RC, Coll DM (2000) Helical computed tomography in the diagnosis of ureteric colic. BJU Int 86(Suppl 1):33–41PubMed
13.
14.
go back to reference Hinkley DV (1970) Inference about change-point in a sequence of random variables. Biometrika 57(1):1–17CrossRef Hinkley DV (1970) Inference about change-point in a sequence of random variables. Biometrika 57(1):1–17CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Killick R, Eckley IA (2014) changepoint: an R package for changepoint analysis. J Stat Softw 58(3):1–19CrossRef Killick R, Eckley IA (2014) changepoint: an R package for changepoint analysis. J Stat Softw 58(3):1–19CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Ekstrom MP (2012) Digital image processing techniques, vol. 2. Cambridge: Academic Press Ekstrom MP (2012) Digital image processing techniques, vol. 2. Cambridge: Academic Press
21.
go back to reference Wall BF, Hart D (1997) Revised radiation doses for typical X-ray examinations. Report on a recent review of doses to patients from medical X-ray examinations in the UK by NRPB. National Radiological Protection Board. Br J Radiol 70(833):437–439. doi:10.1259/bjr.70.833.9227222 CrossRefPubMed Wall BF, Hart D (1997) Revised radiation doses for typical X-ray examinations. Report on a recent review of doses to patients from medical X-ray examinations in the UK by NRPB. National Radiological Protection Board. Br J Radiol 70(833):437–439. doi:10.​1259/​bjr.​70.​833.​9227222 CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Standard vs. reduced-radiation-dose CT in the tracing of the ureter
Authors
Chang Kyu Sung
Min Hoan Moon
Hwancheol Son
Sohee Oh
Myoung Seok Lee
Hyunsik Woo
Publication date
01-03-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Abdominal Radiology / Issue 3/2017
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Electronic ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-016-0929-y

Other articles of this Issue 3/2017

Abdominal Radiology 3/2017 Go to the issue

Classics in Abdominal Imaging

Corkscrew esophagus