Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Abdominal Radiology 12/2016

01-12-2016

MRI for appendicitis in pregnancy: is seeing believing? clinical outcomes in cases of appendix nonvisualization

Authors: Sayf Al-Katib, Farnoosh Sokhandon, Michael Farah

Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 12/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The primary objective of this study was to determine the clinical outcomes in cases of appendix nonvisualization with MRI in pregnant patients with suspected appendicitis and the implications of appendix nonvisualization for excluding appendicitis.

Methods

Fifty-eight pregnant patients with suspected appendicitis evaluated with MRI at three centers from a single institution were retrospectively reviewed by three radiologists with varying levels of abdominal imaging experience. All scans were performed on a 1.5-Tesla Siemens unit. Cases were evaluated for diagnostic quality, visualization of the appendix, presence of appendicitis, and alternate diagnoses. Clinical outcomes were gathered from the electronic medical record.

Results

Of the 58 patients who underwent MRI for suspected appendicitis, 50 cases were considered adequate diagnostic quality by all three radiologists. The rate of appendix visualization among the three radiologists ranged from 60 to 76% (p = 0.44). The appendix was nonvisualized by at least one of the three radiologists in 25 cases (50%). Of these, none had a final diagnosis of appendicitis including one patient who underwent appendectomy. MRI suggested an alternate diagnosis in 6 (24%) patients with appendix nonvisualization. For the three reviewers, the agreement level on whether or not the appendix was visualized on the MRI had a Light’s kappa value of 0.526, indicating a “moderate” level of agreement (p value < 0.01).

Conclusion

Despite only moderate level of interobserver agreement for appendix visualization, appendix nonvisualization on MRI in pregnant patients with suspected appendicitis confers a significant reduction in the risk of appendicitis compared to all comers as long as the study is adequate diagnostic quality and there are no secondary signs of appendicitis present.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Basaran A, Basaran M (2009) Diagnosis of acute appendicitis during pregnancy: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 64(7):481–488; quiz 499. Basaran A, Basaran M (2009) Diagnosis of acute appendicitis during pregnancy: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 64(7):481–488; quiz 499.
2.
go back to reference Duke E, Kalb B, Arif-Tiwari H, et al. (2016) A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of MRI for evaluation of acute appendicitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 206(3):508–517CrossRefPubMed Duke E, Kalb B, Arif-Tiwari H, et al. (2016) A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of MRI for evaluation of acute appendicitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 206(3):508–517CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Lee KS, Rofsky NM, Pedrosa I (2008) Localization of the appendix at MR imaging during pregnancy: utility of the cecal tilt angle. Radiology. 249(1):134–141CrossRefPubMed Lee KS, Rofsky NM, Pedrosa I (2008) Localization of the appendix at MR imaging during pregnancy: utility of the cecal tilt angle. Radiology. 249(1):134–141CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Pedrosa I, Lafornara M, Pandharipande PV, Goldsmith JD, Rofsky NM (2009) Pregnant patients suspected of having acute appendicitis: effect of MR imaging on negative laparotomy rate and appendiceal perforation rate. Radiology. 250(3):749–757CrossRefPubMed Pedrosa I, Lafornara M, Pandharipande PV, Goldsmith JD, Rofsky NM (2009) Pregnant patients suspected of having acute appendicitis: effect of MR imaging on negative laparotomy rate and appendiceal perforation rate. Radiology. 250(3):749–757CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Theilen LH, Mellnick VM, Longman RE, et al. (2015) Utility of magnetic resonance imaging for suspected appendicitis in pregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 212(3):345.e341–346. Theilen LH, Mellnick VM, Longman RE, et al. (2015) Utility of magnetic resonance imaging for suspected appendicitis in pregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 212(3):345.e341–346.
6.
go back to reference Nikolaidis P, Hwang CM, Miller FH, Papanicolaou N (2004) The nonvisualized appendix: incidence of acute appendicitis when secondary inflammatory changes are absent. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 183(4):889–892CrossRefPubMed Nikolaidis P, Hwang CM, Miller FH, Papanicolaou N (2004) The nonvisualized appendix: incidence of acute appendicitis when secondary inflammatory changes are absent. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 183(4):889–892CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Ganguli S, Raptopoulos V, Komlos F, Siewert B, Kruskal JB (2006) Right lower quadrant pain: value of the nonvisualized appendix in patients at multidetector CT. Radiology. 241(1):175–180CrossRefPubMed Ganguli S, Raptopoulos V, Komlos F, Siewert B, Kruskal JB (2006) Right lower quadrant pain: value of the nonvisualized appendix in patients at multidetector CT. Radiology. 241(1):175–180CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Shah BR, Stewart J, Jeffrey RB, Jeffery RB, Olcott EW (2014) Value of short-interval computed tomography when sonography fails to visualize the appendix and shows otherwise normal findings. J Ultrasound Med. 33(9):1589–1595CrossRefPubMed Shah BR, Stewart J, Jeffrey RB, Jeffery RB, Olcott EW (2014) Value of short-interval computed tomography when sonography fails to visualize the appendix and shows otherwise normal findings. J Ultrasound Med. 33(9):1589–1595CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Lehnert BE, Gross JA, Linnau KF, Moshiri M (2012) Utility of ultrasound for evaluating the appendix during the second and third trimester of pregnancy. Emerg Radiol. 19(4):293–299CrossRefPubMed Lehnert BE, Gross JA, Linnau KF, Moshiri M (2012) Utility of ultrasound for evaluating the appendix during the second and third trimester of pregnancy. Emerg Radiol. 19(4):293–299CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Kearl YL, Claudius I, Behar S, et al. (2016) Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound for appendicitis in diagnostic and nondiagnostic studies. Acad Emerg Med. 23(2):179–185CrossRefPubMed Kearl YL, Claudius I, Behar S, et al. (2016) Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound for appendicitis in diagnostic and nondiagnostic studies. Acad Emerg Med. 23(2):179–185CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Nitta N, Takahashi M, Furukawa A, et al. (2005) MR imaging of the normal appendix and acute appendicitis. J Magn Reson Imaging. 21(2):156–165CrossRefPubMed Nitta N, Takahashi M, Furukawa A, et al. (2005) MR imaging of the normal appendix and acute appendicitis. J Magn Reson Imaging. 21(2):156–165CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
MRI for appendicitis in pregnancy: is seeing believing? clinical outcomes in cases of appendix nonvisualization
Authors
Sayf Al-Katib
Farnoosh Sokhandon
Michael Farah
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Abdominal Radiology / Issue 12/2016
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Electronic ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-016-0864-y

Other articles of this Issue 12/2016

Abdominal Radiology 12/2016 Go to the issue

Classics in Abdominal Imaging

The tubal ring and ring of fire signs