Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Abdominal Radiology 5/2015

01-06-2015

Detection of liver metastases in patients with adenocarcinomas of the gastrointestinal tract: comparison of 18F-FDG PET/CT and MR imaging

Authors: Christian Maegerlein, Alexander A. Fingerle, Michael Souvatzoglou, Ernst J. Rummeny, Konstantin Holzapfel

Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 5/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Aim of our study was to compare the diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT and MR imaging (MRI) in the detection of liver metastases in patients with adenocarcinomas of the gastrointestinal tract.

Methods

A total of 49 patients with adenocarcinomas of the gastrointestinal tract who had undergone 18F-FDG PET/CT and MRI of the liver were included in this study. The MRI protocol included diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging after intravenous injection of Gd-DTPA. PET and MR images were analyzed by two experienced radiologists. Imaging results were correlated with histopathological findings or imaging follow-up as available. Sensitivities of both modalities were compared using McNemar Test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated to determine the diagnostic performance in correctly identifying liver metastases.

Results

A total of 151 metastases were confirmed. For lesion detection, MRI was significantly superior to 18F-FDG PET/CT. Sensitivity of MRI in detecting metastases was 86.8% for Reader 1 (R1) and 87.4% for Reader 2 (R2), of PET/CT 66.2% for R1 and 68.2% for R2. Regarding only metastases with diameters of 10 mm or less, sensitivities of MRI were 66.7% for R1 and 75.0% for R2, and were significantly higher than those of PET/CT (17.9% for R1 and 20.5% for R2). ROC analysis showed superiority for lesion classification of MRI as compared to 18F-FDG PET/CT.

Conclusion

MRI is significantly superior to 18F-FDG PET/CT in the detection and classification of liver metastases in patients with adenocarcinomas of the gastrointestinal tract, especially in the detection of small metastases.
Literature
5.
go back to reference Feliberti EC, Wagman LD (2006) Radiofrequency ablation of liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma. Cancer Control 13(1):48–51PubMed Feliberti EC, Wagman LD (2006) Radiofrequency ablation of liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma. Cancer Control 13(1):48–51PubMed
10.
go back to reference Vigano L, Russolillo N, Ferrero A, et al. (2012) Evolution of long-term outcome of liver resection for colorectal metastases: analysis of actual 5-year survival rates over two decades. Ann Surg Oncol 19(6):2035–2044. doi:10.1245/s10434-011-2186-1 CrossRefPubMed Vigano L, Russolillo N, Ferrero A, et al. (2012) Evolution of long-term outcome of liver resection for colorectal metastases: analysis of actual 5-year survival rates over two decades. Ann Surg Oncol 19(6):2035–2044. doi:10.​1245/​s10434-011-2186-1 CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Muhi A, Ichikawa T, Motosugi U, et al. (2010) Diagnosis of colorectal hepatic metastases: contrast-enhanced ultrasonography versus contrast-enhanced computed tomography versus superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging with diffusion-weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 32(5):1132–1140. doi:10.1002/jmri.22360 CrossRefPubMed Muhi A, Ichikawa T, Motosugi U, et al. (2010) Diagnosis of colorectal hepatic metastases: contrast-enhanced ultrasonography versus contrast-enhanced computed tomography versus superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging with diffusion-weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 32(5):1132–1140. doi:10.​1002/​jmri.​22360 CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Titu LV, Breen DJ, Nicholson AA, Hartley J, Monson JR (2006) Is routine magnetic resonance imaging justified for the early detection of resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer? Dis Colon Rectum 49(6):810–815. doi:10.1007/s10350-006-0537-y CrossRefPubMed Titu LV, Breen DJ, Nicholson AA, Hartley J, Monson JR (2006) Is routine magnetic resonance imaging justified for the early detection of resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer? Dis Colon Rectum 49(6):810–815. doi:10.​1007/​s10350-006-0537-y CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Rappeport ED, Loft A, Berthelsen AK, et al. (2007) Contrast-enhanced FDG-PET/CT vs. SPIO-enhanced MRI vs. FDG-PET vs. CT in patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer: a prospective study with intraoperative confirmation. Acta Radiol 48(4):369–378. doi:10.1080/02841850701294560 CrossRefPubMed Rappeport ED, Loft A, Berthelsen AK, et al. (2007) Contrast-enhanced FDG-PET/CT vs. SPIO-enhanced MRI vs. FDG-PET vs. CT in patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer: a prospective study with intraoperative confirmation. Acta Radiol 48(4):369–378. doi:10.​1080/​0284185070129456​0 CrossRefPubMed
16.
17.
go back to reference Floriani I, Torri V, Rulli E, et al. (2010) Performance of imaging modalities in diagnosis of liver metastases from colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Magn Reson Imaging 31(1):19–31. doi:10.1002/jmri.22010 CrossRefPubMed Floriani I, Torri V, Rulli E, et al. (2010) Performance of imaging modalities in diagnosis of liver metastases from colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Magn Reson Imaging 31(1):19–31. doi:10.​1002/​jmri.​22010 CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Yong TW, Yuan ZZ, Jun Z, et al. (2011) Sensitivity of PET/MR images in liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma. Hell J Nucl Med 14(3):264–268PubMed Yong TW, Yuan ZZ, Jun Z, et al. (2011) Sensitivity of PET/MR images in liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma. Hell J Nucl Med 14(3):264–268PubMed
19.
go back to reference Eiber M, Fingerle AA, Brugel M, et al. (2012) Detection and classification of focal liver lesions in patients with colorectal cancer: retrospective comparison of diffusion-weighted MR imaging and multi-slice CT. Eur J Radiol 81(4):683–691. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.01.072 CrossRefPubMed Eiber M, Fingerle AA, Brugel M, et al. (2012) Detection and classification of focal liver lesions in patients with colorectal cancer: retrospective comparison of diffusion-weighted MR imaging and multi-slice CT. Eur J Radiol 81(4):683–691. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ejrad.​2011.​01.​072 CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Niekel MC, Bipat S, Stoker J (2010) Diagnostic imaging of colorectal liver metastases with CT, MR imaging, FDG PET, and/or FDG PET/CT: a meta-analysis of prospective studies including patients who have not previously undergone treatment. Radiology 257(3):674–684. doi:10.1148/radiol.10100729 CrossRefPubMed Niekel MC, Bipat S, Stoker J (2010) Diagnostic imaging of colorectal liver metastases with CT, MR imaging, FDG PET, and/or FDG PET/CT: a meta-analysis of prospective studies including patients who have not previously undergone treatment. Radiology 257(3):674–684. doi:10.​1148/​radiol.​10100729 CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Semelka RC, Martin DR, Balci C, Lance T (2001) Focal liver lesions: comparison of dual-phase CT and multisequence multiplanar MR imaging including dynamic gadolinium enhancement. J Magn Reson Imaging 13(3):397–401CrossRefPubMed Semelka RC, Martin DR, Balci C, Lance T (2001) Focal liver lesions: comparison of dual-phase CT and multisequence multiplanar MR imaging including dynamic gadolinium enhancement. J Magn Reson Imaging 13(3):397–401CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Holzapfel K, Reiser-Erkan C, Fingerle AA, et al. (2011) Comparison of diffusion-weighted MR imaging and multidetector-row CT in the detection of liver metastases in patients operated for pancreatic cancer. Abdom Imaging 36(2):179–184. doi:10.1007/s00261-010-9633-5 CrossRefPubMed Holzapfel K, Reiser-Erkan C, Fingerle AA, et al. (2011) Comparison of diffusion-weighted MR imaging and multidetector-row CT in the detection of liver metastases in patients operated for pancreatic cancer. Abdom Imaging 36(2):179–184. doi:10.​1007/​s00261-010-9633-5 CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Rosa F, Meimarakis G, Stahl A, et al. (2004) Colorectal cancer patients before resection of hepatic metastases. Impact of (18)F-FDG PET on detecting extrahepatic disease. Nuklearmedizin. Nucl Med 43(4):135–140. doi:10.1267/NUKL04040135 Rosa F, Meimarakis G, Stahl A, et al. (2004) Colorectal cancer patients before resection of hepatic metastases. Impact of (18)F-FDG PET on detecting extrahepatic disease. Nuklearmedizin. Nucl Med 43(4):135–140. doi:10.​1267/​NUKL04040135
25.
go back to reference Seo HJ, Kim MJ, Lee JD, Chung WS, Kim YE (2011) Gadoxetate disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging versus contrast-enhanced 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for the detection of colorectal liver metastases. Invest Radiol 46(9):548–555. doi:10.1097/RLI.0b013e31821a2163 CrossRefPubMed Seo HJ, Kim MJ, Lee JD, Chung WS, Kim YE (2011) Gadoxetate disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging versus contrast-enhanced 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for the detection of colorectal liver metastases. Invest Radiol 46(9):548–555. doi:10.​1097/​RLI.​0b013e31821a2163​ CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Bartolozzi C, Cioni D, Donati F, Lencioni R (2001) Focal liver lesions: MR imaging-pathologic correlation. Eur Radiol 11(8):1374–1388CrossRefPubMed Bartolozzi C, Cioni D, Donati F, Lencioni R (2001) Focal liver lesions: MR imaging-pathologic correlation. Eur Radiol 11(8):1374–1388CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Horton KM, Bluemke DA, Hruban RH, Soyer P, Fishman EK (1999) CT and MR imaging of benign hepatic and biliary tumors. Radiographics 19(2):431–451CrossRefPubMed Horton KM, Bluemke DA, Hruban RH, Soyer P, Fishman EK (1999) CT and MR imaging of benign hepatic and biliary tumors. Radiographics 19(2):431–451CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Semelka RC, Brown ED, Ascher SM, et al. (1994) Hepatic hemangiomas: a multi-institutional study of appearance on T2-weighted and serial gadolinium-enhanced gradient-echo MR images. Radiology 192(2):401–406CrossRefPubMed Semelka RC, Brown ED, Ascher SM, et al. (1994) Hepatic hemangiomas: a multi-institutional study of appearance on T2-weighted and serial gadolinium-enhanced gradient-echo MR images. Radiology 192(2):401–406CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Couinaud C (1954) Lobes et segments hepatiques: notes sur l’architecture anatomiques et chirurgicale du foie. Presse Med 62(33):709–712PubMed Couinaud C (1954) Lobes et segments hepatiques: notes sur l’architecture anatomiques et chirurgicale du foie. Presse Med 62(33):709–712PubMed
30.
go back to reference Cohen J (1968) Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychol Bull 70(4):213–220CrossRefPubMed Cohen J (1968) Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychol Bull 70(4):213–220CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Coenegrachts K, De Geeter F, ter Beek L, et al. (2009) Comparison of MRI (including SS SE-EPI and SPIO-enhanced MRI) and FDG-PET/CT for the detection of colorectal liver metastases. Eur Radiol 19(2):370–379. doi:10.1007/s00330-008-1163-y CrossRefPubMed Coenegrachts K, De Geeter F, ter Beek L, et al. (2009) Comparison of MRI (including SS SE-EPI and SPIO-enhanced MRI) and FDG-PET/CT for the detection of colorectal liver metastases. Eur Radiol 19(2):370–379. doi:10.​1007/​s00330-008-1163-y CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Holzapfel K, Eiber MJ, Fingerle AA, et al. (2012) Detection, classification, and characterization of focal liver lesions: value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging, gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging and the combination of both methods. Abdom Imaging 37(1):74–82. doi:10.1007/s00261-011-9758-1 CrossRefPubMed Holzapfel K, Eiber MJ, Fingerle AA, et al. (2012) Detection, classification, and characterization of focal liver lesions: value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging, gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging and the combination of both methods. Abdom Imaging 37(1):74–82. doi:10.​1007/​s00261-011-9758-1 CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Detection of liver metastases in patients with adenocarcinomas of the gastrointestinal tract: comparison of 18F-FDG PET/CT and MR imaging
Authors
Christian Maegerlein
Alexander A. Fingerle
Michael Souvatzoglou
Ernst J. Rummeny
Konstantin Holzapfel
Publication date
01-06-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Abdominal Radiology / Issue 5/2015
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Electronic ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-014-0283-x

Other articles of this Issue 5/2015

Abdominal Radiology 5/2015 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.