Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Abdominal Radiology
Published in: Abdominal Radiology 5/2015

01-06-2015

Half-dose non-contrast CT in the investigation of urolithiasis: image quality improvement with third-generation integrated circuit CT detectors

Authors: Jun Wang, Tony Kang, Chesnal Arepalli, Sarah Barrett, Tim O’Connell, Luck Louis, Savvakis Nicolaou, Patrick McLaughlin

Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 5/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The objective of this study is to establish the effect of third-generation integrated circuit (IC) CT detector on objective image quality in full- and half-dose non-contrast CT of the urinary tract.

Methods

51 consecutive patients with acute renal colic underwent non-contrast CT of the urinary tract using a 128-slice dual-source CT before (n = 24) and after (n = 27) the installation of third-generation IC detectors. Half-dose images were generated using projections from detector A using the dual-source RAW data. Objective image noise in the liver, spleen, right renal cortex, and right psoas muscle was compared between DC and IC cohorts for full-dose and half-dose images reconstructed with FBP and IR algorithms using 1 cm2 regions of interest. Presence and size of obstructing ureteric calculi were also compared for full-dose and half-dose reconstructions using DC and IC detectors.

Results

No statistical difference in age and lateral body size was found between patients in the IC and DC cohorts. Radiation dose, as measured by size-specific dose estimates, did not differ significantly either between the two cohorts (10.02 ± 4.54 mGy IC vs. 12.28 ± 7.03 mGy DC). At full dose, objective image noise was not significantly lower in the IC cohort as compared to the DC cohort for the liver, spleen, and right psoas muscle. At half dose, objective image noise was lower in the IC cohort as compared to DC cohort at the liver (21.32 IC vs. 24.99 DC, 14.7% decrease, p < 0.001), spleen (19.33 IC vs. 20.83 DC, 7.20% decrease, p = 0.02), and right renal cortex (20.28 IC vs. 22.98 DC, 11.7% decrease, p = 0.005). Mean obstructing ureteric calculi size was not significantly different when comparison was made between full-dose and half-dose images, regardless of detector type (p > 0.05 for all comparisons).

Conclusions

Third-generation IC detectors result in lower objective image noise at full- and half-radiation dose levels as compared with traditional DC detectors. The magnitude of noise reduction was greater at half-radiation dose indicating that the benefits of using novel IC detectors are greater in low and ultra-low-dose CT imaging.
Literature
1.
Smith RC, Rosenfield AT, Choe KA, et al. (1995) Acute flank pain: comparison of non-contrast-enhanced CT and intravenous urography. Radiology 194(3):789–794CrossRefPubMed
2.
Miller OF, Rineer SK, Reichard SR, et al. (1998) Prospective comparison of unenhanced spiral computed tomography and intravenous urogram in the evaluation of acute flank pain. Urology 52(6):982–987CrossRefPubMed
3.
Teichman JMH (2004) Clinical practice. Acute renal colic from ureteral calculus. N Engl J Med 350(7):684–693PubMed
4.
Segura JW, Preminger GM, Assimos DG, et al. (1997) Ureteral stones clinical guidelines panel summary report on the management of ureteral calculi. The American Urological Association. J Urol 158(5):1915–1921PubMed
5.
Coll DM, Varanelli MJ, Smith RC (2002) Relationship of spontaneous passage of ureteral calculi to stone size and location as revealed by unenhanced helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178(1):101–103PubMed
6.
Sierakowski R, Finlayson B, Landes RR, Finlayson CD, Sierakowski N (1978) The frequency of urolithiasis in hospital discharge diagnoses in the United States. Invest Urol 15(6):438–441PubMed
7.
Curhan GC, Willett WC, Rimm EB, Stampfer MJ (1997) Family history and risk of kidney stones. J Am Soc Nephrol JASN 8(10):1568–1573
8.
Romero V, Akpinar H, Assimos DG (2010) Kidney stones: a global picture of prevalence, incidence, and associated risk factors. Rev Urol 12(2–3):e86–e96PubMedCentralPubMed
9.
Liu W, Esler SJ, Kenny BJ, et al. (2000) Low-dose nonenhanced helical CT of renal colic: assessment of ureteric stone detection and measurement of effective dose equivalent. Radiology 215(1):51–54CrossRefPubMed
10.
Heneghan JP, McGuire KA, Leder RA, et al. (2003) Helical CT for nephrolithiasis and ureterolithiasis: comparison of conventional and reduced radiation-dose techniques. Radiology 229(2):575–580CrossRefPubMed
11.
Mulkens TH, Daineffe S, De Wijngaert R, et al. (2007) Urinary stone disease: comparison of standard-dose and low-dose with 4D MDCT tube current modulation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188(2):553–562PubMed
12.
Tartari S, Rizzati R, Righi R, et al. (2010) Low-dose unenhanced CT protocols according to individual body size for evaluating suspected renal colic: cumulative radiation exposures. Radiol Med (Torino) 115(1):105–114
13.
Meagher T, Sukumar VP, Collingwood J, et al. (2001) Low dose computed tomography in suspected acute renal colic. Clin Radiol 56(11):873–876PubMed
14.
Hamm M, Knopfle E, Wartenberg S, et al. (2002) Low dose unenhanced helical computerized tomography for the evaluation of acute flank pain. J Urol 167(4):1687–1691PubMed
15.
Tack D, Sourtzis S, Delpierre I, de Maertelaer V, Gevenois PA (2003) Low-dose unenhanced multidetector CT of patients with suspected renal colic. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180(2):305–311PubMed
16.
Katz DS, Venkataramanan N, Napel S, Sommer FG (2003) Can low-dose unenhanced multidetector CT be used for routine evaluation of suspected renal colic? AJR Am J Roentgenol 180(2):313–315PubMed
17.
Kluner C, Hein PA, Gralla O, et al. (2006) Does ultra-low-dose CT with a radiation dose equivalent to that of KUB suffice to detect renal and ureteral calculi? J Comput Assist Tomogr 30(1):44–50PubMed
18.
Kim BS, Hwang IK, Choi YW, et al. (2005) Low-dose and standard-dose unenhanced helical computed tomography for the assessment of acute renal colic: prospective comparative study. Acta Radiol 46(7):756–763PubMed
19.
20.
Winklehner A, Blume I, Winklhofer S, et al. (2013) Iterative reconstructions vs. filtered back-projection for urinary stone detection in low-dose CT. Acad Radiol 20(11):1429–1435PubMed
21.
Kulkarni NM, Uppot RN, Eisner BH, Sahani DV (2012) Radiation dose reduction at multidetector CT with adaptive statistical IR for evaluation of urolithiasis: how low can we go? Radiology 265(1):158–166CrossRefPubMed
22.
Ulzheimer S, Freund J (2012) The Stellar Detector. CA: White Pap Siemens Healthc
23.
Fletcher JG, Grant KLR, Fidler JL, et al. (2012) Validation of dual-source single-tube reconstruction as a method to obtain half-dose images to evaluate radiation dose and noise reduction: phantom and human assessment using CT colonography and sinogram-affirmed IR (SAFIRE). J Comput Assist Tomogr 36(5):560–569PubMed
24.
Spielmann AL, Heneghan JP, Lee LJ, Yoshizumi T, Nelson RC (2002) Decreasing the radiation dose for renal stone CT: a feasibility study of single- and multidetector CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178(5):1058–1062PubMed
25.
Tublin ME, Murphy ME, Delong DM, Tessler FN, Kliewer MA (2002) Conspicuity of renal calculi at unenhanced CT: effects of calculus composition and size and CT technique. Radiology 225(1):91–96CrossRefPubMed
26.
Kalra MK, Maher MM, D’Souza RV, et al. (2005) Detection of urinary tract stones at low-radiation-dose CT with z-axis automatic tube current modulation: phantom and clinical studies. Radiology 235(2):523–529CrossRefPubMed
27.
Ciaschini MW, Remer EM, Baker ME, Lieber M, Herts BR (2009) Urinary calculi: radiation dose reduction of 50% and 75% at CT–effect on sensitivity. Radiology 251(1):105–111CrossRefPubMed
28.
Karmazyn B, Frush DP, Applegate KE, et al. (2009) CT with a computer-simulated dose reduction technique for detection of pediatric nephroureterolithiasis: comparison of standard and reduced radiation doses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192(1):143–149PubMed
29.
Jin DH, Lamberton GR, Broome DR, et al. (2010) Effect of reduced radiation CT protocols on the detection of renal calculi. Radiology 255(1):100–107CrossRefPubMed
30.
Sohn W, Clayman RV, Lee JY, Cohen A, Mucksavage P (2013) Low-dose and standard computed tomography scans yield equivalent stone measurements. Urology 81(2):231–234CrossRefPubMed
31.
Lidén M, Andersson T, Broxvall M, Thunberg P, Geijer H (2012) Urinary stone size estimation: a new segmentation algorithm-based CT method. Eur Radiol 22(4):731–737PubMed
32.
33.
Furlan A, Federle MP, Yealy DM, Averch TD, Pealer K (2008) Nonobstructing renal stones on unenhanced CT: a real cause for renal colic? AJR Am J Roentgenol 190(2):W125–W127PubMed
34.
Morsbach F, Bickelhaupt S, Rätzer S, Schmidt B, Alkadhi H (2014) Integrated Circuit Detector Technology in Abdominal CT: Added Value in Obese Patients. Am J Roentgenol 202(2):368–374
Metadata
Title
Half-dose non-contrast CT in the investigation of urolithiasis: image quality improvement with third-generation integrated circuit CT detectors
Authors
Jun Wang
Tony Kang
Chesnal Arepalli
Sarah Barrett
Tim O’Connell
Luck Louis
Savvakis Nicolaou
Patrick McLaughlin
Publication date
01-06-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Abdominal Radiology / Issue 5/2015
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Electronic ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-014-0264-0

Other articles of this Issue 5/2015

Abdominal Radiology 5/2015 Go to the issue

OriginalPaper

Multi-detector CT of blunt mesenteric injuries: usefulness of imaging findings for predicting surgically significant bowel injuries

OriginalPaper

Accuracy and radiation dose reduction of a limited abdominopelvic CT in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis

OriginalPaper

Identifying decreased peristalsis of abnormal small bowel segments in Crohn’s disease using cine MR enterography: the frozen bowel sign

Pictorial Essay

Primary mesenchymal liver tumors: radiological spectrum, differential diagnosis, and pathologic correlation

OriginalPaper

Computer-aided liver volumetry: performance of a fully-automated, prototype post-processing solution for whole-organ and lobar segmentation based on MDCT imaging

OriginalPaper

MR enterography in Crohn’s disease: current consensus on optimal imaging technique and future advances from the SAR Crohn’s disease-focused panel
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Reserve your place

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

Read more

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine
Image Credits