Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Abdominal Radiology 5/2010

01-10-2010

Comparison of CT colonography vs. conventional colonoscopy in mapping the segmental location of colon cancer before surgery

Authors: Emanuele Neri, Francesca Turini, Francesca Cerri, Lorenzo Faggioni, Paola Vagli, Gabriele Naldini, Carlo Bartolozzi

Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 5/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Once presence of a colorectal cancer has been diagnosed, a key factor for patient's prognosis in view of surgical intervention is the correct segmental localization and resection of the tumor. The aim of this work was to compare the accuracy of the current gold standard technique, conventional colonoscopy (CC), to computed tomography colonography (CTC) in the segmental localization of tumor. Sixty-five patients (mean age 64; 45 female and 19 male) with colorectal cancer diagnosed at colonoscopy underwent CTC before surgery. In 45 out of 65 cases (69%), patients were referred to CTC after incomplete CC. Reasons were patient intolerance to CC or presence of stenosing cancer, with consistent difficulties in crossing the tract of the colon involved by the lesion. CTC allowed the complete colonic examination in 63/65 cases, since in 2 patients with an obstructing lesion of the sigmoid colon, pneumocolon could not be obtained. However, per patient and per lesion sensitivity of CTC was 100%. Difference from colonoscopy was statistically significant (P < 0.05). In terms of segmental localization of masses, CTC located precisely all lesions, while colonoscopy failed in 16/67 (24%) lesions, though six were missed for incomplete colonoscopy (9%). In the remaining 10/67 (15%) lesions, detected by colonoscopy but incorrectly located, the mismatch occurred in the rectum (n = 3), sigmoid (n = 2), descending (n = 1), transverse (n = 2), ascending colon, and cecum. Agreement between CTC and CC was fair (k value 0.62). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of CTC in determining the precise location of colonic masses were respectively 100%, 96%, 85%, and 100%. CT detected hepatic (6/65 patients) and lung metastases (3/65 patients). CT colonography has better performance in the identification of colonic masses (diameter > 3 cm), in the completion of colonic evaluation and in the segmental localization of tumor. CTC should replace colonoscopy for preoperative staging of colorectal cancer.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Longo WE, Johnson FE (2002) The preoperative assessment and postoperative surveillance of patients with colon and rectal cancer. Surg Clin North Am 82(5):1091–1108CrossRefPubMed Longo WE, Johnson FE (2002) The preoperative assessment and postoperative surveillance of patients with colon and rectal cancer. Surg Clin North Am 82(5):1091–1108CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Dekker E, van Gulik T (2005) Colorectal cancer: what the clinician wants to know. Cancer Imaging 5(Spec No A):S127–S132CrossRefPubMed Dekker E, van Gulik T (2005) Colorectal cancer: what the clinician wants to know. Cancer Imaging 5(Spec No A):S127–S132CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Nesbitt C, Glendinning RJ, Byrne C, Poston GJ (2007) Factors that influence treatment strategies in advanced colorectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 33(Suppl 2):S88–S94PubMed Nesbitt C, Glendinning RJ, Byrne C, Poston GJ (2007) Factors that influence treatment strategies in advanced colorectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 33(Suppl 2):S88–S94PubMed
4.
go back to reference Sjo OH, Lunde OC, Nygaard K, Sandvik L, Nesbakken A (2008) Tumour location is a prognostic factor for survival in colonic cancer patients. Colorectal Dis 10(1):33–40PubMed Sjo OH, Lunde OC, Nygaard K, Sandvik L, Nesbakken A (2008) Tumour location is a prognostic factor for survival in colonic cancer patients. Colorectal Dis 10(1):33–40PubMed
5.
go back to reference Kimura T, Iwagaki H, Fuchimoto S, Hizuta A, Orita K (1994) Synchronous colorectal carcinomas. Hepatogastroenterology 41(5):409–412PubMed Kimura T, Iwagaki H, Fuchimoto S, Hizuta A, Orita K (1994) Synchronous colorectal carcinomas. Hepatogastroenterology 41(5):409–412PubMed
6.
go back to reference Tate JJ, Rawlinson J, Royle GT, Brunton FJ, Taylor I (1988) Pre-operative or postoperative colonic examination for synchronous lesions in colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 75(10):1016–1018CrossRefPubMed Tate JJ, Rawlinson J, Royle GT, Brunton FJ, Taylor I (1988) Pre-operative or postoperative colonic examination for synchronous lesions in colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 75(10):1016–1018CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Isabel-Martinez L, Chapman AH, Hall RI (1988) The value of a barium enema in the investigation of patients with rectal carcinoma. Clin Radiol 39(5):531–533CrossRefPubMed Isabel-Martinez L, Chapman AH, Hall RI (1988) The value of a barium enema in the investigation of patients with rectal carcinoma. Clin Radiol 39(5):531–533CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Larach SW, et al. (1997) Complications of laparoscopic colorectal surgery: analysis and comparison of early vs latter experience. Dis Colon Rectum 40:592–596CrossRefPubMed Larach SW, et al. (1997) Complications of laparoscopic colorectal surgery: analysis and comparison of early vs latter experience. Dis Colon Rectum 40:592–596CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Vignati P, Welch JP, Cohen JL (1994) Endoscopic localization of colon cancers. Surg Endosc 8(9):1085–1087CrossRefPubMed Vignati P, Welch JP, Cohen JL (1994) Endoscopic localization of colon cancers. Surg Endosc 8(9):1085–1087CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Piscatelli N, Hyman N, Osler T (2005) Localizing colorectal cancer by colonoscopy. Arch Surg 140(10):932–935CrossRefPubMed Piscatelli N, Hyman N, Osler T (2005) Localizing colorectal cancer by colonoscopy. Arch Surg 140(10):932–935CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Kim SH, Milsom JW, Church JM, et al. (1997) Perioperative tumor localization for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 11(10):1013–1016CrossRefPubMed Kim SH, Milsom JW, Church JM, et al. (1997) Perioperative tumor localization for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 11(10):1013–1016CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Frager DH, Frager JD, Wolf EL, Beneventano TC (1987) Problems in the colonoscopic localization of tumors: continued value of the barium enema. Gastrointest Radiol 12(4):343–346CrossRefPubMed Frager DH, Frager JD, Wolf EL, Beneventano TC (1987) Problems in the colonoscopic localization of tumors: continued value of the barium enema. Gastrointest Radiol 12(4):343–346CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Hilliard G, Ramming K, Thompson J Jr, Passaro E Jr (1990) The elusive colonic malignancy. A need for definitive preoperative localization. Am Surg 56(12):742–744PubMed Hilliard G, Ramming K, Thompson J Jr, Passaro E Jr (1990) The elusive colonic malignancy. A need for definitive preoperative localization. Am Surg 56(12):742–744PubMed
14.
go back to reference Otchy D, Hyman NH, Simmang C, et al. (2004) Practice parameters for colon cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 47(8):1269–1284CrossRefPubMed Otchy D, Hyman NH, Simmang C, et al. (2004) Practice parameters for colon cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 47(8):1269–1284CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Copel L, Sosna J, Kruskal JB, et al. (2007) CT colonography in 546 patients with incomplete colonoscopy. Radiology 244(2):471–478CrossRefPubMed Copel L, Sosna J, Kruskal JB, et al. (2007) CT colonography in 546 patients with incomplete colonoscopy. Radiology 244(2):471–478CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Neri E, Giusti P, Battolla L, et al. (2002) Colorectal cancer: role of CT colonography in preoperative evaluation after incomplete colonoscopy. Radiology 223(3):615–619CrossRefPubMed Neri E, Giusti P, Battolla L, et al. (2002) Colorectal cancer: role of CT colonography in preoperative evaluation after incomplete colonoscopy. Radiology 223(3):615–619CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Fenlon HM, McAneny DB, Nunes DP, Clarke PD, Ferrucci JT (1999) Occlusive colon carcinoma: virtual colonoscopy in the preoperative evaluation of the proximal colon. Radiology 210(2):423–428PubMed Fenlon HM, McAneny DB, Nunes DP, Clarke PD, Ferrucci JT (1999) Occlusive colon carcinoma: virtual colonoscopy in the preoperative evaluation of the proximal colon. Radiology 210(2):423–428PubMed
18.
go back to reference Taylor SA, Halligan S, Burling D, Bassett P, Bartram CI (2005) Intra-individual comparison of patient acceptability of multidetector-row CT colonography and double-contrast barium enema. Clin Radiol 60(2):207–214CrossRefPubMed Taylor SA, Halligan S, Burling D, Bassett P, Bartram CI (2005) Intra-individual comparison of patient acceptability of multidetector-row CT colonography and double-contrast barium enema. Clin Radiol 60(2):207–214CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Gluecker TM, Johnson CD, Harmsen WS, et al. (2003) Colorectal cancer screening with CT colonography, colonoscopy, and double-contrast barium enema examination: prospective assessment of patient perceptions and preferences. Radiology 227(2):378–384CrossRefPubMed Gluecker TM, Johnson CD, Harmsen WS, et al. (2003) Colorectal cancer screening with CT colonography, colonoscopy, and double-contrast barium enema examination: prospective assessment of patient perceptions and preferences. Radiology 227(2):378–384CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Rockey DC, et al. (2005) Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy: prospective comparison. Lancet 365(9456):305–311PubMed Rockey DC, et al. (2005) Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy: prospective comparison. Lancet 365(9456):305–311PubMed
21.
go back to reference Johnson CD, MacCarty RL, Welch TJ, et al. (2004) Comparison of the relative sensitivity of CT colonography and double-contrast barium enema for screen detection of colorectal polyps. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2(4):314–321CrossRefPubMed Johnson CD, MacCarty RL, Welch TJ, et al. (2004) Comparison of the relative sensitivity of CT colonography and double-contrast barium enema for screen detection of colorectal polyps. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2(4):314–321CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Zalis ME, Barish MA, Choi JR, et al. (2005) CT colonography reporting and data system: a consensus proposal. Radiology 236:3–9CrossRefPubMed Zalis ME, Barish MA, Choi JR, et al. (2005) CT colonography reporting and data system: a consensus proposal. Radiology 236:3–9CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Otchy D, Hyman NH, Simmang C, et al. (2004) Practice parameters for colon cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1268–1284CrossRef Otchy D, Hyman NH, Simmang C, et al. (2004) Practice parameters for colon cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1268–1284CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Pawlik TM, Scoggins CR, Zorzi D, et al. (2005) Effect of surgical margin status on survival and site of recurrence after hepatic resection for colorectal metastases. Ann Surg 241(5):715–722 (discussion 722–4)CrossRefPubMed Pawlik TM, Scoggins CR, Zorzi D, et al. (2005) Effect of surgical margin status on survival and site of recurrence after hepatic resection for colorectal metastases. Ann Surg 241(5):715–722 (discussion 722–4)CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Kirchgatterer A, Steiner P, Hubner D, et al. (2005) Colorectal cancer in geriatric patients: endoscopic diagnosis and surgical treatment. World J Gastroenterol 11(3):315–318PubMed Kirchgatterer A, Steiner P, Hubner D, et al. (2005) Colorectal cancer in geriatric patients: endoscopic diagnosis and surgical treatment. World J Gastroenterol 11(3):315–318PubMed
26.
go back to reference Oliva MR, Saini S (2004) Liver cancer imaging: role of CT, MRI, US and PET. Cancer Imaging 4 Spec No A:S42–S46 Oliva MR, Saini S (2004) Liver cancer imaging: role of CT, MRI, US and PET. Cancer Imaging 4 Spec No A:S42–S46
27.
go back to reference Agrawal N, Fowler AL, Thomas MG (2006) The routine use of intra-operative ultrasound in patients with colorectal cancer improves the detection of hepatic metastases. Colorectal Dis 8(3):192–194CrossRefPubMed Agrawal N, Fowler AL, Thomas MG (2006) The routine use of intra-operative ultrasound in patients with colorectal cancer improves the detection of hepatic metastases. Colorectal Dis 8(3):192–194CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Hough DM, Malone DE, Rawlinson J, et al. (1994) Colon cancer detection: an algorithm using endoscopy and barium enema. Clin Radiol 49(3):170–175CrossRefPubMed Hough DM, Malone DE, Rawlinson J, et al. (1994) Colon cancer detection: an algorithm using endoscopy and barium enema. Clin Radiol 49(3):170–175CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference AGA Clinical Practice Economics Committee (2006) Position of the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Institute on computed tomographic colonography. Gastroenterology 131(5):1627–1628CrossRef AGA Clinical Practice Economics Committee (2006) Position of the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Institute on computed tomographic colonography. Gastroenterology 131(5):1627–1628CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Cass OW, Freeman ML, Peine CJ, Zera RT, Onstad GR (1993) Objective evaluation of endoscopy skills during training. Ann Intern Med 118(1):40–44PubMed Cass OW, Freeman ML, Peine CJ, Zera RT, Onstad GR (1993) Objective evaluation of endoscopy skills during training. Ann Intern Med 118(1):40–44PubMed
31.
go back to reference Wexner SD, Garbus JE, Singh JJ, SAGES Colonoscopy Study Outcomes Group (2001) A prospective analysis of 13,580 colonoscopies. Reevaluation of credentialing guidelines. Surg Endosc 15(3):251–261CrossRefPubMed Wexner SD, Garbus JE, Singh JJ, SAGES Colonoscopy Study Outcomes Group (2001) A prospective analysis of 13,580 colonoscopies. Reevaluation of credentialing guidelines. Surg Endosc 15(3):251–261CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Comparison of CT colonography vs. conventional colonoscopy in mapping the segmental location of colon cancer before surgery
Authors
Emanuele Neri
Francesca Turini
Francesca Cerri
Lorenzo Faggioni
Paola Vagli
Gabriele Naldini
Carlo Bartolozzi
Publication date
01-10-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Abdominal Radiology / Issue 5/2010
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Electronic ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-009-9570-3

Other articles of this Issue 5/2010

Abdominal Radiology 5/2010 Go to the issue