Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Abdominal Radiology 1/2009

01-01-2009

Location of the transition zone in CT of small-bowel obstruction: added value of multiplanar reformations

Authors: Jerome Hodel, Marc Zins, Loic Desmottes, Isabelle Boulay-Coletta, Marie Christine Jullès, Jean Pierre Nakache, Mathieu Rodallec

Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 1/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the additional value of multiplanar reformations (MPR) in comparison with axial images alone for location of the transition zone in CT of mechanical small-bowel obstruction (SBO).

Materials and methods

Sixty-nine consecutive patients with mechanical SBO underwent 16-slice multi detector row CT (MDCT). The gold standard for the precise location of the transition zone was established by two experienced abdominal radiologists, unblinded to clinical and surgical reports, reviewing all CT examinations. On a workstation, two blinded readers independently located the transition zone using first axial slices alone and then 1 month later MPR (axial, coronal, sagittal and oblique views) according to a three-point confidence scale. Diagnostic accuracy and mean confidence score were evaluated for both the transverse and multiplanar data sets.

Results

Accuracy of transition zone location for reader 1 and reader 2 was 86% and 84% with axial slices alone, and by using MPR 93% (significant: P = 0.03) and 90% (not significant: P = 0.08), respectively. Mean confidence score was significantly increased for both readers using MPR: 0.3 higher (P = 0.0001) and 0.37 higher (P = 0.0001) respectively.

Conclusion

MPR can increase both accuracy and confidence in the location of the transition zone in CT of SBO.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Balthazar EJ, George W (1994) Holmes Lecture CT of SBO. AJR Am J Roentgenol 162:255–261PubMed Balthazar EJ, George W (1994) Holmes Lecture CT of SBO. AJR Am J Roentgenol 162:255–261PubMed
2.
go back to reference Megibow AJ, Balthazar EJ, Cho KC, et al. (1991) Bowel obstruction: evaluation with CT. Radiology 180:313–318PubMed Megibow AJ, Balthazar EJ, Cho KC, et al. (1991) Bowel obstruction: evaluation with CT. Radiology 180:313–318PubMed
3.
go back to reference Taourel PG, Fabre JM, Pradel JA, et al. (1995) Value of CT in the diagnosis and management of patients with suspected acute SBO. AJR Am J Roentgenol 165:1187–1192PubMed Taourel PG, Fabre JM, Pradel JA, et al. (1995) Value of CT in the diagnosis and management of patients with suspected acute SBO. AJR Am J Roentgenol 165:1187–1192PubMed
4.
go back to reference Boudiaf M, Soyer P, Terem C, et al. (2001) CT evaluation of SBO. Radiographics 21:613–624PubMed Boudiaf M, Soyer P, Terem C, et al. (2001) CT evaluation of SBO. Radiographics 21:613–624PubMed
5.
go back to reference Frager D, Medwid SW, Baer JW, et al. (1994) CT of SBO: value in establishing the diagnosis and determining the degree and cause. AJR Am J Roentgenol 162:37–41PubMed Frager D, Medwid SW, Baer JW, et al. (1994) CT of SBO: value in establishing the diagnosis and determining the degree and cause. AJR Am J Roentgenol 162:37–41PubMed
6.
go back to reference Maglinte DD, Kelvin FM, Rowe MG, et al. (2001) SBO: optimizing radiologic investigation and nonsurgical management. Radiology 218:39–46PubMed Maglinte DD, Kelvin FM, Rowe MG, et al. (2001) SBO: optimizing radiologic investigation and nonsurgical management. Radiology 218:39–46PubMed
7.
go back to reference Donckier V, Closset J, Van Gansbeke D, et al. (1998) Contribution of computed tomography to decision making in the management of adhesive SBO. Br J Surg 85:1071–1074PubMedCrossRef Donckier V, Closset J, Van Gansbeke D, et al. (1998) Contribution of computed tomography to decision making in the management of adhesive SBO. Br J Surg 85:1071–1074PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Daneshmand S, Hedley CG, Stain SC. (1999) The utility and reliability of computed tomography scan in the diagnosis of SBO. Am Surg 65:922–926PubMed Daneshmand S, Hedley CG, Stain SC. (1999) The utility and reliability of computed tomography scan in the diagnosis of SBO. Am Surg 65:922–926PubMed
9.
go back to reference Lazarus DE, Slywotsky C, Bennett GL, et al. (2004) Frequency and relevance of the “small-bowel feces” sign on CT in patients with SBO. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183:1361–1366PubMed Lazarus DE, Slywotsky C, Bennett GL, et al. (2004) Frequency and relevance of the “small-bowel feces” sign on CT in patients with SBO. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183:1361–1366PubMed
10.
go back to reference Jaffe TA, Nelson RC, Johnson GA, et al. (2006) Optimization of MPR from isotropic data sets acquired with 16-detector row helical CT scanner. Radiology 238:292–299PubMedCrossRef Jaffe TA, Nelson RC, Johnson GA, et al. (2006) Optimization of MPR from isotropic data sets acquired with 16-detector row helical CT scanner. Radiology 238:292–299PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Khurana B, Ledbetter S, McTavish J, et al. (2002) Bowel obstruction revealed by multidetector CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178:1139–1144PubMed Khurana B, Ledbetter S, McTavish J, et al. (2002) Bowel obstruction revealed by multidetector CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178:1139–1144PubMed
12.
go back to reference Furukawa A, Yamasaki M, Furuichi K (2001) Helical CT in the diagnosis of SBO. Radiographics 21:341–355PubMed Furukawa A, Yamasaki M, Furuichi K (2001) Helical CT in the diagnosis of SBO. Radiographics 21:341–355PubMed
13.
go back to reference Jaffe TA, Martin LC, Thomas J, et al. (2006) Small-bowel obstruction: coronal reformations from isotropic voxels at 16-section MDCT. Radiology 238:135–142PubMedCrossRef Jaffe TA, Martin LC, Thomas J, et al. (2006) Small-bowel obstruction: coronal reformations from isotropic voxels at 16-section MDCT. Radiology 238:135–142PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Frager DH, Baer JW, Rothpearl A, et al. (1995) Distinction between postoperative ileus and mechanical SBO: value of CT compared with clinical and other radiographic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 164:891–894PubMed Frager DH, Baer JW, Rothpearl A, et al. (1995) Distinction between postoperative ileus and mechanical SBO: value of CT compared with clinical and other radiographic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 164:891–894PubMed
15.
go back to reference Rydberg J, Buckwalter KA, Caldemeyer KS, et al. (2000) Multisection CT: scanning techniques and clinical applications. Radiographics 20:1787–1806PubMed Rydberg J, Buckwalter KA, Caldemeyer KS, et al. (2000) Multisection CT: scanning techniques and clinical applications. Radiographics 20:1787–1806PubMed
16.
go back to reference Dewey M, Lembcke A, Enzweiler C, et al. (2004) Isotropic half-millimeter angiography of coronary artery bypass grafts with 16-slice computed tomography. Ann Thorac Surg 77:800–804PubMedCrossRef Dewey M, Lembcke A, Enzweiler C, et al. (2004) Isotropic half-millimeter angiography of coronary artery bypass grafts with 16-slice computed tomography. Ann Thorac Surg 77:800–804PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Kopp AF, Küttner A, Trabold T, et al. (2004) Multislice CT in cardiac and coronary angiography. Br J Radiol 77:S87–S97PubMedCrossRef Kopp AF, Küttner A, Trabold T, et al. (2004) Multislice CT in cardiac and coronary angiography. Br J Radiol 77:S87–S97PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Honda O, Johkoh T, Yamamoto S, et al. (2002) Comparison of quality of multiplanar reconstructions and direct coronal multidetector CT scans of the lungs. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:875–879PubMed Honda O, Johkoh T, Yamamoto S, et al. (2002) Comparison of quality of multiplanar reconstructions and direct coronal multidetector CT scans of the lungs. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:875–879PubMed
19.
go back to reference Philipp MO, Kubin K, Mang T, et al. (2003) Three-dimensional volume rendering of multidetector-row CT data: applicable for emergency radiology. Eur J Radiol 48:33–38PubMedCrossRef Philipp MO, Kubin K, Mang T, et al. (2003) Three-dimensional volume rendering of multidetector-row CT data: applicable for emergency radiology. Eur J Radiol 48:33–38PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Prokesch RW, Chow LC, Beaulieu CF, et al. (2002) Local staging of pancreatic carcinoma with MDCT: use of curved planar reformations-initial experience. Radiology 225:759–765PubMedCrossRef Prokesch RW, Chow LC, Beaulieu CF, et al. (2002) Local staging of pancreatic carcinoma with MDCT: use of curved planar reformations-initial experience. Radiology 225:759–765PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Kim HJ, Kim AY, Oh ST, et al. (2005) Gastric cancer staging at MDCT gastrography: comparison of transverse and volumetric CT scanning. Radiology 236:879–885PubMedCrossRef Kim HJ, Kim AY, Oh ST, et al. (2005) Gastric cancer staging at MDCT gastrography: comparison of transverse and volumetric CT scanning. Radiology 236:879–885PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Paulson EK, Harris JP, Jaffe TA, Haugan PA, Nelson RC (2005) Acute appendicitis: added diagnostic value of coronal reformations from isotropic voxels at MDCT. Radiology 235:879–885PubMedCrossRef Paulson EK, Harris JP, Jaffe TA, Haugan PA, Nelson RC (2005) Acute appendicitis: added diagnostic value of coronal reformations from isotropic voxels at MDCT. Radiology 235:879–885PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Yaghmai V, Nikolaidis P, Hammond NA, Petrovic B, Gore RM, Miller FH (2006) Multidetector-row computed tomography diagnosis of small bowel obstruction: can coronal reformations replace axial images? Emerg Radiol 13(2):69–72PubMedCrossRef Yaghmai V, Nikolaidis P, Hammond NA, Petrovic B, Gore RM, Miller FH (2006) Multidetector-row computed tomography diagnosis of small bowel obstruction: can coronal reformations replace axial images? Emerg Radiol 13(2):69–72PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Location of the transition zone in CT of small-bowel obstruction: added value of multiplanar reformations
Authors
Jerome Hodel
Marc Zins
Loic Desmottes
Isabelle Boulay-Coletta
Marie Christine Jullès
Jean Pierre Nakache
Mathieu Rodallec
Publication date
01-01-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Abdominal Radiology / Issue 1/2009
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Electronic ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-007-9348-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2009

Abdominal Radiology 1/2009 Go to the issue