Skip to main content
Top

01-08-2006 | Editorial

Putting ‘clear’ into nuclear medicine: a decade of PET/CT development

Authors: Thomas Beyer, David W. Townsend

Published in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging | Issue 8/2006

Login to get access

Excerpt

Combining data from different imaging modalities is far from being a new idea. Hand-drawn contours on early thyroid scans constituted a rough anatomical reference for images of thyroid function acquired using trace amounts of radioactive iodine. When analogue imaging with planar X-rays and Polaroid photos of radiotracer distributions gave way to the digital imaging era of the CT scanner and emission tomography, visual correlation of structure and function became possible. The next step, beginning in the late 1980s, was the development of computer software to co-register the images from different modalities, a development that was applied primarily to brain imaging. However, even though non-invasive anatomical and functional imaging became well-established diagnostic procedures within radiology and nuclear medicine, little attention was actually paid to the co-registration of images from the different modalities. What were the reasons for this? One reason was that accurate registration of anatomy and function was never really considered essential for the interpretation of the images and access to multimodality data was rarely routine and certainly not straightforward. Furthermore, anatomical and functional images were typically acquired in different departments and read by different specialists, a situation that did little to promote the use of software fusion techniques. Thus, up until the mid 1990s, and despite the expenditure of considerable intellectual effort, image fusion techniques had little impact on public healthcare. The arrival of PET/CT has changed this situation forever. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Townsend DW, Cherry SR. Combining anatomy with function: the path to true image fusion. Eur Radiol 2001;11:1968–74PubMedCrossRef Townsend DW, Cherry SR. Combining anatomy with function: the path to true image fusion. Eur Radiol 2001;11:1968–74PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Townsend D, Beyer T, Kinahan P, et al. The SMART scanner: a combined PET/CT tomograph for clinical oncology. Radiology 1998;209(P):169–70 Townsend D, Beyer T, Kinahan P, et al. The SMART scanner: a combined PET/CT tomograph for clinical oncology. Radiology 1998;209(P):169–70
3.
go back to reference Beyer T, Townsend DW, Brun T, Kinahan PE, Charron M, Roddy R, et al. A combined PET/CT tomograph for clinical oncology. J Nucl Med 2000;41:1369–79PubMed Beyer T, Townsend DW, Brun T, Kinahan PE, Charron M, Roddy R, et al. A combined PET/CT tomograph for clinical oncology. J Nucl Med 2000;41:1369–79PubMed
4.
go back to reference Charron M, Beyer T, Bohnen NN, Kinahan PE, Dachille M, Jerin J, et al. Image analysis in patients with cancer studied with a combined PET and CT scanner. Clin Nucl Med 2000;25:905–91PubMedCrossRef Charron M, Beyer T, Bohnen NN, Kinahan PE, Dachille M, Jerin J, et al. Image analysis in patients with cancer studied with a combined PET and CT scanner. Clin Nucl Med 2000;25:905–91PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kluetz PG, Meltzer CC, Villemagne VL, Kinahan PE, Chander S, Martinelli MA, et al. Combined PET/CT imaging in oncology: impact on patient management. Clinical Positron Imaging 2000;3:223–30CrossRefPubMed Kluetz PG, Meltzer CC, Villemagne VL, Kinahan PE, Chander S, Martinelli MA, et al. Combined PET/CT imaging in oncology: impact on patient management. Clinical Positron Imaging 2000;3:223–30CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Jaroff L. A winning combination. TIME Magazine 2000;156(23):72–4 Jaroff L. A winning combination. TIME Magazine 2000;156(23):72–4
7.
go back to reference Wiley G. Disruptive technology: the conflict over PET/CT. Decis Imaging Econ 2005;June Issue:17–20 Wiley G. Disruptive technology: the conflict over PET/CT. Decis Imaging Econ 2005;June Issue:17–20
8.
go back to reference Jager P, Slart R, Corstens F, Oyen W, Hockstra O, Teule J. PET-CT: a matter of opinion. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2003;30:470–1PubMedCrossRef Jager P, Slart R, Corstens F, Oyen W, Hockstra O, Teule J. PET-CT: a matter of opinion. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2003;30:470–1PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Lemke A-J, Niehues SM, Hosten N, Amthauer H, Boehmig M, Stroszczynski C, et al. Retrospective digital image fusion of multidetector CT and 18F-FDG PET: clinical value in pancreatic lesions—a prospective study with 104 patients. J Nucl Med 2004;45:1279–86PubMed Lemke A-J, Niehues SM, Hosten N, Amthauer H, Boehmig M, Stroszczynski C, et al. Retrospective digital image fusion of multidetector CT and 18F-FDG PET: clinical value in pancreatic lesions—a prospective study with 104 patients. J Nucl Med 2004;45:1279–86PubMed
10.
go back to reference Slomka PJ. Software approach to merging molecular with anatomic information. J Nucl Med 2004;45:36S–45SPubMed Slomka PJ. Software approach to merging molecular with anatomic information. J Nucl Med 2004;45:36S–45SPubMed
11.
go back to reference Shekhar R, Walimbe V, Raja S, Zagrodsky V, Kanvinde M, Wu G, et al. Automated 3-dimensional elastic registration of whole-body PET and CT from separate or combined scanners. J Nucl Med 2005;46:1488–96PubMed Shekhar R, Walimbe V, Raja S, Zagrodsky V, Kanvinde M, Wu G, et al. Automated 3-dimensional elastic registration of whole-body PET and CT from separate or combined scanners. J Nucl Med 2005;46:1488–96PubMed
12.
go back to reference Pietrzyk U. Does PET/CT render software fusion obsolete? Nuklearmedizin 2005;44:S13–7PubMed Pietrzyk U. Does PET/CT render software fusion obsolete? Nuklearmedizin 2005;44:S13–7PubMed
13.
go back to reference Pannu HK, Bristow RE, Cohade C, Fishman EK, Wahl RL. PET-CT in recurrent ovarian cancer: initial observations. Radiographics 2004;24:209–23PubMedCrossRef Pannu HK, Bristow RE, Cohade C, Fishman EK, Wahl RL. PET-CT in recurrent ovarian cancer: initial observations. Radiographics 2004;24:209–23PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Branstetter BF 4th, Blodgett TM, Zimmer LA, Snyderman CH, Johnson JT, Raman S, et al. Head and neck malignancy: is PET/CT more accurate than PET or CT alone? Radiology 2005;235:580–6PubMedCrossRef Branstetter BF 4th, Blodgett TM, Zimmer LA, Snyderman CH, Johnson JT, Raman S, et al. Head and neck malignancy: is PET/CT more accurate than PET or CT alone? Radiology 2005;235:580–6PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference von Schulthess GK. Cost considerations regarding an integrated CT-PET system. Eur Radiol 2000;10:S377–80CrossRef von Schulthess GK. Cost considerations regarding an integrated CT-PET system. Eur Radiol 2000;10:S377–80CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Kinahan PE, Townsend DW, Beyer T, Sashin D. Attenuation correction for a combined 3D PET/CT scanner. Med Phys 1998;25:2046–53PubMedCrossRef Kinahan PE, Townsend DW, Beyer T, Sashin D. Attenuation correction for a combined 3D PET/CT scanner. Med Phys 1998;25:2046–53PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Townsend D, Carney JP, Yap JT, Hall NC. PET/CT today and tomorrow. J Nucl Med 2004;45:4S–14SPubMed Townsend D, Carney JP, Yap JT, Hall NC. PET/CT today and tomorrow. J Nucl Med 2004;45:4S–14SPubMed
18.
go back to reference Townsend D, Beyer T. Anato-molecular imaging: combining structure and function. In: Bailey DL, Townsend DW, Valk PE, Maisey MN, editors. Positron emission tomography: principles and practice. London: Springer; 2005. p 179–202CrossRef Townsend D, Beyer T. Anato-molecular imaging: combining structure and function. In: Bailey DL, Townsend DW, Valk PE, Maisey MN, editors. Positron emission tomography: principles and practice. London: Springer; 2005. p 179–202CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Pfannenberg A, Eschmann S, Brechtel K, et al. A new high-resolution, multi-slice PET/CT tomograph for state-of-the-art oncology imaging—radiologist’s perspective. J Nucl Med 2005;46:414P Pfannenberg A, Eschmann S, Brechtel K, et al. A new high-resolution, multi-slice PET/CT tomograph for state-of-the-art oncology imaging—radiologist’s perspective. J Nucl Med 2005;46:414P
20.
go back to reference Moses W. Time of flight in PET revisited. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 2003;50:1325–30CrossRef Moses W. Time of flight in PET revisited. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 2003;50:1325–30CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Townsend DW, Isoardi RA, Bendriem B. Volume imaging tomographs. In: Townsend DW, Bendriem B, editors. Theory and practice of 3D PET. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic; 1998. p 111–32 Townsend DW, Isoardi RA, Bendriem B. Volume imaging tomographs. In: Townsend DW, Bendriem B, editors. Theory and practice of 3D PET. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic; 1998. p 111–32
22.
go back to reference Lodge MA, Badawi RD, Gilbert R, Dibos PE, Line BR. Comparison of 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional acquisition for 18F-FDG PET oncology studies performed on an LSO-based scanner. J Nucl Med 2006;47:23–31PubMed Lodge MA, Badawi RD, Gilbert R, Dibos PE, Line BR. Comparison of 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional acquisition for 18F-FDG PET oncology studies performed on an LSO-based scanner. J Nucl Med 2006;47:23–31PubMed
23.
go back to reference Visvikis D, Griffiths D, Costa D, Bomanji J, Ell P. Clinical evaluation of 2D versus 3D whole-body PET image quality using a dedicated BGO PET scanner. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2005;32:1050–6PubMedCrossRef Visvikis D, Griffiths D, Costa D, Bomanji J, Ell P. Clinical evaluation of 2D versus 3D whole-body PET image quality using a dedicated BGO PET scanner. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2005;32:1050–6PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Votaw JR, White M. Comparison of 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional cardiac 82Rb PET studies. J Nucl Med 2001;42:701–6PubMed Votaw JR, White M. Comparison of 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional cardiac 82Rb PET studies. J Nucl Med 2001;42:701–6PubMed
25.
go back to reference Ferreira NC, Trébossen R, Bendriem B. Assessment of 3-D PET quantitation: influence of out of the field of view radioactive sources and of attenuating media. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 1998;45:1670–5CrossRef Ferreira NC, Trébossen R, Bendriem B. Assessment of 3-D PET quantitation: influence of out of the field of view radioactive sources and of attenuating media. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 1998;45:1670–5CrossRef
26.
27.
go back to reference Flohr T, McCollough C, Bruder H, Petersilka M, Gruber K, Suss C, et al. First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system. Eur Radiol 2006;16:256–68PubMedCrossRef Flohr T, McCollough C, Bruder H, Petersilka M, Gruber K, Suss C, et al. First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system. Eur Radiol 2006;16:256–68PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Burger C, Goerres G, Schoenes S, Buck A, Lonn AHR, Schulthess GKv. PET attenuation coefficients from CT images: experimental evaluation of the transformation of CT into PET 511-keV attenuation coefficients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2002;29:922–92PubMedCrossRef Burger C, Goerres G, Schoenes S, Buck A, Lonn AHR, Schulthess GKv. PET attenuation coefficients from CT images: experimental evaluation of the transformation of CT into PET 511-keV attenuation coefficients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2002;29:922–92PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Kinahan P, Hasegawa B, Beyer T. X-ray based attenuation correction for PET/CT scanners. Semin Nucl Med 2003;XXXIII:166–79CrossRef Kinahan P, Hasegawa B, Beyer T. X-ray based attenuation correction for PET/CT scanners. Semin Nucl Med 2003;XXXIII:166–79CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Watson CC, Rappoport V, Faul D, Townsend DW, Carney JPJ. A method for calibrating the CT-based attenuation correction of PET in human tissue. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 2006; in press Watson CC, Rappoport V, Faul D, Townsend DW, Carney JPJ. A method for calibrating the CT-based attenuation correction of PET in human tissue. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 2006; in press
31.
go back to reference Beyer T, Bockisch A, Kuhl H, Martinez M-J. Whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT in the presence of truncation artifacts. J Nucl Med 2006;47:91–9PubMed Beyer T, Bockisch A, Kuhl H, Martinez M-J. Whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT in the presence of truncation artifacts. J Nucl Med 2006;47:91–9PubMed
32.
go back to reference Brechtel K, Klein M, Vogel M, Mueller M, Aschoff P, Beyer T, et al. Optimized contrast enhanced CT protocols for diagnostic whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT: single-phase versus multi-phase CT imaging. J Nucl Med 2006;47(3):470–6PubMed Brechtel K, Klein M, Vogel M, Mueller M, Aschoff P, Beyer T, et al. Optimized contrast enhanced CT protocols for diagnostic whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT: single-phase versus multi-phase CT imaging. J Nucl Med 2006;47(3):470–6PubMed
33.
go back to reference Bockisch A, Beyer T, Antoch G, Freudenberg LS, Kuhl H, Debatin JF, et al. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography—imaging protocols, artifacts, and pitfalls. Mol Imaging Biol 2004;6:188–99PubMedCrossRef Bockisch A, Beyer T, Antoch G, Freudenberg LS, Kuhl H, Debatin JF, et al. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography—imaging protocols, artifacts, and pitfalls. Mol Imaging Biol 2004;6:188–99PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Kuehl H, Antoch G. How much CT do we need for PET/CT? A radiologist’s perspective. Nuklearmedizin 2005;44:S24–31PubMed Kuehl H, Antoch G. How much CT do we need for PET/CT? A radiologist’s perspective. Nuklearmedizin 2005;44:S24–31PubMed
35.
go back to reference Strobel K, Thuerl CM, Hany T. How much intravenous contrast is needed in FDG-PET/CT? Nuklearmedizin 2005;44:S32–7PubMed Strobel K, Thuerl CM, Hany T. How much intravenous contrast is needed in FDG-PET/CT? Nuklearmedizin 2005;44:S32–7PubMed
36.
go back to reference Beyer T. Towards truly integrated hardware fusion with PET/CT. Nuklearmedizin 2005;44:S5–S12PubMed Beyer T. Towards truly integrated hardware fusion with PET/CT. Nuklearmedizin 2005;44:S5–S12PubMed
37.
go back to reference Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, Wanders J, Kaplan RS, Rubinstein L, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92:205–16PubMedCrossRef Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, Wanders J, Kaplan RS, Rubinstein L, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92:205–16PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Putting ‘clear’ into nuclear medicine: a decade of PET/CT development
Authors
Thomas Beyer
David W. Townsend
Publication date
01-08-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging / Issue 8/2006
Print ISSN: 1619-7070
Electronic ISSN: 1619-7089
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-006-0137-z