Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Radiology 6/2021

01-05-2021 | Abusive Head Injury | Child abuse imaging

The impact of the consensus statement on abusive head trauma in infants and young children

Author: Arabinda K. Choudhary

Published in: Pediatric Radiology | Issue 6/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

It seems paradoxical that facts, data and science are still considered controversial despite the harrowing death of a multitude of people from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), an unparalleled health care crisis of our lifetime. In addition, while scientists are desperately attempting to produce a vaccine for COVID-19, a large segment of the populace still believes in conspiracies related to vaccines. Therefore, it is not surprising that the diagnosis of abusive head trauma (AHT) faces similar challenges — the difference being that AHT challenges are mostly in the realms of law courts rather than actual clinical management of these infants. Against this backdrop, the Child Abuse Imaging Committee of the Society for Pediatric Radiology (SPR) collaborated with other leading experts to develop the consensus statement on AHT. This consensus statement has had a significant impact since its publication. It is now endorsed by 17 multinational, multidisciplinary organizations. The consensus statement has helped educate the diverse stakeholders of AHT and has helped further our understanding of AHT and the issues related to it. This could serve as the template for developing future consensus documents.
Literature
7.
go back to reference Wakefield AJ, Murch SH, Anthony A et al (1998) Retracted: Ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children. Lancet 351:637–641CrossRef Wakefield AJ, Murch SH, Anthony A et al (1998) Retracted: Ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children. Lancet 351:637–641CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Godlee F, Smith J, Marcovitch H (2011) Wakefield’s article linking MMR vaccine and autism was fraudulent. BMJ 342:64–66 Godlee F, Smith J, Marcovitch H (2011) Wakefield’s article linking MMR vaccine and autism was fraudulent. BMJ 342:64–66
9.
go back to reference Kmietowicz Z (2010) Wakefield is struck off for the “serious and wide-ranging findings against him”. BMJ 340:c2803CrossRef Kmietowicz Z (2010) Wakefield is struck off for the “serious and wide-ranging findings against him”. BMJ 340:c2803CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Strouse PJ (2018) Shaken baby syndrome is real. Pediatr Radiol 48:1043–1047CrossRef Strouse PJ (2018) Shaken baby syndrome is real. Pediatr Radiol 48:1043–1047CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Strouse PJ (2016) Child abuse: we have problems. Pediatr Radiol 46:587–590CrossRef Strouse PJ (2016) Child abuse: we have problems. Pediatr Radiol 46:587–590CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Janson S (2020) Towards a deeper understanding of abusive head trauma. Acta Paediatr 109:1290–1291CrossRef Janson S (2020) Towards a deeper understanding of abusive head trauma. Acta Paediatr 109:1290–1291CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Choudhary AK, Narang SK, Moreno JA et al (2019) A consensus response on the complete picture: reply to Lynøe and Eriksson. Pediatr Radiol 49:424–428CrossRef Choudhary AK, Narang SK, Moreno JA et al (2019) A consensus response on the complete picture: reply to Lynøe and Eriksson. Pediatr Radiol 49:424–428CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Saunders D, Raissaki M, Servaes S et al (2017) Throwing the baby out with the bath water — response to the Swedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services (SBU) report on traumatic shaking. Pediatr Radiol 47:1386–1389CrossRef Saunders D, Raissaki M, Servaes S et al (2017) Throwing the baby out with the bath water — response to the Swedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services (SBU) report on traumatic shaking. Pediatr Radiol 47:1386–1389CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Debelle GD, Maguire S, Watts P et al (2018) Abusive head trauma and the triad: a critique on behalf of RCPCH of “Traumatic shaking: the role of the triad in medical investigations of suspected traumatic shaking”. Arch Dis Child 103:606–610CrossRef Debelle GD, Maguire S, Watts P et al (2018) Abusive head trauma and the triad: a critique on behalf of RCPCH of “Traumatic shaking: the role of the triad in medical investigations of suspected traumatic shaking”. Arch Dis Child 103:606–610CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Choudhary AK, Servaes S, Slovis TL et al (2018) Consensus statement on abusive head trauma in infants and young children. Pediatr Radiol 48:1048–1065CrossRef Choudhary AK, Servaes S, Slovis TL et al (2018) Consensus statement on abusive head trauma in infants and young children. Pediatr Radiol 48:1048–1065CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Choudhary AK, Dies Suarez P, Binenbaum G et al (2019) Consensus statement on abusive head trauma: additional endorsements. Pediatr Radiol 49:421CrossRef Choudhary AK, Dies Suarez P, Binenbaum G et al (2019) Consensus statement on abusive head trauma: additional endorsements. Pediatr Radiol 49:421CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The impact of the consensus statement on abusive head trauma in infants and young children
Author
Arabinda K. Choudhary
Publication date
01-05-2021
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Pediatric Radiology / Issue 6/2021
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-020-04949-x

Other articles of this Issue 6/2021

Pediatric Radiology 6/2021 Go to the issue