Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Radiology 2/2011

01-09-2011 | ALARA-CT

Image Gently: progress and challenges in CT education and advocacy

Authors: Marilyn J. Goske, Kimberly E. Applegate, Dorothy Bulas, Priscilla F. Butler, Michael J. Callahan, Brian D. Coley, Steven Don, Donald P. Frush, Marta Hernanz-Schulman, Sue C. Kaste, Gregory Morrison, Manrita Sidhu, Keith J. Strauss, S. Ted Treves, on behalf of the Alliance for Radiation Safety in Pediatric Imaging

Published in: Pediatric Radiology | Special Issue 2/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Significant progress has been made in radiation protection for children during the last 10 years. This includes increased awareness of the need for radiation protection for pediatric patients with international partnerships through the Alliance for Radiation Safety in Pediatric Imaging. This paper identifies five areas of significant progress in radiation safety for children: the growth of the Alliance; the development of an adult radiation protection campaign Image Wisely™; increased collaboration with government agencies, societies and the vendor community; the development of national guidelines in pediatric nuclear medicine, and the development of a size-based patient dose correction factor by the American Association of Physicists in Medicine, Task Group 204. However, many challenges remain. These include the need for continued education and change of practice at adult-focused hospitals where many pediatric CT exams are performed; the need for increased emphasis on appropriateness of pediatric imaging and outcomes research to validate the performance of CT studies, and the advancement of the work of the first pediatric national dose registry to determine the “state of the practice” with the final goal of establishing ranges of optimal CT technique for specific scan indications when imaging children with CT.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Scaife ER, Rollins MD (2010) Managing radiation risk in the evaluation of the pediatric trauma patient. Semin Pediatr Surg 19:252–256PubMedCrossRef Scaife ER, Rollins MD (2010) Managing radiation risk in the evaluation of the pediatric trauma patient. Semin Pediatr Surg 19:252–256PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Stratton KL, Pope JC, Adams MC et al (2010) Implications of ionizing radiation in the pediatric urology patient. J Urol 183:2137–2142PubMedCrossRef Stratton KL, Pope JC, Adams MC et al (2010) Implications of ionizing radiation in the pediatric urology patient. J Urol 183:2137–2142PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Gray JE, Archer BR, Butler PF et al (2005) Reference values for diagnostic radiology: application and impact. Radiology 235:354–358PubMedCrossRef Gray JE, Archer BR, Butler PF et al (2005) Reference values for diagnostic radiology: application and impact. Radiology 235:354–358PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Goske MJ, Applegate KE, Bell C et al (2010) Image Gently: providing practical educational tools and advocacy to accelerate radiation protection for children worldwide. Semin Ultrasound CT MRI 31:57–63CrossRef Goske MJ, Applegate KE, Bell C et al (2010) Image Gently: providing practical educational tools and advocacy to accelerate radiation protection for children worldwide. Semin Ultrasound CT MRI 31:57–63CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Brink JA, Amis ES (2010) Image Wisely: a campaign to increase awareness about adult radiation protection. Radiology 257:601–602PubMedCrossRef Brink JA, Amis ES (2010) Image Wisely: a campaign to increase awareness about adult radiation protection. Radiology 257:601–602PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (2009) Ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States: NCRP Report No. 160. NCRP, Bethesda, MD, pp 142–146 National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (2009) Ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States: NCRP Report No. 160. NCRP, Bethesda, MD, pp 142–146
11.
go back to reference Goske MJ, Applegate KE, Bulas D et al (2011) Approaches to promotion and implementation of action on radiation protection for children. Radiat Prot Dosim, in press Goske MJ, Applegate KE, Bulas D et al (2011) Approaches to promotion and implementation of action on radiation protection for children. Radiat Prot Dosim, in press
12.
go back to reference Gelfand M, Parisi M, Treves ST (2011) Pediatric radiopharmaceutical administered doses: 2010 North American consensus guidelines. J Nucl Med 52:318–322PubMedCrossRef Gelfand M, Parisi M, Treves ST (2011) Pediatric radiopharmaceutical administered doses: 2010 North American consensus guidelines. J Nucl Med 52:318–322PubMedCrossRef
14.
15.
go back to reference Strauss KJ, Goske MJ, Frush DP et al (2009) Image Gently Vendor Summit: working together for better estimates of pediatric radiation dose from CT. AJR 192:1169–1175PubMedCrossRef Strauss KJ, Goske MJ, Frush DP et al (2009) Image Gently Vendor Summit: working together for better estimates of pediatric radiation dose from CT. AJR 192:1169–1175PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Larson DB, Johnson LW, Schnell BM et al (2011) Increasing use of CT in children visiting emergency departments, 1995–2007. Radiology 258:164–173PubMedCrossRef Larson DB, Johnson LW, Schnell BM et al (2011) Increasing use of CT in children visiting emergency departments, 1995–2007. Radiology 258:164–173PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Medina S, Applegate K, Blackmore CC (eds) (2010) Evidence-based imaging in pediatrics: optimizing imaging in pediatric patient care. Springer, New York Medina S, Applegate K, Blackmore CC (eds) (2010) Evidence-based imaging in pediatrics: optimizing imaging in pediatric patient care. Springer, New York
21.
go back to reference Kuppermann N, Holmes JF, Dayan PS et al (2009) Identification of children at very low risk of clinically-importantbrain injuries after head trauma: a prospective cohort study. Lancet 374:1160–1170PubMedCrossRef Kuppermann N, Holmes JF, Dayan PS et al (2009) Identification of children at very low risk of clinically-importantbrain injuries after head trauma: a prospective cohort study. Lancet 374:1160–1170PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Broder J, Fordham LA, Warshauer DM (2007) Increasing utilization of computed tomography in the pediatric emergency department, 2000–2006. Emerg Radiol 14:227–232PubMedCrossRef Broder J, Fordham LA, Warshauer DM (2007) Increasing utilization of computed tomography in the pediatric emergency department, 2000–2006. Emerg Radiol 14:227–232PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Kalra MK, Saini S (2006) Standardized nomenclature and description of CT scanning techniques. Radiology 241:657–660PubMedCrossRef Kalra MK, Saini S (2006) Standardized nomenclature and description of CT scanning techniques. Radiology 241:657–660PubMedCrossRef
24.
25.
go back to reference Donnelly LF, Emery KH, Brody AS et al (2001) Minimizing radiation dose for pediatric body applications of single-detector helical CT: strategies at a large children’s hospital. AJR 176:303–306PubMed Donnelly LF, Emery KH, Brody AS et al (2001) Minimizing radiation dose for pediatric body applications of single-detector helical CT: strategies at a large children’s hospital. AJR 176:303–306PubMed
26.
go back to reference Patterson A, Frush DP, Donnelly LF (2001) Helical CT of the body: are settings adjusted for pediatric patients? AJR 176:297–301 Patterson A, Frush DP, Donnelly LF (2001) Helical CT of the body: are settings adjusted for pediatric patients? AJR 176:297–301
27.
go back to reference Gray JE, Archer BR, Butler PF et al (2005) Reference values for diagnostic radiology: application and impact. Radiology 235:354–358PubMedCrossRef Gray JE, Archer BR, Butler PF et al (2005) Reference values for diagnostic radiology: application and impact. Radiology 235:354–358PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Conference of Radiation Control Program Directors (1994) Nationwide Evaluation of X-ray Trends (NEXT): summary of 1990 computed tomography survey and 1991 flouroscopy survey. CRCPD publication no. 94–2. Frankfort, KY Conference of Radiation Control Program Directors (1994) Nationwide Evaluation of X-ray Trends (NEXT): summary of 1990 computed tomography survey and 1991 flouroscopy survey. CRCPD publication no. 94–2. Frankfort, KY
29.
go back to reference Nievelstein RA, van Dam IM, van der Molen AJ (2010) Mutidetector CT in children: current concepts and dose reduction strategies. Pediatr Radiol 40:1324–1344PubMedCrossRef Nievelstein RA, van Dam IM, van der Molen AJ (2010) Mutidetector CT in children: current concepts and dose reduction strategies. Pediatr Radiol 40:1324–1344PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Reid J, Gamberoni J, Dong F et al (2010) Optimization of kVp and mAs for pediatric low-dose simulated abdominal CT: is it best to base parameter selection on object circumference? AJR 195:1015–1020PubMedCrossRef Reid J, Gamberoni J, Dong F et al (2010) Optimization of kVp and mAs for pediatric low-dose simulated abdominal CT: is it best to base parameter selection on object circumference? AJR 195:1015–1020PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Image Gently: progress and challenges in CT education and advocacy
Authors
Marilyn J. Goske
Kimberly E. Applegate
Dorothy Bulas
Priscilla F. Butler
Michael J. Callahan
Brian D. Coley
Steven Don
Donald P. Frush
Marta Hernanz-Schulman
Sue C. Kaste
Gregory Morrison
Manrita Sidhu
Keith J. Strauss
S. Ted Treves
on behalf of the Alliance for Radiation Safety in Pediatric Imaging
Publication date
01-09-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Pediatric Radiology / Issue Special Issue 2/2011
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-011-2133-0

Other articles of this Special Issue 2/2011

Pediatric Radiology 2/2011 Go to the issue