Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Radiology 8/2010

Open Access 01-08-2010 | Review

Multidetector CT in children: current concepts and dose reduction strategies

Authors: Rutger A. J. Nievelstein, Ingrid M. van Dam, Aart J. van der Molen

Published in: Pediatric Radiology | Issue 8/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

The recent technical development of multidetector CT (MDCT) has contributed to a substantial increase in its diagnostic applications and accuracy in children. A major drawback of MDCT is the use of ionising radiation with the risk of inducing secondary cancer. Therefore, justification and optimisation of paediatric MDCT is of great importance in order to minimise these risks (“as low as reasonably achievable” principle). This review will focus on all technical and non-technical aspects relevant for paediatric MDCT optimisation and includes guidelines for radiation dose level-based CT protocols.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Slovis TL (2002) The ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) concept in pediatric CT intelligent dose reduction. ALARA conference proceedings. Pediatr Radiol 32:217–218CrossRefPubMed Slovis TL (2002) The ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) concept in pediatric CT intelligent dose reduction. ALARA conference proceedings. Pediatr Radiol 32:217–218CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography—An increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357:2277–2284CrossRefPubMed Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography—An increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357:2277–2284CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Smith-Bindman R, Lipson J, Marcus R et al (2009) Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. Arch Intern Med 169:2078–2086CrossRefPubMed Smith-Bindman R, Lipson J, Marcus R et al (2009) Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. Arch Intern Med 169:2078–2086CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Berrington de González A, Mahesh M, Kim KP et al (2009) Projected cancer risks from computed tomography scans performed in the United States in 2007. Arch Intern Med 169:2071–2077CrossRefPubMed Berrington de González A, Mahesh M, Kim KP et al (2009) Projected cancer risks from computed tomography scans performed in the United States in 2007. Arch Intern Med 169:2071–2077CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference ICRP-103 (2007) The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP 37:1–332 ICRP-103 (2007) The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP 37:1–332
7.
go back to reference Semelka RC, Armao DM, Elias J et al (2007) Imaging strategies to reduce the risk of radiation in CT studies, including selective substitution with MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 25:900–909CrossRefPubMed Semelka RC, Armao DM, Elias J et al (2007) Imaging strategies to reduce the risk of radiation in CT studies, including selective substitution with MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 25:900–909CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Frush DP (2009) Radiation, CT, and Children: the simple answer is... It’s complicated. Radiology 252:4–6CrossRefPubMed Frush DP (2009) Radiation, CT, and Children: the simple answer is... It’s complicated. Radiology 252:4–6CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Little MP, Wakeford R, Tawn EJ et al (2009) Risks associated with low doses and low dose rates of ionizing radiation: why linearity may be (almost) the best we can do. Radiology 251:6–12CrossRefPubMed Little MP, Wakeford R, Tawn EJ et al (2009) Risks associated with low doses and low dose rates of ionizing radiation: why linearity may be (almost) the best we can do. Radiology 251:6–12CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Tubiana M, Feinendegen LE, Yang C et al (2009) The linear no-threshold relationship is inconsistent with radiation biologic and experimental data. Radiology 251:13–22CrossRefPubMed Tubiana M, Feinendegen LE, Yang C et al (2009) The linear no-threshold relationship is inconsistent with radiation biologic and experimental data. Radiology 251:13–22CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Arch ME, Frush DP (2008) Pediatric body MDCT: a 5-year follow-up survey of scanning parameters used by pediatric radiologists. AJR 191:611–617CrossRefPubMed Arch ME, Frush DP (2008) Pediatric body MDCT: a 5-year follow-up survey of scanning parameters used by pediatric radiologists. AJR 191:611–617CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Brody AS, Frush DP, Huda W et al (2007) Radiation risk to children from computed tomography. Pediatrics 120:677–682CrossRefPubMed Brody AS, Frush DP, Huda W et al (2007) Radiation risk to children from computed tomography. Pediatrics 120:677–682CrossRefPubMed
14.
15.
go back to reference Robbins E (2008) Radiation risks from imaging studies in children with cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer 51:453–457CrossRefPubMed Robbins E (2008) Radiation risks from imaging studies in children with cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer 51:453–457CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Redberg RF (2009) Cancer risks and radiation exposure from computed tomograpic scans: how can we be sure that the benefit outweighs the risks? Arch Intern Med 169:2049–2050CrossRefPubMed Redberg RF (2009) Cancer risks and radiation exposure from computed tomograpic scans: how can we be sure that the benefit outweighs the risks? Arch Intern Med 169:2049–2050CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Boland GW (2008) The CT dose and utilization controversy: the radiologist’s response. J Am Coll Radiol 5:696–698CrossRefPubMed Boland GW (2008) The CT dose and utilization controversy: the radiologist’s response. J Am Coll Radiol 5:696–698CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Fenton SJ, Hansen KW, Meyers RL et al (2004) CT scan and the pediatric trauma patient: are we overdoing it? J Pediatr Surg 39:1877–1881CrossRefPubMed Fenton SJ, Hansen KW, Meyers RL et al (2004) CT scan and the pediatric trauma patient: are we overdoing it? J Pediatr Surg 39:1877–1881CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Donnelly LF (2005) Reducing radiation dose associated with pediatric CT by decreasing unnecessary examinations. AJR 184:655–657PubMed Donnelly LF (2005) Reducing radiation dose associated with pediatric CT by decreasing unnecessary examinations. AJR 184:655–657PubMed
21.
go back to reference Oikarinen H, Meriläinen S, Pääkkö E et al (2009) Unjustified CT examinations in young patients. Eur Radiol 19:1161–1165CrossRefPubMed Oikarinen H, Meriläinen S, Pääkkö E et al (2009) Unjustified CT examinations in young patients. Eur Radiol 19:1161–1165CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Shiralkar S, RennieA SM et al (2003) Doctor’s knowledge of radiation exposure: questionnaire study. BMJ 327:371–372CrossRefPubMed Shiralkar S, RennieA SM et al (2003) Doctor’s knowledge of radiation exposure: questionnaire study. BMJ 327:371–372CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Lee CI, Haims AH, Monico EP et al (2004) Diagnostic CT scans: assessment of patient, physician, and radiologist awareness of radiation dose and possible risks. Radiology 231:393–398CrossRefPubMed Lee CI, Haims AH, Monico EP et al (2004) Diagnostic CT scans: assessment of patient, physician, and radiologist awareness of radiation dose and possible risks. Radiology 231:393–398CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Thomas KE, Parnell-Parmley JE, Haidar S et al (2006) Assessment of radiation dose awareness among pediatricians. Pediatr Radiol 36:823–832CrossRefPubMed Thomas KE, Parnell-Parmley JE, Haidar S et al (2006) Assessment of radiation dose awareness among pediatricians. Pediatr Radiol 36:823–832CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Galanski M, Nagel HD, Stamm G (2006) Pediatric CT exposure practice in the Federal Republic of Germany. Results of a nation-wide survey in 2005/06. Medizinische Hochschule Hannover. http://www.drg-apt.de/ Galanski M, Nagel HD, Stamm G (2006) Pediatric CT exposure practice in the Federal Republic of Germany. Results of a nation-wide survey in 2005/06. Medizinische Hochschule Hannover. http://​www.​drg-apt.​de/​
26.
27.
go back to reference Riccabona M (2008) Ultrasound of the chest in children (mediastinum excluded). Eur Radiol 18:390–399CrossRefPubMed Riccabona M (2008) Ultrasound of the chest in children (mediastinum excluded). Eur Radiol 18:390–399CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Darge K, Jaramillo D, Siegel MJ (2008) Whole-body MRI in children, Current status and future applications. Eur J Radiol 68:289–298CrossRefPubMed Darge K, Jaramillo D, Siegel MJ (2008) Whole-body MRI in children, Current status and future applications. Eur J Radiol 68:289–298CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Taghon TA, Bryan YF, Kurth CD (2006) Pediatric radiology sedation and anesthesia. Int Anesthesiol Clin 44:64–79CrossRef Taghon TA, Bryan YF, Kurth CD (2006) Pediatric radiology sedation and anesthesia. Int Anesthesiol Clin 44:64–79CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Shankar VR (2008) Sedating children for radiological procedures: an intensivist’s perspective. Pediatr Radiol 38:S213–S217CrossRefPubMed Shankar VR (2008) Sedating children for radiological procedures: an intensivist’s perspective. Pediatr Radiol 38:S213–S217CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Frush DP (2008) MDCT in children: scan techniques and contrast issues. In: Kalra MK, Sanjay S, Rubin GD (eds) Multidetector CT: from protocols to practice, 1st edn. Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, pp 331–351 Frush DP (2008) MDCT in children: scan techniques and contrast issues. In: Kalra MK, Sanjay S, Rubin GD (eds) Multidetector CT: from protocols to practice, 1st edn. Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, pp 331–351
34.
go back to reference Siegel MJ (2008) Practical CT techniques. In: Siegel MJ (ed) Pediatric body CT, 2nd edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 1–32 Siegel MJ (2008) Practical CT techniques. In: Siegel MJ (ed) Pediatric body CT, 2nd edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 1–32
35.
go back to reference Hebert JJ, Taylor AJ, Winter TC et al (2006) Low-attenuation oral GI contrast agents in abdominal-pelvic computed tomography. Abdom Imaging 31:48–53CrossRefPubMed Hebert JJ, Taylor AJ, Winter TC et al (2006) Low-attenuation oral GI contrast agents in abdominal-pelvic computed tomography. Abdom Imaging 31:48–53CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Koo CW, Shah-Patel LR, Baer JW et al (2008) Cost-effectiveness and patient tolerance of low-attenuation oral contrast material: milk versus VoLumen. AJR 190:1307–1313CrossRefPubMed Koo CW, Shah-Patel LR, Baer JW et al (2008) Cost-effectiveness and patient tolerance of low-attenuation oral contrast material: milk versus VoLumen. AJR 190:1307–1313CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Schwab SA, Uder M, Anders K et al (2009) Peripheral intravenous power injection of iodinated contrast media through 22G and 20G cannulas: can high flow rates be achieved safely? A clinical feasibility study. RoFo 181:355–361PubMed Schwab SA, Uder M, Anders K et al (2009) Peripheral intravenous power injection of iodinated contrast media through 22G and 20G cannulas: can high flow rates be achieved safely? A clinical feasibility study. RoFo 181:355–361PubMed
38.
go back to reference Herts BR, O’Malley CM, Wirth SL et al (2001) Power injection of contrast media using central venous catheters: feasibility, safety, and efficacy. AJR 176:447–453PubMed Herts BR, O’Malley CM, Wirth SL et al (2001) Power injection of contrast media using central venous catheters: feasibility, safety, and efficacy. AJR 176:447–453PubMed
39.
go back to reference Gebauer B, Teichgräber UK, Hothan T et al (2005) Contrast media pressure injection using a portal catheter system—results of an in vitro study. Rofo 177:1417–1423PubMed Gebauer B, Teichgräber UK, Hothan T et al (2005) Contrast media pressure injection using a portal catheter system—results of an in vitro study. Rofo 177:1417–1423PubMed
40.
go back to reference Rigsby CK, Gasber E, Seshadri R et al (2007) Safety and efficacy of pressure-limited power injection of iodinated contrast medium through central lines in children. AJR 188:726–732CrossRefPubMed Rigsby CK, Gasber E, Seshadri R et al (2007) Safety and efficacy of pressure-limited power injection of iodinated contrast medium through central lines in children. AJR 188:726–732CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Zamos DT, Todd TM, Patton HA et al (2007) Injection rate threshold for triple-lumen central venous catheter. An in vitro study. Acad Radiol 14:574–578CrossRefPubMed Zamos DT, Todd TM, Patton HA et al (2007) Injection rate threshold for triple-lumen central venous catheter. An in vitro study. Acad Radiol 14:574–578CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Fleishmann D, Kamaya A (2009) Optimal vascular and parenchymal contrast enhancement: the current state of the art. Radiol Clin North Am 47:13–26CrossRef Fleishmann D, Kamaya A (2009) Optimal vascular and parenchymal contrast enhancement: the current state of the art. Radiol Clin North Am 47:13–26CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Bae KT, Heiken JP (2005) Scan and contrast administration principles of MDCT. Eur Radiol 15:E46–59CrossRefPubMed Bae KT, Heiken JP (2005) Scan and contrast administration principles of MDCT. Eur Radiol 15:E46–59CrossRefPubMed
44.
go back to reference Bae KT, Shah AJ, Shang SS et al (2008) Aortic and hepatic contrast enhancement with abdominal 64-MDCT in pediatric patients: effect of body weight and iodine dose. AJR 191:1589–1594CrossRefPubMed Bae KT, Shah AJ, Shang SS et al (2008) Aortic and hepatic contrast enhancement with abdominal 64-MDCT in pediatric patients: effect of body weight and iodine dose. AJR 191:1589–1594CrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference Fricke BL, Donnelly LF, Frush DP et al (2003) In-plane bismuth breast shields for pediatric CT: effects on radiation dose and image quality using experimental and clinical data. AJR 180:407–411PubMed Fricke BL, Donnelly LF, Frush DP et al (2003) In-plane bismuth breast shields for pediatric CT: effects on radiation dose and image quality using experimental and clinical data. AJR 180:407–411PubMed
46.
go back to reference Coursey C, Frush DP, Yoshizumi T et al (2008) Pediatric chest MDCT using tube current modulation: effect on radiation dose with breast shielding. AJR 190:W54–W61CrossRefPubMed Coursey C, Frush DP, Yoshizumi T et al (2008) Pediatric chest MDCT using tube current modulation: effect on radiation dose with breast shielding. AJR 190:W54–W61CrossRefPubMed
47.
go back to reference Vollmar SV, Kalender WA (2008) Reduction of dose to the female breast in thoracic CT: a comparison of standard-protocol, bismuth-shielded, partial and tube-current-modulated CT examinations. Eur Radiol 18:1674–1682CrossRefPubMed Vollmar SV, Kalender WA (2008) Reduction of dose to the female breast in thoracic CT: a comparison of standard-protocol, bismuth-shielded, partial and tube-current-modulated CT examinations. Eur Radiol 18:1674–1682CrossRefPubMed
48.
go back to reference Geleijns J, Salvadó Artells M, Veldkamp WJH et al (2006) Quantitative assessment of selective in-plane shielding of tissues in computed tomography through evaluation of absorbed dose and image quality. Eur Radiol 16:2334–2340CrossRefPubMed Geleijns J, Salvadó Artells M, Veldkamp WJH et al (2006) Quantitative assessment of selective in-plane shielding of tissues in computed tomography through evaluation of absorbed dose and image quality. Eur Radiol 16:2334–2340CrossRefPubMed
49.
go back to reference Leswick DA, Hunt MM, Webster ST et al (2008) Thyroid shields versus z-axis automatic tube current modulation for dose reduction at neck CT. Radiology 249:572–580CrossRefPubMed Leswick DA, Hunt MM, Webster ST et al (2008) Thyroid shields versus z-axis automatic tube current modulation for dose reduction at neck CT. Radiology 249:572–580CrossRefPubMed
50.
go back to reference Vock P, Wolf R (2007) Dose optimization and reduction in CT of children (chapter 15). In: Tack D, Gevenois PA (eds) Radiation dose from adult and pediatric multidetector computed tomography. Springer, Berlin, pp 223–236CrossRef Vock P, Wolf R (2007) Dose optimization and reduction in CT of children (chapter 15). In: Tack D, Gevenois PA (eds) Radiation dose from adult and pediatric multidetector computed tomography. Springer, Berlin, pp 223–236CrossRef
51.
go back to reference Singh S, Kalra MK, Moore MA et al (2009) Dose reduction and compliance with pediatric CT protocols adapted to patient size, clinical indication, and number of prior studies. Radiology 252:200–208CrossRefPubMed Singh S, Kalra MK, Moore MA et al (2009) Dose reduction and compliance with pediatric CT protocols adapted to patient size, clinical indication, and number of prior studies. Radiology 252:200–208CrossRefPubMed
52.
go back to reference Verdun FR, Gutierrez D, Schnyder PF et al (2007) CT dose optimization when changing to CT multi-detector row technology. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 36:176–184CrossRefPubMed Verdun FR, Gutierrez D, Schnyder PF et al (2007) CT dose optimization when changing to CT multi-detector row technology. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 36:176–184CrossRefPubMed
53.
go back to reference Da Costa e Silva EJ, Da Silva GA (2007) Eliminating unenhanced CT when evaluating abdominal neoplasms in children. AJR 189:1211–1214CrossRefPubMed Da Costa e Silva EJ, Da Silva GA (2007) Eliminating unenhanced CT when evaluating abdominal neoplasms in children. AJR 189:1211–1214CrossRefPubMed
54.
go back to reference Sodickson A, Baeyens PF, Andriole KP et al (2009) Recurrent CT, cumulative radiation exposure, and associated radiation-induced cancer risks from CT of adults. Radiology 251:175–184CrossRefPubMed Sodickson A, Baeyens PF, Andriole KP et al (2009) Recurrent CT, cumulative radiation exposure, and associated radiation-induced cancer risks from CT of adults. Radiology 251:175–184CrossRefPubMed
55.
go back to reference Udayansankar UK, Braithwaite K, Arvaniti M et al (2008) Low-dose nonenhanced head CT protocol for follow-up evaluation of children with ventriculoperitoneal shunt: reduction of radiation and effect on image quality. AJNR 29:802–806CrossRef Udayansankar UK, Braithwaite K, Arvaniti M et al (2008) Low-dose nonenhanced head CT protocol for follow-up evaluation of children with ventriculoperitoneal shunt: reduction of radiation and effect on image quality. AJNR 29:802–806CrossRef
56.
go back to reference Shah R, Gupta AK, Rehani MN et al (2005) Effect of reduction of tube current on reader confidence in paediatric computed tomography. Clin Radiol 60:224–231CrossRefPubMed Shah R, Gupta AK, Rehani MN et al (2005) Effect of reduction of tube current on reader confidence in paediatric computed tomography. Clin Radiol 60:224–231CrossRefPubMed
57.
go back to reference Frush DP, Soden B, Frush KS et al (2002) Improved pediatric multidetector body CT using a size-based color-coded format. AJR 178:721–726PubMed Frush DP, Soden B, Frush KS et al (2002) Improved pediatric multidetector body CT using a size-based color-coded format. AJR 178:721–726PubMed
58.
go back to reference Kotre CJ, Willis SP (2003) A method for the systematic selection of technique factors in paediatric CT. BJR 76:51–56CrossRefPubMed Kotre CJ, Willis SP (2003) A method for the systematic selection of technique factors in paediatric CT. BJR 76:51–56CrossRefPubMed
59.
go back to reference Paterson A, Frush DP (2007) Dose reduction in paediatric MDCT: general principles. Clin Radiol 62:507–517CrossRefPubMed Paterson A, Frush DP (2007) Dose reduction in paediatric MDCT: general principles. Clin Radiol 62:507–517CrossRefPubMed
60.
go back to reference Lee CH, Goo JM, Lee HJ et al (2008) Radiation dose modulation techniques in the multidetector CT era: From basics to practice. Radiographics 28:1451–1459CrossRefPubMed Lee CH, Goo JM, Lee HJ et al (2008) Radiation dose modulation techniques in the multidetector CT era: From basics to practice. Radiographics 28:1451–1459CrossRefPubMed
61.
go back to reference McCollough CH, Primak AN, Braun N et al (2009) Strategies for reducing radiation dose in CT. Radiol Clin North Am 47:27–40CrossRefPubMed McCollough CH, Primak AN, Braun N et al (2009) Strategies for reducing radiation dose in CT. Radiol Clin North Am 47:27–40CrossRefPubMed
62.
go back to reference Smith AB, Dillon WP, Lau BC et al (2008) Radiation dose reduction strategy for CT protocols: successful implementation in neuroradiology section. Radiology 247:499–506CrossRefPubMed Smith AB, Dillon WP, Lau BC et al (2008) Radiation dose reduction strategy for CT protocols: successful implementation in neuroradiology section. Radiology 247:499–506CrossRefPubMed
63.
go back to reference Kalra MK, Maher MM, Toth TL et al (2004) Techniques and applications of automatic tube current modulation for CT. Radiology 233:649–657CrossRefPubMed Kalra MK, Maher MM, Toth TL et al (2004) Techniques and applications of automatic tube current modulation for CT. Radiology 233:649–657CrossRefPubMed
64.
go back to reference Kalender WA, Buchenau S, Deak P et al (2008) Technical approaches to the optimisation of CT. Phys Med 24:71–79PubMed Kalender WA, Buchenau S, Deak P et al (2008) Technical approaches to the optimisation of CT. Phys Med 24:71–79PubMed
65.
go back to reference Van der Molen AJ, Geleijns J (2007) Overranging in multisection CT: quantification and relative contribution to dose—comparison of four 16-section CT-scanners. Radiology 242:208–216CrossRefPubMed Van der Molen AJ, Geleijns J (2007) Overranging in multisection CT: quantification and relative contribution to dose—comparison of four 16-section CT-scanners. Radiology 242:208–216CrossRefPubMed
66.
go back to reference Nagel HD (2007) CT parameters that influence the radiation dose. In: Tack D, Gevenois PA (eds) Radiation dose from adult and pediatric multidetector computed tomography. Springer, Berlin, pp 51–79CrossRef Nagel HD (2007) CT parameters that influence the radiation dose. In: Tack D, Gevenois PA (eds) Radiation dose from adult and pediatric multidetector computed tomography. Springer, Berlin, pp 51–79CrossRef
67.
go back to reference Deak PD, Lagner O, Lell M et al (2009) Effects of adaptive section collimation on patient radiation dose in multisection spiral CT. Radiology 252:140–147CrossRefPubMed Deak PD, Lagner O, Lell M et al (2009) Effects of adaptive section collimation on patient radiation dose in multisection spiral CT. Radiology 252:140–147CrossRefPubMed
68.
go back to reference Thomas KE, Wang B (2008) Age-specific effective doses for pediatric MSCT examinations at a large children’s hospital using DLP conversion coefficients: a simple estimation method. Pediatr Radiol 38:645–656CrossRefPubMed Thomas KE, Wang B (2008) Age-specific effective doses for pediatric MSCT examinations at a large children’s hospital using DLP conversion coefficients: a simple estimation method. Pediatr Radiol 38:645–656CrossRefPubMed
69.
go back to reference Fujii K, Aoyama T, Koyama S et al (2007) Comparative evaluation of organ and effective doses of paediatric patients with those for adults in chest and abdominal CT examinations. BJR 80:657–667CrossRefPubMed Fujii K, Aoyama T, Koyama S et al (2007) Comparative evaluation of organ and effective doses of paediatric patients with those for adults in chest and abdominal CT examinations. BJR 80:657–667CrossRefPubMed
70.
71.
go back to reference Shrimpton PC, Hillier MC, Lewis MA et al (2006) National survey of doses from CT in the UK: 2003. Br J Radiol 79:968–980CrossRefPubMed Shrimpton PC, Hillier MC, Lewis MA et al (2006) National survey of doses from CT in the UK: 2003. Br J Radiol 79:968–980CrossRefPubMed
72.
go back to reference Verdun FR, Gutierrez D, Vader JP et al (2008) CT radiation dose in children: a survey to establish age-based diagnostic reference levels in Switzerland. Eur Radiol 18:1980–1986CrossRefPubMed Verdun FR, Gutierrez D, Vader JP et al (2008) CT radiation dose in children: a survey to establish age-based diagnostic reference levels in Switzerland. Eur Radiol 18:1980–1986CrossRefPubMed
73.
go back to reference Brisse HJ, Aubert B (2009) CT exposure from pediatric MDCT: results from the 2007–2008 SFIPP/ISRN survey. J Radiol 90:207–215CrossRefPubMed Brisse HJ, Aubert B (2009) CT exposure from pediatric MDCT: results from the 2007–2008 SFIPP/ISRN survey. J Radiol 90:207–215CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Multidetector CT in children: current concepts and dose reduction strategies
Authors
Rutger A. J. Nievelstein
Ingrid M. van Dam
Aart J. van der Molen
Publication date
01-08-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Pediatric Radiology / Issue 8/2010
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-010-1714-7

Other articles of this Issue 8/2010

Pediatric Radiology 8/2010 Go to the issue