Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Radiology 2/2006

Open Access 01-09-2006 | ALARA

Management of pediatric radiation dose using GE fluoroscopic equipment

Authors: Barry Belanger, John Boudry

Published in: Pediatric Radiology | Special Issue 2/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

In this article, we present GE Healthcare’s design philosophy and implementation of X-ray imaging systems with dose management for pediatric patients, as embodied in its current radiography and fluoroscopy and interventional cardiovascular X-ray product offerings. First, we present a basic framework of image quality and dose in the context of a cost–benefit trade-off, with the development of the concept of imaging dose efficiency. A set of key metrics of image quality and dose efficiency is presented, including X-ray source efficiency, detector quantum efficiency (DQE), detector dynamic range, and temporal response, with an explanation of the clinical relevance of each. Second, we present design methods for automatically selecting optimal X-ray technique parameters (kVp, mA, pulse width, and spectral filtration) in real time for various clinical applications. These methods are based on an optimization scheme where patient skin dose is minimized for a target desired image contrast-to-noise ratio. Operator display of skin dose and Dose-Area Product (DAP) is covered, as well. Third, system controls and predefined protocols available to the operator are explained in the context of dose management and the need to meet varying clinical procedure imaging demands. For example, fluoroscopic dose rate is adjustable over a range of 20:1 to adapt to different procedure requirements. Fourth, we discuss the impact of image processing techniques upon dose minimization. In particular, two such techniques, dynamic range compression through adaptive multiband spectral filtering and fluoroscopic noise reduction, are explored in some detail. Fifth, we review a list of system dose-reduction features, including automatic spectral filtration, virtual collimation, variable-rate pulsed fluoroscopic, grid and no-grid techniques, and fluoroscopic loop replay with store. In addition, we describe a new feature that automatically minimizes the patient-to-detector distance, along with an estimate of its dose reduction potential. Finally, two recently developed imaging techniques and their potential effect on dose utilization are discussed. Specifically, we discuss the dose benefits of rotational angiography and low frame rate imaging with advanced image processing in lieu of higher-dose digital subtraction.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Moy JP (2000) Signal-to-noise ratio and spatial resolution in x-ray electronic imagers: is the MTF a relevant parameter? Med Phys 27:86–3CrossRefPubMed Moy JP (2000) Signal-to-noise ratio and spatial resolution in x-ray electronic imagers: is the MTF a relevant parameter? Med Phys 27:86–3CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Chotas HG (1999) Principles of digital radiography with large-area, electronically readable detectors: a review of the basics. Radiology 210:595–99PubMed Chotas HG (1999) Principles of digital radiography with large-area, electronically readable detectors: a review of the basics. Radiology 210:595–99PubMed
3.
go back to reference Belanger B, Betraoui F, Dhawale P, et al (2006) Development of next generation digital flat panel catheterization system: design principles and validation methodology. Proceedings of SPIE: Physics of Medical Imaging (in press) Belanger B, Betraoui F, Dhawale P, et al (2006) Development of next generation digital flat panel catheterization system: design principles and validation methodology. Proceedings of SPIE: Physics of Medical Imaging (in press)
4.
go back to reference National Electrical Manufacturers Association (2006) Standard XR 21-2000. Revised May 2002. National Electrical Manufacturers Association (Medical Division), Arlington, Va. http://www.nema.org/stds National Electrical Manufacturers Association (2006) Standard XR 21-2000. Revised May 2002. National Electrical Manufacturers Association (Medical Division), Arlington, Va. http://​www.​nema.​org/​stds
5.
go back to reference Balter S, Heupler FA, Lin PJ, et al (2001) A new tool for benchmarking cardiovascular fluoroscopes. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 52:67–2CrossRefPubMed Balter S, Heupler FA, Lin PJ, et al (2001) A new tool for benchmarking cardiovascular fluoroscopes. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 52:67–2CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Gordon CL III (2000) Image quality optimization using an x-ray spectra model-based optimization method. In: Dobbins JT, Boone JM (eds) Medical Imaging 2000. Physics of medical imaging: 13–5 Feb 2000, San Diego, Calif. Bellingham, Washington, USA, Proc SPIE 3977:456–65 Gordon CL III (2000) Image quality optimization using an x-ray spectra model-based optimization method. In: Dobbins JT, Boone JM (eds) Medical Imaging 2000. Physics of medical imaging: 13–5 Feb 2000, San Diego, Calif. Bellingham, Washington, USA, Proc SPIE 3977:456–65
7.
go back to reference Aufrichtig R, Xue P, Thomas CW, et al (1994) Perceptual comparison of pulsed and continuous fluoroscopy. Med Phys 21:245–56CrossRefPubMed Aufrichtig R, Xue P, Thomas CW, et al (1994) Perceptual comparison of pulsed and continuous fluoroscopy. Med Phys 21:245–56CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Raman SV, Magorien RD, Vaillant R, et al (2002) Rotational cardiovascular x-ray imaging for left coronary artery angiography using a digital flat-panel cardiac imaging system. Am J Cardiol 90 [Suppl 6A]:129H Raman SV, Magorien RD, Vaillant R, et al (2002) Rotational cardiovascular x-ray imaging for left coronary artery angiography using a digital flat-panel cardiac imaging system. Am J Cardiol 90 [Suppl 6A]:129H
10.
go back to reference Thanvi S, Dani S (2004) Rotational digital angiocardiography in evaluation of congenital heart disease. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 63:110 Thanvi S, Dani S (2004) Rotational digital angiocardiography in evaluation of congenital heart disease. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 63:110
Metadata
Title
Management of pediatric radiation dose using GE fluoroscopic equipment
Authors
Barry Belanger
John Boudry
Publication date
01-09-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Pediatric Radiology / Issue Special Issue 2/2006
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-006-0228-9

Other articles of this Special Issue 2/2006

Pediatric Radiology 2/2006 Go to the issue