Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Radiology 2/2006

Open Access 01-09-2006 | ALARA

Pediatric interventional radiography equipment: safety considerations

Author: Keith J. Strauss

Published in: Pediatric Radiology | Special Issue 2/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

This paper discusses pediatric image quality and radiation dose considerations in state-of-the-art fluoroscopic imaging equipment. Although most fluoroscopes are capable of automatically providing good image quality on infants, toddlers, and small children, excessive radiation dose levels can result from design deficiencies of the imaging device or inappropriate configuration of the equipment’s capabilities when imaging small body parts. Important design features and setup choices at installation and during the clinical use of the imaging device can improve image quality and reduce radiation exposure levels in pediatric patients. Pediatric radiologists and cardiologists, with the help of medical physicists, need to understand the issues involved in creating good image quality at reasonable pediatric patient doses. The control of radiographic technique factors by the generator of the imaging device must provide a large dynamic range of mAs values per exposure pulse during both fluoroscopy and image recording as a function of patient girth, which is the thickness of the patient in the posterior–anterior projection at the umbilicus (less than 10 cm to greater than 30 cm). The range of pulse widths must be limited to less than 10 ms in children to properly freeze patient motion. Variable rate pulsed fluoroscopy can be leveraged to reduce radiation dose to the patient and improve image quality. Three focal spots with nominal sizes of 0.3 mm to 1 mm are necessary on the pediatric unit. A second, lateral imaging plane might be necessary because of the child’s limited tolerance of contrast medium. Spectral and spatial beam shaping can improve image quality while reducing the radiation dose. Finally, the level of entrance exposure to the image receptor of the fluoroscope as a function of operator choices, of added filter thickness, of selected pulse rate, of the selected field-of-view and of the patient girth all must be addressed at installation.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Boone JM, Pfeiffer DE, Strauss KJ, et al (1993) A survey of fluoroscopic exposure rates: AAPM task group II report. Med Phys 20:789–94CrossRefPubMed Boone JM, Pfeiffer DE, Strauss KJ, et al (1993) A survey of fluoroscopic exposure rates: AAPM task group II report. Med Phys 20:789–94CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Chung T, Kirks DR (1998) Techniques. In: Kirks DR, Griscom NT (eds) Practical pediatric imaging. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 1–3 Chung T, Kirks DR (1998) Techniques. In: Kirks DR, Griscom NT (eds) Practical pediatric imaging. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 1–3
3.
go back to reference Hall EJ (2002) Lessons we have learned from our children: cancer risks from diagnostic radiology. Pediatr Radiol 32:700–06CrossRefPubMed Hall EJ (2002) Lessons we have learned from our children: cancer risks from diagnostic radiology. Pediatr Radiol 32:700–06CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Lichtenstein DA, Klapholz L, Vardy DA, et al (1996) Chronic radiodermatitis following cardiac catheterization. Arch Dermatol 132:663–67CrossRefPubMed Lichtenstein DA, Klapholz L, Vardy DA, et al (1996) Chronic radiodermatitis following cardiac catheterization. Arch Dermatol 132:663–67CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Shope TB (1996) Radiation-induced skin injuries from fluoroscopy. Radiographics 16:1195–199PubMed Shope TB (1996) Radiation-induced skin injuries from fluoroscopy. Radiographics 16:1195–199PubMed
6.
go back to reference Jones KL (1997) Smith’s recognizable patterns of human malformation, 5th edn. Saunders, Philadelphia Jones KL (1997) Smith’s recognizable patterns of human malformation, 5th edn. Saunders, Philadelphia
7.
go back to reference Kruger RA (1984) Basic concepts of digital subtraction angiography. Hall Medical Publishers, Boston Kruger RA (1984) Basic concepts of digital subtraction angiography. Hall Medical Publishers, Boston
8.
go back to reference Hernandez RJ, Goodsitt MM (1996) Reduction of radiation dose in pediatric patients using pulsed fluoroscopy. AJR 167:1247–253PubMed Hernandez RJ, Goodsitt MM (1996) Reduction of radiation dose in pediatric patients using pulsed fluoroscopy. AJR 167:1247–253PubMed
9.
go back to reference Grollman JH Jr, Klosterman H, Herman MW, et al (1972) Dose reduction low pulse-rate fluoroscopy. Radiology 105:293–98PubMed Grollman JH Jr, Klosterman H, Herman MW, et al (1972) Dose reduction low pulse-rate fluoroscopy. Radiology 105:293–98PubMed
10.
go back to reference Grollman JH Jr (1974) Radiation reduction by means of low pulse-rate fluoroscopy during cardiac catheterization and coronary arteriography. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 121:636–41PubMed Grollman JH Jr (1974) Radiation reduction by means of low pulse-rate fluoroscopy during cardiac catheterization and coronary arteriography. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 121:636–41PubMed
11.
go back to reference Aufrichtig R, Xue P, Thomas CW, et al (1994) Perceptual comparison of pulsed and continuous fluoroscopy. Med Phys 21:245–56CrossRefPubMed Aufrichtig R, Xue P, Thomas CW, et al (1994) Perceptual comparison of pulsed and continuous fluoroscopy. Med Phys 21:245–56CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Ammann E, Wiede G (1995) Generators and tubes in interventional radiology. In: Balter S, Shope TB (eds) Physical and technical aspects of angiography and interventional radiology. RSNA Publications, Oak Brook, Ill, pp 59–4 Ammann E, Wiede G (1995) Generators and tubes in interventional radiology. In: Balter S, Shope TB (eds) Physical and technical aspects of angiography and interventional radiology. RSNA Publications, Oak Brook, Ill, pp 59–4
13.
go back to reference Rudin S, Bednarek DR (1995) Spatial shaping of the beam: collimation, grids, equalization filters, and region-of-interest fluoroscopy. In: Balter S, Shope TB (eds) Physical and technical aspects of angiography and interventional radiology. RSNA Publications, Oak Brook, Ill, pp 75–5 Rudin S, Bednarek DR (1995) Spatial shaping of the beam: collimation, grids, equalization filters, and region-of-interest fluoroscopy. In: Balter S, Shope TB (eds) Physical and technical aspects of angiography and interventional radiology. RSNA Publications, Oak Brook, Ill, pp 75–5
14.
go back to reference Labbe MS, Chiu MY, Rzeszotarski MS, et al (1994) The x-ray fovea, a device for reducing x-ray dose in fluoroscopy. Med Phys 21:471–81CrossRefPubMed Labbe MS, Chiu MY, Rzeszotarski MS, et al (1994) The x-ray fovea, a device for reducing x-ray dose in fluoroscopy. Med Phys 21:471–81CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Atkins HL, Fairchild RG, Robertson JS, et al (1975) Effect of absorption edge filters on diagnostic x-ray spectra. Radiology 115:431–37PubMed Atkins HL, Fairchild RG, Robertson JS, et al (1975) Effect of absorption edge filters on diagnostic x-ray spectra. Radiology 115:431–37PubMed
17.
go back to reference Johnson MA, Burgess AE (1981) Clinical use of a gadolinium filter in pediatric radiography. Pediatr Radiol 10:229–32CrossRefPubMed Johnson MA, Burgess AE (1981) Clinical use of a gadolinium filter in pediatric radiography. Pediatr Radiol 10:229–32CrossRefPubMed
18.
19.
go back to reference Oosterkamp IW (1961) Monochromatic x-rays for medical fluoroscopy and radiography? Medicamundi 7:68–7PubMed Oosterkamp IW (1961) Monochromatic x-rays for medical fluoroscopy and radiography? Medicamundi 7:68–7PubMed
20.
go back to reference Villagran JE, Hobbs BB, Taylor KW (1978) Reduction of patient exposure by use of heavy elements as radiation filters in diagnostic radiology. Radiology 127:249–54PubMed Villagran JE, Hobbs BB, Taylor KW (1978) Reduction of patient exposure by use of heavy elements as radiation filters in diagnostic radiology. Radiology 127:249–54PubMed
21.
go back to reference Boone JM, Seibert JA (1994) A comparison of mono- and poly-energetic x-ray beam performance for radiographic and fluoroscopic imaging. Med Phys 21:1853–863CrossRefPubMed Boone JM, Seibert JA (1994) A comparison of mono- and poly-energetic x-ray beam performance for radiographic and fluoroscopic imaging. Med Phys 21:1853–863CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Balter S (1995) Managing radiation in the fluoroscopic environment. Philips Medical Systems 4522 982 4900:1–5 Balter S (1995) Managing radiation in the fluoroscopic environment. Philips Medical Systems 4522 982 4900:1–5
23.
go back to reference Gagne RM, Quinn PW (1995) X-ray spectral considerations in fluoroscopy. In: Balter S, Shope TB (eds) Physical and technical aspects of angiography and interventional radiology. RSNA Publications, Oak Brook, Ill, pp 49–8 Gagne RM, Quinn PW (1995) X-ray spectral considerations in fluoroscopy. In: Balter S, Shope TB (eds) Physical and technical aspects of angiography and interventional radiology. RSNA Publications, Oak Brook, Ill, pp 49–8
24.
go back to reference den Boer A, de Feyter PJ, Hummel WA, et al (1994) Reduction of radiation exposure while maintaining high-quality fluoroscopic images during interventional cardiology using novel x-ray tube technology with extra beam filtering. Circulation 89:2710–714 den Boer A, de Feyter PJ, Hummel WA, et al (1994) Reduction of radiation exposure while maintaining high-quality fluoroscopic images during interventional cardiology using novel x-ray tube technology with extra beam filtering. Circulation 89:2710–714
25.
go back to reference Thierens H, Kunnen M, Van der Plaetsen A, et al (1991) Evaluation of the use of a niobium filter for patient dose reduction in chest radiography. Br J Radiol 64:334–40CrossRefPubMed Thierens H, Kunnen M, Van der Plaetsen A, et al (1991) Evaluation of the use of a niobium filter for patient dose reduction in chest radiography. Br J Radiol 64:334–40CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Rossi RP, Harnisch B, Hendee WR (1982) Reduction of radiation exposure in radiography of the chest. Radiology 144:909–14PubMed Rossi RP, Harnisch B, Hendee WR (1982) Reduction of radiation exposure in radiography of the chest. Radiology 144:909–14PubMed
27.
go back to reference Thorsen F, Mehus A, Nordanger J (1990) The use of copper and niobium filters in diagnostic x-ray equipment. A comparison of dose reduction, tube loading and picture quality. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 110:2878–880PubMed Thorsen F, Mehus A, Nordanger J (1990) The use of copper and niobium filters in diagnostic x-ray equipment. A comparison of dose reduction, tube loading and picture quality. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 110:2878–880PubMed
28.
go back to reference Gagne RM, Quinn PW, Jennings RJ (1994) Comparison of beam-hardening and K-edge filters for imaging barium and iodine during fluoroscopy. Med Phys 21:107–21CrossRefPubMed Gagne RM, Quinn PW, Jennings RJ (1994) Comparison of beam-hardening and K-edge filters for imaging barium and iodine during fluoroscopy. Med Phys 21:107–21CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Wesenberg RL, Amundson GM, Mueller DL, et al (1987) Ultra-low-dose routine pediatric radiography utilizing a rare-earth filter. Can Assoc Radiol J 38:158–64PubMed Wesenberg RL, Amundson GM, Mueller DL, et al (1987) Ultra-low-dose routine pediatric radiography utilizing a rare-earth filter. Can Assoc Radiol J 38:158–64PubMed
30.
go back to reference Campbell JM, Kuntzler CM, Nikesch W (1986) Exposure reduction using yttrium filters in a cardiac catheterization unit. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 12:202–04PubMed Campbell JM, Kuntzler CM, Nikesch W (1986) Exposure reduction using yttrium filters in a cardiac catheterization unit. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 12:202–04PubMed
31.
go back to reference Kohn ML, Gooch AW Jr, Keller WS (1988) Filters for radiation reduction: a comparison. Radiology 167:255–57PubMed Kohn ML, Gooch AW Jr, Keller WS (1988) Filters for radiation reduction: a comparison. Radiology 167:255–57PubMed
32.
go back to reference Jangland L, Axelsson B (1990) Niobium filters for dose reduction in pediatric radiology. Acta Radiol 31:540–41CrossRefPubMed Jangland L, Axelsson B (1990) Niobium filters for dose reduction in pediatric radiology. Acta Radiol 31:540–41CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Williamson BD, van Doorn T (1994) The efficacy of K-edge filters in diagnostic radiology. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 17:162–74PubMed Williamson BD, van Doorn T (1994) The efficacy of K-edge filters in diagnostic radiology. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 17:162–74PubMed
34.
35.
go back to reference Ort MG, Gregg EC, Pillai KM, et al (1979) Radiographic quality, tube potential, and patient dose. Med Phys 6:134–36CrossRefPubMed Ort MG, Gregg EC, Pillai KM, et al (1979) Radiographic quality, tube potential, and patient dose. Med Phys 6:134–36CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Hufton AP, Russell JG (1986) The use of carbon fibre material in table tops, cassette fronts and grid covers: magnitude of possible dose reduction. Br J Radiol 59:157–63CrossRefPubMed Hufton AP, Russell JG (1986) The use of carbon fibre material in table tops, cassette fronts and grid covers: magnitude of possible dose reduction. Br J Radiol 59:157–63CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Sandborg M, Dance DR, Carlsson GA, et al (1993) Monte Carlo study of grid performance in diagnostic radiology: factors which affect the selection of tube potential and grid ratio. Br J Radiol 66:1164–176CrossRefPubMed Sandborg M, Dance DR, Carlsson GA, et al (1993) Monte Carlo study of grid performance in diagnostic radiology: factors which affect the selection of tube potential and grid ratio. Br J Radiol 66:1164–176CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference McDaniel DL, Cohen G, Wagner LK, et al (1984) Relative dose efficiencies of antiscatter grids and air gaps in pediatric radiography. Med Phys 11:508–12CrossRefPubMed McDaniel DL, Cohen G, Wagner LK, et al (1984) Relative dose efficiencies of antiscatter grids and air gaps in pediatric radiography. Med Phys 11:508–12CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Drury P, Robinson A (1980) Fluoroscopy without the grid: a method of reducing the radiation dose. Br J Radiol 53:93–9CrossRefPubMed Drury P, Robinson A (1980) Fluoroscopy without the grid: a method of reducing the radiation dose. Br J Radiol 53:93–9CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Gray JE, Swee RG (1982) The elimination of grids during intensified fluoroscopy and photofluoro spot imaging. Radiology 144:426–29PubMed Gray JE, Swee RG (1982) The elimination of grids during intensified fluoroscopy and photofluoro spot imaging. Radiology 144:426–29PubMed
41.
go back to reference Rossi RP, Wesenberg RL, Hendee WR (1978) A variable aperture fluoroscopic unit for reduced patient exposure. Radiology 129:799–02PubMed Rossi RP, Wesenberg RL, Hendee WR (1978) A variable aperture fluoroscopic unit for reduced patient exposure. Radiology 129:799–02PubMed
42.
go back to reference Rudin S, Bednarek DR, Miller JA (1991) Dose reduction during fluoroscopic placement of feeding tubes. Radiology 178:647–51PubMed Rudin S, Bednarek DR, Miller JA (1991) Dose reduction during fluoroscopic placement of feeding tubes. Radiology 178:647–51PubMed
43.
go back to reference Rudin S, Bednarek DR (1992) Minimizing radiation dose to patient and staff during fluoroscopic, nasoenteral tube insertions. Br J Radiol 65:162–66CrossRefPubMed Rudin S, Bednarek DR (1992) Minimizing radiation dose to patient and staff during fluoroscopic, nasoenteral tube insertions. Br J Radiol 65:162–66CrossRefPubMed
44.
go back to reference Strauss KJ (1998) Cardiac catheterization equipment requirements: pediatric catheterization laboratory considerations. In: Nickoloff EL, Strauss KJ (eds) Cardiac catheterization imaging. RSNA Publications, Oak Brook, Ill, pp 105–19 Strauss KJ (1998) Cardiac catheterization equipment requirements: pediatric catheterization laboratory considerations. In: Nickoloff EL, Strauss KJ (eds) Cardiac catheterization imaging. RSNA Publications, Oak Brook, Ill, pp 105–19
Metadata
Title
Pediatric interventional radiography equipment: safety considerations
Author
Keith J. Strauss
Publication date
01-09-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Pediatric Radiology / Issue Special Issue 2/2006
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-006-0220-4

Other articles of this Special Issue 2/2006

Pediatric Radiology 2/2006 Go to the issue