Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Cardiology 3/2020

01-03-2020 | Review Article

Regulatory Science, and How Device Regulation Will Shape Our Future

Authors: Nicole Ibrahim, Nicole Gillette, Hetal Patel, Vasum Peiris

Published in: Pediatric Cardiology | Issue 3/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Pediatric medical device approvals lag behind adult approvals. Historically, medical devices have rarely been designed specifically for children, but use in children has most often borrowed from adult or general use applications. While a variety of social, economic, and clinical factors have contributed to this phenomenon, the regulatory process remains a fundamental aspect of pediatric device development and commercialization. FDA’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) has established programmatic and technological areas of advancement to support innovation that serves the public health needs of children and special populations. We highlight four regulatory areas that have the potential to shape the future of pediatric cardiology: the CDRH Early Feasibility Study Program, advancements in 3D printing or additive manufacturing, computational modeling and simulation, and the use of real-world evidence for regulatory applications. These programs have the potential to impact all stages of device development, from early conception, design, and prototyping to clinical evidence generation, regulatory review, and finally commercialization. The success of these programs relies on a collaborative community of stakeholders, including government, regulators, device manufacturers, patients, payers, and the academic and professional community societies.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Rontgen W (1896) On a new kind of rays. Nature 53:274–276 Rontgen W (1896) On a new kind of rays. Nature 53:274–276
2.
go back to reference Williams F (1896) A method for more fully determining the outlines of the heart by means of a fluoroscope. Boston Med Surg 135:335–337CrossRef Williams F (1896) A method for more fully determining the outlines of the heart by means of a fluoroscope. Boston Med Surg 135:335–337CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Einthoven W (1906) Le telecardiogramme. Arch Inst Physiol 4:132–164 Einthoven W (1906) Le telecardiogramme. Arch Inst Physiol 4:132–164
4.
go back to reference Gross R, Hubbard J (1939) Surgical ligation of a patent ductus arteriosus: report of first successful case. JAMA 112:729–731CrossRef Gross R, Hubbard J (1939) Surgical ligation of a patent ductus arteriosus: report of first successful case. JAMA 112:729–731CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Gibbon J (1954) Application of a mechanical heart and lung apparatus to cardiac surgery. Minn Med 37:171–185PubMed Gibbon J (1954) Application of a mechanical heart and lung apparatus to cardiac surgery. Minn Med 37:171–185PubMed
6.
go back to reference Kirklin J, Dushane J, Patrick R, Donald D, Hetzel P, Harshbarger H, Wood H (1955) Intracardiac surgery with the aid of a mechanical pumpoxygenator system (gibbon type): report of eight cases. Mayo Clin Proc 201–206 Kirklin J, Dushane J, Patrick R, Donald D, Hetzel P, Harshbarger H, Wood H (1955) Intracardiac surgery with the aid of a mechanical pumpoxygenator system (gibbon type): report of eight cases. Mayo Clin Proc 201–206
7.
go back to reference Lillehei C, Cohen M, Warden H, Varco R (1955) The direct vision intracardiac correction of congenital anomalies by controlled cross circulation. Results in thirty two patients with ventricular septal defects, tetrology of Fallot, and atrioventricular communis defects. Surgery 30:11–29 Lillehei C, Cohen M, Warden H, Varco R (1955) The direct vision intracardiac correction of congenital anomalies by controlled cross circulation. Results in thirty two patients with ventricular septal defects, tetrology of Fallot, and atrioventricular communis defects. Surgery 30:11–29
8.
go back to reference Forssmann W (1929) Sonderung des rechter. Herzenz Kein Wochenschr 28:2085–2087CrossRef Forssmann W (1929) Sonderung des rechter. Herzenz Kein Wochenschr 28:2085–2087CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Cournand A, Baldwin J, Himmelstein A (1949) Cardiac catherization in congenital heart disease: a clinical and physiological study in infants and children. Commonwealth Fund, New York Cournand A, Baldwin J, Himmelstein A (1949) Cardiac catherization in congenital heart disease: a clinical and physiological study in infants and children. Commonwealth Fund, New York
10.
go back to reference Martin J, Hamilton B, Osterman M (2017) Births in the United States, 2016. NCHS Data Brief, pp 1–8 Martin J, Hamilton B, Osterman M (2017) Births in the United States, 2016. NCHS Data Brief, pp 1–8
11.
go back to reference Workshop P (2017) Advancing the development of pediatric therapeutics (ADEPT): application of "Big Data" to pediatric safety studies. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring Workshop P (2017) Advancing the development of pediatric therapeutics (ADEPT): application of "Big Data" to pediatric safety studies. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring
12.
go back to reference Workshop P (2010) Developing pathways to market for pediatric heart valves. Food and Drug Administration, AdvaMed, Silver Spring Workshop P (2010) Developing pathways to market for pediatric heart valves. Food and Drug Administration, AdvaMed, Silver Spring
13.
go back to reference Workshop P (2016) Pediatric clinical investigator training. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring Workshop P (2016) Pediatric clinical investigator training. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring
14.
go back to reference Workshop P (2018) Pediatric medical device development. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring Workshop P (2018) Pediatric medical device development. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring
15.
go back to reference Workshop P (2017) Pediatric trial design and modeling: moving into the next decade. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring Workshop P (2017) Pediatric trial design and modeling: moving into the next decade. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring
16.
go back to reference Breakthrough Devices Program: Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff (2018) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Center for Biologics Evaluation Research, Silver Spring Breakthrough Devices Program: Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff (2018) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Center for Biologics Evaluation Research, Silver Spring
17.
go back to reference Leveraging Existing Clinical Data for Extrapolation to Pediatric Uses of Medical Devices (2016) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Center for Biologics Evaluation Research, Silver Spring Leveraging Existing Clinical Data for Extrapolation to Pediatric Uses of Medical Devices (2016) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Center for Biologics Evaluation Research, Silver Spring
18.
go back to reference Investigational Device Exemptions (IDEs) for Early Feasibility Medical Device Clinical Studies, Including Certain First in Human (FIH) Studies (2013) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Center for Biologics Evaluation Research., Silver Spring Investigational Device Exemptions (IDEs) for Early Feasibility Medical Device Clinical Studies, Including Certain First in Human (FIH) Studies (2013) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Center for Biologics Evaluation Research., Silver Spring
19.
go back to reference Holmes D, Califf R, Farb A, Abel D, Mack M, Syrek Jensen T, Zuckerman B, Leon M, Shuren S (2016) Overcoming the challenges of conducting early feasibility studies of medical devices in the United States. JACC 68:1908–1915 Holmes D, Califf R, Farb A, Abel D, Mack M, Syrek Jensen T, Zuckerman B, Leon M, Shuren S (2016) Overcoming the challenges of conducting early feasibility studies of medical devices in the United States. JACC 68:1908–1915
20.
go back to reference Technical Considerations for Additive Manufactured Medical Devices: Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff (2017) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Center for Biologics Evaluation Research, Silver Spring Technical Considerations for Additive Manufactured Medical Devices: Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff (2017) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Center for Biologics Evaluation Research, Silver Spring
21.
go back to reference Morrison T, Dreher M, Nagaraja S, Angelone L, Kainz W (2017) The role of computational modeling and simulation in the total product life cycle of peripheral vascular devices. J Med Device 11:024503CrossRef Morrison T, Dreher M, Nagaraja S, Angelone L, Kainz W (2017) The role of computational modeling and simulation in the total product life cycle of peripheral vascular devices. J Med Device 11:024503CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Reporting of Computational Modeling Studies in Medical Device Submissions: Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff (2016) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Silver Spring Reporting of Computational Modeling Studies in Medical Device Submissions: Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff (2016) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Silver Spring
23.
go back to reference Haddad T, Himes A, Thompson L, Irony T, Nair R (2017) Participants, Incorporation of stochiastic engineering models as prior information in Bayesian medical device trials. J Biopharm Stat 27:1089–1103 Haddad T, Himes A, Thompson L, Irony T, Nair R (2017) Participants, Incorporation of stochiastic engineering models as prior information in Bayesian medical device trials. J Biopharm Stat 27:1089–1103
24.
go back to reference Medical Device Classification Procedures: Determination of Safety and Effectiveness (2018) Medical Device Classification Procedures: Determination of Safety and Effectiveness (2018)
25.
go back to reference Use of Real-World Evidence to Support Regulatory Decision-Making for Medical Devices (2017) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Center for Biologics Evaluation Research, Silver Spring Use of Real-World Evidence to Support Regulatory Decision-Making for Medical Devices (2017) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Center for Biologics Evaluation Research, Silver Spring
26.
go back to reference Dubin A, Cannon B, Saarel E, Triedman J, Berul C, Bar-Cohen Y, Shah M, Paulsen J, Patel H, Reich J, Carlson M, Stein K, Gilkerson J, Kowal R, Peiris V (2019) Pediatric and congential electrophysiology society initiative on device needs in pediatric electrophysiology. Heart Rhythm 16(4):e39–e46CrossRef Dubin A, Cannon B, Saarel E, Triedman J, Berul C, Bar-Cohen Y, Shah M, Paulsen J, Patel H, Reich J, Carlson M, Stein K, Gilkerson J, Kowal R, Peiris V (2019) Pediatric and congential electrophysiology society initiative on device needs in pediatric electrophysiology. Heart Rhythm 16(4):e39–e46CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Regulatory Science, and How Device Regulation Will Shape Our Future
Authors
Nicole Ibrahim
Nicole Gillette
Hetal Patel
Vasum Peiris
Publication date
01-03-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Pediatric Cardiology / Issue 3/2020
Print ISSN: 0172-0643
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1971
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-020-02296-0

Other articles of this Issue 3/2020

Pediatric Cardiology 3/2020 Go to the issue