Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Cardiology 6/2019

01-08-2019 | Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation | Original Article

Development and Evaluation of a New Chest Compression Technique for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Infants

Authors: Dongjun Yang, Kwan Ho Kim, Je Hyeok Oh, Sunhan Son, Junmo Cho, Kyung Mook Seo

Published in: Pediatric Cardiology | Issue 6/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

We designed the newly developed flexed two-finger chest compression technique for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in infants to increase the quality of chest compression by considering the advantages and disadvantages of the two-thumb encircling hand technique and conventional two-finger technique. The aim of the study is to compare the performance of the flexed two-finger technique and the currently used two-thumb technique or two-finger technique for infant CPR. A total of 42 doctors conducted 2-min single-rescuer CPR on a cardiac arrest infant model using the two-thumb technique followed, in a random order, by the two-finger technique and the flexed two-finger technique. Although the ratio of the adequate compression depth was highest in the two-thumb technique, followed by the flexed two-finger technique and two-finger technique (100% [98–100] vs. 99% [80–100] vs. 76% [42–95], respectively, P < 0.001), the hand-off time of the two-thumb technique was significantly longer than in the two-finger technique and flexed two-finger technique (31 s [28–35] vs. 29 s [27–32] vs. 29 s [26–32], respectively, P < 0.001). The number of total chest compressions of the two-thumb technique was significantly lower than in the two-finger technique and flexed two-finger technique (150 [148–159] vs. 159 [149–173] vs. 162 [150–172], respectively, P < 0.001). The newly developed chest compression technique could provide adequate compression depth without increasing the hand-off time during single-rescuer infant CPR.
Trial registration: Clinical Research Information Service, KCT0002730.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
9.
go back to reference Whitelaw CC, Slywka B, Goldsmith LJ (2000) Comparison of a two-finger versus two-thumb method for chest compressions by healthcare providers in an infant mechanical model. Resuscitation 43(3):213–216CrossRef Whitelaw CC, Slywka B, Goldsmith LJ (2000) Comparison of a two-finger versus two-thumb method for chest compressions by healthcare providers in an infant mechanical model. Resuscitation 43(3):213–216CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Dorfsman ML, Menegazzi JJ, Wadas RJ, Auble TE (2000) Two-thumb vs. two-finger chest compression in an infant model of prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Acad Emerg Med 7(10):1077–1082CrossRef Dorfsman ML, Menegazzi JJ, Wadas RJ, Auble TE (2000) Two-thumb vs. two-finger chest compression in an infant model of prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Acad Emerg Med 7(10):1077–1082CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Houri PK, Frank LR, Menegazzi JJ, Taylor R (1997) A randomized, controlled trial of two-thumb vs two-finger chest compression in a swine infant model of cardiac arrest (see comment). Prehosp Emerg Care 1(2):65–67CrossRef Houri PK, Frank LR, Menegazzi JJ, Taylor R (1997) A randomized, controlled trial of two-thumb vs two-finger chest compression in a swine infant model of cardiac arrest (see comment). Prehosp Emerg Care 1(2):65–67CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Development and Evaluation of a New Chest Compression Technique for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Infants
Authors
Dongjun Yang
Kwan Ho Kim
Je Hyeok Oh
Sunhan Son
Junmo Cho
Kyung Mook Seo
Publication date
01-08-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Pediatric Cardiology / Issue 6/2019
Print ISSN: 0172-0643
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1971
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-019-02135-x

Other articles of this Issue 6/2019

Pediatric Cardiology 6/2019 Go to the issue