Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Cardiology 8/2016

01-12-2016 | Original Article

Evaluation of Impedance Cardiography for Measurement of Stroke Volume in Congenital Heart Disease

Authors: Mohammed Ebrahim, Sanjeet Hegde, Beth Printz, Mark Abcede, James A. Proudfoot, Christopher Davis

Published in: Pediatric Cardiology | Issue 8/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Noninvasive measurement of cardiac output (CO) and particularly stroke volume (SV) remain difficult but potentially valuable. These variables can be particularly challenging to measure in children with congenital heart disease (CHD). Impedance cardiography (IC) is a technique shown to be accurate in measuring SV in adults and in children with structurally normal hearts. The ease of use and rapidity of SV measurement using IC makes it potentially attractive for young patients with CHD. Advances in IC technology have led to more sophisticated signal-morphology IC (SMIC) devices that may further improve accuracy. We tested the accuracy of SMIC to measure SV in 21 subjects with CHD by comparing measurements with those from cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging. There was good agreement between SMIC and CMR in measurement of SV: mean difference = 1.7 ml (p = 0.47); r = 0.89. The agreement and correlation persisted when controlling for the differences in blood pressure and heart rate during the two testing methods. We conclude that SMIC is accurate at measuring SV and thus CO when compared to CMR in a variety of forms of CHD.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Powell AJ, Maier SE, Chung T, Geva T (2000) Phase-velocity cine magnetic resonance imaging measurement of pulsatile blood flow in children and young adults: in vitro and in vivo validation. Pediatr Cardiol 21:104–110. doi:10.1007/s002469910014 CrossRefPubMed Powell AJ, Maier SE, Chung T, Geva T (2000) Phase-velocity cine magnetic resonance imaging measurement of pulsatile blood flow in children and young adults: in vitro and in vivo validation. Pediatr Cardiol 21:104–110. doi:10.​1007/​s002469910014 CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Saur J, Fluechter S, Trinkmann F, Papavassiliu T, Schoenberg S, Weissmann J, Hagdi D, Borggrefe M, Kaden JJ (2009) Noninvasive determination of cardiac output by the inert-gas-rebreathing method—comparison with cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. Cardiology 114:247–254. doi:10.1159/000232407 CrossRefPubMed Saur J, Fluechter S, Trinkmann F, Papavassiliu T, Schoenberg S, Weissmann J, Hagdi D, Borggrefe M, Kaden JJ (2009) Noninvasive determination of cardiac output by the inert-gas-rebreathing method—comparison with cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. Cardiology 114:247–254. doi:10.​1159/​000232407 CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Warburton DE, Haykowsky MJ, Quinney HA, Humen DP, Teo KK (1999) Reliability and validity of measures of cardiac output during incremental to maximal aerobic exercise. II. Novel techniques and new advances. Sports Med 27:241–260. doi:10.2165/00007256 CrossRefPubMed Warburton DE, Haykowsky MJ, Quinney HA, Humen DP, Teo KK (1999) Reliability and validity of measures of cardiac output during incremental to maximal aerobic exercise. II. Novel techniques and new advances. Sports Med 27:241–260. doi:10.​2165/​00007256 CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Kemps HM, Thijssen EJ, Schep G, Sleutjies BT, De Vries WR, Hoogeveen AR, Wijin PF, Doevendrans PA (2008) Evaluation of two methods for continuous cardiac output assessment during exercise in chronic heart failure patients. J Appl Physiol 105:1822–1829. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.90430.2008 CrossRefPubMed Kemps HM, Thijssen EJ, Schep G, Sleutjies BT, De Vries WR, Hoogeveen AR, Wijin PF, Doevendrans PA (2008) Evaluation of two methods for continuous cardiac output assessment during exercise in chronic heart failure patients. J Appl Physiol 105:1822–1829. doi:10.​1152/​japplphysiol.​90430.​2008 CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Richard R, Lonsdorfer-Wolf E, Charloux A, Doutreleau S, Buchheit M, Oswald-Mammosser M, Lampert E, Mattauer B, Geny B, Lonsdorfer J (2001) Non-invasive cardiac output evaluation during maximal progressive exercise test, using a new impedance cardiograph device. Eur J Appl Physiol 85:202–207. doi:10.1007/s004210100458 CrossRefPubMed Richard R, Lonsdorfer-Wolf E, Charloux A, Doutreleau S, Buchheit M, Oswald-Mammosser M, Lampert E, Mattauer B, Geny B, Lonsdorfer J (2001) Non-invasive cardiac output evaluation during maximal progressive exercise test, using a new impedance cardiograph device. Eur J Appl Physiol 85:202–207. doi:10.​1007/​s004210100458 CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Charloux A, Lonsdorfer-Wolf E, Richard R (2000) A new impedance cardiography device for the noninvasive evaluation of cardiac output at rest and during exercise: comparison with the “direct” Fick method. Eur J Appl Physiol 82:313–320. doi:10.1007/s004210000226 CrossRefPubMed Charloux A, Lonsdorfer-Wolf E, Richard R (2000) A new impedance cardiography device for the noninvasive evaluation of cardiac output at rest and during exercise: comparison with the “direct” Fick method. Eur J Appl Physiol 82:313–320. doi:10.​1007/​s004210000226 CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Taylor K, La Rotta G, McCindle B, Manlhiot C, Redington A, Holtby H (2011) A comparison of cardiac output by thoracic impedance and direct Fick in children with congenital heart disease undergoing diagnostic cardiac catheterization. J Cardiothor Vasc Anesth 25:776–779. doi:10.1053/j.jvca.2011.05.002 CrossRef Taylor K, La Rotta G, McCindle B, Manlhiot C, Redington A, Holtby H (2011) A comparison of cardiac output by thoracic impedance and direct Fick in children with congenital heart disease undergoing diagnostic cardiac catheterization. J Cardiothor Vasc Anesth 25:776–779. doi:10.​1053/​j.​jvca.​2011.​05.​002 CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Taylor K, Manlhiot C, McCindle B, Grosse-Wortmann L, Holtby H (2012) Poor accuracy of noninvasive cardiac output monitoring using bioimpedance cardiography [PhysioFlow ®] compared to magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric patients. Anesth Analg 114:771–775. doi:10.1213/ANE.0b013e318246c32c CrossRefPubMed Taylor K, Manlhiot C, McCindle B, Grosse-Wortmann L, Holtby H (2012) Poor accuracy of noninvasive cardiac output monitoring using bioimpedance cardiography [PhysioFlow ®] compared to magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric patients. Anesth Analg 114:771–775. doi:10.​1213/​ANE.​0b013e318246c32c​ CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Lababidi Z, Ehmke DA, Durnin RE, Leaverton PE, Lauer RM (1971) Evaluation of impedance cardiac output in children. Pediatrics 47:870–879PubMed Lababidi Z, Ehmke DA, Durnin RE, Leaverton PE, Lauer RM (1971) Evaluation of impedance cardiac output in children. Pediatrics 47:870–879PubMed
Metadata
Title
Evaluation of Impedance Cardiography for Measurement of Stroke Volume in Congenital Heart Disease
Authors
Mohammed Ebrahim
Sanjeet Hegde
Beth Printz
Mark Abcede
James A. Proudfoot
Christopher Davis
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Pediatric Cardiology / Issue 8/2016
Print ISSN: 0172-0643
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1971
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-016-1456-x

Other articles of this Issue 8/2016

Pediatric Cardiology 8/2016 Go to the issue