Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Urolithiasis 4/2009

01-08-2009 | Original Paper

The influence of ureteral stent on renal pelvic pressure in vivo

Authors: Yi Shao, Zhi-jie Shen, Jian Zhuo, Hai-tao Liu, Sheng-qiang Yu, Shu-Jie Xia

Published in: Urolithiasis | Issue 4/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

The objective of this study was to explore the influence of ureteral stent on renal pelvic pressure by urodynamic study. 41 patients (with unilateral renal and/or ureteral calculi) after minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) were placed a 4.7-Fr ureteral stent and 16-Fr nephrostomy tube. Renal pelvic pressure of these patients was measured by urodynamic study at the 5–7 days after MPCNL. Renal pelvic pressure (RPP), intraabdominal pressure (IAP), and vesical pressure (VP) during the filling and voiding phases were detected by urodynamic study with intravesical perfusion. At the baseline, intraabdominal pressure (IAP0) was 27.52 ± 7.03 cmH2O, renal pelvic pressure (RPP0) was 33.07 ± 7.04 cmH2O; at the maximum cystometric bladder capacity (MCBC) during the filling phase, vesical pressure (VPvol) was 41.61 ± 10.34 cmH2O, renal pelvic pressure (RPPvol) was 39.44 ± 7.33 cmH2O; at the maximum vesical pressure during the voiding phase, vesical pressure (VPmax) was 74.95 ± 12.79 cmH2O, renal pelvic pressure (RPPmax) was 65.68 ± 17.03 cmH2O. (1) There was a strong relationship between RPP0 and IAP0 (P = 0.0001); (2) There was statistical significance among RPP0, RPPvol and RPPmax (P = 0.0001); (3) RPP was higher than 40 cmH2O during the voiding phase, and it was obviously relevant to the VP (P = 0.0001) but not to the MCBC (P = 0.2696). RPP increased mildly during the filling phase and dramatically during the voiding phase after stenting. RPP increased higher than the level required for a backflow (40 cmH2O) during the voiding phase. So it was encouraged to remove the stent at earlier stage or decrease using the ureteral stent if possible.
Literature
11.
go back to reference Constantinou CE (1978) Contractility of the pyeloureteral pacemaker system. Urol Int 33:399–416PubMed Constantinou CE (1978) Contractility of the pyeloureteral pacemaker system. Urol Int 33:399–416PubMed
13.
go back to reference Mosli HA, Farsi HM, Al-zimaity MF et al (1991) Vesicoureteral reflux in patients with double pigtail stent. J Urol 146:966–969PubMed Mosli HA, Farsi HM, Al-zimaity MF et al (1991) Vesicoureteral reflux in patients with double pigtail stent. J Urol 146:966–969PubMed
Metadata
Title
The influence of ureteral stent on renal pelvic pressure in vivo
Authors
Yi Shao
Zhi-jie Shen
Jian Zhuo
Hai-tao Liu
Sheng-qiang Yu
Shu-Jie Xia
Publication date
01-08-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Urolithiasis / Issue 4/2009
Print ISSN: 2194-7228
Electronic ISSN: 2194-7236
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-009-0199-z

Other articles of this Issue 4/2009

Urolithiasis 4/2009 Go to the issue