Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Urolithiasis 2/2009

01-04-2009 | Original Paper

Indications of stented uncomplicated ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a prospective randomized controlled study

Authors: Chung-Jing Wang, Shi-Wei Huang, Chien-Hsing Chang

Published in: Urolithiasis | Issue 2/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

The purpose of our trial was to evaluate whether stents could be eliminated after uncomplicated ureteroscopic lithotripsy for ureteral stones and the indications of ureteral stent placement. A total of 228 patients underwent uncomplicated ureteroscopic intracorporeal lithotripsy. After the procedures, patients without marked ureteral edema, polypoid change or stent placement were treated as a control group. The other patients were randomized to two groups. Patients were followed on the first postoperative day, 6 and 12 weeks, postoperatively. In stented cases the stent was removed after 1 week. Outcome measures included visual analog scale assessment, postoperative analgesic requirements, complications and the stone-free rate. On the first postoperative day the symptoms of flank pain, dysuria and frequency were significantly greater in the stented group (< 0.0001). The overall perioperative complication rate, including fever, pyuria, flank and loin pain, was 3.3% (3/90) in group 1, 16.9% (12/71) in group 2, and 41.8% (28/67) in group 3. We believe that in selected patients undergoing ureteroscopy for ureteral stone, stents can be safely omitted. Patients without stents have significantly less stent-related symptoms and are not at higher risk of complications with smooth ureteral mucosa. When there is ureteral edema or polypoid change with pyuria, ureteral stents should be indwelled to avoid severe postoperative complications.
Literature
5.
go back to reference Huffman JL et al (1998) Ureteroscopy. In: Walsh PC, Retik AB, Vaughan ED (eds) Campbell’s urology, 7th edn. Saunders, Philadelphia, p 2755 Huffman JL et al (1998) Ureteroscopy. In: Walsh PC, Retik AB, Vaughan ED (eds) Campbell’s urology, 7th edn. Saunders, Philadelphia, p 2755
6.
go back to reference Boddy SM, Nimmon CC, Jones S, Ramsay JW, Britton KE, Levison DA et al (1988) Acute ureteric dilatation after ureteroscopy: an experimental study. Br J Urol 61:27–31PubMedCrossRef Boddy SM, Nimmon CC, Jones S, Ramsay JW, Britton KE, Levison DA et al (1988) Acute ureteric dilatation after ureteroscopy: an experimental study. Br J Urol 61:27–31PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Pollard SG, MacFarlane R (1988) Symptoms arising from double-J ureteral stents. J Urol 139:37–38PubMed Pollard SG, MacFarlane R (1988) Symptoms arising from double-J ureteral stents. J Urol 139:37–38PubMed
8.
go back to reference Bregg K, Riehle RA (1989) Morbidity associated with indwelling internal ureteral stents after shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 141:510–512PubMed Bregg K, Riehle RA (1989) Morbidity associated with indwelling internal ureteral stents after shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 141:510–512PubMed
9.
go back to reference Pryor JL, Langley MJ, Jenkins AD (1991) Comparison of symptom characteristics of indwelling ureteral catheters. J Urol 145:719–722PubMed Pryor JL, Langley MJ, Jenkins AD (1991) Comparison of symptom characteristics of indwelling ureteral catheters. J Urol 145:719–722PubMed
13.
go back to reference Wollin TA, Nott L, Denstedt JD, Nottl L, Weir M, Honey RJ (1999) Early results of a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing stented versus nonstented ureteroscopic lithotripsy. J Urol 161(suppl):371. doi:10.1097/00005392-199904020-00487, abstract 1438CrossRef Wollin TA, Nott L, Denstedt JD, Nottl L, Weir M, Honey RJ (1999) Early results of a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing stented versus nonstented ureteroscopic lithotripsy. J Urol 161(suppl):371. doi:10.​1097/​00005392-199904020-00487, abstract 1438CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Stoller ML, Wolf JS Jr, Hofmann R, Marc B (1992) Ureteroscopy without routine balloon dilation: an outcome assessment. J Urol 147:1238–1242PubMed Stoller ML, Wolf JS Jr, Hofmann R, Marc B (1992) Ureteroscopy without routine balloon dilation: an outcome assessment. J Urol 147:1238–1242PubMed
15.
17.
go back to reference Haleblian G, Kijvikai K, Rosette J, Preminger G (2008) Ureteral stenting and urinary stone management: a systematic review. J Urol 179:424–430PubMedCrossRef Haleblian G, Kijvikai K, Rosette J, Preminger G (2008) Ureteral stenting and urinary stone management: a systematic review. J Urol 179:424–430PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Borboroglu PG, Amling CL, Schenkman NS, John MMF, Natania WY, Jay PT et al (2001) Ureteral stenting after ureteroscopy for distal ureteral calculi: a multi-institutional prospective randomized controlled study assessing pain, outcomes and complications. J Urol 166:1651–1657. doi:10.1016/S0022-5347(05)65646-7 PubMedCrossRef Borboroglu PG, Amling CL, Schenkman NS, John MMF, Natania WY, Jay PT et al (2001) Ureteral stenting after ureteroscopy for distal ureteral calculi: a multi-institutional prospective randomized controlled study assessing pain, outcomes and complications. J Urol 166:1651–1657. doi:10.​1016/​S0022-5347(05)65646-7 PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Indications of stented uncomplicated ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a prospective randomized controlled study
Authors
Chung-Jing Wang
Shi-Wei Huang
Chien-Hsing Chang
Publication date
01-04-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Urolithiasis / Issue 2/2009
Print ISSN: 2194-7228
Electronic ISSN: 2194-7236
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-009-0175-7

Other articles of this Issue 2/2009

Urolithiasis 2/2009 Go to the issue