Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Urolithiasis 2/2008

01-05-2008 | Original Paper

Clinical value of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the supine position under the guidance of real-time ultrasound: report of 92 cases

Authors: Xiangfu Zhou, Xin Gao, Jiling Wen, Cuilan Xiao

Published in: Urolithiasis | Issue 2/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

To determine the clinical value of the real-time-ultrasound-guided minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (m-PCNL) technique in the supine position, 92 patients suffering from renal or upper ureteral stones were treated by m-PCNL with a nephroscope/ureteroscope in the supine position. The ipsilateral flanks of the patients with different body sizes were elevated with a 1,000 or 3,000-ml water bag. Under cystoscopy, a ureteral catheter was inserted into the kidney. Normal saline was infused into the kidney via the ureteral catheter to dilate the entire urinary system. Under the guidance of real-time ultrasound, the needle was inserted into the urinary system to dilate the tract and establish the 16F mini-tract for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. All 92 (100%) m-PCNL procedures were successfully performed in the supine position. Primary stone clearance was achieved in 64 cases (69.6%). Residual stones occurred in 28 cases (30.4%). M-PCNL was performed for a second time in 16 cases to clear the residual stones. In 4 cases, stones remained after the second m-PCNL. Two of them were treated further by extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL). The total stone clearance rate of m-PCNL was 82.6%. Only one case required blood transfusion. No other serious complications occurred. The supine position is a favorable position for the patients, the surgeons and the anesthesiologists during the m-PCNL procedure. Real-time ultrasound is a valuable technique for guiding of the m-PCNL.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Valdivia-Uria JG, Valer J, Villarroya S et al (1995) Why is percutaneous nephroscopy still performed with patient prone? J Endourol 4:269–272CrossRef Valdivia-Uria JG, Valer J, Villarroya S et al (1995) Why is percutaneous nephroscopy still performed with patient prone? J Endourol 4:269–272CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Valdivia-Uria JG, Gerhold J, Lopez JA et al (1999) Technique and complications of percutaneous nephroscopy: experience with 557 patients in the supine position. J Urol 160:1975–1978CrossRef Valdivia-Uria JG, Gerhold J, Lopez JA et al (1999) Technique and complications of percutaneous nephroscopy: experience with 557 patients in the supine position. J Urol 160:1975–1978CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Gao X, Zhou T, Xiao CL et al (2003) Developing renal tract for percutaneous nephrostolithotomy solely under the guide of B-Ultrasound (Report of 102 cases). J Clin Urol 18:10–12 Gao X, Zhou T, Xiao CL et al (2003) Developing renal tract for percutaneous nephrostolithotomy solely under the guide of B-Ultrasound (Report of 102 cases). J Clin Urol 18:10–12
4.
go back to reference Gofrit ON, Shapiro A, Donchin Y (2002) Lateral decubitus position for percutaneous nephrolithotripsy in the morbidly obese or kyphotic patient. J Endourol 16(6):383–386CrossRefPubMed Gofrit ON, Shapiro A, Donchin Y (2002) Lateral decubitus position for percutaneous nephrolithotripsy in the morbidly obese or kyphotic patient. J Endourol 16(6):383–386CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Shoma AM, Eraky I, El-Kenawy MR et al (2002) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the supine position: technical aspects and functional outcome compared with the prone technique. Urology 60(3):388–392CrossRefPubMed Shoma AM, Eraky I, El-Kenawy MR et al (2002) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the supine position: technical aspects and functional outcome compared with the prone technique. Urology 60(3):388–392CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Li X, Zeng GH, Yuan J et al (2004) Treatment of upper urinary calculus with the PCNL technique (Experience of 20 years). J Peking Univ Health Sci 36(2):124–126 Li X, Zeng GH, Yuan J et al (2004) Treatment of upper urinary calculus with the PCNL technique (Experience of 20 years). J Peking Univ Health Sci 36(2):124–126
7.
go back to reference Netto NR, Lemos GC, Fiuza JL (1988) Colon perforation following percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urology 32(3):223–224CrossRef Netto NR, Lemos GC, Fiuza JL (1988) Colon perforation following percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urology 32(3):223–224CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Vallancien G, Capdeville R, Veillon B et al (1985) Colonic perforation during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Urol 134(6):1185–1187PubMed Vallancien G, Capdeville R, Veillon B et al (1985) Colonic perforation during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Urol 134(6):1185–1187PubMed
9.
go back to reference Hopper KD, Maj MC, Sherman JL et al (1987) The retrorenal colon in the supine and prone patient. Radiology 162:443–446CrossRefPubMed Hopper KD, Maj MC, Sherman JL et al (1987) The retrorenal colon in the supine and prone patient. Radiology 162:443–446CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Boon JM, Shinners B, Meiring JH (2001) Variations of the position of the colon as applied to percutaneous nephrostomy. Surg Radiol Anat 23(6):421–425CrossRefPubMed Boon JM, Shinners B, Meiring JH (2001) Variations of the position of the colon as applied to percutaneous nephrostomy. Surg Radiol Anat 23(6):421–425CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Clinical value of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the supine position under the guidance of real-time ultrasound: report of 92 cases
Authors
Xiangfu Zhou
Xin Gao
Jiling Wen
Cuilan Xiao
Publication date
01-05-2008
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Urolithiasis / Issue 2/2008
Print ISSN: 2194-7228
Electronic ISSN: 2194-7236
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-008-0134-8

Other articles of this Issue 2/2008

Urolithiasis 2/2008 Go to the issue