Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Plastic Surgery 4/2020

01-08-2020 | Original Paper

Pilot study about the relationship between body perception and sexuality using the DAS59

Published in: European Journal of Plastic Surgery | Issue 4/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The idea of this study stemmed to understand if sexuality can be a factor that affects the perception of one’s body and can be a feature that makes the subject more inclined to undergo esthetic surgery.

Methods

A total of 51 male subjects participated in this study by filling out the Italian version of the DAS59 consisting of 59 items, which took approximately 35 min, under the supervision of a research assistant who did not interfere with the privacy of the patient. The data was entered in SAS version 8.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). The reliability of the scale was tested by Cronbach’s alpha coefficient and the correlation coefficient. Retest reliability was also tested using Spearman’s correlation coefficient between items and the total scale score. Analysis of variance was performed between the two groups. Differences between the homosexual and heterosexual subjects were assessed using the Mann–Whitney test of discriminant validity.

Results

Adult homosexual male patients without a personal history of esthetic procedures were recruited. We enrolled 26 adult homosexual male patients aged 18–42 years old and 25 male heterosexual adults aged 18–43 years. Any subject had personal history of esthetic procedures. We analyzed direct and indirect indicators of “esthetic concern,” the number of answers given by each subject accuracy, the attention to the questionnaire, and the effect on age on accuracy between the two groups. We confirmed that there are many differences between the two groups. Nevertheless, the greater attention to esthetics and concern for appearance is much more present in the homosexual group than in the heterosexual group, and its relationship with age in the homosexual group is a strong indication of an important and essential phenomenon in development. The absence of such a relationship in the heterosexual group leads instead to think that the esthetic concern is in this group a phenomenon of local type and much less fundamental than the personality.

Conclusions

The DAS59, used in a homogeneous study group, has shown that esthetic sensibility may depend on emotional and psychological factors within a homogeneous social dimension that does not create a difference. This pilot study is the first to introduce the importance of the role of sexuality in the perception of the esthetics of one’s body.
Level of evidence: Not ratable.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Health USDO, Human Services FDA Center for Drug Evaluation, Research USDOH et al (2006) Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims: draft guidance. Health Qual Life Outcomes 4(1):79CrossRef Health USDO, Human Services FDA Center for Drug Evaluation, Research USDOH et al (2006) Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims: draft guidance. Health Qual Life Outcomes 4(1):79CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Karimi M, Brazier J (2016) Health, health-related quality of life, and quality of life: what is the difference? PharmacoEconomics. 34(7):645–649CrossRef Karimi M, Brazier J (2016) Health, health-related quality of life, and quality of life: what is the difference? PharmacoEconomics. 34(7):645–649CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Barone M, Cogliandro A, Salzillo R, Tambone V, Persichetti P (2018) The role of appearance: definition of appearance-pain (app-pain) and systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures used in literature. Aesthet Plast Surg 42(5):1399–1409CrossRef Barone M, Cogliandro A, Salzillo R, Tambone V, Persichetti P (2018) The role of appearance: definition of appearance-pain (app-pain) and systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures used in literature. Aesthet Plast Surg 42(5):1399–1409CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Barone M, Cogliandro A, Persichetti P (2019) Patients satisfaction following cosmetic procedures: the role of App-Pain. Plast Reconstr Surg 143(5):1123e–1124eCrossRef Barone M, Cogliandro A, Persichetti P (2019) Patients satisfaction following cosmetic procedures: the role of App-Pain. Plast Reconstr Surg 143(5):1123e–1124eCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Hess J, Rossi Neto R, Panic L, Rübben H, Senf W (2014) Satisfaction with male-to-female gender reassignment surgery. Dtsch Arztebl Int 111(47):795–801PubMedPubMedCentral Hess J, Rossi Neto R, Panic L, Rübben H, Senf W (2014) Satisfaction with male-to-female gender reassignment surgery. Dtsch Arztebl Int 111(47):795–801PubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Barone M, Cogliandro A, Di Stefano N, Tambone V, Persichetti P (2017) A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures following transsexual surgery. Aesthet Plast Surg 41(3):700–713CrossRef Barone M, Cogliandro A, Di Stefano N, Tambone V, Persichetti P (2017) A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures following transsexual surgery. Aesthet Plast Surg 41(3):700–713CrossRef
7.
go back to reference van de Grift TC, Kreukels BP, Elfering L, Özer M, Bouman MB, Buncamper ME, Smit JM, Mullender MG (2016) Body image in transmen: multidimensional measurement and the effects of mastectomy. J Sex Med 13:1778–1786CrossRef van de Grift TC, Kreukels BP, Elfering L, Özer M, Bouman MB, Buncamper ME, Smit JM, Mullender MG (2016) Body image in transmen: multidimensional measurement and the effects of mastectomy. J Sex Med 13:1778–1786CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Harris DL, Carr AT (2001) The Derriford appearance scale (DAS59): a new psychometric scale for the evaluation of patients with disfigurements and aesthetic problems of appearance. Br J Plast Surg 54:216–222CrossRef Harris DL, Carr AT (2001) The Derriford appearance scale (DAS59): a new psychometric scale for the evaluation of patients with disfigurements and aesthetic problems of appearance. Br J Plast Surg 54:216–222CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Moss TP, Cogliandro A, Pennacchini M, Tambone V, Persichetti P (2013) Appearance distress and dysfunction in the elderly: international contrasts across Italy and the UK using DAS59. Aesthet Plast Surg 37:1187–1193CrossRef Moss TP, Cogliandro A, Pennacchini M, Tambone V, Persichetti P (2013) Appearance distress and dysfunction in the elderly: international contrasts across Italy and the UK using DAS59. Aesthet Plast Surg 37:1187–1193CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Cogliandro A, Persichetti P, Ghilardi G, Moss TP, Barone M, Piccinocchi G, Ricci G, Vitali M, Giuliani A, Tambone V (2016) How to assess appearance distress and motivation in plastic surgery candidates: Italian validation of Derriford appearance scale 59 (DAS 59). Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 20(18):3732–3737PubMed Cogliandro A, Persichetti P, Ghilardi G, Moss TP, Barone M, Piccinocchi G, Ricci G, Vitali M, Giuliani A, Tambone V (2016) How to assess appearance distress and motivation in plastic surgery candidates: Italian validation of Derriford appearance scale 59 (DAS 59). Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 20(18):3732–3737PubMed
11.
12.
go back to reference Di Stefano N (2017) The idea of beauty and its biases: critical notes on the aesthetics of plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 5:e1523CrossRef Di Stefano N (2017) The idea of beauty and its biases: critical notes on the aesthetics of plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 5:e1523CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Buetow S, Wallis K (2017) The beauty in perfect imperfection. J Med Humanit 40:389–394CrossRef Buetow S, Wallis K (2017) The beauty in perfect imperfection. J Med Humanit 40:389–394CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Harth W (2017) Was ist Schönheit? Manifest einer ästhetischen Charaktermedizin [What is beauty? Manifest for an aesthetic character medicine]. Hautarzt 68:950–958CrossRef Harth W (2017) Was ist Schönheit? Manifest einer ästhetischen Charaktermedizin [What is beauty? Manifest for an aesthetic character medicine]. Hautarzt 68:950–958CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Dikmans RE, Krouwel EM, Ghasemi M, van de Grift T, Bouman MB, Ritt MJPF, Elzevier HW, Mullender MG (2018) Discussing sexuality in the field of plastic and reconstructive surgery: a national survey of current practice in the Netherlands. Eur J Plast Surg 41:707–714CrossRef Dikmans RE, Krouwel EM, Ghasemi M, van de Grift T, Bouman MB, Ritt MJPF, Elzevier HW, Mullender MG (2018) Discussing sexuality in the field of plastic and reconstructive surgery: a national survey of current practice in the Netherlands. Eur J Plast Surg 41:707–714CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Barone M, Cogliandro A, La Monaca G, Tambone V, Persichetti P (2015) Cognitive investigation study of patients admitted for cosmetic surgery: information, expectations, and consent for treatment. Arch Plast Surg 42:46–51CrossRef Barone M, Cogliandro A, La Monaca G, Tambone V, Persichetti P (2015) Cognitive investigation study of patients admitted for cosmetic surgery: information, expectations, and consent for treatment. Arch Plast Surg 42:46–51CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Cash TF, Melnyk SE, Hrabosky JI (2004) The assessment of body image investment: an extensive revision of the appearance schemas inventory. Int J Eat Disord 35:305–316CrossRef Cash TF, Melnyk SE, Hrabosky JI (2004) The assessment of body image investment: an extensive revision of the appearance schemas inventory. Int J Eat Disord 35:305–316CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 151(4):264–269CrossRef Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 151(4):264–269CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Higgins JPT, Green S (eds) (2011) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1. 0 [Updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration Higgins JPT, Green S (eds) (2011) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1. 0 [Updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration
20.
go back to reference Terwee CB, Jansma EP, Riphagen II, de Vet HCW (2009) Development of a methodological PubMed search filter for finding studies on measurement properties of measurement instruments. Qual Life Res 18(8):1115–1123CrossRef Terwee CB, Jansma EP, Riphagen II, de Vet HCW (2009) Development of a methodological PubMed search filter for finding studies on measurement properties of measurement instruments. Qual Life Res 18(8):1115–1123CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Pilot study about the relationship between body perception and sexuality using the DAS59
Publication date
01-08-2020
Published in
European Journal of Plastic Surgery / Issue 4/2020
Print ISSN: 0930-343X
Electronic ISSN: 1435-0130
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-020-01658-4

Other articles of this Issue 4/2020

European Journal of Plastic Surgery 4/2020 Go to the issue