Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Plastic Surgery 2/2017

01-04-2017 | Original Paper

The influence of plastic surgeon age and gender on decision-making in breast reconstruction: a national survey of American plastic surgeons

Authors: Shruti C. Tannan, Shawna R. Kleban, Wendy M. Novicoff, Chris A. Campbell

Published in: European Journal of Plastic Surgery | Issue 2/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

There are numerous options for breast reconstruction after mastectomy, and the final reconstructive option is often influenced by patient preference. This study surveyed plastic surgeons regarding their personal preferences for breast reconstruction after mastectomy to identify the impact of gender and age on reconstructive preference. An anonymous online survey was distributed to plastic surgeons in the American Society of Plastic Surgeons member directory and current plastic surgery residents. Female surgeons were asked to select reconstructive options for themselves as patients, while male surgeons were asked to answer the same questions as if advising a loved one. After unilateral mastectomy, 60.2 % of respondents preferred implant-based reconstruction, increasing to 67.8 % after bilateral mastectomy. Top reasons for selecting implant-based reconstruction were recovery time (78.0 %) and hospital length of stay (54.5 %). In contrast, respondents who preferred abdominal flap-based autologous reconstruction cited the longevity (83.3 %) and the aesthetic appearance of the final result (82.7 %) as top reasons. Female surgeons were significantly more likely to choose implant-based reconstruction than male surgeons (68.7 vs. 56.6 %, p = 0.001). Younger male surgeons preferred autologous reconstruction (58.8 %). Plastic surgeons’ reconstructive choices parallel current patient-based surveys favoring breast reconstruction with implants. Respondents’ reasons for selecting one reconstructive method over another are consistent with prior patient-based surveys. Female plastic surgeons prefer implant-based reconstruction to a greater extent than male plastic surgeons. This survey identifies the need for further prospective study of physician perspectives of patient experiences.
Level of Evidence: Not ratable.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Albornoz CR, Bach PB, Mehrara BJ, et al. (2013) A paradigm shift in U.S. Breast reconstruction: increasing implant rates. Plast Reconstr Surg 131(1):15–23CrossRefPubMed Albornoz CR, Bach PB, Mehrara BJ, et al. (2013) A paradigm shift in U.S. Breast reconstruction: increasing implant rates. Plast Reconstr Surg 131(1):15–23CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Reuben BC, Manwaring J, Neumayer L (2009) Recent trends and predictors in immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy in the United States. Am J Surg 198(2):237–243CrossRefPubMed Reuben BC, Manwaring J, Neumayer L (2009) Recent trends and predictors in immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy in the United States. Am J Surg 198(2):237–243CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Hernandez-Boussard T, Zeidler K, Barzin A, et al. (2013) Breast reconstruction national trends and healthcare implications. Breast J 19(5):463–469PubMed Hernandez-Boussard T, Zeidler K, Barzin A, et al. (2013) Breast reconstruction national trends and healthcare implications. Breast J 19(5):463–469PubMed
6.
go back to reference Nelson J, Tchou J, Domchek S, et al. (2012) Breast reconstruction in bilateral prophylactic mastectomy patients: factors that influence decision making. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 65(11):1481–1489CrossRefPubMed Nelson J, Tchou J, Domchek S, et al. (2012) Breast reconstruction in bilateral prophylactic mastectomy patients: factors that influence decision making. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 65(11):1481–1489CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Gopie JP, Hilhorst MT, Kleijne A, et al. (2011) Women’s motives to opt for either implant or DIEP-flap breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg 64:1062–1067CrossRef Gopie JP, Hilhorst MT, Kleijne A, et al. (2011) Women’s motives to opt for either implant or DIEP-flap breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg 64:1062–1067CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Leone MS, Priano V, Franchelli S, et al. (2011) Factors affecting symmetrization of the contralateral breast: a 7-year unilateral postmastectomy breast reconstruction experience. Aesthetic Plast Surg 35:446–451CrossRefPubMed Leone MS, Priano V, Franchelli S, et al. (2011) Factors affecting symmetrization of the contralateral breast: a 7-year unilateral postmastectomy breast reconstruction experience. Aesthetic Plast Surg 35:446–451CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Losken A, Carlson GW, Bostwick J, et al. (2002) Trends in unilateral breast reconstruction and management of the contralateral breast: the Emory experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 110:89–97CrossRefPubMed Losken A, Carlson GW, Bostwick J, et al. (2002) Trends in unilateral breast reconstruction and management of the contralateral breast: the Emory experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 110:89–97CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Vyas RM, Dickinson BP, Fastekjian JH, et al. (2008) Risk factors for abdominal donor-site morbidity in free flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 121(5):1519–1526CrossRefPubMed Vyas RM, Dickinson BP, Fastekjian JH, et al. (2008) Risk factors for abdominal donor-site morbidity in free flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 121(5):1519–1526CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Berry T, Brooks S, Sydow N, et al. (2010) Complication rates of radiation on tissue expander and autologous tissue breast reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol 17(Suppl 3):202–210CrossRefPubMed Berry T, Brooks S, Sydow N, et al. (2010) Complication rates of radiation on tissue expander and autologous tissue breast reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol 17(Suppl 3):202–210CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Evans GR, Schusterman MA, Kroll SS, et al. (1995) Reconstruction and the radiated breast: is there a role for implants? Plast Reconstr Surg:1111–1115 discussion, 1116–1118 Evans GR, Schusterman MA, Kroll SS, et al. (1995) Reconstruction and the radiated breast: is there a role for implants? Plast Reconstr Surg:1111–1115 discussion, 1116–1118
13.
go back to reference Williams JK, Carlson GW, Bostwick J, et al. (1997) The effects of radiation treatment after TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 100:1153–1160CrossRefPubMed Williams JK, Carlson GW, Bostwick J, et al. (1997) The effects of radiation treatment after TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 100:1153–1160CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Rogers NE, Allen RJ (2002) Radiation effects on breast reconstruction with the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 109:1919–1924 discussion 1925-1926CrossRefPubMed Rogers NE, Allen RJ (2002) Radiation effects on breast reconstruction with the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 109:1919–1924 discussion 1925-1926CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Spear SL, Onyewu C (2000) Staged breast reconstruction with saline-filled implants in the irradiated breast: recent trends and therapeutic implications. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:930–942CrossRefPubMed Spear SL, Onyewu C (2000) Staged breast reconstruction with saline-filled implants in the irradiated breast: recent trends and therapeutic implications. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:930–942CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Schwartz MD, Lerman C, Brogan B, et al. (2004) Impact of BRCA1/BRCA2 counseling and testing on newly diagnosed breast cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 22(10):1823–1829CrossRefPubMed Schwartz MD, Lerman C, Brogan B, et al. (2004) Impact of BRCA1/BRCA2 counseling and testing on newly diagnosed breast cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 22(10):1823–1829CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Howard-Mcnatt M, Schroll RW, Hurt GJ, et al. (2011) Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in breast cancer patients who test negative for BRCA mutations. Am J Surg 202:298–302CrossRefPubMed Howard-Mcnatt M, Schroll RW, Hurt GJ, et al. (2011) Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in breast cancer patients who test negative for BRCA mutations. Am J Surg 202:298–302CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Weichman KE, Broer PN, Thanik VD, et al. (2015) Patient-reported satisfaction and quality of life following breast reconstruction in this patients: a comparison between microsurgical and prosthetic implant recipients. Plast Reconstr Surg 136(2):213–220CrossRefPubMed Weichman KE, Broer PN, Thanik VD, et al. (2015) Patient-reported satisfaction and quality of life following breast reconstruction in this patients: a comparison between microsurgical and prosthetic implant recipients. Plast Reconstr Surg 136(2):213–220CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The influence of plastic surgeon age and gender on decision-making in breast reconstruction: a national survey of American plastic surgeons
Authors
Shruti C. Tannan
Shawna R. Kleban
Wendy M. Novicoff
Chris A. Campbell
Publication date
01-04-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Journal of Plastic Surgery / Issue 2/2017
Print ISSN: 0930-343X
Electronic ISSN: 1435-0130
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-016-1229-z

Other articles of this Issue 2/2017

European Journal of Plastic Surgery 2/2017 Go to the issue