Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 4/2011

01-08-2011 | Original Article

Factors Affecting Symmetrization of the Contralateral Breast: A 7-Year Unilateral Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction Experience

Authors: Maria Stella Leone, Virginia Priano, Simonetta Franchelli, Valeria Puggioni, Domenico Franco Merlo, Matilde Mannucci, Pier Luigi Santi

Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Issue 4/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Although a number of studies compare different techniques of breast reconstruction, information documenting the factors that affect breast symmetry after unilateral mastectomy and reconstruction seems to be scarce. A statistical analysis of 606 patients undergoing unilateral mastectomy and breast reconstruction performed during a 7 year period was undertaken in an endeavor to identify these factors. Patients were classified according to time of reconstruction, method of reconstruction, type of implant, and mastectomy type. Contralateral procedures included mastopexy, augmentation, and reduction mammaplasty. Delayed reconstruction more frequently required a symmetrization than an immediate reconstruction. The percentage of contralateral procedures was higher for implant reconstructions than for autologous reconstructions, and the type of mastectomy was significantly associated with the symmetrization procedure. The findings showed that non–skin-sparing mastectomy (non-SSM) needed symmetrization surgery more frequently than did SSM procedures. The data suggest a preoperative collaboration and case study between oncologic and plastic surgeons to apply, when possible, SSM with immediate implant breast reconstruction, resulting in fewer symmetrization procedures and the best aesthetic follow-up result. These factors need to be considered when mastectomy and reconstruction are planned in order to optimize the aesthetic result together with the development of breast surgery specialty units.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kroll SS, Baldwin B (1992) A comparison of outcomes using three different methods of breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 90(3):455−462 Kroll SS, Baldwin B (1992) A comparison of outcomes using three different methods of breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 90(3):455−462
2.
go back to reference Lejour M, Jabri M, Deraemaecker R (1988) Analysis of long-term results of 326 breast reconstructions. Clin Plast Surg 15:689PubMed Lejour M, Jabri M, Deraemaecker R (1988) Analysis of long-term results of 326 breast reconstructions. Clin Plast Surg 15:689PubMed
3.
go back to reference Nahabedian MY (2003) Symmetrical breast reconstruction: analysis of secondary procedures after reconstruction with implants and autologous tissue. Plast Reconstr Surg 112:1582PubMedCrossRef Nahabedian MY (2003) Symmetrical breast reconstruction: analysis of secondary procedures after reconstruction with implants and autologous tissue. Plast Reconstr Surg 112:1582PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Leone MS, Perniciaro G, Franchelli S, Santi PL (1994) Considerations in immediate and delayed breast reconstruction (Italian). Minerva Chir 49:671–675PubMed Leone MS, Perniciaro G, Franchelli S, Santi PL (1994) Considerations in immediate and delayed breast reconstruction (Italian). Minerva Chir 49:671–675PubMed
5.
go back to reference Carlson GW, Bostwich J III, Styblo TM et al (1997) Skin-sparing mastectomy: oncological and reconstruction considerations. Ann Surg 225:570PubMedCrossRef Carlson GW, Bostwich J III, Styblo TM et al (1997) Skin-sparing mastectomy: oncological and reconstruction considerations. Ann Surg 225:570PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Carlson GW (1996) Skin-sparing mastectomy: anatomic and technical considerations. Am Surg 62:151PubMed Carlson GW (1996) Skin-sparing mastectomy: anatomic and technical considerations. Am Surg 62:151PubMed
8.
go back to reference Losken A, Carlson GW, Bostwick J III et al (2002) Trends in unilateral breast reconstruction and management of the controlateral breast: the Emoroy experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 110:89PubMedCrossRef Losken A, Carlson GW, Bostwick J III et al (2002) Trends in unilateral breast reconstruction and management of the controlateral breast: the Emoroy experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 110:89PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Hudson D (2004) Factors determining shape and symmetry in immediate breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 52:15–21PubMedCrossRef Hudson D (2004) Factors determining shape and symmetry in immediate breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 52:15–21PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Stevenson TR, Goldstein JA (1993) TRAM flap breast reconstruction and contralateral reduction of mastopexy. Plast Reconstr Surg 92:118CrossRef Stevenson TR, Goldstein JA (1993) TRAM flap breast reconstruction and contralateral reduction of mastopexy. Plast Reconstr Surg 92:118CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Factors Affecting Symmetrization of the Contralateral Breast: A 7-Year Unilateral Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction Experience
Authors
Maria Stella Leone
Virginia Priano
Simonetta Franchelli
Valeria Puggioni
Domenico Franco Merlo
Matilde Mannucci
Pier Luigi Santi
Publication date
01-08-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Issue 4/2011
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-010-9622-7

Other articles of this Issue 4/2011

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 4/2011 Go to the issue