Top

Published in:

Open Access 01-06-2011 | Research Article

Giving a helping hand: effects of joint attention on mental rotation of body parts

Authors: Anne Böckler, Günther Knoblich, Natalie Sebanz

Published in: Experimental Brain Research | Issue 3-4/2011

Abstract

Research on joint attention has addressed both the effects of gaze following and the ability to share representations. It is largely unknown, however, whether sharing attention also affects the perceptual processing of jointly attended objects. This study tested whether attending to stimuli with another person from opposite perspectives induces a tendency to adopt an allocentric rather than an egocentric reference frame. Pairs of participants performed a handedness task while individually or jointly attending to rotated hand stimuli from opposite sides. Results revealed a significant flattening of the performance rotation curve when participants attended jointly (experiment 1). The effect of joint attention was robust to manipulations of social interaction (cooperation versus competition, experiment 2), but was modulated by the extent to which an allocentric reference frame was primed (experiment 3). Thus, attending to objects together from opposite perspectives makes people adopt an allocentric rather than the default egocentric reference frame.

Amorim MA, Isableu B, Jarraya M (2006) Embodied spatial transformations: “Body analogy” for the mental rotation of objects. JEP 135:327–347

Baron-Cohen S (1991) Precursors to a theory of mind: understanding attention in others. In: Whiten A (ed) Natural theories of mind: evolution, development and simulation of everyday mindreading. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp 233–251

Barresi J, Moore C (1996) Intentional relations and social understanding. Behav Brain Sci 19:107–154CrossRef

Bekkering H, de Bruijn E, Cuipers R, Newman-Norlund R, van Schie H, Meulenbroek R (2009) Joint action: Neurocognitive mechanisms supporting human interaction. TICS 1:340–352

Chan AW, Peelen MV, Downing PE (2004) The effect of viewpoint on body representation in the extrastriate body area. Neuroreport 15:2407–2410PubMedCrossRef

Clark HH, Krych MA (2004) Speaking while monitoring addressees for understanding. J Memory Lang 50:62–81CrossRef

Cooper LA (1975) Mental rotation of random two-dimensional shapes. Cogn Psychol 7:20–43CrossRef

Cooper LA, Shepard RN (1973) The time required to prepare for a rotated stimulus. Mem Cognit 1:246–250CrossRef

Corradi-Dell’Acqua C, Tessari A (2010) Is the body in the eye of the beholder?: visual processing of bodies in individuals with anomalous anatomical sensory and motor features. Neuropsychologia 48:689–702PubMedCrossRef

Csibra G, Gergely G (2009) Natural pedagogy. TICS 13:148–153

de Lange FP, Helmich RC, Toni I (2006) Posture influences motor imagery: an fMRI study. NeuroImage 33:609–617PubMedCrossRef

Driver J, Davis G, Ricciardelli P, Kidd P, Maxwell E, Baron-Cohen S (1999) Gaze perception triggers reflexive visuospatial orienting. Visual Cognit 6:509–540CrossRef

Fias W, Brysbaert M, Geypens F, d’Ydewall G (1996) The importance of magnitude information in numerical processing: evidence from the SNARC effect. Mathematical Cognit 2:95–110CrossRef

Frischen A, Bayliss AP, Tipper SP (2007) Gaze cueing of attention: visual attention, social cognition, and individual differences. Psychol Bull 133:694–724PubMedCrossRef

Grabherr L, Karmali L, Bach S, Indermaur K, Metzler S, Mast FW (2007) Mental own-body and body-part transformations in microgravity. J Vestib Res 17:279–287PubMed

Hobson P (2002) The cradle of thought: exploring the origins of thinking. Oxford University Press, New York

Humphreys GW, Riddoch MJ (2004) Attention in action: advances in cognitive neuroscience. Psychology Press, Hove, England

Just MA, Carpenter PA (1985) Cognitive coordinate systems: accounts of mental rotation and individual differences in spatial ability. Psychol Rev 92:137–171PubMedCrossRef

Klatzky RL (1998) Allocentric and egocentric spatial representations: definitions, distinctions, and interconnections. In: Freksa C, Habel C, Wender KF (eds) Spatial cognition—an interdisciplinary approach to representation and processing of spatial knowledge. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–17

Kosslyn SM, Thompson WL, Wraga M, Alpert NM (2001) Imagining rotation by endogenous versus exogenous forces: distinct neural mechanisms. NeuroReport 12:2519–2525PubMedCrossRef

Lakoff G, Johnson M (1999) Philosophy in the flesh: the embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. Basic Books, New York

Lorch RF, Myers JL (1990) Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research. JEP LMC 16:149–157

Parsons LM (1987a) Imagined spatial transformations of one’s body. JEP General 116:172–191

Parsons LM (1987b) Imagined spatial transformations of one’s hands and feet. Cogn Psychol 19:178–241PubMedCrossRef

Parsons LM (1994) Temporal and kinematic properties of motor behavior reflected in mentally simulated action. JEP HPP 20:709–730

Parsons LM, Fox PT, Downs JH, Glass T, Hirsch TB, Martin CC et al (1995) Use of implicit motor imagery for visual shape discrimination as revealed by PET. Nature 375:54–58PubMedCrossRef

Patterson MM, Bigler RS (2007) Effects of physical atypicality on children’s social identities and intergroup attitudes. Int J Behav Dev 31:433–444CrossRef

Richardson DC, Dale R (2005) Looking to understand: the coupling between speakers’ and listeners’ eye movements and its relationship to discourse comprehension. Cognit Sci A Multidiscip J 29:1045–1060CrossRef

Richardson DC, Dale R, Kirkham NZ (2007) The art of conversation is coordination: common ground and the coupling of eye movements during dialogue. Psychol Sci 18:407–413PubMedCrossRef

Richardson D, Dale R, Tomlinson J (2009) Conversation, gaze coordination, and beliefs about visual context. Cognit Sci 33:1468–1482CrossRef

Ristic J, Friesen CK, Kingstone A (2002) Are eyes special? It depends on how you look at it. Psychon Bull Rev 9:507–513PubMedCrossRef

Samson D, Apperly IA, Braithwaite JJ, Andrews BJ, Scott SEB (in press) Seeing it their way: evidence for rapid and involuntary computation of what other people see. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. doi:10.1037/a0018729

Saxe R, Jamal N, Powell L (2006) My body or yours? The effect of visual perspective on cortical body representations. Cereb Cortex 16:178–182PubMedCrossRef

Sebanz N, Knoblich G (2009) Prediction in joint action: What, when, and where. Topics Cognit Sci 1:353–367CrossRef

Sebanz N, Knoblich G, Prinz W (2005) How two share a task: corepresenting stimulus-response mappings. JEP HPP 31:1234–1246

Sebanz N, Bekkering H, Knoblich G (2006) Joint action: bodies and minds moving together. TICS 10:70–76

Shepard RN, Metzler J (1971) Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science 171:701–703

Soechting JF, Flanders M (1992) Moving in three-dimensional space: frames of reference, vectors, and coordinate systems. Annu Rev Neurosci 15:167–191PubMedCrossRef

Striano T, Reid VM, Hoehl S (2006) Neural mechanisms of joint attention in infancy. Eur J Neurosci 23:2819–2823PubMedCrossRef

Tomasello M, Carpenter M, Call J, Behne T, Moll H (2005) Understanding and sharing intentions: the origins of cultural cognition. Behav Brain Sci 28:675–691PubMed

Tomasino B, Rumiati RI (2004) Effects of strategies on mental rotation and hemispheric lateralization: neuropsychological evidence. J Cognit Neurosci 16:878–888CrossRef

Tversky B (2005) Functional significance of visuospatial representations. In: Shah P, Miyake A (eds) Handbook of higher-level visuospatial thinking. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–34CrossRef

Tversky B, Hard BM (2009) Embodied and disembodied cognition: spatial perspective-taking. Cognition 110:124–129PubMedCrossRef

Vesper C, Butterfill S, Knoblich G, Sebanz N (2010) A minimal architecture for joint action. Neural Netw 23:998–1003PubMedCrossRef

Vogeley K, Fink GR (2003) Neural correlates of the first-person perspective. TICS 7:38–42

Volcic R, Kappers AML (2008) Allocentric and egocentric reference frames in the processing of three-dimensional haptic space. Exp Brain Res 188:199–213PubMedCrossRef

Wexler M, Kosslyn SM, Berthoz A (1998) Motor processes in mental rotation. Cognition 68:77–94PubMedCrossRef

Wohlschlaeger A, Gattis M, Bekkering H (2003) Action generation and action perception in imitation: an instance of the ideomotor principle. Phil Trans R Soce Lond B 358:501–515CrossRef

Title: Giving a helping hand: effects of joint attention on mental rotation of body parts
Authors: Anne Böckler
Günther Knoblich
Natalie Sebanz
Publication date: 01-06-2011
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Published in: Experimental Brain Research / Issue 3-4/2011
Print ISSN: 0014-4819
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1106
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2625-z

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Giving a helping hand: effects of joint attention on mental rotation of body parts

Abstract

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 3-4/2011

Social attitudes differentially modulate imitation in adolescents and adults

Joint action in a cooperative precision task: nested processes of intrapersonal and interpersonal coordination

Covert motor activity on NoGo trials in a task sharing paradigm: evidence from the lateralized readiness potential

Sense of agency in joint action: influence of human and computer co-actors

Corticospinal excitability is specifically modulated by the social dimension of observed actions

Motor coordination: when two have to act as one