Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Osteoporosis International 9/2017

01-09-2017 | Original Article

FRAX for fracture prediction shorter and longer than 10 years: the Manitoba BMD registry

Authors: W. D. Leslie, S. R. Majumdar, S. N. Morin, L. M. Lix, H. Johansson, A. Oden, E. V. McCloskey, J. A. Kanis

Published in: Osteoporosis International | Issue 9/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Summary

In a large clinical registry for the province of Manitoba, Canada, FRAX predicted incident MOF and hip fracture from 1 to 15 years following baseline assessment. A simple linear rescaling of FRAX outputs seems useful for predicting both short- and long-term fracture risk in this population.

Introduction

FRAX® estimates 10-year probability of major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) and hip fracture. We examined FRAX predictions over intervals shorter and longer than 10 years.

Methods

Using a population-based clinical registry for Manitoba, Canada, we identified 62,275 women and 6455 men 40 years and older with baseline dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans and FRAX scores. Incident MOF and hip fracture were assessed up to 15 years from population-based data. We assessed agreement between estimated fracture probability from 1 to 15 years using linearly rescaled FRAX scores and observed cumulative fracture probability. The gradient of risk for FRAX probability and incident fracture was examined overall and for 5-year intervals.

Results

FRAX predicted incident MOF and hip fracture for all time intervals. There was no attenuation in the gradient of risk for MOF even for years >10. Gradient of risk was slightly lower for hip fracture prediction in years >10 vs years <5, though HRs remained high. Linear agreement was seen in the relationships between observed vs predicted (rescaled) FRAX probabilities (R 2 0.95–1.00). Among women, there was near-perfect linearity in MOF predictions. Deviations from linearity, with a slightly higher observed than predicted MOF probability, were most evident in the first years following a fracture event and after 10 years for hip fracture prediction in women using FRAX with BMD. Simulations showed that results were robust to large differences in fracture rates and moderate differences in mortality rates.

Conclusions

FRAX predicts incident MOF and hip fracture up to 15 years and could be adapted to predict fracture over time periods shorter and longer term than 10 years in populations with fracture and mortality epidemiology similar to Canada.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference NIH Consensus Development Panel (2001) Osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. JAMA 285:785–795CrossRef NIH Consensus Development Panel (2001) Osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. JAMA 285:785–795CrossRef
2.
go back to reference MacLean C, Newberry S, Maglione M et al (2008) Systematic review: comparative effectiveness of treatments to prevent fractures in men and women with low bone density or osteoporosis. Ann Intern Med 148:197–213CrossRefPubMed MacLean C, Newberry S, Maglione M et al (2008) Systematic review: comparative effectiveness of treatments to prevent fractures in men and women with low bone density or osteoporosis. Ann Intern Med 148:197–213CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Hopkins RB, Goeree R, Pullenayegum E et al (2011) The relative efficacy of nine osteoporosis medications for reducing the rate of fractures in post-menopausal women. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 12:209CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hopkins RB, Goeree R, Pullenayegum E et al (2011) The relative efficacy of nine osteoporosis medications for reducing the rate of fractures in post-menopausal women. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 12:209CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Leslie WD, Lix LM (2014) Comparison between various fracture risk assessment tools. Osteoporos Int 25:1–21CrossRefPubMed Leslie WD, Lix LM (2014) Comparison between various fracture risk assessment tools. Osteoporos Int 25:1–21CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Kanis JA, Harvey NC, Cooper C et al (2016) A systematic review of intervention thresholds based on FRAX : a report prepared for the National Osteoporosis Guideline Group and the International Osteoporosis Foundation. Arch Osteoporos 11:25–0278CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kanis JA, Harvey NC, Cooper C et al (2016) A systematic review of intervention thresholds based on FRAX : a report prepared for the National Osteoporosis Guideline Group and the International Osteoporosis Foundation. Arch Osteoporos 11:25–0278CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Cummings SR, Cosman F, Eastell R et al (2013) Goal-directed treatment of osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 28:433–438CrossRefPubMed Cummings SR, Cosman F, Eastell R et al (2013) Goal-directed treatment of osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 28:433–438CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Nguyen ND, Frost SA, Center JR et al (2007) Development of a nomogram for individualizing hip fracture risk in men and women. Osteoporos Int 18:1109–1117CrossRefPubMed Nguyen ND, Frost SA, Center JR et al (2007) Development of a nomogram for individualizing hip fracture risk in men and women. Osteoporos Int 18:1109–1117CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Nguyen ND, Frost SA, Center JR et al (2008) Development of prognostic nomograms for individualizing 5-year and 10-year fracture risks. Osteoporos Int 19:1431–1444CrossRefPubMed Nguyen ND, Frost SA, Center JR et al (2008) Development of prognostic nomograms for individualizing 5-year and 10-year fracture risks. Osteoporos Int 19:1431–1444CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Hippisley-Cox J, Coupland C (2009) Predicting risk of osteoporotic fracture in men and women in England and Wales: prospective derivation and validation of QFractureScores. BMJ 339:b4229CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hippisley-Cox J, Coupland C (2009) Predicting risk of osteoporotic fracture in men and women in England and Wales: prospective derivation and validation of QFractureScores. BMJ 339:b4229CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Hippisley-Cox J, Coupland C (2012) Derivation and validation of updated QFracture algorithm to predict risk of osteoporotic fracture in primary care in the United Kingdom: prospective open cohort study. BMJ 344:e3427CrossRefPubMed Hippisley-Cox J, Coupland C (2012) Derivation and validation of updated QFracture algorithm to predict risk of osteoporotic fracture in primary care in the United Kingdom: prospective open cohort study. BMJ 344:e3427CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Bynum JP, Bell JE, Cantu RV et al (2016) Second fractures among older adults in the year following hip, shoulder, or wrist fracture. Osteoporos Int 27:2207–2215CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bynum JP, Bell JE, Cantu RV et al (2016) Second fractures among older adults in the year following hip, shoulder, or wrist fracture. Osteoporos Int 27:2207–2215CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Giangregorio LM, Leslie WD (2010) Time since prior fracture is a risk modifier for 10-year osteoporotic fractures. J Bone Miner Res 25:1400–1405CrossRefPubMed Giangregorio LM, Leslie WD (2010) Time since prior fracture is a risk modifier for 10-year osteoporotic fractures. J Bone Miner Res 25:1400–1405CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Leslie WD, MacWilliam L, Lix L et al (2005) A population-based study of osteoporosis testing and treatment following introduction of a new bone densitometry service. Osteoporos Int 16:773–782CrossRefPubMed Leslie WD, MacWilliam L, Lix L et al (2005) A population-based study of osteoporosis testing and treatment following introduction of a new bone densitometry service. Osteoporos Int 16:773–782CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Leslie WD, Caetano PA, MacWilliam LR et al (2005) Construction and validation of a population-based bone densitometry database. J Clin Densitom 8:25–30CrossRefPubMed Leslie WD, Caetano PA, MacWilliam LR et al (2005) Construction and validation of a population-based bone densitometry database. J Clin Densitom 8:25–30CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Looker AC, Wahner HW, Dunn WL et al (1998) Updated data on proximal femur bone mineral levels of US adults. Osteoporos Int 8:468–489CrossRefPubMed Looker AC, Wahner HW, Dunn WL et al (1998) Updated data on proximal femur bone mineral levels of US adults. Osteoporos Int 8:468–489CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Leslie WD, Lix LM, Langsetmo L et al (2011) Construction of a FRAX((R)) model for the assessment of fracture probability in Canada and implications for treatment. Osteoporos Int 22:817–827CrossRefPubMed Leslie WD, Lix LM, Langsetmo L et al (2011) Construction of a FRAX((R)) model for the assessment of fracture probability in Canada and implications for treatment. Osteoporos Int 22:817–827CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Leslie WD, Lix LM, Johansson H et al (2010) Independent clinical validation of a Canadian FRAX tool: fracture prediction and model calibration. J Bone Miner Res 25:2350–2358CrossRefPubMed Leslie WD, Lix LM, Johansson H et al (2010) Independent clinical validation of a Canadian FRAX tool: fracture prediction and model calibration. J Bone Miner Res 25:2350–2358CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Fraser LA, Langsetmo L, Berger C et al (2011) Fracture prediction and calibration of a Canadian FRAX(R) tool: a population-based report from CaMos. Osteoporos Int 22:829–837CrossRefPubMed Fraser LA, Langsetmo L, Berger C et al (2011) Fracture prediction and calibration of a Canadian FRAX(R) tool: a population-based report from CaMos. Osteoporos Int 22:829–837CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (eds) (2005) Guidelines for ATC classification and DDD assignment. Oslo WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (eds) (2005) Guidelines for ATC classification and DDD assignment. Oslo
23.
go back to reference Leslie WD, Lix LM, Johansson H et al (2012) Does osteoporosis therapy invalidate FRAX for fracture prediction? J Bone Miner Res 27:1243–1251CrossRefPubMed Leslie WD, Lix LM, Johansson H et al (2012) Does osteoporosis therapy invalidate FRAX for fracture prediction? J Bone Miner Res 27:1243–1251CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Leslie WD, Tsang JF, Caetano PA et al (2007) Effectiveness of bone density measurement for predicting osteoporotic fractures in clinical practice. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 92:77–81CrossRefPubMed Leslie WD, Tsang JF, Caetano PA et al (2007) Effectiveness of bone density measurement for predicting osteoporotic fractures in clinical practice. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 92:77–81CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Roos NP, Shapiro E (1999) Revisiting the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy and Evaluation and its population-based health information system. Med Care 37:JS10–JS14PubMed Roos NP, Shapiro E (1999) Revisiting the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy and Evaluation and its population-based health information system. Med Care 37:JS10–JS14PubMed
26.
go back to reference Leslie WD, Lix LM, Wu X (2013) Competing mortality and fracture risk assessment. Osteoporos Int 24:681–688CrossRefPubMed Leslie WD, Lix LM, Wu X (2013) Competing mortality and fracture risk assessment. Osteoporos Int 24:681–688CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Lam A, Leslie WD, Lix LM et al (2014) Major osteoporotic to hip fracture ratios in Canadian men and women with Swedish comparisons: a population-based analysis. J Bone Miner Res 29:1067–1073CrossRefPubMed Lam A, Leslie WD, Lix LM et al (2014) Major osteoporotic to hip fracture ratios in Canadian men and women with Swedish comparisons: a population-based analysis. J Bone Miner Res 29:1067–1073CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Johnell O, Kanis JA, Oden A et al (2004) Mortality after osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 15:38–42CrossRefPubMed Johnell O, Kanis JA, Oden A et al (2004) Mortality after osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 15:38–42CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Morin S, Lix LM, Azimaee M et al (2011) Mortality rates after incident non-traumatic fractures in older men and women. Osteoporos Int 22:2439–2448CrossRefPubMed Morin S, Lix LM, Azimaee M et al (2011) Mortality rates after incident non-traumatic fractures in older men and women. Osteoporos Int 22:2439–2448CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Lindsay R, Silverman SL, Cooper C et al (2001) Risk of new vertebral fracture in the year following a fracture. JAMA 285:320–323CrossRefPubMed Lindsay R, Silverman SL, Cooper C et al (2001) Risk of new vertebral fracture in the year following a fracture. JAMA 285:320–323CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Lix LM, Azimaee M, Osman BA et al (2012) Osteoporosis-related fracture case definitions for population-based administrative data. BMC Public Health 12:301CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lix LM, Azimaee M, Osman BA et al (2012) Osteoporosis-related fracture case definitions for population-based administrative data. BMC Public Health 12:301CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
go back to reference O’Donnell S (2013) Use of administrative data for national surveillance of osteoporosis and related fractures in Canada: results from a feasibility study. Arch Osteoporos 8:143CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral O’Donnell S (2013) Use of administrative data for national surveillance of osteoporosis and related fractures in Canada: results from a feasibility study. Arch Osteoporos 8:143CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
go back to reference Bolland MJ, Grey AB, Gamble GD et al (2010) Effect of osteoporosis treatment on mortality: a meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 95:1174–1181CrossRefPubMed Bolland MJ, Grey AB, Gamble GD et al (2010) Effect of osteoporosis treatment on mortality: a meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 95:1174–1181CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
FRAX for fracture prediction shorter and longer than 10 years: the Manitoba BMD registry
Authors
W. D. Leslie
S. R. Majumdar
S. N. Morin
L. M. Lix
H. Johansson
A. Oden
E. V. McCloskey
J. A. Kanis
Publication date
01-09-2017
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Osteoporosis International / Issue 9/2017
Print ISSN: 0937-941X
Electronic ISSN: 1433-2965
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-017-4091-3

Other articles of this Issue 9/2017

Osteoporosis International 9/2017 Go to the issue