Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Osteoporosis International 2/2007

Open Access 01-02-2007 | Original Article

The prevalence of vertebral fracture amongst patients presenting with non-vertebral fractures

Authors: S. J. Gallacher, A. P. Gallagher, C. McQuillian, P. J. Mitchell, T. Dixon

Published in: Osteoporosis International | Issue 2/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Despite vertebral fracture being a significant risk factor for further fracture, vertebral fractures are often unrecognised. A study was therefore conducted to determine the proportion of patients presenting with a non-vertebral fracture who also have an unrecognised vertebral fracture.

Methods

Prospective study of patients presenting with a non-vertebral fracture in South Glasgow who underwent DXA evaluation with vertebral morphometry (MXA) from DV5/6 to LV4/5. Vertebral deformities (consistent with fracture) were identified by direct visualisation using the Genant semi-quantitative grading scale.

Results

Data were available for 337 patients presenting with low trauma non-vertebral fracture; 261 were female. Of all patients, 10.4% were aged 50–64 years, 53.2% were aged 65–74 years and 36.2% were aged 75 years or over. According to WHO definitions, 35.0% of patients had normal lumbar spine BMD (T-score −1 or above), 37.4% were osteopenic (T-score −1.1 to −2.4) and 27.6% osteoporotic (T-score −2.5 or lower). Humerus (n=103, 31%), radius–ulna (n=90, 27%) and hand/foot (n=53, 16%) were the most common fractures. For 72% of patients (n=241) the presenting fracture was the first low trauma fracture to come to clinical attention. The overall prevalence of vertebral deformity established by MXA was 25% (n=83); 45% (n=37) of patients with vertebral deformity had deformities of more than one vertebra. Of the patients with vertebral deformity and readable scans for grading, 72.5% (58/80) had deformities of grade 2 or 3. Patients presenting with hip fracture, or spine T-score ≤−2.5, or low BMI, or with more than one prior non-vertebral fracture were all significantly more likely to have evidence of a prevalent vertebral deformity (p<0.05). However, 19.8% of patients with an osteopenic T-score had a vertebral deformity (48% of which were multiple), and 16.1% of patients with a normal T-score had a vertebral deformity (26.3% of which were multiple). Following non-vertebral fracture, some guidelines suggest that anti-resorptive therapy should be reserved for patients with DXA-proven osteoporosis. However, patients who have one or more prior vertebral fractures (prevalent at the time of their non-vertebral fracture) would also become candidates for anti-resorptive therapy—which would have not been the case had their vertebral fracture status not been known. Overall in this study, 8.9% of patients are likely to have had a change in management by virtue of their underlying vertebral deformity status. In other words, 11 patients who present with a non-vertebral fracture would need to undergo vertebral morphometry in order to identify one patient who ought to be managed differently.

Conclusions

Our results support the recommendation to perform vertebral morphometry in patients who are referred for DXA after experiencing a non-vertebral fracture. Treatment decisions will then better reflect any given patient’s future absolute fracture risk. The 'Number Needed to Screen' if vertebral morphometry is used in this way would be seven to identify one patient with vertebral deformity, and 14 to identify one patient with two or more vertebral deformities. Although carrying out MXA will increase radiation exposure for the patient, this increased exposure is significantly less than would be obtained if X-rays of the dorso-lumbar spine were obtained.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis and therapy (2000) NIH Consensus Statement 17(1):1–36 Osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis and therapy (2000) NIH Consensus Statement 17(1):1–36
2.
go back to reference van Staa TP, Dennison EM, Leufkens HG et al (2001) Epidemiology of fractures in England and Wales. Bone 29:517–522PubMedCrossRef van Staa TP, Dennison EM, Leufkens HG et al (2001) Epidemiology of fractures in England and Wales. Bone 29:517–522PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference McLellan AR, Gallacher SJ, Fraser M, McQuillian C (2003) The fracture liaison service: success of a program for the evaluation and management of patients with osteoporotic fracture. Osteoporos Int 14:1028–1034PubMedCrossRef McLellan AR, Gallacher SJ, Fraser M, McQuillian C (2003) The fracture liaison service: success of a program for the evaluation and management of patients with osteoporotic fracture. Osteoporos Int 14:1028–1034PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Cooper C, O’Neill T, Silman A; on behalf of the European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study Group (1993) The epidemiology of vertebral fractures. Bone 14:S89–S97PubMedCrossRef Cooper C, O’Neill T, Silman A; on behalf of the European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study Group (1993) The epidemiology of vertebral fractures. Bone 14:S89–S97PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference The European Prospective Osteoporosis Study (EPOS) group (2002) Incidence of vertebral fracture in Europe: results from the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study (EPOS). J Bone Miner Res 17:716–724CrossRef The European Prospective Osteoporosis Study (EPOS) group (2002) Incidence of vertebral fracture in Europe: results from the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study (EPOS). J Bone Miner Res 17:716–724CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Naves M, Diaz-López JB, Gómez C et al (2003) The effect of vertebral fracture as a risk factor for osteoporotic fracture and mortality in a Spanish population. Osteoporos Int 14:520–524PubMedCrossRef Naves M, Diaz-López JB, Gómez C et al (2003) The effect of vertebral fracture as a risk factor for osteoporotic fracture and mortality in a Spanish population. Osteoporos Int 14:520–524PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Pongchaiyakul C, Nguyen ND, Jones G et al (2005) Asymptomatic vertebral deformity as a major risk factor for subsequent fractures and mortality: a long-term prospective study. J Bone Min Res 8:1349–1355CrossRef Pongchaiyakul C, Nguyen ND, Jones G et al (2005) Asymptomatic vertebral deformity as a major risk factor for subsequent fractures and mortality: a long-term prospective study. J Bone Min Res 8:1349–1355CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Scane AC, Sutcliffe AM, Francis RM (1994) The sequelae of vertebral crush fractures in men. Osteoporos Int 4:89–92PubMedCrossRef Scane AC, Sutcliffe AM, Francis RM (1994) The sequelae of vertebral crush fractures in men. Osteoporos Int 4:89–92PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Klotzbuecher CM, Ross PD, Landsman PB et al (2000) Patients with prior fractures have an increased risk of future fractures: a summary of the literature and statistical synthesis. J Bone Miner Res 15:721–739PubMedCrossRef Klotzbuecher CM, Ross PD, Landsman PB et al (2000) Patients with prior fractures have an increased risk of future fractures: a summary of the literature and statistical synthesis. J Bone Miner Res 15:721–739PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Kanis JA, Johnell O, De Laet C et al (2004) A meta-analysis of previous fracture and subsequent fracture risk. Bone 35:375–382PubMedCrossRef Kanis JA, Johnell O, De Laet C et al (2004) A meta-analysis of previous fracture and subsequent fracture risk. Bone 35:375–382PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Black DM, Arden NK, Palermo L, Pearson J et al (1999) Prevalent vertebral deformities predict hip fractures and new vertebral deformities but not wrist fractures. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. J Bone Miner Res 14:821–828PubMedCrossRef Black DM, Arden NK, Palermo L, Pearson J et al (1999) Prevalent vertebral deformities predict hip fractures and new vertebral deformities but not wrist fractures. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. J Bone Miner Res 14:821–828PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Ferrar L, Jiang G, Adams J et al (2005) Identification of vertebral fractures: an update. Osteoporos Int 16:717–728PubMedCrossRef Ferrar L, Jiang G, Adams J et al (2005) Identification of vertebral fractures: an update. Osteoporos Int 16:717–728PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Genant HK, Wu CY, van Kuijk C et al (1993) Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique. J Bone Miner Res 8:1137–1148PubMed Genant HK, Wu CY, van Kuijk C et al (1993) Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique. J Bone Miner Res 8:1137–1148PubMed
14.
go back to reference Rea JA, Li J, Blake GM, Steiger P et al (2000) Visual assessment of vertebral deformity by X-ray absorptiometry: a highly predictive method to exclude vertebral deformity. Osteoporosis Int 11:660–668CrossRef Rea JA, Li J, Blake GM, Steiger P et al (2000) Visual assessment of vertebral deformity by X-ray absorptiometry: a highly predictive method to exclude vertebral deformity. Osteoporosis Int 11:660–668CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Greenspan SL, von Stetten E, Emond SK (2001) Instant vertebral assessment. J Clin Densitom 4:373–380PubMedCrossRef Greenspan SL, von Stetten E, Emond SK (2001) Instant vertebral assessment. J Clin Densitom 4:373–380PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Kanterewicz E, Yañez A, Del Rio L et al (2003) Vertebral morphometric x-ray absorptiometry in women with Colles’ fracture. J Clin Densitom 6:359–365PubMedCrossRef Kanterewicz E, Yañez A, Del Rio L et al (2003) Vertebral morphometric x-ray absorptiometry in women with Colles’ fracture. J Clin Densitom 6:359–365PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference National Institute for Clinical Excellence (2005) Bisphosphonates (alendronate, etidronate, risedronate), selective oestrogen receptor modulators (raloxifene) and parathyroid hormone (teriparatide) for the secondary prevention of osteoporotic fragility fractures in postmenopausal women. Technology Appraisal 87. January 2005 National Institute for Clinical Excellence (2005) Bisphosphonates (alendronate, etidronate, risedronate), selective oestrogen receptor modulators (raloxifene) and parathyroid hormone (teriparatide) for the secondary prevention of osteoporotic fragility fractures in postmenopausal women. Technology Appraisal 87. January 2005
18.
go back to reference Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (2003) Management of osteoporosis. SIGN 71. June 2003 Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (2003) Management of osteoporosis. SIGN 71. June 2003
19.
go back to reference Robinson CM, Royds M, Abraham A, McQueen MM, Court-Brown CM, Christie J (2002) Refracture in patients at least 45 years old. A retrospective analysis of twenty-two thousand and sixty patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84:1528–1533PubMedCrossRef Robinson CM, Royds M, Abraham A, McQueen MM, Court-Brown CM, Christie J (2002) Refracture in patients at least 45 years old. A retrospective analysis of twenty-two thousand and sixty patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84:1528–1533PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference O’Neill TW, Felsenberg D, Varlow J, Cooper C, Kanis JA, Silman AJ (1996) The prevalence of vertebral deformity in European man and women: the European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study. J Bone Miner Res 11:1010–1018PubMedCrossRef O’Neill TW, Felsenberg D, Varlow J, Cooper C, Kanis JA, Silman AJ (1996) The prevalence of vertebral deformity in European man and women: the European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study. J Bone Miner Res 11:1010–1018PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Chapurlat RD, Deboeuf F, Marion-Audibert HO et al (2006) Effectiveness of instant vertebral assessment to detect prevalent vertebral fracture. Osteoporos Int 17:1189–1195PubMedCrossRef Chapurlat RD, Deboeuf F, Marion-Audibert HO et al (2006) Effectiveness of instant vertebral assessment to detect prevalent vertebral fracture. Osteoporos Int 17:1189–1195PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Binkley N, Krueger D, Gangon R et al (2005) Lateral vertebral assessment: a valuable technique to detect clinically significant vertebral fractures. Osteoporos Int 16:1513–1518PubMedCrossRef Binkley N, Krueger D, Gangon R et al (2005) Lateral vertebral assessment: a valuable technique to detect clinically significant vertebral fractures. Osteoporos Int 16:1513–1518PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Schousboe JT, DeBold CR (2006) Reliability and accuracy of vertebral fracture assessment with densitometry compared to radiography in clinical practice. Osteoporos Int 17:281–289PubMedCrossRef Schousboe JT, DeBold CR (2006) Reliability and accuracy of vertebral fracture assessment with densitometry compared to radiography in clinical practice. Osteoporos Int 17:281–289PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
The prevalence of vertebral fracture amongst patients presenting with non-vertebral fractures
Authors
S. J. Gallacher
A. P. Gallagher
C. McQuillian
P. J. Mitchell
T. Dixon
Publication date
01-02-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Osteoporosis International / Issue 2/2007
Print ISSN: 0937-941X
Electronic ISSN: 1433-2965
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-006-0211-1

Other articles of this Issue 2/2007

Osteoporosis International 2/2007 Go to the issue