Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Osteoporosis International 12/2005

01-12-2005 | Original Article

Lateral vertebral assessment: a valuable technique to detect clinically significant vertebral fractures

Authors: Neil Binkley, D. Krueger, R. Gangnon, H. K. Genant, M. K. Drezner

Published in: Osteoporosis International | Issue 12/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

Although many vertebral fractures are clinically silent, they are associated with increased risk for subsequent osteoporotic fractures. A substantial number of these fractures are demonstrable using instant vertebral assessment with Hologic densitometers. Whether similar recognition is possible using dual-energy lateral vertebral assessment (LVA) with GE Lunar densitometers remains uncertain. Thus, we evaluated the ability of clinicians using LVA to detect prevalent vertebral fractures. Dual-energy LVA and conventional thoracic and lumbar spine radiographs were concurrently obtained in 80 postmenopausal women. Using an established visual semiquantitative system, vertebral fractures were identified individually by two non-radiologist clinicians on LVA images, and the results were compared with spinal radiograph evaluation by an expert radiologist. Using LVA, 95% of vertebral bodies from T7 through L4 were evaluable, but a majority (66%) of vertebrae from T4 to T6 were not adequately visualized. In the LVA-evaluable vertebrae, prevalent fractures were identified in 40 vertebral bodies by radiography. In this regard, the clinicians using LVA detected 17 of 18 radiographically evident vertebral fractures of grade 2 or 3, a false negative rate of 6%. They identified 50% (11/22) of grade 1 fractures. Additionally, the vast majority of evaluable non-fractured vertebrae, (764/794, 96.2%) were correctly classified as normal by LVA. Thus, clinicians utilizing LVA correctly identified the vast majority of grade 2 or 3 vertebral compression fractures and normal vertebral bodies, although detection of grade 1 fractures was less effective. In conclusion, the low-radiation, dual-energy LVA technique provides a rapid and convenient way for clinicians to identify patients with, and without, grade 2 or 3 vertebral fractures, thereby enhancing care of osteoporotic patients.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cooper C, Atkinson EJ, Jacobsen SL, O’Fallon WM, Melton LJ (1993) Population-based study of survival after osteoporotic fractures. Am J Epidemiol 137:1001–1005 Cooper C, Atkinson EJ, Jacobsen SL, O’Fallon WM, Melton LJ (1993) Population-based study of survival after osteoporotic fractures. Am J Epidemiol 137:1001–1005
2.
go back to reference Ensrud K, Thompson D, Cauley J et al (2000) Prevalent vertebral deformities predict mortality and hospitalization in older women with low bone mass. J Am Geriatr Soc 48:241–249 Ensrud K, Thompson D, Cauley J et al (2000) Prevalent vertebral deformities predict mortality and hospitalization in older women with low bone mass. J Am Geriatr Soc 48:241–249
3.
go back to reference Jalava T, Sarna S, Pylkkanen L et al (2003) Association between vertebral fracture and increased mortality in osteoporotic patients. J Bone Miner Res 18:1254–1260 Jalava T, Sarna S, Pylkkanen L et al (2003) Association between vertebral fracture and increased mortality in osteoporotic patients. J Bone Miner Res 18:1254–1260
4.
go back to reference Gold DT (2001) The nonskeletal consequences of osteoporotic fractures. Psychologic and social outcomes. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 27:255–262 Gold DT (2001) The nonskeletal consequences of osteoporotic fractures. Psychologic and social outcomes. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 27:255–262
5.
go back to reference Nevitt MC, Ettinger B, Black DM et al (1998) The association of radiographically detected vertebral fractures with back pain and function: A prospective study. Ann Intern Med 128:793–800 Nevitt MC, Ettinger B, Black DM et al (1998) The association of radiographically detected vertebral fractures with back pain and function: A prospective study. Ann Intern Med 128:793–800
6.
go back to reference Silverman SL, Minshall ME, Shen W, Harper KD, Xie S (2001) The relationship of health-related quality of life to prevalent and incident vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: Results from the multiple outcomes of raloxifene evaluation study. Arthritis Rheum 44:2611–2619 Silverman SL, Minshall ME, Shen W, Harper KD, Xie S (2001) The relationship of health-related quality of life to prevalent and incident vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: Results from the multiple outcomes of raloxifene evaluation study. Arthritis Rheum 44:2611–2619
7.
go back to reference Melton LJ, Atkinson EJ, Cooper C, O’Fallon WM, Riggs BL (1999) Vertebral fractures predict subsequent fractures. Osteoporos Int 10:214–221 Melton LJ, Atkinson EJ, Cooper C, O’Fallon WM, Riggs BL (1999) Vertebral fractures predict subsequent fractures. Osteoporos Int 10:214–221
8.
go back to reference Black DM, Arden NK, Palermo L, Pearson J, Cummings SR (1999) Prevalent vertebral deformities predict hip fractures and new vertebral deformities but not wrist fractures. J Bone Miner Res 14:821–828 Black DM, Arden NK, Palermo L, Pearson J, Cummings SR (1999) Prevalent vertebral deformities predict hip fractures and new vertebral deformities but not wrist fractures. J Bone Miner Res 14:821–828
9.
go back to reference Cooper C, Atkinson EJ, O’Fallon M, Melton LJ 3rd (1992) Incidence of clinically diagnosed vertebral fractures: a population-based study in Rochester, Minnesota, 1985–1989. J Bone Miner Res 7:221–227 Cooper C, Atkinson EJ, O’Fallon M, Melton LJ 3rd (1992) Incidence of clinically diagnosed vertebral fractures: a population-based study in Rochester, Minnesota, 1985–1989. J Bone Miner Res 7:221–227
10.
go back to reference Rea JA, Chen MB, Li J et al (2001) Vertebral morphometry: A comparison of long-term precision of morphometric X-ray absorptiometry and morphometric radiography in normal and osteoporotic subjects. Osteoporos Int 12:158–166 Rea JA, Chen MB, Li J et al (2001) Vertebral morphometry: A comparison of long-term precision of morphometric X-ray absorptiometry and morphometric radiography in normal and osteoporotic subjects. Osteoporos Int 12:158–166
11.
go back to reference Rea JA, Li J, Blake GM et al (2000) Visual assessment of vertebral deformity by X-ray absorptiometry: A highly predictive method to exclude vertebral deformity. Osteoporos Int 11:660–668 Rea JA, Li J, Blake GM et al (2000) Visual assessment of vertebral deformity by X-ray absorptiometry: A highly predictive method to exclude vertebral deformity. Osteoporos Int 11:660–668
12.
go back to reference Greenspan SL, von Stetten E, Emond SK, Jones L, Parker RA (2001) Instant vertebral assessment. J Clin Densitom 4:373–380 Greenspan SL, von Stetten E, Emond SK, Jones L, Parker RA (2001) Instant vertebral assessment. J Clin Densitom 4:373–380
13.
go back to reference Genant HK, Li J, Wu CY, Shepherd JA (2000) Vertebral fractures in osteoporosis. J Clin Densitom 3:281–290 Genant HK, Li J, Wu CY, Shepherd JA (2000) Vertebral fractures in osteoporosis. J Clin Densitom 3:281–290
14.
go back to reference Genant HK, Wu CY, Van Kuijk C, Nevitt MC (1993) Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique. J Bone Miner Res 8:1137–1148 Genant HK, Wu CY, Van Kuijk C, Nevitt MC (1993) Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique. J Bone Miner Res 8:1137–1148
15.
go back to reference Genant HK, Jergas M, Palmero L et al (1996) Comparison of semiquantitative visual and quantitative morphometric assessment of prevalent and incident vertebral fractures in osteoporosis: The study of osteoporotic fractures research group. J Bone Miner Res 11:984–996 Genant HK, Jergas M, Palmero L et al (1996) Comparison of semiquantitative visual and quantitative morphometric assessment of prevalent and incident vertebral fractures in osteoporosis: The study of osteoporotic fractures research group. J Bone Miner Res 11:984–996
16.
go back to reference Anonymous (1995) Report: Assessing vertebral fractures. National Osteoporosis Foundation working group on vertebral fractures. J Bone Miner Res 10:518–523 Anonymous (1995) Report: Assessing vertebral fractures. National Osteoporosis Foundation working group on vertebral fractures. J Bone Miner Res 10:518–523
17.
go back to reference Genant HK, Jergas M (2003) Assessment of prevalent and incident vertebral fractures in osteoporosis research. Osteoporos Int 14:S43–S55 Genant HK, Jergas M (2003) Assessment of prevalent and incident vertebral fractures in osteoporosis research. Osteoporos Int 14:S43–S55
18.
go back to reference Ziegler R, Scheidt-Nave C, Leidig-Bruckner G (1996) What is a vertebral fracture? Bone 18:169S–177S Ziegler R, Scheidt-Nave C, Leidig-Bruckner G (1996) What is a vertebral fracture? Bone 18:169S–177S
19.
go back to reference Osman AAH, Bassiouni H, Koutri R et al (1994) Aging of the thoracic spine: Distinction between wedging in osteoarthritis and fracture in osteoporosis—A cross-section and longitudinal study. Bone 15:437–442 Osman AAH, Bassiouni H, Koutri R et al (1994) Aging of the thoracic spine: Distinction between wedging in osteoarthritis and fracture in osteoporosis—A cross-section and longitudinal study. Bone 15:437–442
20.
go back to reference Kleerekoper M, Nelson DA (1990) Vertebral fracture or vertebral deformity? Calcif Tissue Int 50:5–6 Kleerekoper M, Nelson DA (1990) Vertebral fracture or vertebral deformity? Calcif Tissue Int 50:5–6
21.
go back to reference Harrison JE, Patt N, Muller C et al (1990) Bone mineral mass associated with postmenopausal vertebral deformities. Bone Miner 10:243–251 Harrison JE, Patt N, Muller C et al (1990) Bone mineral mass associated with postmenopausal vertebral deformities. Bone Miner 10:243–251
22.
go back to reference Szulc P, Munoz F, Marchand F, Delmas PD (2001) Semiquantitative evaluation of prevalent vertebral deformities in men and their relationship with osteoporosis: The MINOS study. Osteoporos Int 12:302–310 Szulc P, Munoz F, Marchand F, Delmas PD (2001) Semiquantitative evaluation of prevalent vertebral deformities in men and their relationship with osteoporosis: The MINOS study. Osteoporos Int 12:302–310
23.
go back to reference Genant HK, Mitlak BH, Myers S, Wang O (2000) Radiographic fracture grade is related to clinical disease severity. Results from the rhPTH (1–34) fracture prevention study. Arthritis Rheum 43:S383 Genant HK, Mitlak BH, Myers S, Wang O (2000) Radiographic fracture grade is related to clinical disease severity. Results from the rhPTH (1–34) fracture prevention study. Arthritis Rheum 43:S383
24.
go back to reference Delmas PD, Genant HK, Crans GG et al (2003) Severity of prevalent vertebral fractures and the risk of subsequent vertebral and nonvertebral fractures: results from the MORE trial. Bone 33:522–532 Delmas PD, Genant HK, Crans GG et al (2003) Severity of prevalent vertebral fractures and the risk of subsequent vertebral and nonvertebral fractures: results from the MORE trial. Bone 33:522–532
25.
go back to reference Delmas PD, Watts N, Eastell R et al (2001) Underdiagnosis of vertebral fractures is a worldwide problem: The IMPACT study. J Bone Miner Res 16 [Suppl 1]:S139 Delmas PD, Watts N, Eastell R et al (2001) Underdiagnosis of vertebral fractures is a worldwide problem: The IMPACT study. J Bone Miner Res 16 [Suppl 1]:S139
26.
go back to reference Gehlback SH, Bigelow C, Heimisdottir M et al (2000) Recognition of vertebral fracture in a clinical setting. Osteoporos Int 11:577–582 Gehlback SH, Bigelow C, Heimisdottir M et al (2000) Recognition of vertebral fracture in a clinical setting. Osteoporos Int 11:577–582
27.
go back to reference Sauer P, Leidig G, Minne HW et al (1991) Spine deformity index versus other objective procedures of vertebral fracture identification in patients with osteoporosis: A comparative study. J Bone Miner Res 6:227–238 Sauer P, Leidig G, Minne HW et al (1991) Spine deformity index versus other objective procedures of vertebral fracture identification in patients with osteoporosis: A comparative study. J Bone Miner Res 6:227–238
28.
go back to reference Ross PD, Davis JW, Epstein RS, Wasnich RD (1992) Ability of vertebral dimensions from a single radiograph to identify fractures. Calcif Tissue Int 51:95–99 Ross PD, Davis JW, Epstein RS, Wasnich RD (1992) Ability of vertebral dimensions from a single radiograph to identify fractures. Calcif Tissue Int 51:95–99
29.
go back to reference Smith-Bindman R, Cummings SR, Steiger P, Genant HK (1991) A comparison of morphometric definitions of vertebral fractures. J Bone Miner Res 6:25–34 Smith-Bindman R, Cummings SR, Steiger P, Genant HK (1991) A comparison of morphometric definitions of vertebral fractures. J Bone Miner Res 6:25–34
30.
go back to reference Adami S, Gatti D, Rossini M et al (1992) The radiological assessment of vertebral osteoporosis. Bone 13:S33–S66 Adami S, Gatti D, Rossini M et al (1992) The radiological assessment of vertebral osteoporosis. Bone 13:S33–S66
31.
go back to reference Hansen MA, Overgaard K, Nielsen VA et al (1992) No secular increase in the prevalence of vertebral fractures due to postmenopausal osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 2:241–246 Hansen MA, Overgaard K, Nielsen VA et al (1992) No secular increase in the prevalence of vertebral fractures due to postmenopausal osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 2:241–246
32.
go back to reference Melton LJ, Kan SH, Frye MA et al (1989) Epidemiology of vertebral fractures in women. Am J Epidemiol 129:1000–1011 Melton LJ, Kan SH, Frye MA et al (1989) Epidemiology of vertebral fractures in women. Am J Epidemiol 129:1000–1011
33.
go back to reference Clark KC (1986) Positioning in radiography. Butterworth-Heinemanns, Oxford, UK Clark KC (1986) Positioning in radiography. Butterworth-Heinemanns, Oxford, UK
Metadata
Title
Lateral vertebral assessment: a valuable technique to detect clinically significant vertebral fractures
Authors
Neil Binkley
D. Krueger
R. Gangnon
H. K. Genant
M. K. Drezner
Publication date
01-12-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Osteoporosis International / Issue 12/2005
Print ISSN: 0937-941X
Electronic ISSN: 1433-2965
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-005-1891-7

Other articles of this Issue 12/2005

Osteoporosis International 12/2005 Go to the issue