Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 6/2010

01-06-2010 | Original Article

Factors influencing long-term pessary use

Authors: Sarah Friedman, Katherine S. Sandhu, Cuiling Wang, Magdy S. Mikhail, Erika Banks

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 6/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

We aimed to identify factors contributing to successful pessary use for over 1 year.

Methods

A chart review was conducted composed of 150 women at Montefiore Medical Center, using a pessary for over 1 year. Characteristics of those who continued pessary usage were compared with those who discontinued use by using Chi-square, Fisher’s exact test, logistic regression model, receiver–operator characteristic curve, and Kaplan–Meier survival curves.

Results

Thirty-five women (23%) discontinued using pessaries (DP) after a year, while 115 women (77%) continued (CP). There was no difference in multiple characteristics. The DP group had more patients with stress incontinence, p = 0.17. Older age at pessary insertion showed higher continued use (OR = 1.083, CI: 1.033–1.136). Patients with a history of prolapse repair surgery were more likely to discontinue pessary use.

Conclusions

Age greater than 72 years was associated with continued pessary use and history of hysterectomy or prolapse surgery, and stress incontinence were associated with discontinuation.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Subak LL, Waetjen LE, Van den Eaden S, Thom DH, Vittinghoff E, Brown JS (2001) Cost of pelvic organ prolapse surgery in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 98:646–651CrossRefPubMed Subak LL, Waetjen LE, Van den Eaden S, Thom DH, Vittinghoff E, Brown JS (2001) Cost of pelvic organ prolapse surgery in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 98:646–651CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL (1997) Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 89:501–506CrossRefPubMed Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL (1997) Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 89:501–506CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Clemons JL, Aguilar VC, Tillinghast TA, Jackson ND, Myers DL (2004) Risk factors associated with an unsuccessful pessary fitting trial in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 190:345–350CrossRef Clemons JL, Aguilar VC, Tillinghast TA, Jackson ND, Myers DL (2004) Risk factors associated with an unsuccessful pessary fitting trial in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 190:345–350CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Mutone MF, Terry C, Hale DS, Benson JT (2005) Factors which influence the short-term success of pessary management of pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 193:89–94CrossRef Mutone MF, Terry C, Hale DS, Benson JT (2005) Factors which influence the short-term success of pessary management of pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 193:89–94CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Hanson LA, Schulz JA, Flood CG, Cooley B, Tam F (2006) Vaginal pessaries in managing women with pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence: patient characteristics and factors contributing to success. Int Urogynecol J 17:155–159CrossRef Hanson LA, Schulz JA, Flood CG, Cooley B, Tam F (2006) Vaginal pessaries in managing women with pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence: patient characteristics and factors contributing to success. Int Urogynecol J 17:155–159CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Maito JM, Quam ZA, Craig E, Danner KA, Rogers RG (2006) Predictors of successful pessary fitting and continued use in a nurse–midwifery pessary clinic. J Midwifery Women’s Health 51:78–84CrossRef Maito JM, Quam ZA, Craig E, Danner KA, Rogers RG (2006) Predictors of successful pessary fitting and continued use in a nurse–midwifery pessary clinic. J Midwifery Women’s Health 51:78–84CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Powers K, Lazarou G, Wang A, LaCombe J, Bensinger G, Greston WM et al (2006) Pessary use in advanced pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 17:160–164CrossRef Powers K, Lazarou G, Wang A, LaCombe J, Bensinger G, Greston WM et al (2006) Pessary use in advanced pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 17:160–164CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Heit M, Rosenquist C, Culligan P, Graham C, Murphy M, Shott S (2003) Predicting treatment choice for patients with pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 101:1279–1284CrossRefPubMed Heit M, Rosenquist C, Culligan P, Graham C, Murphy M, Shott S (2003) Predicting treatment choice for patients with pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 101:1279–1284CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Clemons JL, Aguilar VC, Sokol ER, Jackson ND, Myers DL (2004) Patient characteristics that are associated with continued pessary use versus surgery after 1 year. Obstet Gynecol 191:159–164CrossRef Clemons JL, Aguilar VC, Sokol ER, Jackson ND, Myers DL (2004) Patient characteristics that are associated with continued pessary use versus surgery after 1 year. Obstet Gynecol 191:159–164CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Brincat C, Kenton K, Fitzgerald MP, Brubaker L (2004) Sexual activity predicts continued pessary use. Obstet Gynecol 191:198–200CrossRef Brincat C, Kenton K, Fitzgerald MP, Brubaker L (2004) Sexual activity predicts continued pessary use. Obstet Gynecol 191:198–200CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Factors influencing long-term pessary use
Authors
Sarah Friedman
Katherine S. Sandhu
Cuiling Wang
Magdy S. Mikhail
Erika Banks
Publication date
01-06-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 6/2010
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-1080-x

Other articles of this Issue 6/2010

International Urogynecology Journal 6/2010 Go to the issue