Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 5/2019

01-05-2019 | Computed Tomography | KNEE

Phenotyping of hip–knee–ankle angle in young non-osteoarthritic knees provides better understanding of native alignment variability

Authors: Michael T. Hirschmann, Silvan Hess, Henrik Behrend, Felix Amsler, Vincent Leclercq, Lukas B. Moser

Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Issue 5/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

There is a lack of knowledge about the native coronal knee alignment in 3D. The currently used classification system (neutral, valgus and varus) oversimplifies the coronal knee alignment. The purpose of this study was therefore (1) to investigate the coronal knee alignment in non-osteoarthritic knees using 3D-reconstructed CT images and (2) to introduce a classification system for the overall knee alignment based on phenotypes.

Methods

The hospital registry was searched for patients younger than 45 years and older than 16, who received a CT according to the Imperial Knee Protocol. Patients with prosthesis, osteoarthritis, fractures or injury of the collateral ligaments were excluded. Finally, 308 non-osteoarthritic knees of 160 patients remained (102 males and 58 females, mean age ± standard deviation (SD) 30 ± 7 years). The overall lower limb alignment was defined as the hip–knee–ankle angle (HKA), which is formed by lines connecting the centers of the femoral head, the knee and the talus. The angle was measured using a commercially planning software (KneePLAN 3D, Symbios, Yverdon les Bains, Switzerland). Descriptive statistics, such as means, ranges, and measures of variance (e.g., standard deviations) are presented. Based on these results, the currently used classification system was evaluated and a new system, based on phenotypes, was introduced. These phenotypes consist of a phenotype-specific mean value (a HKA value) and cover a range of ± 1.5° from this mean (e.g., 183° ± 1.5°). The mean values represent 3° increments of the angle starting from the overall mean value (mean HKA = 180°; 3° increments = 183° and 177°, 186° and 174°). The distribution of these limb phenotypes was assessed.

Results

The overall mean HKA was 179.7° ± 2.9° varus and values ranged from 172.6° varus to 187.1° valgus. The mean HKA values for male and female were 179.2° ± 2.8° and 180.5° ± 2.8°, respectively, which implied a significant gender difference (r2 = 0.23). The most common limb phenotype in males was NEUHKA0° (36.4%), followed by VARHKA3° (29.2%) and VALHKA3° (23.1%). The most common limb phenotype in females was NEUHKA0° (36.4%), followed by VALHKA3° (22.1%) and VARHKA3° (15.0%).

Conclusion

The measurements using 3D-reconstructed CT images confirmed the great variability of the overall lower limb alignment in non-osteoarthritic knees. However, the currently used classification system (neutral, varus, valgus) oversimplifies the coronal alignment and therefore the introduced classification system, based on limb phenotypes, should be used. This will help to better understand individual coronal knee alignment.

Level of evidence

Level III, retrospective cohort study.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bellemans J, Colyn W, Vandenneucker H, Victor J (2012) The Chitranjan Ranawat award: is neutral mechanical alignment normal for all patients? The concept of constitutional varus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:45–53CrossRefPubMed Bellemans J, Colyn W, Vandenneucker H, Victor J (2012) The Chitranjan Ranawat award: is neutral mechanical alignment normal for all patients? The concept of constitutional varus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:45–53CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Cooke D, Scudamore A, Li J, Wyss U, Bryant T et al (1997) Axial lower-limb alignment: comparison of knee geometry in normal volunteers and osteoarthritis patients. Osteoarthr Cartil 5:39–47CrossRefPubMed Cooke D, Scudamore A, Li J, Wyss U, Bryant T et al (1997) Axial lower-limb alignment: comparison of knee geometry in normal volunteers and osteoarthritis patients. Osteoarthr Cartil 5:39–47CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Eckhoff DG, Bach JM, Spitzer VM, Reinig KD, Bagur MM et al (2005) Three-dimensional mechanics, kinematics, and morphology of the knee viewed in virtual reality. J Bone Jt Surg Am 87(Suppl 2):71–80 Eckhoff DG, Bach JM, Spitzer VM, Reinig KD, Bagur MM et al (2005) Three-dimensional mechanics, kinematics, and morphology of the knee viewed in virtual reality. J Bone Jt Surg Am 87(Suppl 2):71–80
4.
go back to reference Gbejuade HO, White P, Hassaballa M, Porteous AJ, Robinson JR et al (2014) Do long leg supine CT scanograms correlate with weight-bearing full-length radiographs to measure lower limb coronal alignment? Knee 21:549–552CrossRefPubMed Gbejuade HO, White P, Hassaballa M, Porteous AJ, Robinson JR et al (2014) Do long leg supine CT scanograms correlate with weight-bearing full-length radiographs to measure lower limb coronal alignment? Knee 21:549–552CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Henckel J, Richards R, Lozhkin K, Harris S, Rodriguez y Baena FM et al (2006) Very low-dose computed tomography for planning and outcome measurement in knee replacement. The imperial knee protocol. J Bone Jt Surg Br 88:1513–1518CrossRef Henckel J, Richards R, Lozhkin K, Harris S, Rodriguez y Baena FM et al (2006) Very low-dose computed tomography for planning and outcome measurement in knee replacement. The imperial knee protocol. J Bone Jt Surg Br 88:1513–1518CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Hirschmann A, Buck FM, Fucentese SF, Pfirrmann CWA (2015) Upright CT of the knee: the effect of weight-bearing on joint alignment. Eur Radiol 25:3398–3404CrossRefPubMed Hirschmann A, Buck FM, Fucentese SF, Pfirrmann CWA (2015) Upright CT of the knee: the effect of weight-bearing on joint alignment. Eur Radiol 25:3398–3404CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Hirschmann MT, Konala P, Amsler F, Iranpour F, Friederich NF et al (2011) The position and orientation of total knee replacement components: a comparison of conventional radiographs, transverse 2D-CT slices and 3D-CT reconstruction. J Bone Jt Surg Br 93:629–633CrossRef Hirschmann MT, Konala P, Amsler F, Iranpour F, Friederich NF et al (2011) The position and orientation of total knee replacement components: a comparison of conventional radiographs, transverse 2D-CT slices and 3D-CT reconstruction. J Bone Jt Surg Br 93:629–633CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hovinga KR, Lerner AL (2009) Anatomic variations between Japanese and Caucasian populations in the healthy young adult knee joint. J Orthop Res 27:1191–1196CrossRefPubMed Hovinga KR, Lerner AL (2009) Anatomic variations between Japanese and Caucasian populations in the healthy young adult knee joint. J Orthop Res 27:1191–1196CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Hsu RWW, Himeno S, Coventry MB, Chao EYS (1990) Normal axial alignment of the lower extremity and load-bearing distribution at the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 255:215–227 Hsu RWW, Himeno S, Coventry MB, Chao EYS (1990) Normal axial alignment of the lower extremity and load-bearing distribution at the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 255:215–227
10.
go back to reference Jabalameli M, Moghimi J, Yeganeh A, Nojomi M (2015) Parameters of lower extremities alignment view in Iranian adult population. Acta Med Iran 4:122–127 Jabalameli M, Moghimi J, Yeganeh A, Nojomi M (2015) Parameters of lower extremities alignment view in Iranian adult population. Acta Med Iran 4:122–127
11.
go back to reference Jenny J-Y, Boeri C, Ballonzoli L (2005) Coronal alignment of the lower limb. Acta Orthop 76:403–407CrossRefPubMed Jenny J-Y, Boeri C, Ballonzoli L (2005) Coronal alignment of the lower limb. Acta Orthop 76:403–407CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Longstaff LM, Sloan K, Stamp N, Scaddan M, Beaver R (2009) Good alignment after total knee arthroplasty leads to faster rehabilitation and better function. J Arthroplast 24:570–578CrossRef Longstaff LM, Sloan K, Stamp N, Scaddan M, Beaver R (2009) Good alignment after total knee arthroplasty leads to faster rehabilitation and better function. J Arthroplast 24:570–578CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Lotke PA, Ecker ML (1977) Influence of positioning of prosthesis in total knee replacement. J Bone Jt Surg Am 59:77–79CrossRef Lotke PA, Ecker ML (1977) Influence of positioning of prosthesis in total knee replacement. J Bone Jt Surg Am 59:77–79CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Moreland JR, Bassett LW, Hanker GJ (1987) Radiographic analysis of the axial alignment of the lower extremity. J Bone Jt Surg Am 69:745–749CrossRef Moreland JR, Bassett LW, Hanker GJ (1987) Radiographic analysis of the axial alignment of the lower extremity. J Bone Jt Surg Am 69:745–749CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Sailhan F, Jacob L, Hamadouche M (2017) Differences in limb alignment and femoral mechanical-anatomical angles using two dimension versus three dimension radiographic imaging. Int Orthop 41:2009–2016CrossRefPubMed Sailhan F, Jacob L, Hamadouche M (2017) Differences in limb alignment and femoral mechanical-anatomical angles using two dimension versus three dimension radiographic imaging. Int Orthop 41:2009–2016CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Shetty GM, Mullaji A, Bhayde S, Nha KW, Oh HK (2014) Factors contributing to inherent varus alignment of lower limb in normal Asian adults: role of tibial plateau inclination. Knee 21:544–548CrossRefPubMed Shetty GM, Mullaji A, Bhayde S, Nha KW, Oh HK (2014) Factors contributing to inherent varus alignment of lower limb in normal Asian adults: role of tibial plateau inclination. Knee 21:544–548CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Song M-H, Yoo S-H, Kang S-W, Kim Y-J, Park G-T et al (2015) Coronal alignment of the lower limb and the incidence of constitutional varus knee in Korean females. Knee Surg Relat Res 27:49–55CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Song M-H, Yoo S-H, Kang S-W, Kim Y-J, Park G-T et al (2015) Coronal alignment of the lower limb and the incidence of constitutional varus knee in Korean females. Knee Surg Relat Res 27:49–55CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Tanaka T, Takayama K, Hashimoto S, Kanzaki N, Hayashi S et al (2017) Radiographic analysis of the lower limbs using the hip–calcaneus line in healthy individuals and in patients with varus knee osteoarthritis. Knee 24:1146–1152CrossRefPubMed Tanaka T, Takayama K, Hashimoto S, Kanzaki N, Hayashi S et al (2017) Radiographic analysis of the lower limbs using the hip–calcaneus line in healthy individuals and in patients with varus knee osteoarthritis. Knee 24:1146–1152CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Tang WM, Zhu YH, Chiu KY (2000) Axial Alignment of the lower extremity in Chinese adults. J Bone Jt Surg Am 82:1603–1608CrossRef Tang WM, Zhu YH, Chiu KY (2000) Axial Alignment of the lower extremity in Chinese adults. J Bone Jt Surg Am 82:1603–1608CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Than P, Szuper K, Somoskeöy S, Warta V, Illés T (2012) Geometrical values of the normal and arthritic hip and knee detected with the EOS imaging system. Int Orthop 36:1291–1297CrossRefPubMed Than P, Szuper K, Somoskeöy S, Warta V, Illés T (2012) Geometrical values of the normal and arthritic hip and knee detected with the EOS imaging system. Int Orthop 36:1291–1297CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Thienpont E, Schwab PE, Cornu O, Bellemans J, Victor J (2017) Bone morphotypes of the varus and valgus knee. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 137:393–400CrossRefPubMed Thienpont E, Schwab PE, Cornu O, Bellemans J, Victor J (2017) Bone morphotypes of the varus and valgus knee. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 137:393–400CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Phenotyping of hip–knee–ankle angle in young non-osteoarthritic knees provides better understanding of native alignment variability
Authors
Michael T. Hirschmann
Silvan Hess
Henrik Behrend
Felix Amsler
Vincent Leclercq
Lukas B. Moser
Publication date
01-05-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Issue 5/2019
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05507-1

Other articles of this Issue 5/2019

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 5/2019 Go to the issue