Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

LIVE: Thursday 2nd May 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

Quality sleep is essential for health. But what happens to our brains when sleep patterns are disturbed? Join our experts to explore the interplay between sleep disruption and neurological diseases, and the questions that you need to be asking your patients to help you prevent the harmful effects of sleep deprivation.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Intensive Care Medicine
Published in: Intensive Care Medicine 5/2013

01-05-2013 | Correspondence

Parenteral versus enteral nutrition in the critically ill patient: additional sensitivity analysis supports benefit of early parenteral compared to delayed enteral nutrition

Author: Gordon Stuart Doig

Published in: Intensive Care Medicine | Issue 5/2013

Login to get access

Excerpt

Dear Editor, …
Literature
1.
2.
Simpson F, Doig GS (2005) Parenteral vs. enteral nutrition in the critically ill patient: a meta-analysis of trials using the intention to treat principle. Intensive Care Med 31:12–23PubMedCrossRef
3.
Doig GS, Simpson F, Finfer S et al (2008) Effect of evidence-based feeding guidelines on mortality of critically ill adults: a cluster randomized trial. J Am Med Assoc 300:2731–2741CrossRef
4.
Rapp RP, Young B, Twyman D et al (1983) The favorable effect of early parenteral feeding on survival in head-injured patients. J Neurosurg 58:906–912PubMedCrossRef
5.
McClave SA, Martindale RG, Vanek VW et al (2009) Guidelines for the provision and assessment of nutrition support therapy in the adult critically ill patient: Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN). JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 33:277–316PubMedCrossRef
6.
Rice TW, Wheeler AP, Thompson BT et al (2012) Initial trophic vs. full enteral feeding in patients with acute lung injury: the EDEN randomized trial. JAMA 307:795–803PubMedCrossRef
7.
Lachin JM (2000) Statistical considerations in the intent-to-treat principle. Control Clin Trials 21:167–189PubMedCrossRef
8.
Doig GS, Simpson F, Delaney A (2005) A review of the true methodological quality of nutritional support trials conducted in the critically ill: time for improvement. Anesth Analg 100:527–533PubMedCrossRef
9.
Wood AM, White IR, Thompson SG (2004) Are missing outcome data adequately handled? A review of published randomized controlled trials in major medical journals. Clin Trials 1:368–376PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Parenteral versus enteral nutrition in the critically ill patient: additional sensitivity analysis supports benefit of early parenteral compared to delayed enteral nutrition
Author
Gordon Stuart Doig
Publication date
01-05-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine / Issue 5/2013
Print ISSN: 0342-4642
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1238
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-013-2856-5

Other articles of this Issue 5/2013

Intensive Care Medicine 5/2013 Go to the issue

Pediatric Original

Validation of a new method based on ultrasound velocity dilution to measure cardiac output in paediatric patients

From the Inside

Memorable patients: I’ll be dead on Friday

Correspondence

NIV should be delivered in do-not-intubate patients in acute respiratory failure, but how?

Correspondence

Optimized safety and function of the bicaval dual-lumen cannula by refined positioning and bedside management

Correspondence

Ultrasound in critically ill patients: focus on diaphragm

Correspondence

Parenteral versus enteral nutrition in the critically ill patient: a re-analysis of a flawed meta-analysis