Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Intensive Care Medicine 7/2007

01-07-2007 | Brief Report

Reproducibility of bladder pressure measurements in critically ill patients

Authors: Edward J. Kimball, Mary C. Mone, Timothy R. Wolfe, Gabriele K. Baraghoshi, Stephen C. Alder

Published in: Intensive Care Medicine | Issue 7/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

Intra-abdominal hypertension is an independent cause of multiorgan failure and directly effects other physiological measurements, making it an important factor in the management of critically ill patients, but no clinical studies have investigated the reproducibility of intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) measurement to ensure diagnostic accuracy. This study evaluated the intraobserver and interobserver variability of bladder pressure measurements.

Design and setting

Prospective, observational study in a university-based adult surgical intensive care unit.

Patients

Critically ill patients undergoing intra-abdominal pressure readings, measured by nursing staff.

Measurements and results

The study compared patient IAP measurements obtained by the same nurse (intraobserver variation) and between two different nurses (interobserver variation) in critical care patients with clinical indications for IAP monitoring. Data related to the nursing technique and performance were observed and collected for each IAP measurement obtained. Good correlation of bladder pressure measurements between the same and different individuals was found. Intraobserver and interobserver Pearson's correlations for measured IAP were 0.934 and 0.950, respectively. A unit protocol for IAP measurement standardization was modified based on observational data collected.

Conclusions

Intra-abdominal pressure can be accurately and reliably measured in critically ill patients by utilizing a standardized measurement device combined with a standardized clinical protocol.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Sugrue M (2002) Intra-abdominal pressure: time for clinical practice guidelines? Intensive Care Med 28:389–391CrossRefPubMed Sugrue M (2002) Intra-abdominal pressure: time for clinical practice guidelines? Intensive Care Med 28:389–391CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Malbrain MLNG (2004) Different techniques to measure intra-abdominal pressure (IAP): time for a critical re-appraisal. Intensive Care Med 30:357–371CrossRefPubMed Malbrain MLNG (2004) Different techniques to measure intra-abdominal pressure (IAP): time for a critical re-appraisal. Intensive Care Med 30:357–371CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Wolfe TR, Kimball EJ (2005) Inter- and intra-observer variability does not occur with a new intra-abdominal pressure monitoring kit. ANZ J Surg 75:A1CrossRef Wolfe TR, Kimball EJ (2005) Inter- and intra-observer variability does not occur with a new intra-abdominal pressure monitoring kit. ANZ J Surg 75:A1CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Zar JH (1999) Biostatistical analyses. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River Zar JH (1999) Biostatistical analyses. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River
6.
go back to reference Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310CrossRefPubMed Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Darovic GO, Zbilut JB (2002) Fluid filled monitoring systems. In: Darovic GO (ed) Hemodynamic monitoring: invasive and noninvasive clinical applications. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 113–131 Darovic GO, Zbilut JB (2002) Fluid filled monitoring systems. In: Darovic GO (ed) Hemodynamic monitoring: invasive and noninvasive clinical applications. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 113–131
8.
go back to reference DePotter TJ, Dits H, Malbrain MLNG (2005) Intra- and interobserver variability during in vitro validation of two novel methods for intra-abdominal pressure monitoring. Intensive Care Med 31:747–751CrossRef DePotter TJ, Dits H, Malbrain MLNG (2005) Intra- and interobserver variability during in vitro validation of two novel methods for intra-abdominal pressure monitoring. Intensive Care Med 31:747–751CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Peters K, Jones F, Sugrue M, Bauman A, Parr M, Balogh Z (2005) How reliable is intra-abdominal pressure measurement in intensive care? ANZ J Surg 75:A10CrossRef Peters K, Jones F, Sugrue M, Bauman A, Parr M, Balogh Z (2005) How reliable is intra-abdominal pressure measurement in intensive care? ANZ J Surg 75:A10CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Rizvi K, deBoisblanc BP, Truwit JD, Dhillon G, Arroliga A, Fuchs BD, Guntupalli KK, Hite D, Hayden D (2005) Effect of airway pressure display on interobserver agreement in the assessment of vascular pressures in patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med 33:98–103CrossRefPubMed Rizvi K, deBoisblanc BP, Truwit JD, Dhillon G, Arroliga A, Fuchs BD, Guntupalli KK, Hite D, Hayden D (2005) Effect of airway pressure display on interobserver agreement in the assessment of vascular pressures in patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med 33:98–103CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Reproducibility of bladder pressure measurements in critically ill patients
Authors
Edward J. Kimball
Mary C. Mone
Timothy R. Wolfe
Gabriele K. Baraghoshi
Stephen C. Alder
Publication date
01-07-2007
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine / Issue 7/2007
Print ISSN: 0342-4642
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1238
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-007-0641-z

Other articles of this Issue 7/2007

Intensive Care Medicine 7/2007 Go to the issue