Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Diabetologia 1/2018

Open Access 01-01-2018 | Article

Random non-fasting C-peptide testing can identify patients with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes at high risk of hypoglycaemia

Authors: Suzy V. Hope, Bridget A. Knight, Beverley M. Shields, Anita V. Hill, Pratik Choudhary, W. David Strain, Timothy J. McDonald, Angus G. Jones

Published in: Diabetologia | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis

The aim of this study was to determine whether random non-fasting C-peptide (rCP) measurement can be used to assess hypoglycaemia risk in insulin-treated type 2 diabetes.

Methods

We compared continuous glucose monitoring-assessed SD of blood glucose and hypoglycaemia duration in 17 patients with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes and severe insulin deficiency (rCP < 200 pmol/l) and 17 matched insulin-treated control patients with type 2 diabetes but who had preserved endogenous insulin (rCP > 600 pmol/l). We then assessed the relationship between rCP and questionnaire-based measures of hypoglycaemia in 256 patients with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes and a comparison group of 209 individuals with type 1 diabetes.

Results

Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)-assessed glucose variability and hypoglycaemia was greater in individuals with rCP < 200 pmol/l despite similar mean glucose. In those with low vs high C-peptide, SD of glucose was 4.2 (95% CI 3.7, 4.6) vs 3.0 (2.6, 3.4) mmol/l (p < 0.001). In the low-C-peptide vs high-C-peptide group, the proportion of individuals experiencing sustained hypoglycaemia ≤ 4 mmol/l was 94% vs 41% (p < 0.001), the mean rate of hypoglycaemia was 5.5 (4.4, 6.7) vs 2.1 (1.4, 2.9) episodes per person per week (p = 0.004) and the mean duration was 630 (619, 643) vs 223 (216, 230) min per person per week (p = 0.01). Hypoglycaemia ≤ 3 mmol/l was infrequent in individuals with preserved C-peptide (1.8 [1.2, 2.6] episodes per person per week vs 0.4 [0.1, 0.8] episodes per person per week for low vs high C-peptide, p = 0.04) and only occurred at night. In a population-based cohort with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes, self-reported hypoglycaemia was twice as frequent in those with rCP < 200 pmol/l (OR 2.0, p < 0.001) and the rate of episodes resulting in loss of consciousness or seizure was five times higher (OR 5.0, p = 0.001). The relationship between self-reported hypoglycaemia and C-peptide was similar in individuals with type 1 and type 2 diabetes.

Conclusions/interpretation

Low rCP is associated with increased glucose variability and hypoglycaemia in patients with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes and represents a practical, stable and inexpensive biomarker for assessment of hypoglycaemia risk.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group (1991) Epidemiology of severe hypoglycemia in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Am J Med 90:450–459CrossRef The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group (1991) Epidemiology of severe hypoglycemia in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Am J Med 90:450–459CrossRef
2.
go back to reference The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group (1997) Hypoglycemia in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Diabetes 46:271–286CrossRef The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group (1997) Hypoglycemia in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Diabetes 46:271–286CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Steffes MW, Sibley S, Jackson M, Thomas W (2003) β-cell function and the development of diabetes-related complications in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Diabetes Care 26:832–836CrossRefPubMed Steffes MW, Sibley S, Jackson M, Thomas W (2003) β-cell function and the development of diabetes-related complications in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Diabetes Care 26:832–836CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Greven W, Beulens J, Biesma D, Faiz S, De Valk H (2010) Glycemic variability in inadequately controlled type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes on intensive insulin therapy: a cross-sectional, observational study. Diabetes Technol Ther 12:695–699CrossRefPubMed Greven W, Beulens J, Biesma D, Faiz S, De Valk H (2010) Glycemic variability in inadequately controlled type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes on intensive insulin therapy: a cross-sectional, observational study. Diabetes Technol Ther 12:695–699CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Wang L, Lovejoy NF, Faustman DL (2012) Persistence of prolonged C-peptide production in type 1 diabetes as measured with an ultrasensitive C-peptide assay. Diabetes Care 35:465–470CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wang L, Lovejoy NF, Faustman DL (2012) Persistence of prolonged C-peptide production in type 1 diabetes as measured with an ultrasensitive C-peptide assay. Diabetes Care 35:465–470CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Oram RA, McDonald TJ, Shields BM et al (2015) Most people with long-duration type 1 diabetes in a large population-based study are insulin microsecretors. Diabetes Care 38:323–328CrossRefPubMed Oram RA, McDonald TJ, Shields BM et al (2015) Most people with long-duration type 1 diabetes in a large population-based study are insulin microsecretors. Diabetes Care 38:323–328CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Kuhtreiber WM, Washer SLL, Hsu E et al (2015) Low levels of C-peptide have clinical significance for established Type 1 diabetes. Diabet Med 32:1346–1353CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kuhtreiber WM, Washer SLL, Hsu E et al (2015) Low levels of C-peptide have clinical significance for established Type 1 diabetes. Diabet Med 32:1346–1353CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Lachin JM, McGee P, Palmer JP, for the DCCT/EDIC Research Group (2014) Impact of C-peptide preservation on metabolic and clinical outcomes in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Diabetes 63:739–748CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lachin JM, McGee P, Palmer JP, for the DCCT/EDIC Research Group (2014) Impact of C-peptide preservation on metabolic and clinical outcomes in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Diabetes 63:739–748CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Hope SV, Knight BA, Shields BM, Hattersley AT, McDonald TJ, Jones AG (2016) Random non-fasting C–peptide: bringing robust assessment of endogenous insulin secretion to the clinic. Diabet Med 33:1554–1558CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hope SV, Knight BA, Shields BM, Hattersley AT, McDonald TJ, Jones AG (2016) Random non-fasting C–peptide: bringing robust assessment of endogenous insulin secretion to the clinic. Diabet Med 33:1554–1558CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference McDonald TJ, Perry MH, Peake RWA et al (2012) EDTA improves stability of whole blood C-peptide and insulin to over 24 hours at room temperature. PLoS One 7:e42084CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral McDonald TJ, Perry MH, Peake RWA et al (2012) EDTA improves stability of whole blood C-peptide and insulin to over 24 hours at room temperature. PLoS One 7:e42084CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Hope SV, Jones AG, Goodchild E et al (2013) Urinary C-peptide creatinine ratio detects absolute insulin deficiency in Type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med 30:1342–1348CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hope SV, Jones AG, Goodchild E et al (2013) Urinary C-peptide creatinine ratio detects absolute insulin deficiency in Type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med 30:1342–1348CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Jones AG, McDonald TJ, Shields BM et al (2016) Markers of β-cell failure predict poor glycemic response to GLP-1 receptor agonist therapy in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 39:250–257PubMed Jones AG, McDonald TJ, Shields BM et al (2016) Markers of β-cell failure predict poor glycemic response to GLP-1 receptor agonist therapy in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 39:250–257PubMed
15.
go back to reference Hope SV, Wienand-Barnett S, Shepherd M et al (2016) Practical classification guidelines for diabetes in patients treated with insulin: a cross-sectional study of the accuracy of diabetes diagnosis. Br J Gen Pract 66:e315–e322CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hope SV, Wienand-Barnett S, Shepherd M et al (2016) Practical classification guidelines for diabetes in patients treated with insulin: a cross-sectional study of the accuracy of diabetes diagnosis. Br J Gen Pract 66:e315–e322CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Gottsater A, Landin-Olsson M, Fernlund P, Lernmark A, Sundkvist G (1993) β-Cell function in relation to islet cell antibodies during the first 3 yr after clinical diagnosis of diabetes in type II diabetic patients. Diabetes Care 16:902–910CrossRefPubMed Gottsater A, Landin-Olsson M, Fernlund P, Lernmark A, Sundkvist G (1993) β-Cell function in relation to islet cell antibodies during the first 3 yr after clinical diagnosis of diabetes in type II diabetic patients. Diabetes Care 16:902–910CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Clarke WL, Cox DJ, Gonder-Frederick LA, Julian D, Schlundt D, Polonsky W (1995) Reduced awareness of hypoglycemia in adults with IDDM: a prospective study of hypoglycemic frequency and associated symptoms. Diabetes Care 18:517–522CrossRefPubMed Clarke WL, Cox DJ, Gonder-Frederick LA, Julian D, Schlundt D, Polonsky W (1995) Reduced awareness of hypoglycemia in adults with IDDM: a prospective study of hypoglycemic frequency and associated symptoms. Diabetes Care 18:517–522CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Choudhary P, Geddes J, Freeman JV, Emery CJ, Heller SR, Frier BM (2010) Frequency of biochemical hypoglycaemia in adults with Type 1 diabetes with and without impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia: no identifiable differences using continuous glucose monitoring. Diabet Med 27:666–672CrossRefPubMed Choudhary P, Geddes J, Freeman JV, Emery CJ, Heller SR, Frier BM (2010) Frequency of biochemical hypoglycaemia in adults with Type 1 diabetes with and without impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia: no identifiable differences using continuous glucose monitoring. Diabet Med 27:666–672CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Hill N, Oliver N, Choudhary P, Levy J, Hindmarsh P, Matthews D (2011) Normal reference range for mean tissue glucose and glycemic variability derived from continuous glucose monitoring for subjects without diabetes in different ethnic groups. Diabetes Technol Ther 13:921–928CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hill N, Oliver N, Choudhary P, Levy J, Hindmarsh P, Matthews D (2011) Normal reference range for mean tissue glucose and glycemic variability derived from continuous glucose monitoring for subjects without diabetes in different ethnic groups. Diabetes Technol Ther 13:921–928CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Riddle MC, Rosenstock J, Vlajnic A, Gao L (2014) Randomized, 1-year comparison of three ways to initiate and advance insulin for type 2 diabetes: twice-daily premixed insulin versus basal insulin with either basal-plus one prandial insulin or basal-bolus up to three prandial injections. Diabetes Obes Metab 16:396–402CrossRefPubMed Riddle MC, Rosenstock J, Vlajnic A, Gao L (2014) Randomized, 1-year comparison of three ways to initiate and advance insulin for type 2 diabetes: twice-daily premixed insulin versus basal insulin with either basal-plus one prandial insulin or basal-bolus up to three prandial injections. Diabetes Obes Metab 16:396–402CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Holman R, Farmer A, Davies M et al (2009) Three-year efficacy of complex insulin regimens in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 361:1736–1747CrossRefPubMed Holman R, Farmer A, Davies M et al (2009) Three-year efficacy of complex insulin regimens in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 361:1736–1747CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference NICE (2016) Integrated sensor-augmented pump therapy systems for managing blood glucose levels in type 1 diabetes (the MiniMed Paradigm Veo system and the Vibe and G4 PLATINUM CGM system). Diagnostics Guidance [DG21]. Available from https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/dg21. Accessed 24 Mar 2017 NICE (2016) Integrated sensor-augmented pump therapy systems for managing blood glucose levels in type 1 diabetes (the MiniMed Paradigm Veo system and the Vibe and G4 PLATINUM CGM system). Diagnostics Guidance [DG21]. Available from https://​www.​nice.​org.​uk/​guidance/​dg21. Accessed 24 Mar 2017
23.
go back to reference Rodbard D (2009) Interpretation of continuous glucose monitoring data: glycemic variability and quality of glycemic control. Diabetes Technol Ther 11:S55–S67PubMed Rodbard D (2009) Interpretation of continuous glucose monitoring data: glycemic variability and quality of glycemic control. Diabetes Technol Ther 11:S55–S67PubMed
24.
go back to reference Rodbard D (2009) New and improved methods to characterize glycemic variability using continuous glucose monitoring. Diabetes Technol Ther 11:551–565CrossRefPubMed Rodbard D (2009) New and improved methods to characterize glycemic variability using continuous glucose monitoring. Diabetes Technol Ther 11:551–565CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Gribovschi M, Ţigan Ş, Hancu N (2013) Glycemic variability and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Appl Med Inform 32:53–60 Gribovschi M, Ţigan Ş, Hancu N (2013) Glycemic variability and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Appl Med Inform 32:53–60
26.
go back to reference ADA/EASD (2017) Glucose concentrations of less than 3.0 mmol/l (54 mg/dl) should be reported in clinical trials: a joint position statement of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetologia 60:3–6CrossRef ADA/EASD (2017) Glucose concentrations of less than 3.0 mmol/l (54 mg/dl) should be reported in clinical trials: a joint position statement of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetologia 60:3–6CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Buckingham B, Cheng P, Beck RW et al (2015) CGM-measured glucose values have a strong correlation with C-peptide, HbA1c and IDAAC, but do poorly in predicting C-peptide levels in the two years following onset of diabetes. Diabetologia 58:1167–1174CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Buckingham B, Cheng P, Beck RW et al (2015) CGM-measured glucose values have a strong correlation with C-peptide, HbA1c and IDAAC, but do poorly in predicting C-peptide levels in the two years following onset of diabetes. Diabetologia 58:1167–1174CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Pinckney A, Rigby MR, Keyes-Elstein L, Soppe CL, Nepom GT, Ehlers MR (2016) Correlation among hypoglycemia, glycemic variability, and C-peptide preservation after Alefacept therapy in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus: analysis of data from the immune tolerance network T1DAL trial. Clin Ther 38:1327–1339CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pinckney A, Rigby MR, Keyes-Elstein L, Soppe CL, Nepom GT, Ehlers MR (2016) Correlation among hypoglycemia, glycemic variability, and C-peptide preservation after Alefacept therapy in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus: analysis of data from the immune tolerance network T1DAL trial. Clin Ther 38:1327–1339CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
go back to reference Brooks AM, Oram R, Home P, Steen N, Shaw JA (2015) Demonstration of an intrinsic relationship between endogenous C-peptide concentration and determinants of glycemic control in type 1 diabetes following islet transplantation. Diabetes Care 38:105–112CrossRefPubMed Brooks AM, Oram R, Home P, Steen N, Shaw JA (2015) Demonstration of an intrinsic relationship between endogenous C-peptide concentration and determinants of glycemic control in type 1 diabetes following islet transplantation. Diabetes Care 38:105–112CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Jin SM, Kim TH, Bae JC et al (2014) Clinical factors associated with absolute and relative measures of glycemic variability determined by continuous glucose monitoring: an analysis of 480 subjects. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 104:266–272CrossRefPubMed Jin SM, Kim TH, Bae JC et al (2014) Clinical factors associated with absolute and relative measures of glycemic variability determined by continuous glucose monitoring: an analysis of 480 subjects. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 104:266–272CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Henderson JN, Allen KV, Deary IJ, Frier BM (2003) Hypoglycaemia in insulin-treated Type 2 diabetes: frequency, symptoms and impaired awareness. Diabet Med 20:1016–1021CrossRefPubMed Henderson JN, Allen KV, Deary IJ, Frier BM (2003) Hypoglycaemia in insulin-treated Type 2 diabetes: frequency, symptoms and impaired awareness. Diabet Med 20:1016–1021CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Hermansen K, Kipnes M, Luo E, Fanurik D, Khatami H, Stein P (2007) Efficacy and safety of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, sitagliptin, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on glimepiride alone or on glimepiride and metformin. Diabetes Obes Metab 9:733–745CrossRefPubMed Hermansen K, Kipnes M, Luo E, Fanurik D, Khatami H, Stein P (2007) Efficacy and safety of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, sitagliptin, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on glimepiride alone or on glimepiride and metformin. Diabetes Obes Metab 9:733–745CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Chow L, Chen H, Miller M, Marcovina S, Seaquist E (2015) Biomarkers related to severe hypoglycaemia and lack of good glycaemic control in ACCORD. Diabetologia 58:1160–1166CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chow L, Chen H, Miller M, Marcovina S, Seaquist E (2015) Biomarkers related to severe hypoglycaemia and lack of good glycaemic control in ACCORD. Diabetologia 58:1160–1166CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
go back to reference Berger B, Stenstrom G, Sundkvist G (2000) Random C-peptide in the classification of diabetes. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 60:687–693CrossRefPubMed Berger B, Stenstrom G, Sundkvist G (2000) Random C-peptide in the classification of diabetes. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 60:687–693CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Hope S, Strain W (2013) Hypoglycemia in the elderly. Diabetic Hypoglycemia 6:3–10 Hope S, Strain W (2013) Hypoglycemia in the elderly. Diabetic Hypoglycemia 6:3–10
36.
go back to reference Jones A, Besser R, Shields B et al (2012) Assessment of endogenous insulin secretion in insulin treated diabetes predicts postprandial glucose and treatment response to prandial insulin. BMC Endocr Disord 12:6CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jones A, Besser R, Shields B et al (2012) Assessment of endogenous insulin secretion in insulin treated diabetes predicts postprandial glucose and treatment response to prandial insulin. BMC Endocr Disord 12:6CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Random non-fasting C-peptide testing can identify patients with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes at high risk of hypoglycaemia
Authors
Suzy V. Hope
Bridget A. Knight
Beverley M. Shields
Anita V. Hill
Pratik Choudhary
W. David Strain
Timothy J. McDonald
Angus G. Jones
Publication date
01-01-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Diabetologia / Issue 1/2018
Print ISSN: 0012-186X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-017-4449-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Diabetologia 1/2018 Go to the issue
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discuss last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.