Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Diabetologia 12/2012

01-12-2012 | Article

A two-step screening algorithm including fasting plasma glucose measurement and a risk estimation model is an accurate strategy for detecting gestational diabetes mellitus

Authors: C. S. Göbl, L. Bozkurt, P. Rivic, G. Schernthaner, R. Weitgasser, G. Pacini, M. Mittlböck, D. Bancher-Todesca, M. Lechleitner, A. Kautzky-Willer

Published in: Diabetologia | Issue 12/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis

It is currently not clear how to construct a time- and cost-effective screening strategy for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Thus, we elaborated a simple screening algorithm combining (1) fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurement; and (2) a multivariable risk estimation model focused on individuals with normal FPG levels to decide if a further OGTT is indicated.

Methods

A total of 1,336 women were prospectively screened for several risk factors for GDM within a multicentre study conducted in Austria. Of 714 women (53.4%) who developed GDM using recent diagnostic guidelines, 461 were sufficiently screened with FPG. A risk prediction score was finally developed using data from the remaining 253 women with GDM and 622 healthy women. The screening algorithm was validated with a further 258 pregnant women.

Results

A risk estimation model including history of GDM, glycosuria, family history of diabetes, age, preconception dyslipidaemia and ethnic origin, in addition to FPG, was accurate for detecting GDM in participants with normal FPG. Including an FPG pretest, the receiver operating characteristic AUC of the screening algorithm was 0.90 (95% CI 0.88, 0.91). A cut-off value of 0.20 was able to differentiate between low and intermediate risk for GDM with a high sensitivity. Comparable results were seen with the validation cohort. Moreover, we demonstrated an independent association between values derived from the risk estimation and macrosomia in offspring (OR 3.03, 95% CI 1.79, 5.19, p < 0.001).

Conclusions/interpretation

This study demonstrates a new concept for accurate but cheap GDM screening. This approach should be further evaluated in different populations to ensure an optimised diagnostic algorithm.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Pedersen J (1967) The pregnant diabetic and her newborn: problems and management. William & Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 128–137 Pedersen J (1967) The pregnant diabetic and her newborn: problems and management. William & Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 128–137
2.
go back to reference Pettitt DJ, Knowler WC, Bennett PH, Aleck KA, Baird HR (1987) Obesity in offspring of diabetic Pima Indian women despite normal birth weight. Diabetes Care 10:76–80PubMedCrossRef Pettitt DJ, Knowler WC, Bennett PH, Aleck KA, Baird HR (1987) Obesity in offspring of diabetic Pima Indian women despite normal birth weight. Diabetes Care 10:76–80PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Catalano PM, Hauguel-De Mouzon S (2011) Is it time to revisit the Pedersen hypothesis in the face of the obesity epidemic? Am J Obstet Gynecol 204:479–487PubMedCrossRef Catalano PM, Hauguel-De Mouzon S (2011) Is it time to revisit the Pedersen hypothesis in the face of the obesity epidemic? Am J Obstet Gynecol 204:479–487PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Metzger BE, Coustan DR (1998) Summary and recommendations of the Fourth International Workshop-Conference on Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. The Organizing Committee. Diabetes Care 21(Suppl 2):B161–B167PubMed Metzger BE, Coustan DR (1998) Summary and recommendations of the Fourth International Workshop-Conference on Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. The Organizing Committee. Diabetes Care 21(Suppl 2):B161–B167PubMed
6.
go back to reference Kim C, Newton KM, Knopp RH (2002) Gestational diabetes and the incidence of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 25:1862–1868PubMedCrossRef Kim C, Newton KM, Knopp RH (2002) Gestational diabetes and the incidence of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 25:1862–1868PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Bozkurt L, Göbl CS, Tura A et al (2012) Fatty liver index predicts further metabolic deteriorations in women with previous gestational diabetes. PLoS One 7:e32710PubMedCrossRef Bozkurt L, Göbl CS, Tura A et al (2012) Fatty liver index predicts further metabolic deteriorations in women with previous gestational diabetes. PLoS One 7:e32710PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Retnakaran R (2009) Glucose tolerance status in pregnancy: a window to the future risk of diabetes and cardiovascular disease in young women. Curr Diabetes Rev 5:239–244PubMedCrossRef Retnakaran R (2009) Glucose tolerance status in pregnancy: a window to the future risk of diabetes and cardiovascular disease in young women. Curr Diabetes Rev 5:239–244PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Bellamy L, Casas JP, Hingorani AD, Williams D (2009) Type 2 diabetes mellitus after gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta analysis. Lancet 373:1773–1779PubMedCrossRef Bellamy L, Casas JP, Hingorani AD, Williams D (2009) Type 2 diabetes mellitus after gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta analysis. Lancet 373:1773–1779PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Göbl CS, Bozkurt L, Prikoszovich T, Winzer C, Pacini G, Kautzky-Willer A (2011) Early possible risk factors for overt diabetes after gestational diabetes mellitus. Obstet Gynecol 118:71–78PubMedCrossRef Göbl CS, Bozkurt L, Prikoszovich T, Winzer C, Pacini G, Kautzky-Willer A (2011) Early possible risk factors for overt diabetes after gestational diabetes mellitus. Obstet Gynecol 118:71–78PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Farrar D, Duley L, Lawlor DA (2011) Different strategies for diagnosing gestational diabetes to improve maternal and infant health. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, Issue 10, Art. no. CD007122 Farrar D, Duley L, Lawlor DA (2011) Different strategies for diagnosing gestational diabetes to improve maternal and infant health. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, Issue 10, Art. no. CD007122
12.
go back to reference Tieu J, Middleton P, McPhe AJ, Crowther CA (2011) Screening and subsequent management for gestational diabetes for improving maternal and infant health. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, Issue 7, Art. no. CD007222 Tieu J, Middleton P, McPhe AJ, Crowther CA (2011) Screening and subsequent management for gestational diabetes for improving maternal and infant health. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, Issue 7, Art. no. CD007222
13.
go back to reference Metzger BE, Buchanan TA, Coustan DR et al (2007) Summary and recommendations of the Fifth International Workshop-Conference on Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Care 30:251–260CrossRef Metzger BE, Buchanan TA, Coustan DR et al (2007) Summary and recommendations of the Fifth International Workshop-Conference on Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Care 30:251–260CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Kautzky-Willer A, Bancher-Todesca D, Weitgasser R et al (2008) The impact of risk factors and more stringent diagnostic criteria of gestational diabetes on outcomes in central European women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 93:1689–1695PubMedCrossRef Kautzky-Willer A, Bancher-Todesca D, Weitgasser R et al (2008) The impact of risk factors and more stringent diagnostic criteria of gestational diabetes on outcomes in central European women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 93:1689–1695PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Griffin ME, Coffey M, Johnson H et al (2000) Universal vs. risk factor-based screening for gestational diabetes mellitus: detection rates, gestation at diagnosis and outcome. Diabet Med 17:26–32PubMedCrossRef Griffin ME, Coffey M, Johnson H et al (2000) Universal vs. risk factor-based screening for gestational diabetes mellitus: detection rates, gestation at diagnosis and outcome. Diabet Med 17:26–32PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference van Leeuwen M, Opmer BC, Zweers EJ et al (2010) Estimating the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: a clinical prediction model based on patient characteristics and medical history. BJOG 117:69–75PubMedCrossRef van Leeuwen M, Opmer BC, Zweers EJ et al (2010) Estimating the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: a clinical prediction model based on patient characteristics and medical history. BJOG 117:69–75PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Naylor CD, Sermer M, Chen E, Farine D (1997) Selective screening for gestational diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 337:1591–1596PubMedCrossRef Naylor CD, Sermer M, Chen E, Farine D (1997) Selective screening for gestational diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 337:1591–1596PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Phaloprakarn C, Tangjitgamol S, Manusirivithaya S (2009) A risk score for selective screening for gestational diabetes mellitus. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 145:71–75PubMedCrossRef Phaloprakarn C, Tangjitgamol S, Manusirivithaya S (2009) A risk score for selective screening for gestational diabetes mellitus. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 145:71–75PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Agarwal MM, Dhatt GS, Shah SM (2010) Gestational diabetes mellitus: simplifying the international association of diabetes and pregnancy diagnostic algorithm using fasting plasma glucose. Diabetes Care 33:2018–2020PubMedCrossRef Agarwal MM, Dhatt GS, Shah SM (2010) Gestational diabetes mellitus: simplifying the international association of diabetes and pregnancy diagnostic algorithm using fasting plasma glucose. Diabetes Care 33:2018–2020PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Consensus Panel (2010) International association of diabetes and pregnancy study groups recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycaemia in pregnancy. Diabetes Care 33:676–682CrossRef International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Consensus Panel (2010) International association of diabetes and pregnancy study groups recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycaemia in pregnancy. Diabetes Care 33:676–682CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Goeman JJ (2010) L1 penalized estimation in the Cox proportional hazards model. Biom J 52:70–84PubMed Goeman JJ (2010) L1 penalized estimation in the Cox proportional hazards model. Biom J 52:70–84PubMed
23.
go back to reference R Development Core Team (2011) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available from: www.R-project.org. Accessed 19 November 2011 R Development Core Team (2011) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available from: www.​R-project.​org. Accessed 19 November 2011
24.
go back to reference Caliskan E, Kayikcioglu F, Öztürk N, Koc S, Haberal A (2004) A population-based risk factor scoring will decrease unnecessary testing for the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 83:524–530PubMed Caliskan E, Kayikcioglu F, Öztürk N, Koc S, Haberal A (2004) A population-based risk factor scoring will decrease unnecessary testing for the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 83:524–530PubMed
25.
go back to reference Coustan DR, Lowe LP, Metzger BE, Dyer AR (2010) The Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (HAPO) study: paving the way for new diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 202:654.e.1–6CrossRef Coustan DR, Lowe LP, Metzger BE, Dyer AR (2010) The Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (HAPO) study: paving the way for new diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 202:654.e.1–6CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Riskin-Mashiah S, Damti A, Auslender R (2010) First trimester fasting hyperglycemia as a predictor for the development of gestational diabetes mellitus. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 152:163–167PubMedCrossRef Riskin-Mashiah S, Damti A, Auslender R (2010) First trimester fasting hyperglycemia as a predictor for the development of gestational diabetes mellitus. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 152:163–167PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Siegmund T, Rad NT, Ritterath C, Siebert G, Heinrich W, Buhling KJ (2008) Longitudinal changes in the continous glucose profile measured by the CGMS in healthy pregnant women and determination of cut-off values. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 139:46–51PubMedCrossRef Siegmund T, Rad NT, Ritterath C, Siebert G, Heinrich W, Buhling KJ (2008) Longitudinal changes in the continous glucose profile measured by the CGMS in healthy pregnant women and determination of cut-off values. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 139:46–51PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Black MH, Sacks DA, Xiang AH, Lawrence JM (2010) Clinical outcomes of pregnancies complicated by mild gestational diabetes differ by combinations of abnormal oral glucose tolerance test values. Diabetes Care 33:2524–2530PubMedCrossRef Black MH, Sacks DA, Xiang AH, Lawrence JM (2010) Clinical outcomes of pregnancies complicated by mild gestational diabetes differ by combinations of abnormal oral glucose tolerance test values. Diabetes Care 33:2524–2530PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Boerschmann H, Pflüger M, Henneberger L, Ziegler AG, Hummel S (2010) Prevalence and predictors of overweight and insulin resistence in offspring of mothers with gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 33:1845–1849PubMedCrossRef Boerschmann H, Pflüger M, Henneberger L, Ziegler AG, Hummel S (2010) Prevalence and predictors of overweight and insulin resistence in offspring of mothers with gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 33:1845–1849PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Schaefer-Graf UM, Graf K, Kulbacka I et al (2008) Maternal lipids as strong determinants of fetal environment and growth in pregnancies with gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 31:1858–1863PubMedCrossRef Schaefer-Graf UM, Graf K, Kulbacka I et al (2008) Maternal lipids as strong determinants of fetal environment and growth in pregnancies with gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 31:1858–1863PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Göbl CS, Handisurya A, Klein K et al (2010) Changes in serum lipid levels during pregnancy in type 1 and type 2 diabetic subjects. Diabetes Care 33(9):2071–2073PubMedCrossRef Göbl CS, Handisurya A, Klein K et al (2010) Changes in serum lipid levels during pregnancy in type 1 and type 2 diabetic subjects. Diabetes Care 33(9):2071–2073PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Scott DA, Loveman E, McIntyre L, Waugh N (2002) Screening for gestational diabetes: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 6:1–161PubMed Scott DA, Loveman E, McIntyre L, Waugh N (2002) Screening for gestational diabetes: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 6:1–161PubMed
33.
go back to reference Kjos S, Buchanan T, Langer O, Yariv Y, Most O, Xenakis EM (2005) Gestational diabetes: the consequence of not treating. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192:989–997CrossRef Kjos S, Buchanan T, Langer O, Yariv Y, Most O, Xenakis EM (2005) Gestational diabetes: the consequence of not treating. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192:989–997CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Savvidou M, Nelson SM, Makgoba M, Messow CM, Sattar N, Nicolaides K (2010) First-trimester prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus: examining the potential of combining maternal characteristics and laboratory measures. Diabetes 59:3017–3022PubMedCrossRef Savvidou M, Nelson SM, Makgoba M, Messow CM, Sattar N, Nicolaides K (2010) First-trimester prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus: examining the potential of combining maternal characteristics and laboratory measures. Diabetes 59:3017–3022PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Kjos SL, Schaefer-Graf UM (2007) Modified therapy for gestational diabetes using high-risk and low-risk fetal abdominal circumference growth to select strict versus relaxed maternal glycaemic targets. Diabetes Care 30:S200–S205PubMedCrossRef Kjos SL, Schaefer-Graf UM (2007) Modified therapy for gestational diabetes using high-risk and low-risk fetal abdominal circumference growth to select strict versus relaxed maternal glycaemic targets. Diabetes Care 30:S200–S205PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Meltzer SJ, Snyder J, Penrod JR, Nudi M, Morin L (2010) Gestational diabetes mellitus screening and diagnosis: a prospective randomised controlled trial comparing costs of one-step and two-step methods. BJOG 117:407–415PubMedCrossRef Meltzer SJ, Snyder J, Penrod JR, Nudi M, Morin L (2010) Gestational diabetes mellitus screening and diagnosis: a prospective randomised controlled trial comparing costs of one-step and two-step methods. BJOG 117:407–415PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Werner EF, Pettker CM, Zuckerwise L et al (2012) Screening for gestational diabetes mellitus: are the criteria proposed by the International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups cost effective? Diabetes Care 35:529–535PubMedCrossRef Werner EF, Pettker CM, Zuckerwise L et al (2012) Screening for gestational diabetes mellitus: are the criteria proposed by the International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups cost effective? Diabetes Care 35:529–535PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Sacks DA, Haden DR, Maresch M, HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group et al (2012) Frequency of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus at collaborating centers based on IADPSG Consensus Panel recommend criteria. Diabetes Care 35:526–528PubMedCrossRef Sacks DA, Haden DR, Maresch M, HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group et al (2012) Frequency of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus at collaborating centers based on IADPSG Consensus Panel recommend criteria. Diabetes Care 35:526–528PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
A two-step screening algorithm including fasting plasma glucose measurement and a risk estimation model is an accurate strategy for detecting gestational diabetes mellitus
Authors
C. S. Göbl
L. Bozkurt
P. Rivic
G. Schernthaner
R. Weitgasser
G. Pacini
M. Mittlböck
D. Bancher-Todesca
M. Lechleitner
A. Kautzky-Willer
Publication date
01-12-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Diabetologia / Issue 12/2012
Print ISSN: 0012-186X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-012-2726-7

Other articles of this Issue 12/2012

Diabetologia 12/2012 Go to the issue