Published in:
Open Access
01-04-2010 | Letter
Insufficient evaluation of adverse events is not a proof of safety. Reply to LG Hemkens, U Grouven, R Bender, et al. [letter]
Authors:
P. D. Home, P. Lagarenne
Published in:
Diabetologia
|
Issue 4/2010
Login to get access
Excerpt
To the Editor: We read the letter from Hemkens et al. with interest [
1]. We find it flawed with respect to scientific method, as well as inappropriate in its suggestion of a potentially more detailed statistical method. First, we need to comment that in our analysis we have taken the highest level of evidence available for the relationship between malignancy and use of insulin glargine (A21Gly, B31Arg, B32Arg human insulin), randomised controlled trials, and put it in the public domain. In our article, we observe (but do not interpret) the data, and only state that the use of insulin glargine in the circumstances of the studies included is not associated with any reduction or increase in malignancy rates. …