Top

European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery

Published in:

01-10-2021 | Acetabular Fracture | Original Article

Antegrade versus retrograde screw fixation of anterior column acetabular fractures: a biomechanical in vitro study

Authors: Georg Osterhoff, Dag Wulsten, Satish Babu, Mark Heyland, Carlotta Pari

Published in: European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery | Issue 5/2021

Abstract

Background

To compare the mechanical strength of antegrade versus retrograde lag screw fixation of anterior column acetabular fractures.

Methods

Standardised anterior column fractures were created in synthetic pelvis models and stabilised by either antegrade (ANTE, n = 4) or retrograde (RETRO, n = 4) anterior column screw fixation. In a validated setup, a cyclic loading protocol was applied with increasing axial force (750 cycles, 250–750 N) followed by load to failure. Construct survival, energy absorbed, construct stiffness, and load to failure were assessed. Descriptive and opto-metric methods were used to describe the mode of failure.

Results

All constructs failed with loads below 1500 N. With regard to energy absorbed until failure, the ANTE group resisted to 3.763 × 10⁵ N*cycles (range 3.760 × 10⁵–3.763 × 10⁵) and the RETRO group to 3.762 × 10⁵ N*cycles (range 3.761 × 10⁵–3.765 × 10⁵; p = 1.0). The load to failure was 1254 N (range 977–1299) in the ANTE group and 1234 N (range 1087–1456) in the RETRO group (p = 1.0). Construct stiffness with 250 N was not different between the two groups (ANTE 192 N/mm vs. RETRO 215 N/mm, p = 0.486). In all samples, the mode of failure was a transiliac fracture with screw breakout due to rotation of the pubic fragment around the axis of the screw with a range of rotational motion [ROM] during cyclic testing of 0.96° in one ANTE sample and 0.82° in one RETRO sample for 750 N, and ROM at failure of 2.53° in one ANTE sample and 2.23° in one RETRO sample. There was some plastic deformation of the screws in all cases but no breakage.

Conclusions

In this in vitro mechanical study, antegrade screw fixation of an anterior column acetabular fracture was not different in construct survival, load to failure, stiffness, and mode of failure when compared to retrograde screw fixation.

Ochs BG, Marintschev I, Hoyer H, et al. Changes in the treatment of acetabular fractures over 15 years: analysis of 1266 cases treated by the German Pelvic Multicentre Study Group (DAO/DGU). Injury. 2010;41(8):839–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2010.04.010.CrossRefPubMed

Ferguson TA, Patel R, Bhandari M, et al. Fractures of the acetabulum in patients aged 60 years and older: an epidemiological and radiological study. J Bone Jt Surg Br Vol. 2010;92(2):250–7. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.92B2.22488.CrossRef

Herath SC, Pott H, Rollmann MFR, et al. Geriatric acetabular surgery: letournel's contraindications then and now-data from the German pelvic registry. J Orthop Trauma. 2019;33(Suppl 2):S8–S13. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000001406.CrossRefPubMed

Starr AJ, Reinert CM, Jones AL. Percutaneous fixation of the columns of the acetabulum: a new technique. J Orthop Trauma. 1998;12(1):51–8.CrossRefPubMed

Starr AJ, Borer DS, Reinert CM. Technical aspects of limited open reduction and percutaneous screw fixation of fractures of the acetabulum. Op Tech Orthop. 2001;11(3):218–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-6666(01)80008-2.CrossRef

Busuttil T, Teuben M, Pfeifer R, et al. Screw fixation of ACPHT acetabular fractures offers sufficient biomechanical stability when compared to standard buttress plate fixation. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019;20(1):39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2422-6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Gary JL, Lefaivre KA, Gerold F, et al. Survivorship of the native hip joint after percutaneous repair of acetabular fractures in the elderly. Injury. 2011;42(10):1144–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2010.08.035.CrossRefPubMed

Lin Y-C, Chen C-H, Huang H-T, et al. Percutaneous antegrade screwing for anterior column fracture of acetabulum with fluoroscopic-based computerized navigation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2008;128(2):223–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-007-0369-9.CrossRefPubMed

Peng Y, Zhang L, Min W, et al. Comparison of anterograde versus retrograde percutaneous screw fixation of anterior column acetabular fractures. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2016;11(4):635–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-015-1308-9.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Schäffler A, Döbele S, Stuby F, et al. Die neue anatomische Flügelplatte für osteoporotische Azetabulumfrakturen: biomechanische Testung und erste klinische Erfahrungen (A new anatomical wing plate for osteoporotic acetabular fractures: biomechanical testing and first clinical experience). Z Orthop Unfall. 2014;152(1):26–322. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1360351.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Osterhoff G, Dodd AE, Unno F, et al. Cement augmentation in sacroiliac screw fixation offers modest biomechanical advantages in a cadaver model. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016;474(11):2522–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-016-4934-9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

12.

Kistler BJ, Smithson IR, Cooper SA, et al. Are quadrilateral surface buttress plates comparable to traditional forms of transverse acetabular fracture fixation? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(11):3353–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-3800-x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

13.

Olson SA, Kadrmas MW, Hernandez JD, et al. Augmentation of posterior wall acetabular fracture fixation using calcium-phosphate cement: a biomechanical analysis. J Orthop Trauma. 2007;21(9):608–16. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181591397.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Khajavi K, Lee AT, Lindsey DP, et al. Single column locking plate fixation is inadequate in two column acetabular fractures. A biomechanical analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2010;5:30. https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-5-30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Bergmann G, Graichen F, Rohlmann A, et al. Realistic loads for testing hip implants. Biomed Mater Eng. 2010;20(2):65–75. https://doi.org/10.3233/BME-2010-0616.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Chow S, Shao J, Wang H. Sample size calculations in clinical research, 2nd edn. CRC biostatistics series. London: Chapman & Hall; 2008.

17.

Olsen MA, Nepple JJ, Riew KD, et al. Risk factors for surgical site infection following orthopaedic spinal operations. J Bone Jt Surg. 2008;90(1):62–9. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.F.01515.CrossRef

18.

Bergmann G, Deuretzbacher G, Heller M, et al. Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. J Biomech. 2001;34(7):859–71.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Widmer BJ, Peters CL, Bachus KN, et al. Initial stability of the acetabular fragment after periacetabular osteotomy: a biomechanical study. J Pediatr Orthop. 2010;30(5):443–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181e00c24.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Spitler CA, Kiner D, Swafford R, et al. Generating stability in elderly acetabular fractures—a biomechanical assessment. Injury. 2017;48(10):2054–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2017.07.020.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Culemann U, Holstein JH, Köhler D, et al. Different stabilisation techniques for typical acetabular fractures in the elderly—a biomechanical assessment. Injury. 2010;41(4):405–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2009.12.001.CrossRefPubMed

22.

Starr AJ, Jones AL, Reinert CM, et al. Preliminary results and complications following limited open reduction and percutaneous screw fixation of displaced fractures of the acetabulum. Injury. 2001;32(Suppl 1):SA45–SA50.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Kazemi N, Archdeacon MT. Immediate full weightbearing after percutaneous fixation of anterior column acetabulum fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2012;26(2):73–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e318216b3e3.CrossRefPubMed

24.

Crowl AC, Kahler DM. Closed reduction and percutaneous fixation of anterior column acetabular fractures. Comput Aided Surg. 2002;7(3):169–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/igs.10040.CrossRefPubMed

Title: Antegrade versus retrograde screw fixation of anterior column acetabular fractures: a biomechanical in vitro study
Authors: Georg Osterhoff
Dag Wulsten
Satish Babu
Mark Heyland
Carlotta Pari
Publication date: 01-10-2021
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Keywords: Acetabular Fracture
Osteoporosis
Osteoporosis
Published in: European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery / Issue 5/2021
Print ISSN: 1863-9933
Electronic ISSN: 1863-9941
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-019-01255-6

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Antegrade versus retrograde screw fixation of anterior column acetabular fractures: a biomechanical in vitro study

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 5/2021

Bipolar clavicular fractures and treatment options

Long-term results of reconstructing the joints’ articular surface in the knee and ankle with the surgical diamond instrumentation (SDI)

The use of the E-PASS scoring system in determining complication development in patients with isolated acetabular fractures

Correction to: The decrease of non-complicated acute appendicitis and the negative appendectomy rate during pandemic

Optimal plate position in minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for mid-shaft clavicle fractures: simulation using 3D-printed models of actual clinical cases

Role of 3D printing in the management of complex acetabular fractures: a comparative study