Top

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Acetabular Fracture | Research article

Screw fixation of ACPHT acetabular fractures offers sufficient biomechanical stability when compared to standard buttress plate fixation

Authors: Tatjana Busuttil, Michel Teuben, Roman Pfeifer, Paolo Cinelli, Hans-Christoph Pape, Georg Osterhoff

Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders | Issue 1/2019

Abstract

Background

Geriatric acetabular fractures require fixation with sufficient primary stability to allow for immediate full-weight bearing. Minimally-invasive procedures would be desirable in order to keep perioperative morbidity low. The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical strength of lag screw-only fixation of anterior column posterior hemi-transverse (ACPHT) acetabular fractures to standard anatomical plate fixation.

Methods

Standardized ACPHT fractures were created in fourth generation synthetic pelvis models and stabilized by either an anatomical buttress plate (n = 4) or by a screw-only construct (n = 4). In a validated setup, a cyclic loading protocol was applied with increasing axial force (3200 cycles, 175 N to 2250 N). Construct survival, acetabular fracture motion, and mode of failure were assessed.

Results

The median number of cycles needed until failure of the construct occurred was 2304 cycles (range, 2020 to 2675) in the plate fixation group and 3200 cycles (range, 3101 to 3200) for the screw fixation constructs (p = .003). With regard to energy absorbed until failure, the plate fixation group resisted to 1.57 × 10⁶ N*cycles (range, 1.21 × 10⁶ to 2.14 × 10⁶) and the screw fixation group to 3.17 × 10⁶ N*cycles (range, 2.92 × 10⁶ to 3.17 × 10⁶; p = .001). All plate fixation specimens failed with a break-out of the posterior-column screw in the quadrilateral wing of the anatomical plate within a maximum load of 1750 N while the screw fixation constructs all survived loading of at least 2100 N. Acetabular fracture gap motion, acetabular rim angle, and medial femoral head subluxation as measures of fracture displacement were all not different between the two groups (p > 0.1).

Conclusions

In this in vitro biomechanical study, screw-only fixation of an ACPHT acetabular fracture resulted in at least as good construct survival as seen for standard buttress plate fixation. Both methods resisted sufficiently to forces that would be expected under physiologic conditions.

Available only for authorised users

Ferguson TA, Patel R, Bhandari M, et al. Fractures of the acetabulum in patients aged 60 years and older: an epidemiological and radiological study. J bone and joint surgery British volume. 2010;92(2):250–7. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.92B2.22488.CrossRef

Ambrose AF, Paul G, Hausdorff JM. Risk factors for falls among older adults: a review of the literature. Maturitas. 2013;75(1):51–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2013.02.009.CrossRefPubMed

Segev-Jacubovski O, Herman T, Yogev-Seligmann G, et al. The interplay between gait, falls and cognition: can cognitive therapy reduce fall risk? Expert Rev Neurother. 2011;11(7):1057–75. https://doi.org/10.1586/ern.11.69.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Hessmann MH, Nijs S, Rommens PM. Acetabulumfrakturen im Alter Ergebnisse eines differenzierten Behandlungskonzeptes (Acetabular fractures in the elderly. Results of a sophisticated treatment concept). Unfallchirurg. 2002;105(10):893–900. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-002-0437-0.CrossRefPubMed

Ruckstuhl T, Osterhoff G, Zuffellato M, et al. Correlation of psychomotor findings and the ability to partially weight bear. Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol. 2012;4:6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1758-2555-4-6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Mouhsine E, Garofalo R, Borens O, et al. Percutaneous retrograde screwing for stabilisation of acetabular fractures. Injury. 2005;36(11):1330–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2004.09.016.CrossRefPubMed

Kilci O, Un C, Sacan O, et al. Postoperative mortality after hip fracture surgery: a 3 years follow up. PLoS One. 2016;11(10):e0162097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162097.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Gänsslen A. Biomechanische Grundlagen bei osteoporotischer Frakturversorgung am Becken (biomechanical principles for treatment of osteoporotic fractures of the pelvis). Unfallchirurg. 2010;113(4):272–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-010-1763-2.CrossRefPubMed

Jeffcoat DM, Carroll EA, Huber FG, et al. Operative treatment of acetabular fractures in an older population through a limited ilioinguinal approach. J Orthop Trauma. 2012;26(5):284–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e31821e10a2.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Starr AJ, Reinert CM, Jones AL. Percutaneous fixation of the columns of the acetabulum: a new technique. J Orthop Trauma. 1998;12(1):51–8.CrossRef

11.

Starr AJ, Jones AL, Reinert CM et al. (2001) Preliminary results and complications following limited open reduction and percutaneous screw fixation of displaced fractures of the acetabulum. Injury 32 Suppl 1: SA45–50.

12.

Spitler CA, Kiner D, Swafford R, et al. Generating stability in elderly acetabular fractures-a biomechanical assessment. Injury. 2017;48(10):2054–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2017.07.020.CrossRefPubMed

13.

Culemann U, Holstein JH, Köhler D, et al. Different stabilisation techniques for typical acetabular fractures in the elderly--a biomechanical assessment. Injury. 2010;41(4):405–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2009.12.001.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Starr AJ, Borer DS, Reinert CM. Technical aspects of limited open reduction and percutaneous screw fixation of fractures of the acetabulum. Oper Tech Orthop. 2001;11(3):218–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-6666(01)80008-2.CrossRef

15.

Osterhoff G, Dodd AE, Unno F, et al. Cement augmentation in sacroiliac screw fixation offers modest biomechanical advantages in a cadaver model. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016;474(11):2522–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-016-4934-9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Kistler BJ, Smithson IR, Cooper SA, et al. Are quadrilateral surface buttress plates comparable to traditional forms of transverse acetabular fracture fixation? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(11):3353–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-3800-x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

17.

Olson SA, Kadrmas MW, Hernandez JD, et al. Augmentation of posterior wall acetabular fracture fixation using calcium-phosphate cement: a biomechanical analysis. J Orthop Trauma. 2007;21(9):608–16. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181591397.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Khajavi K, Lee AT, Lindsey DP, et al. Single column locking plate fixation is inadequate in two column acetabular fractures. A biomechanical analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2010;5:30. https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-5-30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

19.

Rueden CT, Schindelin J, Hiner MC, et al. ImageJ2: ImageJ for the next generation of scientific image data. BMC Bioinformatics. 2017;18(1):529. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-017-1934-z.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

20.

Bergmann G, Graichen F, Rohlmann A, et al. Realistic loads for testing hip implants. Biomed Mater Eng. 2010;20(2):65–75. https://doi.org/10.3233/BME-2010-0616.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Chow S, Shao J, Wang H. Sample size calculations in clinical research. In: CRC biostatistics series. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall; 2008.

22.

Sawaguchi T, Brown TD, Rubash HE, et al. Stability of acetabular fractures after internal fixation. A cadaveric study. Acta Orthop Scand. 1984;55(6):601–5.CrossRef

23.

Shazar N, Brumback RJ, Novak VP, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of transverse acetabular fracture fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;(352):215–22.

24.

Simonian PT, Routt ML, Harrington RM, et al. The unstable iliac fracture: a biomechanical evaluation of internal fixation. Injury. 1997;28(7):469–75.CrossRef

25.

Olsen MA, Nepple JJ, Riew KD, et al. Risk factors for surgical site infection following orthopaedic spinal operations. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(1):62–9. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.F.01515.CrossRefPubMed

26.

Bergmann G, Deuretzbacher G, Heller M, et al. Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. J Biomech. 2001;34(7):859–71.CrossRef

27.

Widmer BJ, Peters CL, Bachus KN, et al. Initial stability of the acetabular fragment after periacetabular osteotomy: a biomechanical study. J Pediatr Orthop. 2010;30(5):443–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181e00c24.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Stöckle U, Hoffmann R, Nittinger M, et al. Screw fixation of acetabular fractures. Int Orthop. 2000;24(3):143–7.CrossRef

Title: Screw fixation of ACPHT acetabular fractures offers sufficient biomechanical stability when compared to standard buttress plate fixation
Authors: Tatjana Busuttil
Michel Teuben
Roman Pfeifer
Paolo Cinelli
Hans-Christoph Pape
Georg Osterhoff
Publication date: 01-12-2019
Publisher: BioMed Central
Keyword: Acetabular Fracture
Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2474
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2422-6

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Screw fixation of ACPHT acetabular fractures offers sufficient biomechanical stability when compared to standard buttress plate fixation

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Gorham’s disease: treatment with an autologous iliac bone graft and a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

Inferior outcome of rotator cuff repair in chronic hemodialytic patients

Application of an interspinous process device after minimally invasive lumbar decompression could lead to stress redistribution at the pars interarticularis: a finite element analysis

Prevalence and incidence rate of lower-extremity tendinopathies in a Danish general practice: a registry-based study

Stress fracture of the posterior talar process in a female long-distance runner treated by osteosynthesis with screw fixation via two-portal hindfoot endoscopy: a case report

Early initiation of home-based sensori-motor training improves muscle strength, activation and size in patients after knee replacement: a secondary analysis of a controlled clinical trial