Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery 5/2020

01-10-2020 | Computed Tomography | Original Article

Computed tomography in suspected anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery: evaluating mortality rates after false-negative imaging

Authors: Nicolò Tamini, Diletta Cassini, Alessandro Giani, Marco Angrisani, Simone Famularo, Massimo Oldani, Mauro Montuori, Gianandrea Baldazzi, Luca Gianotti

Published in: European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery | Issue 5/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Purposes

We sought to investigate the accuracy of abdominal CT scanning for anastomotic leakage and the effect of false-negative scans on the delay in therapeutic intervention and clinical outcome.

Method

Data from a prospectively bi-institutionally maintained database of all patients who underwent elective colorectal surgery with primary anastomosis for malignant or benign disease between 2010 and 2017 were reviewed. Patients with confirmed anastomotic dehiscence at reintervention who underwent a postoperative CT scan for suspected leakage were identified and radiological reports were retrieved.

Results

Seventy-six patients with anastomotic dehiscence were included in the study. American Society of Anesthesiologists score, sex, type of surgical procedure, malignancy, and type of anastomosis do not correlate with postoperative false-negative CT imaging. Postoperative false-negative CT scan, however, led to delayed reintervention (3 vs. 6 h, p = 0.023) and increased mortality (five deaths vs. no deaths, p = 0.043). Free abdominal air (p = 0.001) and extraluminal contrast extravasation (p = 0.001) were found to be predictive of accuracy in anastomotic leakage diagnosis.

Conclusion

The suboptimal specificity of a postoperative CT scan in suspected anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery can delay reintervention and increase mortality.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kornmann VNN, Treskes N, Hoonhout LHF, Bollen TL, van Ramshorst B, Boerma D. Systematic review on the value of CT scanning in the diagnosis of anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2012;28:437–45.CrossRefPubMed Kornmann VNN, Treskes N, Hoonhout LHF, Bollen TL, van Ramshorst B, Boerma D. Systematic review on the value of CT scanning in the diagnosis of anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2012;28:437–45.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Boccola MA, Buettner PG, Rozen WM, Siu SK, Stevenson ARL, Stitz R, et al. Risk factors and outcomes for anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery: a single-institution analysis of 1576 patients. World J Surg. 2011;35:186–95.CrossRefPubMed Boccola MA, Buettner PG, Rozen WM, Siu SK, Stevenson ARL, Stitz R, et al. Risk factors and outcomes for anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery: a single-institution analysis of 1576 patients. World J Surg. 2011;35:186–95.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Krarup P-M, Jorgensen LN, Andreasen AH, Harling H. Danish Colorectal Cancer Group. A nationwide study on anastomotic leakage after colonic cancer surgery. Colorectal Dis. 2012;14:e661–7.CrossRefPubMed Krarup P-M, Jorgensen LN, Andreasen AH, Harling H. Danish Colorectal Cancer Group. A nationwide study on anastomotic leakage after colonic cancer surgery. Colorectal Dis. 2012;14:e661–7.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Pommergaard HC, Gessler B, Burcharth J, Angenete E, Haglind E, Rosenberg J. Preoperative risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection for colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis. 2014;16:662–71.CrossRefPubMed Pommergaard HC, Gessler B, Burcharth J, Angenete E, Haglind E, Rosenberg J. Preoperative risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection for colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis. 2014;16:662–71.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Hirst NA, Tiernan JP, Millner PA, Jayne DG. Systematic review of methods to predict and detect anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis. 2014;16:95–109.CrossRefPubMed Hirst NA, Tiernan JP, Millner PA, Jayne DG. Systematic review of methods to predict and detect anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis. 2014;16:95–109.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Eckmann C, Kujath P, Schiedeck THK, Shekarriz H, Bruch H-P. Anastomotic leakage following low anterior resection: results of a standardized diagnostic and therapeutic approach. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2004;19:128–33.CrossRefPubMed Eckmann C, Kujath P, Schiedeck THK, Shekarriz H, Bruch H-P. Anastomotic leakage following low anterior resection: results of a standardized diagnostic and therapeutic approach. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2004;19:128–33.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Khoury W, Ben-Yehuda A, Ben-Haim M, Klausner JM, Szold O. Abdominal Computed Tomography for Diagnosing Postoperative Lower Gastrointestinal Tract Leaks. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13:1454–8.CrossRefPubMed Khoury W, Ben-Yehuda A, Ben-Haim M, Klausner JM, Szold O. Abdominal Computed Tomography for Diagnosing Postoperative Lower Gastrointestinal Tract Leaks. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13:1454–8.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Rahbari NN, Weitz J, Hohenberger W, Heald RJ, Moran B, Ulrich A, et al. Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: a proposal by the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer. Surgery. 2010;147:339–51.CrossRefPubMed Rahbari NN, Weitz J, Hohenberger W, Heald RJ, Moran B, Ulrich A, et al. Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: a proposal by the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer. Surgery. 2010;147:339–51.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Saklad M. GRADING OF PATIENTS FOR SURGICAL. PROCEDURES Anesthesiology. 1941;2:281–4.CrossRef Saklad M. GRADING OF PATIENTS FOR SURGICAL. PROCEDURES Anesthesiology. 1941;2:281–4.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Carmichael JC, Keller DS, Baldini G, Bordeianou L, Weiss E, Lee L, et al. Clinical Practice Guidelines for Enhanced Recovery After Colon and Rectal Surgery From the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons and Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons. Dis Colon Rectum. 2017;60:761–84.CrossRefPubMed Carmichael JC, Keller DS, Baldini G, Bordeianou L, Weiss E, Lee L, et al. Clinical Practice Guidelines for Enhanced Recovery After Colon and Rectal Surgery From the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons and Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons. Dis Colon Rectum. 2017;60:761–84.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Huiberts AAM, Dijksman LM, Boer SA, Krul EJT, Peringa J, Donkervoort SC. Contrast medium at the site of the anastomosis is crucial in detecting anastomotic leakage with CT imaging after colorectal surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015;30:843–8.CrossRefPubMed Huiberts AAM, Dijksman LM, Boer SA, Krul EJT, Peringa J, Donkervoort SC. Contrast medium at the site of the anastomosis is crucial in detecting anastomotic leakage with CT imaging after colorectal surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015;30:843–8.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Kauv P, Benadjaoud S, Curis E, Boulay-Coletta I, Loriau J, Zins M. Anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery: diagnostic accuracy of CT. Eur Radiol. 2015;25:3543–51.CrossRefPubMed Kauv P, Benadjaoud S, Curis E, Boulay-Coletta I, Loriau J, Zins M. Anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery: diagnostic accuracy of CT. Eur Radiol. 2015;25:3543–51.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Gayer G, Jonas T, Apter S, Amitai M, Shabtai M, Hertz M. Postoperative pneumoperitoneum as detected by CT: prevalence, duration, and relevant factors affecting its possible significance. Abdom Imaging. 2000;25:301–5.CrossRefPubMed Gayer G, Jonas T, Apter S, Amitai M, Shabtai M, Hertz M. Postoperative pneumoperitoneum as detected by CT: prevalence, duration, and relevant factors affecting its possible significance. Abdom Imaging. 2000;25:301–5.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Gervaz P, Platon A, Buchs NC, Rocher T, Perneger T, Poletti P-A. CT scan-based modelling of anastomotic leak risk after colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis. 2013;15:1295–300.CrossRefPubMed Gervaz P, Platon A, Buchs NC, Rocher T, Perneger T, Poletti P-A. CT scan-based modelling of anastomotic leak risk after colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis. 2013;15:1295–300.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Kornmann VNN, van Ramshorst B, Smits AB, Bollen TL, Boerma D. Beware of false-negative CT scan for anastomotic leakage after colonic surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2014;29:445–51.CrossRefPubMed Kornmann VNN, van Ramshorst B, Smits AB, Bollen TL, Boerma D. Beware of false-negative CT scan for anastomotic leakage after colonic surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2014;29:445–51.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Doeksen A, Tanis PJ, Vrouenraets BC, Gooszen JAH, van Lanschot JJB, van Tets WF. Outcome of rectal cancer surgery after the introduction of preoperative radiotherapy in a low-volume hospital. J Gastrointest Cancer. 2007;38:63–70.CrossRefPubMed Doeksen A, Tanis PJ, Vrouenraets BC, Gooszen JAH, van Lanschot JJB, van Tets WF. Outcome of rectal cancer surgery after the introduction of preoperative radiotherapy in a low-volume hospital. J Gastrointest Cancer. 2007;38:63–70.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Alves A, Panis Y, Pocard M, Regimbeau JM, Valleur P. Management of anastomotic leakage after nondiverted large bowel resection. J Am Coll Surg. 1999;189:554–9.CrossRefPubMed Alves A, Panis Y, Pocard M, Regimbeau JM, Valleur P. Management of anastomotic leakage after nondiverted large bowel resection. J Am Coll Surg. 1999;189:554–9.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Metadata
Title
Computed tomography in suspected anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery: evaluating mortality rates after false-negative imaging
Authors
Nicolò Tamini
Diletta Cassini
Alessandro Giani
Marco Angrisani
Simone Famularo
Massimo Oldani
Mauro Montuori
Gianandrea Baldazzi
Luca Gianotti
Publication date
01-10-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery / Issue 5/2020
Print ISSN: 1863-9933
Electronic ISSN: 1863-9941
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-019-01083-8

Other articles of this Issue 5/2020

European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery 5/2020 Go to the issue