Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Strahlentherapie und Onkologie 12/2022

Open Access 13-04-2022 | Radiotherapy | Original Article

Neoadjuvant versus definitive radiochemotherapy of locoregionally advanced oesophageal cancer—who benefits?

Authors: Christoph Schiffner, Hans Christiansen, Iris Brandes, Gerrit Grannas, Jörn Wichmann, Roland Merten

Published in: Strahlentherapie und Onkologie | Issue 12/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

For years, there have been discussions on whether neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy followed by surgery (nRCT-S) is superior to definitive radiochemotherapy (dRCT) as the standard of care for locoregionally advanced oesophageal cancer (OC). This retrospective study aimed to evaluate our patient cohort regarding differences in survival and recurrence between nRCT‑S and dRCT.

Methods

Data from 68 patients with dRCT and 33 patients with nRCT‑S treated from 2010 to 2018 were analysed. Comorbidities were recorded using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Recurrence patterns were recorded as in-field or out-field. Kaplan–Meier analyses were used to compare survival data (overall survival [OS], progression-free survival [PFS], and locoregional control [LRC]).

Results

Patients with nRCT‑S showed significantly lower CCI values than those with dRCT (p = 0.001). The median follow-up was 47 months. The median OS times were 31 months for nRCT‑S and 12 months for dRCT (p = 0.009), the median PFS times were 11 and 9 months, respectively (p = 0.057), and the median LRC times were not reached and 23 months, respectively (p = 0.037). The only further factor with a significant impact on OS was the CCI (p = 0.016). In subgroup analyses for comorbidities regarding differences in OS, the superiority of the nRCT‑S remained almost significant for CCI values 2–6 (p = 0.061).

Conclusion

Our study showed significantly longer OS and LRC for patients with nRCT‑S than for those with dRCT. Due to different comorbidities in the groups, it can be deduced from the subgroup analysis that patients with few comorbidities seem to especially profit from nRCT‑S.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Ajani JA et al (2019) Esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancers, version 2.2019, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 17(7):855–883CrossRefPubMed Ajani JA et al (2019) Esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancers, version 2.2019, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 17(7):855–883CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Van Hagen P et al (2012) Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Engl J Med 366:2074–2084CrossRefPubMed Van Hagen P et al (2012) Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Engl J Med 366:2074–2084CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Shapiro J et al (2015) Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for oesophageal or junctional cancer (CROSS): long-term results of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 16:1090–1098CrossRefPubMed Shapiro J et al (2015) Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for oesophageal or junctional cancer (CROSS): long-term results of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 16:1090–1098CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Eyck BM et al (2021) Ten-year outcome of Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery for esophageal cancer: the randomized controlled CROSS trial. J Clin Oncol 39:1995–2004CrossRefPubMed Eyck BM et al (2021) Ten-year outcome of Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery for esophageal cancer: the randomized controlled CROSS trial. J Clin Oncol 39:1995–2004CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Putora PM et al (2015) Oesophageal cancer: exploring controversies overview of experts’ opinions of Austria, Germany, France, Netherlands and Switzerland. Radiat Oncol 10:116CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Putora PM et al (2015) Oesophageal cancer: exploring controversies overview of experts’ opinions of Austria, Germany, France, Netherlands and Switzerland. Radiat Oncol 10:116CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Stahl M (2010) Is there any role for surgery in the multidisciplinary treatment of esophageal cancer? Ann Oncol 21(7):283–285CrossRef Stahl M (2010) Is there any role for surgery in the multidisciplinary treatment of esophageal cancer? Ann Oncol 21(7):283–285CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Nomura M et al (2016) Comparison between surgery and definitive chemoradiotherapy for patients with resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score analysis. Int J Clin Oncol 21(5):890–898CrossRefPubMed Nomura M et al (2016) Comparison between surgery and definitive chemoradiotherapy for patients with resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score analysis. Int J Clin Oncol 21(5):890–898CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Faiz Z et al (2019) Impact of age and comorbidity on choice and outcome of two different treatment options for patients with potentially curable esophageal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 26(4):986–995CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Faiz Z et al (2019) Impact of age and comorbidity on choice and outcome of two different treatment options for patients with potentially curable esophageal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 26(4):986–995CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Stahl M et al (2005) Chemoradiation with and without surgery in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. J Clin Oncol 23(10):2310–2317CrossRefPubMed Stahl M et al (2005) Chemoradiation with and without surgery in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. J Clin Oncol 23(10):2310–2317CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Bedenne L et al (2007) Chemoradiation followed by surgery compared with chemoradiation alone in squamous cancer of the esophagus: FFCD 9102. J Clin Oncol 25(10):1160–1168CrossRefPubMed Bedenne L et al (2007) Chemoradiation followed by surgery compared with chemoradiation alone in squamous cancer of the esophagus: FFCD 9102. J Clin Oncol 25(10):1160–1168CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Haefner MF et al (2018) Neoadjuvant versus definitive chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer: Outcomes and patterns of failure. Strahlenther Onkol 194(2):116–124CrossRefPubMed Haefner MF et al (2018) Neoadjuvant versus definitive chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer: Outcomes and patterns of failure. Strahlenther Onkol 194(2):116–124CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Mayr P et al (2020) Neoadjuvant and definitive radiochemotherapeutic approaches in esophageal cancer: A retrospective evaluation of 122 cases in daily clinical routine. Oncol Res Treat 43(7–8):372–379CrossRefPubMed Mayr P et al (2020) Neoadjuvant and definitive radiochemotherapeutic approaches in esophageal cancer: A retrospective evaluation of 122 cases in daily clinical routine. Oncol Res Treat 43(7–8):372–379CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Brierley JD et al (2017) TNM classification of malignant tumours. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken Brierley JD et al (2017) TNM classification of malignant tumours. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken
15.
go back to reference Charlson ME et al (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40:373–383CrossRefPubMed Charlson ME et al (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40:373–383CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Herskovic A et al (1992) Combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy compared with radiotherapy alone in patients with cancer of the esophagus. N Engl J Med 326:1593–1598CrossRefPubMed Herskovic A et al (1992) Combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy compared with radiotherapy alone in patients with cancer of the esophagus. N Engl J Med 326:1593–1598CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Marks LB et al (2010) Use of normal tissue complication probability models in the clinic. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 76(3 Suppl):10–19CrossRef Marks LB et al (2010) Use of normal tissue complication probability models in the clinic. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 76(3 Suppl):10–19CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Landberg T et al (1993) Report 50. J Int Comm Radiat Units Meas os26:NP-NP Landberg T et al (1993) Report 50. J Int Comm Radiat Units Meas os26:NP-NP
19.
go back to reference Landberg T et al (1999) Report 62. J Int Comm Radiat Units Meas os32:NP-NP Landberg T et al (1999) Report 62. J Int Comm Radiat Units Meas os32:NP-NP
20.
go back to reference Hermann RM et al (2006) Histomorphological tumor regression grading of esophageal carcinoma after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy: which score to use? Dis Esophagus 19:329–334CrossRefPubMed Hermann RM et al (2006) Histomorphological tumor regression grading of esophageal carcinoma after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy: which score to use? Dis Esophagus 19:329–334CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Machtay M et al (2012) Defining local-regional control and its importance in locally advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma. J Thorac Oncol 7:716–722CrossRefPubMed Machtay M et al (2012) Defining local-regional control and its importance in locally advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma. J Thorac Oncol 7:716–722CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Schemper M et al (1996) A note on quantifying follow-up in studies of failure time. Control Clin Trials 17:343–346CrossRefPubMed Schemper M et al (1996) A note on quantifying follow-up in studies of failure time. Control Clin Trials 17:343–346CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Mariette C et al (2014) Surgery alone versus chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery for stage I and II esophageal cancer: final analysis of randomized controlled phase III trial FFCD 9901. J Clin Oncol 32(23):2416–2422CrossRefPubMed Mariette C et al (2014) Surgery alone versus chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery for stage I and II esophageal cancer: final analysis of randomized controlled phase III trial FFCD 9901. J Clin Oncol 32(23):2416–2422CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Valmasoni M et al (2018) Cervical esophageal cancer treatment strategies: a cohort study appraising the debated role of surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 25(9):2747–2755CrossRefPubMed Valmasoni M et al (2018) Cervical esophageal cancer treatment strategies: a cohort study appraising the debated role of surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 25(9):2747–2755CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Vitz S et al (2018) Adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus: neoadjuvant chemoradiation and radical surgery: Long-term results. Strahlenther Onkol 194(11):1007–1016CrossRefPubMed Vitz S et al (2018) Adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus: neoadjuvant chemoradiation and radical surgery: Long-term results. Strahlenther Onkol 194(11):1007–1016CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Dähn D et al (2010) Influence of irradiated lung volumes on perioperative morbidity and mortality in patients after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy for esophageal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 77(1):44–52CrossRefPubMed Dähn D et al (2010) Influence of irradiated lung volumes on perioperative morbidity and mortality in patients after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy for esophageal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 77(1):44–52CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Paireder M et al (2020) Modification of preoperative radiochemotherapy for esophageal cancer (CROSS protocol) is safe and efficient with no impact on surgical morbidity. Strahlenther Onkol 196(9):779–786CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Paireder M et al (2020) Modification of preoperative radiochemotherapy for esophageal cancer (CROSS protocol) is safe and efficient with no impact on surgical morbidity. Strahlenther Onkol 196(9):779–786CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
go back to reference De Vos-Geelen J et al (2020) A national study to assess outcomes of definitive chemoradiation regimens in proximal esophageal cancer. Acta Oncol 59(8):895–903CrossRefPubMed De Vos-Geelen J et al (2020) A national study to assess outcomes of definitive chemoradiation regimens in proximal esophageal cancer. Acta Oncol 59(8):895–903CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Hulshof MCCM et al (2021) Randomized study on dose escalation in definitive chemoradiation for patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer (ARTDECO study). J Clin Oncol 39(25):2816–2824CrossRefPubMed Hulshof MCCM et al (2021) Randomized study on dose escalation in definitive chemoradiation for patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer (ARTDECO study). J Clin Oncol 39(25):2816–2824CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Noordman BJ et al (2018) Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus active surveillance for oesophageal cancer: a stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial. BMC Cancer 18(1):142CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Noordman BJ et al (2018) Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus active surveillance for oesophageal cancer: a stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial. BMC Cancer 18(1):142CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
go back to reference Eyck BM et al (2021) Updated protocol of the SANO trial: a stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial comparing surgery with active surveillance after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for oesophageal cancer. Trials 22(1):345CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Eyck BM et al (2021) Updated protocol of the SANO trial: a stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial comparing surgery with active surveillance after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for oesophageal cancer. Trials 22(1):345CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
go back to reference Hegemann NS et al (2018) Neoadjuvant chemoradiation for esophageal cancer: Surgery improves locoregional control while response based on FDG-PET/CT predicts survival. Strahlenther Onkol 194(5):435–443CrossRefPubMed Hegemann NS et al (2018) Neoadjuvant chemoradiation for esophageal cancer: Surgery improves locoregional control while response based on FDG-PET/CT predicts survival. Strahlenther Onkol 194(5):435–443CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference De Gouw DJJM et al (2019) Detecting pathological complete response in esophageal cancer after Neoadjuvant therapy based on imaging techniques: A diagnostic systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thorac Oncol 14(7):1156–1171CrossRefPubMed De Gouw DJJM et al (2019) Detecting pathological complete response in esophageal cancer after Neoadjuvant therapy based on imaging techniques: A diagnostic systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thorac Oncol 14(7):1156–1171CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Borggreve AS et al (2018) Preoperative image-guided identification of response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in esophageal cancer (PRIDE): a multicenter observational study. BMC Cancer 18(1):1006CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Borggreve AS et al (2018) Preoperative image-guided identification of response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in esophageal cancer (PRIDE): a multicenter observational study. BMC Cancer 18(1):1006CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
37.
go back to reference Markar S et al (2015) Salvage surgery after chemoradiotherapy in the management of esophageal cancer: Is it a viable therapeutic option? J Clin Oncol 33(33):3866–3873CrossRefPubMed Markar S et al (2015) Salvage surgery after chemoradiotherapy in the management of esophageal cancer: Is it a viable therapeutic option? J Clin Oncol 33(33):3866–3873CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Stairmand J et al (2015) Consideration of comorbidity in treatment decision making in multidisciplinary cancer team meetings: a systematic review. Ann Oncol 26(7):1325–1332CrossRefPubMed Stairmand J et al (2015) Consideration of comorbidity in treatment decision making in multidisciplinary cancer team meetings: a systematic review. Ann Oncol 26(7):1325–1332CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Neoadjuvant versus definitive radiochemotherapy of locoregionally advanced oesophageal cancer—who benefits?
Authors
Christoph Schiffner
Hans Christiansen
Iris Brandes
Gerrit Grannas
Jörn Wichmann
Roland Merten
Publication date
13-04-2022
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Keyword
Radiotherapy
Published in
Strahlentherapie und Onkologie / Issue 12/2022
Print ISSN: 0179-7158
Electronic ISSN: 1439-099X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-022-01929-y

Other articles of this Issue 12/2022

Strahlentherapie und Onkologie 12/2022 Go to the issue