Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Strahlentherapie und Onkologie 11/2015

01-11-2015 | Original Article

Reduced radiation dose for elective nodal irradiation in node-negative anal cancer: back to the roots?

Authors: Dr. med. Christoph Henkenberens, Dr. med. Daniela Meinecke, Dr. med. Stoll Michael, Prof. Dr. med. Michael Bremer, Univ. Prof. Dr. med. Hans Christiansen

Published in: Strahlentherapie und Onkologie | Issue 11/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Chemoradiation (CRT) is the standard of care in patients with node-positive (cN+) and node-negative (cN0) anal cancer. Depending on the tumor size (T-stage), total doses of 50–60 Gray (Gy) in daily fractions of 1.8–2.0 Gy are usually applied to the tumor site. Inguinal and iliac lymph nodes usually receive a dose of ≥ 45 Gy. Since 2010, our policy has been to apply a reduced total dose of 39.6 Gy to uninvolved nodal regions. This paper provides preliminary results of the efficacy and safety of this protocol.

Patients and methods

Overall, 30 patients with histologically confirmed and node-negative anal cancer were treated in our department from 2009–2014 with definitive CRT. Histology all cases showed squamous cell carcinoma. A total dose of 39.6 Gy [single dose (SD) 1.8 Gy] was delivered to the iliac/inguinal lymph nodes. The area of the primary tumor received 50–59.4 Gy, depending on the T-stage. In parallel with the irradiation, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) at a dose of 1000 mg/m2 was administered by continuous intravenous infusion over 24 h on days 1–4 and 29–32, and mitomycin C (MMC) at a dose of 10 mg/m2 (maximum absolute dose 14 mg) was administered on days 1 and 29. The distribution of the tumor stages was as follows: T1, n = 8; T2, n = 17; T3 n = 3. Overall survival (OS), local control (LC) of the lymph nodes, colostomy-free survival (CFS), and acute and chronic toxicities were assessed.

Results

The median follow-up was 27.3 months (range 2.7–57.4 months). Three patients (10.0 %) died, 2 of cardiopulmonary diseases and one of liver failure, yielding a 3-year OS of 90.0 %. Two patients (6.7 %) relapsed early and received salvage colostomies, yielding a 3-year CFS of 93.3 %. No lymph node relapses were observed, giving a lymph node LC of 100 %. According to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0 (CTCAE V. 4.0), there were no grade IV gastrointestinal or genitourinary acute toxicities. Seven patients showed acute grade III perineal skin toxicity. Acute grade III groin skin toxicity was not observed.

Conclusion

Reducing the total irradiation dose to uninvolved nodal regions to 39.6 Gy in chemoradiation protocols for anal carcinoma was safe and effective, and a prospective evaluation in future clinical trials is warranted.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Johnson LG, Madeleine MM, Newcomer LM et al (2004) Anal cancer incidence and survival: the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results experience, 1973–2000. Cancer 101:281–288CrossRefPubMed Johnson LG, Madeleine MM, Newcomer LM et al (2004) Anal cancer incidence and survival: the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results experience, 1973–2000. Cancer 101:281–288CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Frisch M (2002) On the etiology of anal squamous carcinoma. Dan Med Bull 49:194–209PubMed Frisch M (2002) On the etiology of anal squamous carcinoma. Dan Med Bull 49:194–209PubMed
3.
go back to reference Daling JR, Madeleine MM, Johnson LG et al (2004) Human papillomavirus, smoking, and sexual practices in the etiology of anal cancer. Cancer 101:270–280CrossRefPubMed Daling JR, Madeleine MM, Johnson LG et al (2004) Human papillomavirus, smoking, and sexual practices in the etiology of anal cancer. Cancer 101:270–280CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference o A (1996) Epidermoid anal cancer: results from the UKCCCR randomised trial of radiotherapy alone versus radiotherapy, 5-fluorouracil, and mitomycin. UKCCCR Anal Cancer Trial Working Party. UK Co-ordinating Committee on Cancer Research. Lancet 348:1049–1054. (No authors listed) o A (1996) Epidermoid anal cancer: results from the UKCCCR randomised trial of radiotherapy alone versus radiotherapy, 5-fluorouracil, and mitomycin. UKCCCR Anal Cancer Trial Working Party. UK Co-ordinating Committee on Cancer Research. Lancet 348:1049–1054. (No authors listed)
5.
go back to reference Flam M, John M, Pajak TF et al (1996) Role of mitomycin in combination with fluorouracil and radiotherapy, and of salvage chemoradiation in the definitive nonsurgical treatment of epidermoid carcinoma of the anal canal: results of a phase III randomized intergroup study. J Clin Oncol 14:2527–2539PubMed Flam M, John M, Pajak TF et al (1996) Role of mitomycin in combination with fluorouracil and radiotherapy, and of salvage chemoradiation in the definitive nonsurgical treatment of epidermoid carcinoma of the anal canal: results of a phase III randomized intergroup study. J Clin Oncol 14:2527–2539PubMed
6.
go back to reference Glynne-Jones R, Lim F (2011) Anal cancer: an examination of radiotherapy strategies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 79:1290–1301CrossRefPubMed Glynne-Jones R, Lim F (2011) Anal cancer: an examination of radiotherapy strategies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 79:1290–1301CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Kachnic LA, Winter K, Myerson RJ et al (2013) RTOG 0529: a phase 2 evaluation of dose-painted intensity modulated radiation therapy in combination with 5-fluoroucil and mitomycin-C for the reduction of acute morbidity in carcinoma oft he anal canal. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 86:27–33PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Kachnic LA, Winter K, Myerson RJ et al (2013) RTOG 0529: a phase 2 evaluation of dose-painted intensity modulated radiation therapy in combination with 5-fluoroucil and mitomycin-C for the reduction of acute morbidity in carcinoma oft he anal canal. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 86:27–33PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Bartelink H, Roelofsen F, Eschwege F et al (1997) Concomitant radiotherapy and chemotherapy is superior to radiotherapy alone in the treatment of locally advanced anal cancer: results of a phase III randomized trial of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Radiotherapy and Gastrointestinal Cooperative Groups. J Clin Oncol 15:2040–2049PubMed Bartelink H, Roelofsen F, Eschwege F et al (1997) Concomitant radiotherapy and chemotherapy is superior to radiotherapy alone in the treatment of locally advanced anal cancer: results of a phase III randomized trial of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Radiotherapy and Gastrointestinal Cooperative Groups. J Clin Oncol 15:2040–2049PubMed
9.
go back to reference Nigro ND, Seydel HG, Considine B et al (1983) Combined preoperative radiation and chemotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal. Cancer 51:1826–1829CrossRefPubMed Nigro ND, Seydel HG, Considine B et al (1983) Combined preoperative radiation and chemotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal. Cancer 51:1826–1829CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference James RD, Glynne-Jones R, Meadows HM et al (2013) Mitomycin or cisplatin chemoradiation with or without maintenance chemotherapy for treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (ACT II): a randomized, phase 3, open label, 2 × 2 factorial trial. Lancet Oncol 14:516–524CrossRefPubMed James RD, Glynne-Jones R, Meadows HM et al (2013) Mitomycin or cisplatin chemoradiation with or without maintenance chemotherapy for treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (ACT II): a randomized, phase 3, open label, 2 × 2 factorial trial. Lancet Oncol 14:516–524CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Blinde SE, Schasfoort R, Mens JW et al (2014) Inguinal lymph node recurrence in the untreated groin of patients with anal carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 57:578–584CrossRefPubMed Blinde SE, Schasfoort R, Mens JW et al (2014) Inguinal lymph node recurrence in the untreated groin of patients with anal carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 57:578–584CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Call JA, Haddock MG, Quevedo JF et al (2011) Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the anal cacnal: Efficacyof a low daily dose to clinically negative regions. Radiat Oncol 6:134. doi:10.1186/1748-717X-6-134PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Call JA, Haddock MG, Quevedo JF et al (2011) Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the anal cacnal: Efficacyof a low daily dose to clinically negative regions. Radiat Oncol 6:134. doi:10.1186/1748-717X-6-134PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Kachnic LA, Tsai HK, Coen JJ et al (2012) Dose-painted intensity-modulated radiation therapy for anal cancer: a multi-institutional report of acute toxicity and response to therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 82:153–158CrossRefPubMed Kachnic LA, Tsai HK, Coen JJ et al (2012) Dose-painted intensity-modulated radiation therapy for anal cancer: a multi-institutional report of acute toxicity and response to therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 82:153–158CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Mai SK, Welzel G, Hermann B et al (2009) Can the radiation dose to CT enlarged but FDG-PET negative inguinal lymph nodes in anal cacner be reduced? Strahlenther Onkol 185:254–259CrossRefPubMed Mai SK, Welzel G, Hermann B et al (2009) Can the radiation dose to CT enlarged but FDG-PET negative inguinal lymph nodes in anal cacner be reduced? Strahlenther Onkol 185:254–259CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Janssen S, Glanzmann C, Bauerfeind P et al (2014) Clinical experience of SIB-IMRT in anal cancer and selective literature review. Radiat Oncol 9:199. doi:10.1186/1748-717X-9-199PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Janssen S, Glanzmann C, Bauerfeind P et al (2014) Clinical experience of SIB-IMRT in anal cancer and selective literature review. Radiat Oncol 9:199. doi:10.1186/1748-717X-9-199PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Provencher S, Oehler S, Lavertu S, Jolicoeur M et al (2010) Quality of life after split-course chemoradiation for anal canal carcinoma. Radiat Oncol 5:41. doi:10.1186/1748-717X-5-41PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Provencher S, Oehler S, Lavertu S, Jolicoeur M et al (2010) Quality of life after split-course chemoradiation for anal canal carcinoma. Radiat Oncol 5:41. doi:10.1186/1748-717X-5-41PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Serup-Hansen E, Linnemann D, Skovrinder-Ruminski W et al (2014) Human papillovirus genotyping and p16 expression as prognostic factors for patients with americanJoint Committee on Cancer stages I to III carcinoma of the anal canal. J Clin Oncol 32:1812–1817CrossRefPubMed Serup-Hansen E, Linnemann D, Skovrinder-Ruminski W et al (2014) Human papillovirus genotyping and p16 expression as prognostic factors for patients with americanJoint Committee on Cancer stages I to III carcinoma of the anal canal. J Clin Oncol 32:1812–1817CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (icru) ICRU Report 62. Bethesda: ICRU; 1999. Prescribing, Recording and Reporting Photon Beam Therapy [supplement to ICRU Report 50] International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (icru) ICRU Report 62. Bethesda: ICRU; 1999. Prescribing, Recording and Reporting Photon Beam Therapy [supplement to ICRU Report 50]
19.
go back to reference International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (2010) ICRU Report 83. prescribing, recording, and reporting photon-beam intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). J ICRU 10:1 doi: 10.1093/jicru/ndq002 International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (2010) ICRU Report 83. prescribing, recording, and reporting photon-beam intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). J ICRU 10:1 doi: 10.1093/jicru/ndq002
21.
go back to reference Pavy JJ, Denekamp J, Letschert J et al (1995) EORTC Late Effects Working Group. Late effects toxicity scoring: the SOMA scale. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 31:1043–1091CrossRefPubMed Pavy JJ, Denekamp J, Letschert J et al (1995) EORTC Late Effects Working Group. Late effects toxicity scoring: the SOMA scale. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 31:1043–1091CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Northover J, Glynne-Jones R, Sebaq-Montefiore D et al (2010) Chemoradiation for the treatment of epidermoid anal cancer: 13-year follow-up of the first randomised UKCCR Anal Cancer Trial (ACT I). Br J Cancer 102:1123–1128PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Northover J, Glynne-Jones R, Sebaq-Montefiore D et al (2010) Chemoradiation for the treatment of epidermoid anal cancer: 13-year follow-up of the first randomised UKCCR Anal Cancer Trial (ACT I). Br J Cancer 102:1123–1128PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Zilli T, Betz M, Bieri S et al (2013) Elective inguinal node irradiation in early-stage T2N0 anal cancer: prognostic impact on locoregional control. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 87:60–66CrossRefPubMed Zilli T, Betz M, Bieri S et al (2013) Elective inguinal node irradiation in early-stage T2N0 anal cancer: prognostic impact on locoregional control. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 87:60–66CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference De Bari B, Lestrade L, Pommier P et al (2015) Could concomitant Radio-Chemotherapy improve the outcomes of early-stage node negative anal cancer patients? A retrospective analysis of 122 patients. Cancer Invest 33:114–120CrossRefPubMed De Bari B, Lestrade L, Pommier P et al (2015) Could concomitant Radio-Chemotherapy improve the outcomes of early-stage node negative anal cancer patients? A retrospective analysis of 122 patients. Cancer Invest 33:114–120CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Ajani JA, Winter KA, Gunderson LL et al (2008) Fluorouracil, mitomycin, and radiotherapy vs fluorouracil, cisplatin, and radiotherapy for carcinoma of the anal canal: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 299:1914–1921CrossRefPubMed Ajani JA, Winter KA, Gunderson LL et al (2008) Fluorouracil, mitomycin, and radiotherapy vs fluorouracil, cisplatin, and radiotherapy for carcinoma of the anal canal: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 299:1914–1921CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Gerard JP, Chapet O, Samjei F et al (2001) Management of inguinal lymph node metastases in patients with carcinoma of the anal canal: experience in a series of 270 patients treated in Lyon and review of literature. Cancer 92:77–84CrossRefPubMed Gerard JP, Chapet O, Samjei F et al (2001) Management of inguinal lymph node metastases in patients with carcinoma of the anal canal: experience in a series of 270 patients treated in Lyon and review of literature. Cancer 92:77–84CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Grabenbauer GG, Kessler H, Matzel KE et al (2005) Tumor site predicts outcome after radiochemotherapy in squamous-cell carcinoma of the anal region: long-term results of 101 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1742–1751CrossRefPubMed Grabenbauer GG, Kessler H, Matzel KE et al (2005) Tumor site predicts outcome after radiochemotherapy in squamous-cell carcinoma of the anal region: long-term results of 101 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1742–1751CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Matthews JH, Burmeister BH, Borg M et al (2011) T1–2 anal carcinoma requires elective inguinal radiation treatment-the results of Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group study TROG 99.02. Radiother Oncol 98:93–98CrossRefPubMed Matthews JH, Burmeister BH, Borg M et al (2011) T1–2 anal carcinoma requires elective inguinal radiation treatment-the results of Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group study TROG 99.02. Radiother Oncol 98:93–98CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Peiffert D, Tournier-Rangeard L, Gérard JP et al (2012) Induction chemotherapy and dose intensification of the radiation boost in locally advanced anal carcinoma: final analysis of the radomizes UNICANCER ACCORD 03 trial. J Clin Oncol 30:1941–1948CrossRefPubMed Peiffert D, Tournier-Rangeard L, Gérard JP et al (2012) Induction chemotherapy and dose intensification of the radiation boost in locally advanced anal carcinoma: final analysis of the radomizes UNICANCER ACCORD 03 trial. J Clin Oncol 30:1941–1948CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Wright JL, Patil SM, Temple LK et al (2010) Squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal: patterns and predictors of failure and implications for intensity-modulated radiation treatment planning. J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 78:1064–1072CrossRef Wright JL, Patil SM, Temple LK et al (2010) Squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal: patterns and predictors of failure and implications for intensity-modulated radiation treatment planning. J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 78:1064–1072CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Glynne-Jones R, Kadalayil L, Meadows HM et al (2014) Tumour- and treatment-related colostomy rates following mitomycin C or cisplatin chemoradiation with or without maintenance chemotherapy in squamous cell carcinoma of the anus in the ACT II trial. Ann Oncol 25:1616–1622CrossRefPubMed Glynne-Jones R, Kadalayil L, Meadows HM et al (2014) Tumour- and treatment-related colostomy rates following mitomycin C or cisplatin chemoradiation with or without maintenance chemotherapy in squamous cell carcinoma of the anus in the ACT II trial. Ann Oncol 25:1616–1622CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Fakhrian K, Sauer T, Dinkel A et al (2013) Chronic adverse events and quality of life after radiochemotherapy in anal cancer patients. A single institution experience and review of the literature. Strahlenther Onkol 189:486–494CrossRefPubMed Fakhrian K, Sauer T, Dinkel A et al (2013) Chronic adverse events and quality of life after radiochemotherapy in anal cancer patients. A single institution experience and review of the literature. Strahlenther Onkol 189:486–494CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Han K, Cummings BJ, Lindsay P et al (2014) Prospective evaluation of acute toxicity and quality of life after IMRT and concurrent chemotherapy for anal canal and perianal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 90:587–594CrossRefPubMed Han K, Cummings BJ, Lindsay P et al (2014) Prospective evaluation of acute toxicity and quality of life after IMRT and concurrent chemotherapy for anal canal and perianal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 90:587–594CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Frenzel T, Krüll A (2015) The use of IMRT in Germany. Strahlenther Onkol. (in press). DOI: 10.1007/s00066-015-0832-4 Frenzel T, Krüll A (2015) The use of IMRT in Germany. Strahlenther Onkol. (in press). DOI: 10.1007/s00066-015-0832-4
36.
go back to reference Hernando-Requejo O, López M, Cubillo A et al (2014) Complete pathological responses in locally advanced rectal cancer after preoperative IMRT and integrated-boost chemoradiation. Strahlenther Onkol 190:515–520CrossRefPubMed Hernando-Requejo O, López M, Cubillo A et al (2014) Complete pathological responses in locally advanced rectal cancer after preoperative IMRT and integrated-boost chemoradiation. Strahlenther Onkol 190:515–520CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Devisetty K, Salama JK, Schomas DA et al (2009) A multi-institutional acute gastrointestinal toxcicity analysis of anal cancer patients treated with concurrent intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and chemotherapy. Radiother Oncol 93:298–301CrossRefPubMed Devisetty K, Salama JK, Schomas DA et al (2009) A multi-institutional acute gastrointestinal toxcicity analysis of anal cancer patients treated with concurrent intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and chemotherapy. Radiother Oncol 93:298–301CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Reduced radiation dose for elective nodal irradiation in node-negative anal cancer: back to the roots?
Authors
Dr. med. Christoph Henkenberens
Dr. med. Daniela Meinecke
Dr. med. Stoll Michael
Prof. Dr. med. Michael Bremer
Univ. Prof. Dr. med. Hans Christiansen
Publication date
01-11-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Strahlentherapie und Onkologie / Issue 11/2015
Print ISSN: 0179-7158
Electronic ISSN: 1439-099X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-015-0885-4

Other articles of this Issue 11/2015

Strahlentherapie und Onkologie 11/2015 Go to the issue