Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Strahlentherapie und Onkologie 2/2015

01-02-2015 | Original article

Effect of dose reduction on image registration and image quality for cone-beam CT in radiotherapy

Authors: B. Loutfi-Krauss, J. Köhn, N. Blümer, K. Freundl, T. Koch, Dr. rer. nat., E. Kara, C. Scherf, Dr. rer. nat., C. Rödel, Prof. Dr. med., U. Ramm, PD Dr. phil. nat., Dr. rer. med. J. Licher

Published in: Strahlentherapie und Onkologie | Issue 2/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

The additional radiation exposure applied to patients undergoing cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) for image registration in radiation therapy is of great concern. Since a decrease in CBCT dose is linked to a degradation of image quality, the consequences of dose reduction on the registration process have to be investigated.

Material and methods

This paper examines image quality and registration of low-contrast structures on an Elekta XVI for the two treatment areas prostate and chest while gradually decreasing the mAs per frame and the number of projections per CBCT to achieve dose reduction.

Results

Ideal results for image quality were obtained for 1.6 mAs/frame and 377 projections in prostate scans and 0.63 mAs/frame and 440 projections in chest images. Lower as well as higher total mAs lead to a decrease in image quality. In spite of poor image quality, registration can be successfully performed even for lowest possible settings.

Conclusion

The results for registration allow an extensive dose reduction in both treatment areas. Very low mAs, however, do not qualify for clinical use because subjective judgment of the registration process is impossible. Compared to default presets the use of settings for acceptable image quality already permit a decrease in exposure of about 40 % (29.0 to 16.7 mGy) in prostate scans and 60 % (18.3 to 7.7 mGy) in chest scans.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Amer A, Marchant T, Sykes J et al (2008) Imaging doses from the Elekta Synergy X-ray cone beam CT system. Brit J Radiol 80:476–482CrossRef Amer A, Marchant T, Sykes J et al (2008) Imaging doses from the Elekta Synergy X-ray cone beam CT system. Brit J Radiol 80:476–482CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Ding GX, Duggan DM, Coffey CW (2008) Accurate patient dosimetry of kilovoltage cone-beam CT in radiation therapy. Med Phys 35:1135–1144PubMedCrossRef Ding GX, Duggan DM, Coffey CW (2008) Accurate patient dosimetry of kilovoltage cone-beam CT in radiation therapy. Med Phys 35:1135–1144PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hüttenrauch P, Witt M, Wolff D et al (2014) Target volume coverage and dose to organs at risk in prostate cancer patients. Strahlenther Onkol 190:310–316PubMedCrossRef Hüttenrauch P, Witt M, Wolff D et al (2014) Target volume coverage and dose to organs at risk in prostate cancer patients. Strahlenther Onkol 190:310–316PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Donovan EM, James H, Bonora M et al (2012) Second cancer incidence risk estimates using BEIR VII models for standard and complex external beam radiotherapy for early breast cancer. Med Phys 39:5814–5824PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Donovan EM, James H, Bonora M et al (2012) Second cancer incidence risk estimates using BEIR VII models for standard and complex external beam radiotherapy for early breast cancer. Med Phys 39:5814–5824PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kim S, Yoshizumi TT, Frush DP et al (2010) Radiation dose from cone beam CT in a pediatric phantom: risk estimation of cancer incidence. Am J Roentgenol 194:186–190CrossRef Kim S, Yoshizumi TT, Frush DP et al (2010) Radiation dose from cone beam CT in a pediatric phantom: risk estimation of cancer incidence. Am J Roentgenol 194:186–190CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Siewerdsen JH, Moseley DJ, Bakhtiar B et al (2004) The influence of antiscatter grids on soft-tissue detectability in cone-beam computed tomography with flat-panel detectors. Med Phys 31:3506–3520PubMedCrossRef Siewerdsen JH, Moseley DJ, Bakhtiar B et al (2004) The influence of antiscatter grids on soft-tissue detectability in cone-beam computed tomography with flat-panel detectors. Med Phys 31:3506–3520PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Islam MK, Purdie TG, Norrlinger BD et al (2006) Patient dose from kilovoltage cone beam computed tomography imaging in radiation therapy. Med Phys 33:1573–1582PubMedCrossRef Islam MK, Purdie TG, Norrlinger BD et al (2006) Patient dose from kilovoltage cone beam computed tomography imaging in radiation therapy. Med Phys 33:1573–1582PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Cheng JCH, Liang CH, Wu JK et al (2008) Evaluation of radiation dose and positioning accuracy on X-ray volume imaging system for image-guided radiotherapy. Nucl Instrum Meth B 266:2203–2206CrossRef Cheng JCH, Liang CH, Wu JK et al (2008) Evaluation of radiation dose and positioning accuracy on X-ray volume imaging system for image-guided radiotherapy. Nucl Instrum Meth B 266:2203–2206CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Jereczek-Fossa BA, Pobbiati C, Santoro L et al (2014) Prostate positioning using cone-beam computer tomography based on manual soft-tissue registration. Strahlenther Onkol 190:81–87PubMedCrossRef Jereczek-Fossa BA, Pobbiati C, Santoro L et al (2014) Prostate positioning using cone-beam computer tomography based on manual soft-tissue registration. Strahlenther Onkol 190:81–87PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Morrow NV, Lawton CA, Qi XS et al (2012) Impact of computed tomography image quality on image-guided radiation therapy based on soft tissue registration. Int J Radiation Oncol Biol Phys 82:e733–738CrossRef Morrow NV, Lawton CA, Qi XS et al (2012) Impact of computed tomography image quality on image-guided radiation therapy based on soft tissue registration. Int J Radiation Oncol Biol Phys 82:e733–738CrossRef
11.
go back to reference De Puysseleyr A, Mulliez T, Gulyban A et al (2013) Improved cone-beam computed tomography in supine and prone breast radiotherapy. Strahlenther Onkol 189:945–950PubMedCrossRef De Puysseleyr A, Mulliez T, Gulyban A et al (2013) Improved cone-beam computed tomography in supine and prone breast radiotherapy. Strahlenther Onkol 189:945–950PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Yan H, Cervino L, Jia X Jiang SB (2012) A comprehensive study on the relationship between the image quality and imaging dose in low-dose cone beam CT. Phys Med Biol 57:2063–2080PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Yan H, Cervino L, Jia X Jiang SB (2012) A comprehensive study on the relationship between the image quality and imaging dose in low-dose cone beam CT. Phys Med Biol 57:2063–2080PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Sykes JR, Amer A, Czajka J et al (2005) A feasibility study for image guided radiotherapy using low dose, high speed, cone beam X-ray volumetric imaging. Radiother Oncol 77:45–52PubMedCrossRef Sykes JR, Amer A, Czajka J et al (2005) A feasibility study for image guided radiotherapy using low dose, high speed, cone beam X-ray volumetric imaging. Radiother Oncol 77:45–52PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Elekta Limited (2009) XVI R4.5– Customer Acceptance Tests. Elekta Elekta Limited (2009) XVI R4.5– Customer Acceptance Tests. Elekta
15.
go back to reference Zhang X, Kashti T, Kella D et al (2012) Measuring the modulation transfer function of image capture devices: what do the numbers really mean? Proc SPIE 8293:1–11. doi:10.1117/12.912989 Zhang X, Kashti T, Kella D et al (2012) Measuring the modulation transfer function of image capture devices: what do the numbers really mean? Proc SPIE 8293:1–11. doi:10.1117/12.912989
16.
go back to reference Brooks RA, Di Chiro G (1976) Beam hardening in X-ray reconstructive tomography. Phys Med Biol 21:390–398PubMedCrossRef Brooks RA, Di Chiro G (1976) Beam hardening in X-ray reconstructive tomography. Phys Med Biol 21:390–398PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Jaffray DA, Siewerdsen JH (2000) Cone-beam computed tomography with a flat-panel imager: initial performance characterization. Med Phys 27:1311–1323PubMedCrossRef Jaffray DA, Siewerdsen JH (2000) Cone-beam computed tomography with a flat-panel imager: initial performance characterization. Med Phys 27:1311–1323PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference McDavid WD, Waggener RG, Payne WH et al (1975) Spectral effects on three-dimensional reconstruction from X-rays. Med Phys 2:321–324PubMedCrossRef McDavid WD, Waggener RG, Payne WH et al (1975) Spectral effects on three-dimensional reconstruction from X-rays. Med Phys 2:321–324PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Rinkel J, Gerfault L, Estève F et al (2007) A new method from X-ray scatter correction: first assessment on a cone-beam CT experimental setup. Phys Med Biol 52:4633–4652PubMedCrossRef Rinkel J, Gerfault L, Estève F et al (2007) A new method from X-ray scatter correction: first assessment on a cone-beam CT experimental setup. Phys Med Biol 52:4633–4652PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Elstrøm UV, Muren LP, Petersen JBB et al (2011) Evaluation of image quality for different kV cone-beam CT acquisition and reconstruction methods in the head and neck region. Acta Oncol 50:908–917PubMedCrossRef Elstrøm UV, Muren LP, Petersen JBB et al (2011) Evaluation of image quality for different kV cone-beam CT acquisition and reconstruction methods in the head and neck region. Acta Oncol 50:908–917PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Mori S, Endo M, Nishizawa K et al (2005) Enlarged longitudinal dose profiles in cone-beam CT and the need for modified dosimetry. Med Phys 32:1061–1069PubMedCrossRef Mori S, Endo M, Nishizawa K et al (2005) Enlarged longitudinal dose profiles in cone-beam CT and the need for modified dosimetry. Med Phys 32:1061–1069PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Effect of dose reduction on image registration and image quality for cone-beam CT in radiotherapy
Authors
B. Loutfi-Krauss
J. Köhn
N. Blümer
K. Freundl
T. Koch, Dr. rer. nat.
E. Kara
C. Scherf, Dr. rer. nat.
C. Rödel, Prof. Dr. med.
U. Ramm, PD Dr. phil. nat.
Dr. rer. med. J. Licher
Publication date
01-02-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Strahlentherapie und Onkologie / Issue 2/2015
Print ISSN: 0179-7158
Electronic ISSN: 1439-099X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-014-0750-x

Other articles of this Issue 2/2015

Strahlentherapie und Onkologie 2/2015 Go to the issue