Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 1/2020

Open Access 01-01-2020 | Original article

Quantitative evaluation of the progressive wear of powered interproximal reduction systems after repeated use

An in vitro study

Authors: C. Livas, T. Baumann, S. Flury, N. Pandis

Published in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the residual surface roughness of 5 common diamond-coated interproximal reduction (IPR) systems after consecutive in vitro applications in relation to system, diamond grain size, and instrument thickness.

Methods

IPR was performed on 80 extracted human incisors using motor-driven strips and discs under predefined conditions. The IPR auxiliaries were applied at 5 consecutive sessions of 20 s on intact interproximal surfaces, and the surface profile (Ra, Rz, Rmax) was analyzed at baseline and after each session with an optical profilometer.

Results

No overall significant difference in the roughness values was found between systems (P = 0.07 for Ra, P = 0.33 for Rz, and P = 0.48 for Rmax). There was a significant average decrease of Ra, Rz, and Rmax for all systems for every unit increase in time by −0.171 μm (P < 0.001), −3.297 (P ≤ 0.001), and −2.788 μm (P = 0.001), respectively. Ra, Rz, and Rmax values increased significantly, i.e., by 0.194 μm (P = 0.003), 5.890 μm (P = 0.001), and 5.319 μm (P = 0.010) as instrument thickness increased by one unit. No significant reductions in Ra, Rz, and Rmax were observed across grain sizes (−0.008 μm [P > 0.05], −0.244 μm [P > 0.05], and −0.179 μm [P > 0.05], respectively). There was no evidence of interaction between system and time as the P values for Ra, Rz, and Rmax were 0.88, 0.51, and 0.70, respectively.

Conclusions

All IPR materials presented significant gradual decrease of surface roughness after repeated applications. There were no significant roughness changes among auxiliaries of different grain sizes. Thinner auxiliaries showed significantly more roughness reduction, possibly requiring more frequent replacement than thick auxiliaries in clinical practice.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ballard ML (1944) Asymmetry in tooth size: a factor in the etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of malocclusion. Angle Orthod 14:67–71 Ballard ML (1944) Asymmetry in tooth size: a factor in the etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of malocclusion. Angle Orthod 14:67–71
2.
go back to reference Hudson AL (1956) A study of the effects of mesio-distal reduction of mandibular anterior teeth. Am J Orthod 42:615–624CrossRef Hudson AL (1956) A study of the effects of mesio-distal reduction of mandibular anterior teeth. Am J Orthod 42:615–624CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Tuverson DL (1980) Anterior interocclusal relations. Part I. Am J Orthod 78:361–370CrossRef Tuverson DL (1980) Anterior interocclusal relations. Part I. Am J Orthod 78:361–370CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Sheridan JJ (1985) Air-rotor stripping. J Clin Orthod 19:43–59PubMed Sheridan JJ (1985) Air-rotor stripping. J Clin Orthod 19:43–59PubMed
5.
go back to reference Zhong M, Jost-Brinkmann PG, Zellmann M, Zellmann S, Radlanski RJ (2000) Clinical evaluation of a new technique for interdental enamel reduction. J Orofac Orthop 61:432–439CrossRef Zhong M, Jost-Brinkmann PG, Zellmann M, Zellmann S, Radlanski RJ (2000) Clinical evaluation of a new technique for interdental enamel reduction. J Orofac Orthop 61:432–439CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Zachrisson BU (2004) Interdental papilla reconstruction in adult orthodontics. World J Orthod 5:67–73PubMed Zachrisson BU (2004) Interdental papilla reconstruction in adult orthodontics. World J Orthod 5:67–73PubMed
7.
go back to reference Ang AG, Steegmans PA, Kerdijk W, Livas C, Ren Y (2017) Radiographic technique and brackets affect measurements of proximal enamel thickness on mandibular incisors. Eur J Orthod 39:25–30CrossRef Ang AG, Steegmans PA, Kerdijk W, Livas C, Ren Y (2017) Radiographic technique and brackets affect measurements of proximal enamel thickness on mandibular incisors. Eur J Orthod 39:25–30CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Joseph VP, Rossouw PE, Basson NJ (1992) Orthodontic microabrasive reproximation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 102:351–359CrossRef Joseph VP, Rossouw PE, Basson NJ (1992) Orthodontic microabrasive reproximation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 102:351–359CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Piaccentini C, Sfondrini G (1996) A scanning electron microscopy comparison of enamel polishing methods after air-rotor stripping. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 109:57–63CrossRef Piaccentini C, Sfondrini G (1996) A scanning electron microscopy comparison of enamel polishing methods after air-rotor stripping. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 109:57–63CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Arman A, Cehreli B, Ozel E, Arhun N, Cetinsahin A, Soyman M (2006) Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of enamel after various stripping methods. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 130:131.e7–131.e14CrossRef Arman A, Cehreli B, Ozel E, Arhun N, Cetinsahin A, Soyman M (2006) Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of enamel after various stripping methods. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 130:131.e7–131.e14CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Zachrisson BU, Mjör IA (1975) Remodeling of teeth by grinding. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 68:545–553CrossRef Zachrisson BU, Mjör IA (1975) Remodeling of teeth by grinding. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 68:545–553CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Radlanski RJ, Jäger A, Schwestka R, Bertzbach F (1998) Plaque accumulation caused by interdental stripping. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 94:416–420CrossRef Radlanski RJ, Jäger A, Schwestka R, Bertzbach F (1998) Plaque accumulation caused by interdental stripping. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 94:416–420CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Twesme DA, Firestone AR, Heaven TJ, Feagin FF, Jacobson A (1994) Air-rotor stripping and enamel demineralization in vitro. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 105:142–152CrossRef Twesme DA, Firestone AR, Heaven TJ, Feagin FF, Jacobson A (1994) Air-rotor stripping and enamel demineralization in vitro. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 105:142–152CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Koretsi V, Chatzigianni A, Sidiropoulou S (2014) Enamel roughness and incidence of caries after interproximal enamel reduction: a systematic review. Orthod Craniofac Res 17:1–13CrossRef Koretsi V, Chatzigianni A, Sidiropoulou S (2014) Enamel roughness and incidence of caries after interproximal enamel reduction: a systematic review. Orthod Craniofac Res 17:1–13CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Livas C, Jongsma AC, Ren Y (2013) Enamel reduction techniques in orthodontics: a literature review. Open Dent J 7:146–151CrossRef Livas C, Jongsma AC, Ren Y (2013) Enamel reduction techniques in orthodontics: a literature review. Open Dent J 7:146–151CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Lione R, Gazzani F, Pavoni C, Guarino S, Tagliaferri V, Cozza P (2017) In vitro and in vivo evaluation of diamond-coated strips. Angle Orthod 87:455–459CrossRef Lione R, Gazzani F, Pavoni C, Guarino S, Tagliaferri V, Cozza P (2017) In vitro and in vivo evaluation of diamond-coated strips. Angle Orthod 87:455–459CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Hein C, Jost-Brinkmann PG, Schillai G (1990) The enamel surface quality after interproximal stripping—a scanning electron microscopic assessment of different polishing procedures. Fortschr Kieferorthop 51:327–335CrossRef Hein C, Jost-Brinkmann PG, Schillai G (1990) The enamel surface quality after interproximal stripping—a scanning electron microscopic assessment of different polishing procedures. Fortschr Kieferorthop 51:327–335CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Barcoma E, Shroff B, Best AM, Shoff MC, Lindauer SJ (2015) Interproximal reduction of teeth: differences in perspective between orthodontists and dentists. Angle Orthod 85:820–825CrossRef Barcoma E, Shroff B, Best AM, Shoff MC, Lindauer SJ (2015) Interproximal reduction of teeth: differences in perspective between orthodontists and dentists. Angle Orthod 85:820–825CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Keim RG, Gottlieb E, Vogels DS 3rd, Vogels PB (2014) JCO study of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment procedures, Part 1: results and trends. J Clin Orthod 48:607–630PubMed Keim RG, Gottlieb E, Vogels DS 3rd, Vogels PB (2014) JCO study of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment procedures, Part 1: results and trends. J Clin Orthod 48:607–630PubMed
20.
go back to reference Danesh G, Hellak A, Lippold C, Ziebura T, Schafer E (2007) Enamel surfaces following interproximal enamel reduction with different methods. Angle Orthod 77:1004–1010CrossRef Danesh G, Hellak A, Lippold C, Ziebura T, Schafer E (2007) Enamel surfaces following interproximal enamel reduction with different methods. Angle Orthod 77:1004–1010CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Hellak AF, Riepe EM, Seubert A, Korbmacher-Steiner HM (2015) Enamel demineralization after different methods of interproximal polishing. Clin Oral Investig 19:965–972CrossRef Hellak AF, Riepe EM, Seubert A, Korbmacher-Steiner HM (2015) Enamel demineralization after different methods of interproximal polishing. Clin Oral Investig 19:965–972CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Zingler S, Sommer A, Sen S, Saure D, Langer J, Guillon O, Lux CJ (2016) Efficiency of powered systems for interproximal enamel reduction (IER) and enamel roughness before and after polishing-an in vitro study. Clin Oral Investig 20:933–942CrossRef Zingler S, Sommer A, Sen S, Saure D, Langer J, Guillon O, Lux CJ (2016) Efficiency of powered systems for interproximal enamel reduction (IER) and enamel roughness before and after polishing-an in vitro study. Clin Oral Investig 20:933–942CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Flury S, Lussi A, Zimmerli B (2010) Performance of different polishing techniques for direct CAD/CAM ceramic restorations. Oper Dent 35:470–481CrossRef Flury S, Lussi A, Zimmerli B (2010) Performance of different polishing techniques for direct CAD/CAM ceramic restorations. Oper Dent 35:470–481CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Flury S, Peutzfeldt A, Lussi A (2012) Influence of surface roughness on mechanical properties of two computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) ceramic materials. Oper Dent 37:617–624CrossRef Flury S, Peutzfeldt A, Lussi A (2012) Influence of surface roughness on mechanical properties of two computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) ceramic materials. Oper Dent 37:617–624CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Flury S, Diebold E, Peutzfeldt A, Lussi A (2017) Effect of artificial toothbrushing and water storage on the surface roughness and micromechanical properties of tooth-colored CAD-CAM materials. J Prosthet Dent 117:767–774CrossRef Flury S, Diebold E, Peutzfeldt A, Lussi A (2017) Effect of artificial toothbrushing and water storage on the surface roughness and micromechanical properties of tooth-colored CAD-CAM materials. J Prosthet Dent 117:767–774CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Miró MM, Veith M, Lee J, Soldera F, Mücklich F, Bennewitz R, Aktas C (2015) 3D and 2D structural characterization of 1D Al/Al2 O3 biphasic nanostructures. J Microsc 258:113–118CrossRef Miró MM, Veith M, Lee J, Soldera F, Mücklich F, Bennewitz R, Aktas C (2015) 3D and 2D structural characterization of 1D Al/Al2 O3 biphasic nanostructures. J Microsc 258:113–118CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Rudge P, Sherriff M, Bister D (2015) A comparison of roughness parameters and friction coefficients of aesthetic archwires. Eur J Orthod 37:49–55CrossRef Rudge P, Sherriff M, Bister D (2015) A comparison of roughness parameters and friction coefficients of aesthetic archwires. Eur J Orthod 37:49–55CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Lundgren T, Milleding P, Mohlin B, Nannmark U (1993) Restitution of enamel after interdental stripping. Swed Dent J 17:217–224PubMed Lundgren T, Milleding P, Mohlin B, Nannmark U (1993) Restitution of enamel after interdental stripping. Swed Dent J 17:217–224PubMed
29.
go back to reference Johner AM, Pandis N, Dudic A, Kiliaridis S (2013) Quantitative comparison of 3 enamel-stripping devices in vitro: how precisely can we strip teeth? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 143:S168–S172CrossRef Johner AM, Pandis N, Dudic A, Kiliaridis S (2013) Quantitative comparison of 3 enamel-stripping devices in vitro: how precisely can we strip teeth? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 143:S168–S172CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Quantitative evaluation of the progressive wear of powered interproximal reduction systems after repeated use
An in vitro study
Authors
C. Livas
T. Baumann
S. Flury
N. Pandis
Publication date
01-01-2020
Publisher
Springer Medizin
Published in
Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie / Issue 1/2020
Print ISSN: 1434-5293
Electronic ISSN: 1615-6714
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-019-00200-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 1/2020 Go to the issue

Mitteilungen der DGKFO

Mitteilungen der DGKFO

Arnold-Biber Research Award

Artificial intelligence in orthodontics