Top

Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie

Published in:

01-05-2012 | Original article

The influence of adhesives and the base structure of metal brackets on shear bond strength

Authors: Dr. S. Reimann, J. Mezey, N. Daratsianos, A. Jäger, C. Bourauel

Published in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie | Issue 3/2012

Abstract

Objective

The objective of this study was to investigate the shear bond strength of compound made of tooth enamel, adhesive, and brackets for certain material combinations according to the DIN 13990-2 standard.

Materials and methods

We examined a combination of the following materials on permanent bovine incisors: (1) adhesives: Light Bond™ and Phase II® (both produced by Reliance Orthodontic Products, Itasca, IL, USA), Transbond XT™ (3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA), (2) brackets: Carriere®, Euro Midi Classic, Midi Low Friction (all from Ortho Organizers, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The discovery® bracket (Dentaurum, Ispringen, Germany) served as the reference. According to the DIN standard, the teeth were embedded, adhesive was applied and they were then put into storage. This was followed by shear tests in a material testing machine with the shear force acting directly on the bracket base in the occlusal-gingival direction. Finally, the Adhesive Remnant Index was determined.

Results

We observed the greatest shear bond strength (mean value) from the combination of Carriere® and Transbond XT™ (17.4 N/mm²), and the lowest from the combination of Euro Midi Classic and Phase II® (12.8 N/mm²). There were significant differences in the various material combinations. The values obtained from the measurements of discovery® together with Transbond XT™ agreed very well with the results of previous investigations.

Conclusion

The combinations of brackets and adhesives investigated in this study according to DIN standard 13990-2 provided a satisfactory result for clinical use.

Amm EW, Hardan LS, BouSerhal JP et al (2008) Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with self-etching primer to intact and preconditioned human enamel. J Orofac Orthop 69:383–392PubMedCrossRef

Årtun J, Bergland S (1984) Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pre-treatment. Am J Orthod 85:330–340

Benett CG, Shen C, Waldron JH (1984) The effects of debonding on the enamel surface. J Clin Orthod 18:330–334

Bishara SE, Gordan VV, VonWald L et al (1999) Shear bond strength of composite, glass ionomer, and acidic primer adhesive systems. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 115:24–28PubMedCrossRef

Bishara SE, VonWald L, Laffon JF et al (2001) Effect of a self-etch primer/adhesive on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 119:621–624PubMedCrossRef

Bishara SE, Ajlouni R, Soliman MM et al (2007) Evaluation of a new nano-filled restorative material for bonding orthodontic brackets. World J Orthod 8:8–12PubMed

Cal-Neto JP, Miguel JA (2004) Uma analisa dos testes in vitro de forca de adesao em Ortodontia. Rev Dent Press Ortodon Ortop Facial 9:44–51CrossRef

Carli J (2011) Einfluss des Lagerungsmedium auf die Scherfestigkeitswerte mittels “Etch & Rinse”-Technik an humanen und bovinen Schmelz und Dentinflächen applizierter Komposite. Diss, Medizinische Fakultät Universität Hamburg, pp 19–22

Diedrich P (1981) Enamel alterations from bracket bonding and debonding: a study with the scanning electron microscope. Am J Orthod 79:500–522PubMedCrossRef

10.

Diedrich P (2000) Praxis der Zahnheilkunde. Urban&Fischer, München

11.

DIN 13990-2. Zahnheilkunde-Prüfverfahren für die Scherhaftfestigkeit von Adhäsiven für kieferorthopädische Befestigungselemente. Gesamtverbund Befestigungselement-Adhäsiv-Zahnschmelz. Beuth, Berlin, 2009

12.

Eberhard H, Hirschfelder U, Nkenke E et al (1994) In-vitro Untersuchung über die Haftfestigkeit und den Bruchverlauf von lichthärtenden, Fluorid abgebenden Befestigungsmaterialien bei Metallbrackets. Fortschr Kieferorthop 55:304–310PubMedCrossRef

13.

Eliades T, Bourauel C (2005) Intraoral aging of orthodontic materials: the picture we miss and its clinical relevance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 127:403–412PubMedCrossRef

14.

Fox NA, McCabe JF, Buckley JG (1994) A critique of bond strength testing in Orthodontics. Br J Orthod 21:33–43PubMed

15.

Fritz U, Diedrich P, Finger WJ (2001) Self-etching primers – an alternative to the conventional acid etch technique? J Orofac Orthop 62:238–245PubMedCrossRef

16.

Graf I, Jacobi BE (2000) Bond strength of various fluoride – releasing orthodontic bonding systems. J Orofac Orthop 61:191–198PubMedCrossRef

17.

Gwinnett AJ, Gorelick L (1977) Microscopic evaluation of enamel after debonding. Am J Orthod 71:651–665PubMedCrossRef

18.

Iljima M, Ito S, Yuasa T et al (2008) Bond strength comparison and scanning electron microscopic evaluation of three orthodontic bonding systems. Dent Mater J 27:392–399CrossRef

19.

International Organisation for Standardization Office (2001) ISO/TS 11405. Dental materials – testing of adhesion to tooth structure. Geneva, Switzerland

20.

Knoll M, Gwinnett AJ, Wolff MS (1986) Shear strength of brackets bonded to anterior and posterior teeth. Am J Orthod 89:476–479PubMedCrossRef

21.

O’Brien KD, Watts DC, Read MJF (1988) Residual debris and bond strength is there a relationship? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 94:222–230CrossRef

22.

Öztürk B, Malkoc S, Koyutürk AE et al (2008) Influence of different tooth types on the bond strength of two orthodontic adhesive systems. Eur J Orthod 30:407–412PubMedCrossRef

23.

Pickett KL, Sadowsky PL, Jacobson A et al (2001) Orthodontic in vivo bond strength: comparison with in vivo results. Angle Orthod 71:141–148PubMed

24.

Regan D, Noort R van (1989) Bond strengths of two integral bracket-base combinations: an in vitro comparison with foil mesh. Eur J Orthod 11:144–153PubMed

25.

Reynolds IR (1975) Letter: Composite filling materials as adhesives in orthodontics. Br Dent J 138:83PubMedCrossRef

26.

Reynolds IR, Fraunhofer JA von (1976) Direct bonding of orthodontic attachments to teeth: the relation of adhesive bond strength to gauze mesh size. Br J Orthod 3:91–95PubMed

27.

Rix D, Foley TF, Mamandras A (2001) Comparison of bond strength of three adhesives: composite resin, hybrid GIC and glass-filled GIC. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 119:36–42PubMedCrossRef

28.

Sorel O, El Alam R, Chagneau F et al (2002) Comparison of bond strength between simple foil mesh and laser-structured base retention brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 122:260–266PubMedCrossRef

29.

Tang ATH, Björkman L, Adamczak E et al (2000) In vitro shear bond strength of orthodontic bondings without liquid resin. Acta Odontol Scand 58:44–48PubMedCrossRef

30.

Trites B, Foley TF, Banting D (2004) Bond strength comparison of 2 self-etching primers over a 3-month storage period. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 126:709–716PubMedCrossRef

31.

Velo S, Carano A, Carano A (2002) Self-etching vs. traditional bonding systems in orthodontics: an in vitro study. Orthod Craniofac Res 5:166–169PubMedCrossRef

32.

Vicente A, Bravo LA (2008) Influence of an etchant and a desensitizer containing benzalkonium chloride on shear bond strength of brackets. J Adhes Dent 10:205–209PubMed

Title: The influence of adhesives and the base structure of metal brackets on shear bond strength
Authors: Dr. S. Reimann
J. Mezey
N. Daratsianos
A. Jäger
C. Bourauel
Publication date: 01-05-2012
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Published in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie / Issue 3/2012
Print ISSN: 1434-5293
Electronic ISSN: 1615-6714
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-012-0074-3

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

Springer Medicine

The influence of adhesives and the base structure of metal brackets on shear bond strength

Abstract

Objective

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusion

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Objective

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 3/2012

Predicting vertical growth of the mandibular ramus via hand–wrist radiographs

Leserbrief

Time-dependent analysis and representation of force distribution and occlusion contact in the masticatory cycle

DGKFO-Seiten

Erratum to: Reaction of facial soft tissues to treatment with a Herbst appliance

What’s new on the dental scene?