Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 3/2012

01-05-2012 | Original article

Time-dependent analysis and representation of force distribution and occlusion contact in the masticatory cycle

Authors: Dr. B. Koos, J. Höller, C. Schille, A. Godt

Published in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie | Issue 3/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

Until now, the exact timing of force buildup and the distribution of contact points during occlusion have not been analyzed in sufficient detail. Investigations published so far have tended to focus on force curve measurements on single teeth or on a static point in time in the entire dental arch. The objective of this study was to describe precisely and analyze force relations in the dental arch over the course of time and in correlation with their antagonistic dental contact points via instrumental occlusal analysis (T-Scan III; Cumdente, Tübingen, Germany).

Materials and methods

We assessed 190 masticatory cycles of 38 subjects with 5 repetitions each, analyzing the first 0.15 s after the first recorded antagonistic tooth contact. Recording took place in 0.01-s increments. This measurement method’s precision was positively evaluated in previous studies.

Results

At t1, 44% of the subjects occluded first in the molar area; surprisingly, while another 40% occluded first on the anterior teeth. Simultaneous initial antagonistic tooth contact occurred in the lateral and anterior teeth in only 16%. At t10 (after 0.1 s), the predominant contact was in the molar and premolar region. The relative masticatory force distribution also changed over time, starting with a relatively large initial force on the central incisors toward the posterior at the recording conclusion. In the lateral comparison (right/left), the force relationships likewise changed over time (t2 on the left 42.6% of the relative masticatory force, 57.4% on the right). By t10, this lateral difference was significantly reduced (47.4% on the left, 52.6% on the right). The lateral difference, thus, decreased by 9.6% from t2 to t10.

Conclusion

Our data contradict the theory of a simultaneous or even increase in occlusion as the norm. Our detailed analysis of occlusion over time demonstrates that it is the central incisors that usually tend to come into initial contact, perhaps as the result of a guiding function. Over time, the force distribution shifts to the posterior.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Carlsson GE (1974) Bite force and chewing efficiency. Front Oral Physiol 1:265–292 PubMed Carlsson GE (1974) Bite force and chewing efficiency. Front Oral Physiol 1:265–292 PubMed
2.
go back to reference Chapman RJ, Maness WL, Osorio J (1991) Occlusal contact variation with changes in head position. Int J Prosthodont 4:377–381PubMed Chapman RJ, Maness WL, Osorio J (1991) Occlusal contact variation with changes in head position. Int J Prosthodont 4:377–381PubMed
3.
go back to reference Clark JR, Evans RD (2001) Functional occlusion: I. A review. J Orthod 76–81 Clark JR, Evans RD (2001) Functional occlusion: I. A review. J Orthod 76–81
4.
go back to reference Conrad HJ, Schulte JK, Vallee MC (2008) Fractures related to occlusal overload with single posterior implants: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 99:251–256PubMedCrossRef Conrad HJ, Schulte JK, Vallee MC (2008) Fractures related to occlusal overload with single posterior implants: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 99:251–256PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Serrao G et al (2004) Single tooth bite forces in healthy young adults. J Oral Rehabil 31:18–22PubMedCrossRef Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Serrao G et al (2004) Single tooth bite forces in healthy young adults. J Oral Rehabil 31:18–22PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Filtchev AD, Kalachev YS (2008) Phenomenon of domination of the strongest contacts in centric occlusion. Quintessence Int 39:e99–106PubMed Filtchev AD, Kalachev YS (2008) Phenomenon of domination of the strongest contacts in centric occlusion. Quintessence Int 39:e99–106PubMed
7.
go back to reference Forrester SE, Presswood RG, Toy AC et al (2011) Occlusal measurement method can affect SEMG activity during occlusion. J Oral Rehabil 38:655–660PubMedCrossRef Forrester SE, Presswood RG, Toy AC et al (2011) Occlusal measurement method can affect SEMG activity during occlusion. J Oral Rehabil 38:655–660PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Garrido Garcia VC, Garcia Cartagena A, Gonzalez Sequeros O (1997) Evaluation of occlusal contacts in maximum intercuspation using the T-Scan system. J Oral Rehabil 24:899–903CrossRef Garrido Garcia VC, Garcia Cartagena A, Gonzalez Sequeros O (1997) Evaluation of occlusal contacts in maximum intercuspation using the T-Scan system. J Oral Rehabil 24:899–903CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Hauck MJ (2003) Dynamische Okklusionskonzepte in der Totalprothetik. Quintessenz Zahntechnik 10:1214–1220 Hauck MJ (2003) Dynamische Okklusionskonzepte in der Totalprothetik. Quintessenz Zahntechnik 10:1214–1220
10.
go back to reference Hellmann D (2007) Grundlagen der Funktionslehre, Teil 1: Terminologie und Einführung. Quintessenz Zahntechnik 33:500–504 Hellmann D (2007) Grundlagen der Funktionslehre, Teil 1: Terminologie und Einführung. Quintessenz Zahntechnik 33:500–504
11.
go back to reference Isidor F (1996) Loss of osseointegration caused by occlusal load of oral implants. A clinical and radiographic study in monkeys. Clin Oral Implants Res 7:143–152PubMedCrossRef Isidor F (1996) Loss of osseointegration caused by occlusal load of oral implants. A clinical and radiographic study in monkeys. Clin Oral Implants Res 7:143–152PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Ivanis T, Zivko-Babic J, Stalec J (1988) The intensity of masticatory forces in front teeth. Acta Stomatol Croat 22:107–116PubMed Ivanis T, Zivko-Babic J, Stalec J (1988) The intensity of masticatory forces in front teeth. Acta Stomatol Croat 22:107–116PubMed
13.
go back to reference Kahl-Nieke B (2010) Einführung in die Kieferorthopädie. Deutscher Zahnärzteverlag, Köln Kahl-Nieke B (2010) Einführung in die Kieferorthopädie. Deutscher Zahnärzteverlag, Köln
14.
go back to reference Kampe T, Haraldson T, Hannerz H et al (1987) Occlusal perception and bite force in young subjects with and without dental fillings. Acta Odontol Scand 45:101–107PubMedCrossRef Kampe T, Haraldson T, Hannerz H et al (1987) Occlusal perception and bite force in young subjects with and without dental fillings. Acta Odontol Scand 45:101–107PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Kerstein RB (2001) Current applications of computerized occlusal analysis in dental medicine. Gen Dent 49:521–530PubMed Kerstein RB (2001) Current applications of computerized occlusal analysis in dental medicine. Gen Dent 49:521–530PubMed
16.
go back to reference Kerstein RB (2008) Articulating paper mark misconceptions and computerized occlusal analysis technology. Dent Implantol Update 19:41–46PubMed Kerstein RB (2008) Articulating paper mark misconceptions and computerized occlusal analysis technology. Dent Implantol Update 19:41–46PubMed
17.
go back to reference Koos B, Godt A, Schille C et al (2010) Precision of an instrumentation-based method of analyzing occlusion and its resulting distribution of forces in the dental arch. J Orofac Orthop 71:403–410PubMedCrossRef Koos B, Godt A, Schille C et al (2010) Precision of an instrumentation-based method of analyzing occlusion and its resulting distribution of forces in the dental arch. J Orofac Orthop 71:403–410PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Korioth TW (1990) Number and location of occlusal contacts in intercuspal position. J Prosthet Dent 64:206–210PubMedCrossRef Korioth TW (1990) Number and location of occlusal contacts in intercuspal position. J Prosthet Dent 64:206–210PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Kumagai H, Suzuki T, Hamada T et al (1999) Occlusal force distribution on the dental arch during various levels of clenching. J Oral Rehabil 26:932–935PubMedCrossRef Kumagai H, Suzuki T, Hamada T et al (1999) Occlusal force distribution on the dental arch during various levels of clenching. J Oral Rehabil 26:932–935PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Lawn BR, Lee JJ (2009) Analysis of fracture and deformation modes in teeth subjected to occlusal loading. Acta Biomater 5:2213–2221PubMedCrossRef Lawn BR, Lee JJ (2009) Analysis of fracture and deformation modes in teeth subjected to occlusal loading. Acta Biomater 5:2213–2221PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Makofsky HW (2000) The influence of forward head posture on dental occlusion. Cranio 18:30–39PubMed Makofsky HW (2000) The influence of forward head posture on dental occlusion. Cranio 18:30–39PubMed
22.
go back to reference Maness WL, Podoloff R (1989) Distribution of occlusal contacts in maximum intercuspation. J Prosthet Dent 62:238–242PubMedCrossRef Maness WL, Podoloff R (1989) Distribution of occlusal contacts in maximum intercuspation. J Prosthet Dent 62:238–242PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Quirynen M, Naert I, Steenberghe D van (1992) Fixture design and overload influence marginal bone loss and fixture success in the Brånemark system. Clin Oral Implants Res 3:104–111PubMedCrossRef Quirynen M, Naert I, Steenberghe D van (1992) Fixture design and overload influence marginal bone loss and fixture success in the Brånemark system. Clin Oral Implants Res 3:104–111PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Rangert B, Krogh PH, Langer B et al (1995) Bending overload and implant fracture: a retrospective clinical analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 10:326–334PubMed Rangert B, Krogh PH, Langer B et al (1995) Bending overload and implant fracture: a retrospective clinical analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 10:326–334PubMed
25.
go back to reference Reitemeier B, Schwenzer N, Ehrenfeld M (2006) Einführung in die Zahnmedizin (2006). Georg Thieme, Stuttgart Reitemeier B, Schwenzer N, Ehrenfeld M (2006) Einführung in die Zahnmedizin (2006). Georg Thieme, Stuttgart
27.
go back to reference Sakaguchi K, Mehta NR, Abdallah EF et al (2007) Examination of the relationship between mandibular position and body posture. Cranio 25:237–249PubMed Sakaguchi K, Mehta NR, Abdallah EF et al (2007) Examination of the relationship between mandibular position and body posture. Cranio 25:237–249PubMed
28.
go back to reference Stern K, Kordaß B (2010) Vergleich des Greifswald-Digital-Analyzing-Systems mit dem T-Scan III bezüglich der klinischen Reproduzierbarkeit zur Darstellung okklusaler Kontaktpunkte. J CranioMand Func 2:107–119 Stern K, Kordaß B (2010) Vergleich des Greifswald-Digital-Analyzing-Systems mit dem T-Scan III bezüglich der klinischen Reproduzierbarkeit zur Darstellung okklusaler Kontaktpunkte. J CranioMand Func 2:107–119
29.
go back to reference Tawil G (2008) Peri-implant bone loss caused by occlusal overload: repair of the peri-implant defect following correction of the traumatic occlusion. A case report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 23:153–157PubMed Tawil G (2008) Peri-implant bone loss caused by occlusal overload: repair of the peri-implant defect following correction of the traumatic occlusion. A case report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 23:153–157PubMed
30.
go back to reference Zeng Y, Wang J, Zhou S (2000) Occlusal contact force and stress analysis of molars with vertical root split. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 35:142–143PubMed Zeng Y, Wang J, Zhou S (2000) Occlusal contact force and stress analysis of molars with vertical root split. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 35:142–143PubMed
31.
go back to reference Zivko-Babic J, Panduric J, Jerolimov V et al (2002) Bite force in subjects with complete dentition. Coll Antropol 26:293–302PubMed Zivko-Babic J, Panduric J, Jerolimov V et al (2002) Bite force in subjects with complete dentition. Coll Antropol 26:293–302PubMed
Metadata
Title
Time-dependent analysis and representation of force distribution and occlusion contact in the masticatory cycle
Authors
Dr. B. Koos
J. Höller
C. Schille
A. Godt
Publication date
01-05-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie / Issue 3/2012
Print ISSN: 1434-5293
Electronic ISSN: 1615-6714
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-012-0075-2

Other articles of this Issue 3/2012

Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 3/2012 Go to the issue

Letter to the editor

Leserbrief