Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy 4/2007

01-07-2007 | Short Communication

Comparison of FISH and Quantitative RT-PCR for the Diagnosis and Follow-Up of BCR-ABL-Positive Leukemias

Authors: Fei Bao, Dr Reinhold Munker, Clarissa Lowery, Sherry Martin, Runhua Shi, Diana M. Veillon, James D. Cotelingam, Mary Lowery Nordberg

Published in: Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy | Issue 4/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Background: For Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+) leukemias (chronic myelogenous leukemia [CML], acute lymphoblastic leukemia [ALL], and rare other leukemias), both allogeneic transplantation and treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors offer chances of molecular remission (the molecular marker being consistently undetectable). Molecular remission is defined as a reduction in the quantification of BCR-ABL transcripts to an undetectable level by molecular diagnostic methods, and is considered as a surrogate marker for cure or long-term disease control. The molecular diagnostic methods including fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (QRT-PCR) are more sensitive than classical cytogenetic analysis for the detection of BCR-ABL positive cells. QRT-PCR, due to its superior sensitivity, is considered the gold standard for the follow-up of Ph+ leukemias treated with imatinib.
Aim: The objective of our study was to compare the diagnostic and clinical usefulness of FISH and QRT-PCR at different timepoints for Ph+ leukemias.
Patients and methods: We investigated 23 unselected patients with Ph+ CML (n = 21) or Ph+ ALL (n = 2) at 77 different timepoints in a comparative study with both FISH and QRT-PCR using commercially available reagents in a routine laboratory.
Results: Our study demonstrated a good correlation of QRT-PCR with FISH in detecting the BCR-ABL fusion gene among patients with CML or ALL (coefficient of correlation = 0.77493, p < 0.0001, using Spearman’s correlation procedure). All newly diagnosed or untreated cases were positive with both methods. Lower coefficients of correlation were found when FISH and QRT-PCR were correlated with the white blood cell count (WBC). An overall concordance of FISH and QRT-PCR (being either negative or positive in both tests) was found in 65 cases (84.4%) and a discrepancy identified in 12 cases (15.6%).
Conclusions: We confirm that QRT-PCR allows precise measurement of low levels of BCR-ABL transcripts and can serve as a sensitive indicator for minimal residual disease. In addition, we demonstrate in most cases a good correlation of QRT-PCR with FISH in detecting the BCR-ABL fusion gene among patients with CML or Ph+ ALL. FISH is not suitable for monitoring minimal residual disease.
Footnotes
1
The use of trade names is for product identification purposes only and does not imply endorsement.
 
Literature
2.
go back to reference Talpaz M. Interferon-alpha-based treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia and implications of signal transduction inhibition. Semin Hematol 2001; 38(3 Suppl. 8): 22–7PubMedCrossRef Talpaz M. Interferon-alpha-based treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia and implications of signal transduction inhibition. Semin Hematol 2001; 38(3 Suppl. 8): 22–7PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Gratwohl A, Brand R, Apperley J, et al. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for chronic myeloid leukemia in Europe 2006: transplant activity, long-term data and current results. An analysis by the Chronic Leukemia Working Party of the EBMT. Haematologica 2006; 91: 513–21PubMed Gratwohl A, Brand R, Apperley J, et al. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for chronic myeloid leukemia in Europe 2006: transplant activity, long-term data and current results. An analysis by the Chronic Leukemia Working Party of the EBMT. Haematologica 2006; 91: 513–21PubMed
4.
go back to reference Deininger M, Buchdunger E, Druker BJ. The development of imatinib as a therapeutic agent for chronic myeloid leukemia. Blood 2005; 105: 2640–53PubMedCrossRef Deininger M, Buchdunger E, Druker BJ. The development of imatinib as a therapeutic agent for chronic myeloid leukemia. Blood 2005; 105: 2640–53PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kebriaei P, Larson RA. Progress and challenges in the therapy of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Curr Opin Hematol 2003; 10: 284–9PubMedCrossRef Kebriaei P, Larson RA. Progress and challenges in the therapy of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Curr Opin Hematol 2003; 10: 284–9PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Goldman J. Monitoring minimal residual disease in BCR-ABL positive chronic myeloid leukemia in the imatinib era. Curr Opin Hematol 2004; 12: 33–9CrossRef Goldman J. Monitoring minimal residual disease in BCR-ABL positive chronic myeloid leukemia in the imatinib era. Curr Opin Hematol 2004; 12: 33–9CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Martinelli G, Iacobucci I, Rosti G, et al. Prediction of response to imatinib by prospective quantitation of BCR-ABL transcript in late chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia patients. Ann Oncol 2006; 17: 495–502PubMedCrossRef Martinelli G, Iacobucci I, Rosti G, et al. Prediction of response to imatinib by prospective quantitation of BCR-ABL transcript in late chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia patients. Ann Oncol 2006; 17: 495–502PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hughes T, Branford S. Molecular monitoring of BCR-ABL as a guide to clinical management in chronic myeloid leukaemia. Blood Rev 2006; 20: 29–41PubMedCrossRef Hughes T, Branford S. Molecular monitoring of BCR-ABL as a guide to clinical management in chronic myeloid leukaemia. Blood Rev 2006; 20: 29–41PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Landstrom AP, Tefferi A. Fluorescent in situ hybridization in the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment monitoring of chronic myeloid leukemia. Leuk Lymph 2006; 47: 397–402CrossRef Landstrom AP, Tefferi A. Fluorescent in situ hybridization in the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment monitoring of chronic myeloid leukemia. Leuk Lymph 2006; 47: 397–402CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Max N, Wolf K, Wittor B, et al. Rapid real-time quantification of BCR-ABL transcripts in research samples: intra- and inter-assay variation of a novel RT-PCR assay [abstract H13]. J Mol Diag 1999; 1: 48 Max N, Wolf K, Wittor B, et al. Rapid real-time quantification of BCR-ABL transcripts in research samples: intra- and inter-assay variation of a novel RT-PCR assay [abstract H13]. J Mol Diag 1999; 1: 48
11.
go back to reference SAS Institute Inc. SAS OnlineDoc® 9.1.3. Cary (NC): SAS Institute Inc., 2004 SAS Institute Inc. SAS OnlineDoc® 9.1.3. Cary (NC): SAS Institute Inc., 2004
12.
go back to reference Cortes J, Talpaz M, O’Brien S, et al. Molecular responses in patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia in chronic phase treated with imatinib mesylate. Clin Cancer Res 2005; 11: 3425–32PubMedCrossRef Cortes J, Talpaz M, O’Brien S, et al. Molecular responses in patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia in chronic phase treated with imatinib mesylate. Clin Cancer Res 2005; 11: 3425–32PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Tchirkov A, Giollant M, Tavernier F, et al. Interphase cytogenetics and competitive RT-PCR for residual disease monitoring with chronic myeloid leukaemia during interferon-α therapy. Brit J Haematol 1998; 101: 552–7CrossRef Tchirkov A, Giollant M, Tavernier F, et al. Interphase cytogenetics and competitive RT-PCR for residual disease monitoring with chronic myeloid leukaemia during interferon-α therapy. Brit J Haematol 1998; 101: 552–7CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Kim YJ, Kim DW, Lee S, et al. Comprehensive comparison of FISH, RT-PCR, and RQ-PCR for monitoring the BCR-ABL gene after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in CML. Eur J Haematol 2002; 68: 272–80PubMedCrossRef Kim YJ, Kim DW, Lee S, et al. Comprehensive comparison of FISH, RT-PCR, and RQ-PCR for monitoring the BCR-ABL gene after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in CML. Eur J Haematol 2002; 68: 272–80PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Raanani P, Ben-Bassat I, Gan S, et al. Assessment of the response to imatinib in chronic myeloid leukemia patients: comparison between the FISH, multiplex and RT-PCR methods. Eur J Haematol 2002; 73: 243–50CrossRef Raanani P, Ben-Bassat I, Gan S, et al. Assessment of the response to imatinib in chronic myeloid leukemia patients: comparison between the FISH, multiplex and RT-PCR methods. Eur J Haematol 2002; 73: 243–50CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Schoch C, Schnittger S, Bursch S, et al. Comparison of chromosome banding analysis, interphase- and hypermetaphase-FISH, qualitative and quantitative PCR for diagnosis and for follow-up in chronic myeloid leukemia: a study on 350 cases. Leukemia 2002; 16: 53–9PubMedCrossRef Schoch C, Schnittger S, Bursch S, et al. Comparison of chromosome banding analysis, interphase- and hypermetaphase-FISH, qualitative and quantitative PCR for diagnosis and for follow-up in chronic myeloid leukemia: a study on 350 cases. Leukemia 2002; 16: 53–9PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Bhatia R, Holtz M, Niu N, et al. Persistence of malignant hematopoietic progenitors in chronic myelogenous leukemia patients in complete cytogenetic remission following imatinib mesylate treatment. Blood 2003; 101: 4701–7PubMedCrossRef Bhatia R, Holtz M, Niu N, et al. Persistence of malignant hematopoietic progenitors in chronic myelogenous leukemia patients in complete cytogenetic remission following imatinib mesylate treatment. Blood 2003; 101: 4701–7PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Chomel JC, Brizard F, Veinstein A, et al. Persistence of BCR-ABL genomic rearrangement in chronic myeloid leukemia patients in complete and sustained cytogenetic remission after interferon-α therapy or allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Blood 2000; 95: 404–9PubMed Chomel JC, Brizard F, Veinstein A, et al. Persistence of BCR-ABL genomic rearrangement in chronic myeloid leukemia patients in complete and sustained cytogenetic remission after interferon-α therapy or allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Blood 2000; 95: 404–9PubMed
19.
go back to reference Fuggazza G, Miglino M, Bruzzone R, et al. Cytogenetic and fluorescence in situ monitoring in Ph+ chronic myeloid leukemia patients treated with imatinib mesylate. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2004; 23: 295–9 Fuggazza G, Miglino M, Bruzzone R, et al. Cytogenetic and fluorescence in situ monitoring in Ph+ chronic myeloid leukemia patients treated with imatinib mesylate. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2004; 23: 295–9
20.
go back to reference Hughes T. ABL kinase inhibitor therapy for CML: baseline assessments and response monitoring. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2006, 211-8 Hughes T. ABL kinase inhibitor therapy for CML: baseline assessments and response monitoring. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2006, 211-8
21.
go back to reference Rulcová J, Zmeková V, Zemanová Z, et al. The effect of total-ABL, GUS and B2M control genes on BCR-ABL monitoring by real-time RT-PCR. Leuk Res 2007; 31: 483–91PubMedCrossRef Rulcová J, Zmeková V, Zemanová Z, et al. The effect of total-ABL, GUS and B2M control genes on BCR-ABL monitoring by real-time RT-PCR. Leuk Res 2007; 31: 483–91PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Comparison of FISH and Quantitative RT-PCR for the Diagnosis and Follow-Up of BCR-ABL-Positive Leukemias
Authors
Fei Bao
Dr Reinhold Munker
Clarissa Lowery
Sherry Martin
Runhua Shi
Diana M. Veillon
James D. Cotelingam
Mary Lowery Nordberg
Publication date
01-07-2007
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy / Issue 4/2007
Print ISSN: 1177-1062
Electronic ISSN: 1179-2000
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03256245

Other articles of this Issue 4/2007

Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy 4/2007 Go to the issue

Hematologic and Lymphatic Disorders

Biomarkers of Lymphatic Function and Disease