Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 4/2020

01-08-2020 | Left Bundle Branch Block | Editorial

Refining the role of gated SPECT for predicting clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: Are we using the right tool at the wrong time?

Author: Dennis A. Calnon, MD, MASNC

Published in: Journal of Nuclear Cardiology | Issue 4/2020

Login to get access

Excerpt

The accurate prediction of clinical response to cardiac resynchronization (CRT) remains challenging, despite much work in this area. International guidelines for the use of CRT are currently based solely on the severity of heart failure despite optimal medical therapy, reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), electrical dyssynchrony (QRS duration), and atrial rhythm.1 However, as many as 30-40% of patients who meet patient selection criteria fail to derive clinical benefit following CRT.2
Literature
1.
go back to reference Normand C, Linde C, Singh J, Dickstein K. Indications for cardiac resynchronization therapy: A comparison of the major international guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol HF 2018;6:308-16. Normand C, Linde C, Singh J, Dickstein K. Indications for cardiac resynchronization therapy: A comparison of the major international guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol HF 2018;6:308-16.
2.
go back to reference Abraham WT, Fisher WG, Smith AL, et al. Cardiac resynchronization in chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med 2002;346:1845-53.CrossRef Abraham WT, Fisher WG, Smith AL, et al. Cardiac resynchronization in chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med 2002;346:1845-53.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Bleeker G, Mollema SA, Holman ER, et al. Left ventricular resynchronization is mandatory for response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: Analysis in patients with echocardiographic evidence of left ventricular dyssynchrony at baseline. Circulation 2007;116:1440-8.CrossRef Bleeker G, Mollema SA, Holman ER, et al. Left ventricular resynchronization is mandatory for response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: Analysis in patients with echocardiographic evidence of left ventricular dyssynchrony at baseline. Circulation 2007;116:1440-8.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Chen J, Garcia EV, Bax JJ, et al. SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging for the assessment of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony. J Nucl Cardiol 2011;18:685-94.CrossRef Chen J, Garcia EV, Bax JJ, et al. SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging for the assessment of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony. J Nucl Cardiol 2011;18:685-94.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Nowak B, Stellbrink C, Schaefer WM, et al. Comparison of regional myocardial blood flow and perfusion in dilated cardiomyopathy and left bundle branch block: Role of wall thickening. J Nucl Med 2004;45:414-8.PubMed Nowak B, Stellbrink C, Schaefer WM, et al. Comparison of regional myocardial blood flow and perfusion in dilated cardiomyopathy and left bundle branch block: Role of wall thickening. J Nucl Med 2004;45:414-8.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Refining the role of gated SPECT for predicting clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: Are we using the right tool at the wrong time?
Author
Dennis A. Calnon, MD, MASNC
Publication date
01-08-2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology / Issue 4/2020
Print ISSN: 1071-3581
Electronic ISSN: 1532-6551
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-019-01767-z

Other articles of this Issue 4/2020

Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 4/2020 Go to the issue

ASNC President’s Message

The new normal