Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 6/2013

01-12-2013 | Original Article

Feasibility of stress only rubidium-82 PET myocardial perfusion imaging

Authors: Sean R. McMahon, MD, Janusz Kikut, MD, Richard G. Pinckney, MD, MPH, Friederike K. Keating, MD

Published in: Journal of Nuclear Cardiology | Issue 6/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Stress only SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is a validated strategy to streamline cardiac diagnostic imaging. The potential use of Rb82 PET stress only MPI has not been investigated.

Methods and Results

Stress images from 200 Rb82 PET-MPI were reviewed by two blinded readers and categorized as not requiring additional rest images (normal) or requiring additional images (abnormal or equivocal). No additional images were deemed necessary for 95 (48%) and 99 (50%) by the two blinded readers. The stress only interpretation was compared to the previous read of the complete rest-stress study. The rate of detecting a normal result with stress only reading was 76%-79% with a negative predictive value of 94%-95%. Clinical predictors of a normal stress only PET-MPI included lower age, the absence of CAD, and female gender, but not body mass index. Blinded reads of 50 additional consecutive PET-MPI from patients with selected clinical predictors (age <65 years, no known CAD) were then performed. Of these, 40 (80%) were normal by previous rest-stress reading, and 34 (68%) were categorized as not requiring additional images after stress only reading. PET stress only imaging would have resulted in a mean reduction of radiation exposure of 2.4 mSv per study according to a published radiation estimate.

Conclusion

Stress only Rb82 PET-MPI is a feasible strategy to reduce resource utilization and radiation exposure associated with MPI. This strategy would be most applicable to patients with a lower pretest likelihood.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Fazel R, Krumholz HM, Wang Y, Ross JS, Chen J, Ting H, et al. Exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation from medical imaging procedures. N Engl J Med 2009;361:849-57.PubMedCrossRef Fazel R, Krumholz HM, Wang Y, Ross JS, Chen J, Ting H, et al. Exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation from medical imaging procedures. N Engl J Med 2009;361:849-57.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Chen J, Einstein A, Fazel R, Krumholz H, Wang Y, Ross J, et al. Cumulative exposure to ionizing radiation from diagnostic and therapeutic cardiac imaging procedures: A population-based analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;56:702-11.PubMedCrossRef Chen J, Einstein A, Fazel R, Krumholz H, Wang Y, Ross J, et al. Cumulative exposure to ionizing radiation from diagnostic and therapeutic cardiac imaging procedures: A population-based analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;56:702-11.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Mabuchi K, Soda M, Ron E, Tokunaga M, Ochikubo S, Sugimoto S, et al. Cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors. Part I: Use of the tumor registries in Hiroshima and Nagasaki for incidence studies. Radiat Res 1994;137:S1-16.PubMedCrossRef Mabuchi K, Soda M, Ron E, Tokunaga M, Ochikubo S, Sugimoto S, et al. Cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors. Part I: Use of the tumor registries in Hiroshima and Nagasaki for incidence studies. Radiat Res 1994;137:S1-16.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurement. Comparative carcinogenicity of ionizing radiation and chemicals. Report no. 096. Washington, DC: National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurement; 1989. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurement. Comparative carcinogenicity of ionizing radiation and chemicals. Report no. 096. Washington, DC: National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurement; 1989.
8.
go back to reference Schroeder-Tanka J, Tiel-van Buul M, van der Wall E, Roolker W, Lie K, van Royen E, et al. Should imaging at stress always be followed by imaging at rest in Tc-99m MIBI SPECT? A proposal for a selective referral and imaging strategy. Int J Card Imaging 1997;13:323-9.PubMedCrossRef Schroeder-Tanka J, Tiel-van Buul M, van der Wall E, Roolker W, Lie K, van Royen E, et al. Should imaging at stress always be followed by imaging at rest in Tc-99m MIBI SPECT? A proposal for a selective referral and imaging strategy. Int J Card Imaging 1997;13:323-9.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Duvall WL, Wijetunga MN, Klein TM, Razzouk L, Godbold J, Croft L, et al. The prognosis of a normal stress-only Tc-99m myocardial perfusion imaging study. J Nucl Cardiol 2011;17:370-7.CrossRef Duvall WL, Wijetunga MN, Klein TM, Razzouk L, Godbold J, Croft L, et al. The prognosis of a normal stress-only Tc-99m myocardial perfusion imaging study. J Nucl Cardiol 2011;17:370-7.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Chang S, Nabi F, Xu J, Raza U, Mahmarian JJ. Normal stress-only versus standard stress/rest myocardial perfusion imaging: Similar patient mortality with reduced radiation exposure. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:221-30.PubMedCrossRef Chang S, Nabi F, Xu J, Raza U, Mahmarian JJ. Normal stress-only versus standard stress/rest myocardial perfusion imaging: Similar patient mortality with reduced radiation exposure. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:221-30.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Des Prez RD, Dahlberg ST, Einstein AJ, Grossman GB, Henzlova MJ, Mahenthiranet J, et al. Stress-only myocardial perfusion imaging. ASNC update. J Nucl Cardiol 2009;16:329.CrossRef Des Prez RD, Dahlberg ST, Einstein AJ, Grossman GB, Henzlova MJ, Mahenthiranet J, et al. Stress-only myocardial perfusion imaging. ASNC update. J Nucl Cardiol 2009;16:329.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Gibson P, Demus D, Noto R, Hudson W, Johnson L. Low event rate for stress-only perfusion imaging in patients evaluated for chest pain. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:999-1004.PubMedCrossRef Gibson P, Demus D, Noto R, Hudson W, Johnson L. Low event rate for stress-only perfusion imaging in patients evaluated for chest pain. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:999-1004.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Santana CA, Garcia EV, Vansant JP, Krawczynska EG, Folks RD, Cooke CD, et al. Gated stress-only 99mTc myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging accurately assesses coronary artery disease. Nucl Med Commun 2003;24:241-9.PubMedCrossRef Santana CA, Garcia EV, Vansant JP, Krawczynska EG, Folks RD, Cooke CD, et al. Gated stress-only 99mTc myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging accurately assesses coronary artery disease. Nucl Med Commun 2003;24:241-9.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Duvall WL, Hiensch RJ, Levine EJ, Croft LB, Henzlova MJ. The prognosis of a normal TI-201 stress-only SPECT MPI study. J Nucl Cardiol 2012;19:914-21.PubMedCrossRef Duvall WL, Hiensch RJ, Levine EJ, Croft LB, Henzlova MJ. The prognosis of a normal TI-201 stress-only SPECT MPI study. J Nucl Cardiol 2012;19:914-21.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Senthamizhchelvan S, Bravo PE, Lodge MA, Merrill J, Bengel FM, Sgouros G. Radiation dosimetry of 82Rb in humans under pharmacologic stress. J Nucl Med 2011;52:485-9116.PubMedCrossRef Senthamizhchelvan S, Bravo PE, Lodge MA, Merrill J, Bengel FM, Sgouros G. Radiation dosimetry of 82Rb in humans under pharmacologic stress. J Nucl Med 2011;52:485-9116.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). 2007 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP 2007;37:1-332. International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). 2007 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP 2007;37:1-332.
17.
go back to reference Einstein AJ, Moser KW, Thompson RC, Cerqueira MD, Henzlova MJ. Radiation dose to patients from cardiac diagnostic imaging. Circulation 2007;116:1290-130517.PubMedCrossRef Einstein AJ, Moser KW, Thompson RC, Cerqueira MD, Henzlova MJ. Radiation dose to patients from cardiac diagnostic imaging. Circulation 2007;116:1290-130517.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Diamond GA, Forrester JS, Hirsch M, Staniloff HM, Vas R, Berman DS, et al. Analysis of probability as an aid in the clinical diagnosis of coronary-artery disease. N Engl J Med 1979;300:1350-8.PubMedCrossRef Diamond GA, Forrester JS, Hirsch M, Staniloff HM, Vas R, Berman DS, et al. Analysis of probability as an aid in the clinical diagnosis of coronary-artery disease. N Engl J Med 1979;300:1350-8.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Cerqueira MD, Allman KC, Ficaro EP, Hansen CL, Nichols KJ, Thompson RC, et al. Recommendations for reducing radiation exposure in myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Cardiol 2010;17:709-18.PubMedCrossRef Cerqueira MD, Allman KC, Ficaro EP, Hansen CL, Nichols KJ, Thompson RC, et al. Recommendations for reducing radiation exposure in myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Cardiol 2010;17:709-18.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Duvall WL, Baber U, Levine EJ, Croft LB, Henzlova MJ. A model for the prediction of a successful stress-first Tc-99m SPECT MPI. J Nucl Cardiol 2012;19:1124-34.PubMedCrossRef Duvall WL, Baber U, Levine EJ, Croft LB, Henzlova MJ. A model for the prediction of a successful stress-first Tc-99m SPECT MPI. J Nucl Cardiol 2012;19:1124-34.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Henzlova MJ, Croft LB, Duvall WL. Stress-only imaging: Faster, cheaper, less radiation. So what’s the hold up? J Nucl Cardiol 2013;20:17-9.PubMedCrossRef Henzlova MJ, Croft LB, Duvall WL. Stress-only imaging: Faster, cheaper, less radiation. So what’s the hold up? J Nucl Cardiol 2013;20:17-9.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Nakazato R, Berman DS, Dey D, Meunier LL, Hayes SW, Fermin JS, et al. Automated quantitative Rb-82 3D PET/CT myocardial perfusion imaging: Normal limits and correlation with invasive coronary angiography. J Nucl Cardiol 2012;19:265-76.PubMedCrossRef Nakazato R, Berman DS, Dey D, Meunier LL, Hayes SW, Fermin JS, et al. Automated quantitative Rb-82 3D PET/CT myocardial perfusion imaging: Normal limits and correlation with invasive coronary angiography. J Nucl Cardiol 2012;19:265-76.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Feasibility of stress only rubidium-82 PET myocardial perfusion imaging
Authors
Sean R. McMahon, MD
Janusz Kikut, MD
Richard G. Pinckney, MD, MPH
Friederike K. Keating, MD
Publication date
01-12-2013
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology / Issue 6/2013
Print ISSN: 1071-3581
Electronic ISSN: 1532-6551
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-013-9768-1

Other articles of this Issue 6/2013

Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 6/2013 Go to the issue