Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer 2/2024

17-01-2024 | Breast Cancer | Original Article

Clinicopathological differences and survival benefit in ER+/PR+/HER2+ vs ER+/PR−/HER2+ breast cancer subtypes

Authors: Wu Ding, Dengfeng Ye, Haifeng Chen, Yingli Lin, Zhian Li, Chuanjian Tu

Published in: Breast Cancer | Issue 2/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Breast cancer subtypes based on estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression have significant implications for prognosis. HER2-positive tumors historically demonstrated poorer survival, but anti-HER2 targeted therapy improved outcomes. However, hormone receptor (HR)-positive patients may experience reduced benefit due to HER2-HR signaling crosstalk.

Methods

Data from two databases, the Shanghai Jiao Tong University Breast Cancer Data Base (SJTUBCDB) and the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, were analyzed. Propensity score adjustments were used to balance patient characteristics between ER+/PR+/HER2+ and ER+/PR−/HER2+ subtypes. Kaplan–Meier survival curves estimated disease-free survival (DFS), breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS), overall survival (OS) for these subtypes in the SJTUBCDB, while subgroup analyses using multivariable models were performed based on menstruation, pN stage, HER2-targeted therapy, and endocrinotherapy.

Results

The ER+/PR+/HER2+ group showed significantly better DFS and BCSS than the ER+/PR−/HER2+ group, particularly in postmenopausal and pN0 stage patients. Survival outcomes were similar after anti-HER2 therapy or endocrine aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy in both groups. However, among patients receiving selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) treatment, those in the ER+/PR−/HER2+ group had a significantly worse prognosis compared to ER+/PR+/HER2+ patients.

Conclusions

HER2-positive breast cancers with different HR statuses exhibit distinct clinicopathological features and survival outcomes. Patients in the ER+/PR+/HER2+ group generally experience better survival, particularly in postmenopausal and pN0 stage patients. Treatment strategies should consider HR status and specific modalities for better personalized management.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Parise CA, Bauer KR, Brown MM, et al. Breast cancer subtypes as defined by the estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) among women with invasive breast cancer in California, 1999–2004. Breast J. 2009;15(6):593–602.CrossRefPubMed Parise CA, Bauer KR, Brown MM, et al. Breast cancer subtypes as defined by the estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) among women with invasive breast cancer in California, 1999–2004. Breast J. 2009;15(6):593–602.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Cheang MC, Chia SK, Voduc D, et al. Ki67 index, HER2 status, and prognosis of patients with luminal B breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101(10):736–50.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cheang MC, Chia SK, Voduc D, et al. Ki67 index, HER2 status, and prognosis of patients with luminal B breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101(10):736–50.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Mendes D, Alves C, Afonso N, et al. The benefit of HER2-targeted therapies on overall survival of patients with metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer—a systematic review. Breast Cancer Res. 2015;17(17):140.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mendes D, Alves C, Afonso N, et al. The benefit of HER2-targeted therapies on overall survival of patients with metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer—a systematic review. Breast Cancer Res. 2015;17(17):140.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Adusumilli P, Konatam ML, Gundeti S, et al. Treatment challenges and survival analysis of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer in real world. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol. 2017;38(1):22–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Adusumilli P, Konatam ML, Gundeti S, et al. Treatment challenges and survival analysis of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer in real world. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol. 2017;38(1):22–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Sundquist M, Brudin L, Tejler G. Improved survival in metastatic breast cancer 1985–2016. Breast. 2017;31:46–50.CrossRefPubMed Sundquist M, Brudin L, Tejler G. Improved survival in metastatic breast cancer 1985–2016. Breast. 2017;31:46–50.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Dawood S, Broglio K, Buzdar AU, et al. Prognosis of women with metastatic breast cancer by HER2 status and trastuzumab treatment: an institutional-based review. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(1):92–8.CrossRefPubMed Dawood S, Broglio K, Buzdar AU, et al. Prognosis of women with metastatic breast cancer by HER2 status and trastuzumab treatment: an institutional-based review. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(1):92–8.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Pogue-Geile KL, Kim C, Jeong JH, et al. Predicting degree of benefit from adjuvant trastuzumab in NSABP trial B-31. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013;105(23):1782–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pogue-Geile KL, Kim C, Jeong JH, et al. Predicting degree of benefit from adjuvant trastuzumab in NSABP trial B-31. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013;105(23):1782–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Howlader N, Altekruse SF, Li CI, et al. US incidence of breast cancer subtypes defined by joint hormone receptor and HER2 status. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106(5):055.CrossRef Howlader N, Altekruse SF, Li CI, et al. US incidence of breast cancer subtypes defined by joint hormone receptor and HER2 status. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106(5):055.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Rakha EA, El-Sayed ME, Green AR, et al. Biologic and clinical characteristics of breast cancer with single hormone receptor positive phenotype. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(30):4772–8.CrossRefPubMed Rakha EA, El-Sayed ME, Green AR, et al. Biologic and clinical characteristics of breast cancer with single hormone receptor positive phenotype. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(30):4772–8.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Bardou V-J, Arpino G, Elledge RM, et al. Progesterone receptor status significantly improves outcome prediction over estrogen receptor status alone for adjuvant endocrine therapy in two large breast cancer databases. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(10):1973–9.CrossRefPubMed Bardou V-J, Arpino G, Elledge RM, et al. Progesterone receptor status significantly improves outcome prediction over estrogen receptor status alone for adjuvant endocrine therapy in two large breast cancer databases. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(10):1973–9.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Arpino G, Weiss H, Lee AV, Schif R, De Placido S, Osborne CK, Elledge RM. Estrogen receptor-positive, progesterone receptor-negative breast cancer: association with growth factor receptor expression and tamoxifen resistance. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97(17):1254–61.CrossRefPubMed Arpino G, Weiss H, Lee AV, Schif R, De Placido S, Osborne CK, Elledge RM. Estrogen receptor-positive, progesterone receptor-negative breast cancer: association with growth factor receptor expression and tamoxifen resistance. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97(17):1254–61.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Cancello G, Maisonneuve P, Rotmensz N, et al. Progesterone receptor loss identifies Luminal B breast cancer subgroups at higher risk of relapse. Ann Oncol. 2013;24(3):661–8.CrossRefPubMed Cancello G, Maisonneuve P, Rotmensz N, et al. Progesterone receptor loss identifies Luminal B breast cancer subgroups at higher risk of relapse. Ann Oncol. 2013;24(3):661–8.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Prat A, Cheang MC, Martin M, et al. Prognostic significance of progesterone receptor-positive tumor cells within immunohistochemically defined luminal A breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(2):203–9.CrossRefPubMed Prat A, Cheang MC, Martin M, et al. Prognostic significance of progesterone receptor-positive tumor cells within immunohistochemically defined luminal A breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(2):203–9.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Braun L, Mietzsch F, Seibold P, et al. Intrinsic breast cancer subtypes defined by estrogen receptor signalling-prognostic relevance of progesterone receptor loss. Mod Pathol. 2013;26(9):1161–71.CrossRefPubMed Braun L, Mietzsch F, Seibold P, et al. Intrinsic breast cancer subtypes defined by estrogen receptor signalling-prognostic relevance of progesterone receptor loss. Mod Pathol. 2013;26(9):1161–71.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Cui X, Schiff R, Arpino G, et al. Biology of progesterone receptor loss in breast cancer and its implications for endocrine therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(30):7721–35.CrossRefPubMed Cui X, Schiff R, Arpino G, et al. Biology of progesterone receptor loss in breast cancer and its implications for endocrine therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(30):7721–35.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Bae SY, Kim S, Lee JH, et al. Poor prognosis of single hormone receptor–positive breast cancer: similar outcome as triple-negative breast cancer. BMC Cancer. 2015;18(15):138.CrossRef Bae SY, Kim S, Lee JH, et al. Poor prognosis of single hormone receptor–positive breast cancer: similar outcome as triple-negative breast cancer. BMC Cancer. 2015;18(15):138.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Zhao H, Gong Y. The prognosis of single hormone receptor-positive breast cancer stratified by HER2 status. Front Oncol. 2021;17(11): 643956.CrossRef Zhao H, Gong Y. The prognosis of single hormone receptor-positive breast cancer stratified by HER2 status. Front Oncol. 2021;17(11): 643956.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Sagara Y, Mallory MA, Wong S, et al. Survival benefit of breast surgery for low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ: a population based cohort study. JAMA Surg. 2015;150(8):739–45.CrossRefPubMed Sagara Y, Mallory MA, Wong S, et al. Survival benefit of breast surgery for low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ: a population based cohort study. JAMA Surg. 2015;150(8):739–45.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Sagara Y, Freedman RA, Vaz-Luis I, et al. Patient prognostic score and associations with survival improvement offered by radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ: a population-based longitudinal cohort study. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(11):1190–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sagara Y, Freedman RA, Vaz-Luis I, et al. Patient prognostic score and associations with survival improvement offered by radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ: a population-based longitudinal cohort study. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(11):1190–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Squires BS, Quinn TJ, Nandalur SR, et al. Adjuvant radiotherapy improves overall survival when added to surgery and chemotherapy for uterine carcinosarcoma: a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results analysis. Int J Clin Oncol. 2021;26(12):2282–94.CrossRefPubMed Squires BS, Quinn TJ, Nandalur SR, et al. Adjuvant radiotherapy improves overall survival when added to surgery and chemotherapy for uterine carcinosarcoma: a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results analysis. Int J Clin Oncol. 2021;26(12):2282–94.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Diggs A, Sia TY, Huang Y, et al. Utilization and outcomes of adjuvant therapy for stage II and III uterine leiomyosarcoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2022;166(2):308–16.CrossRefPubMed Diggs A, Sia TY, Huang Y, et al. Utilization and outcomes of adjuvant therapy for stage II and III uterine leiomyosarcoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2022;166(2):308–16.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Ding NH, Liu CF, Hu C, et al. Prognostic factors for luminal B-like breast cancer. Curr Med Sci. 2019;39(3):396–402.CrossRefPubMed Ding NH, Liu CF, Hu C, et al. Prognostic factors for luminal B-like breast cancer. Curr Med Sci. 2019;39(3):396–402.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Colditz GA, Rosner BA, Chen WY, et al. Risk factors for breast cancer according to estrogen and progesterone receptor status. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96(3):218–28.CrossRefPubMed Colditz GA, Rosner BA, Chen WY, et al. Risk factors for breast cancer according to estrogen and progesterone receptor status. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96(3):218–28.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Schif R, Massarweh SA, Shou J, Bharwani L, Mohsin SK, Osborne CK. Cross-talk between estrogen receptor and growth factor pathways as a molecular target for overcoming endocrine resistance. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:331s-s336.CrossRef Schif R, Massarweh SA, Shou J, Bharwani L, Mohsin SK, Osborne CK. Cross-talk between estrogen receptor and growth factor pathways as a molecular target for overcoming endocrine resistance. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:331s-s336.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Osborne CK, Shou J, Massarweh S, Schif R. Crosstalk between estrogen receptor and growth factor receptor pathways as a cause for endocrine therapy resistance in breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11:865s-s870.CrossRefPubMed Osborne CK, Shou J, Massarweh S, Schif R. Crosstalk between estrogen receptor and growth factor receptor pathways as a cause for endocrine therapy resistance in breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11:865s-s870.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Zhang Y, Su H, Rahimi M, et al. EGFRvIII-induced estrogen-independence, tamoxifen-resistance phenotype correlates with PgR expression and modulation of apoptotic molecules in breast cancer. Int J Cancer. 2009;125(9):2021–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zhang Y, Su H, Rahimi M, et al. EGFRvIII-induced estrogen-independence, tamoxifen-resistance phenotype correlates with PgR expression and modulation of apoptotic molecules in breast cancer. Int J Cancer. 2009;125(9):2021–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
go back to reference Punglia RS, Kuntz KM, Winer EP, et al. The impact of tumor progesterone receptor status on optimal adjuvant endocrine therapy for postmenopausal patients with early-stage breast cancer: a decision analysis. Cancer. 2006;106(12):2576–82.CrossRefPubMed Punglia RS, Kuntz KM, Winer EP, et al. The impact of tumor progesterone receptor status on optimal adjuvant endocrine therapy for postmenopausal patients with early-stage breast cancer: a decision analysis. Cancer. 2006;106(12):2576–82.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Montemurro F, Di Cosimo S, Arpino G. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive and hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: new insights into molecular interactions and clinical implications. Ann Oncol. 2013;24(11):2715–24.CrossRefPubMed Montemurro F, Di Cosimo S, Arpino G. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive and hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: new insights into molecular interactions and clinical implications. Ann Oncol. 2013;24(11):2715–24.CrossRefPubMed
31.
32.
go back to reference Montemurro F, Rossi V, Cossu Rocca M, et al. Hormone-receptor expression and activity of trastuzumab with chemotherapy in HER2-positive advanced breast cancer patients. Cancer. 2012;118(1):17–26.CrossRefPubMed Montemurro F, Rossi V, Cossu Rocca M, et al. Hormone-receptor expression and activity of trastuzumab with chemotherapy in HER2-positive advanced breast cancer patients. Cancer. 2012;118(1):17–26.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Kay C, Martínez-Pérez C, Meehan J, et al. Current trends in the treatment of HR+/HER2+ breast cancer. Future Oncol. 2021;17(13):1665–81.CrossRefPubMed Kay C, Martínez-Pérez C, Meehan J, et al. Current trends in the treatment of HR+/HER2+ breast cancer. Future Oncol. 2021;17(13):1665–81.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Clinicopathological differences and survival benefit in ER+/PR+/HER2+ vs ER+/PR−/HER2+ breast cancer subtypes
Authors
Wu Ding
Dengfeng Ye
Haifeng Chen
Yingli Lin
Zhian Li
Chuanjian Tu
Publication date
17-01-2024
Publisher
Springer Nature Singapore
Published in
Breast Cancer / Issue 2/2024
Print ISSN: 1340-6868
Electronic ISSN: 1880-4233
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-023-01538-2

Other articles of this Issue 2/2024

Breast Cancer 2/2024 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine